From: '-(USANYS) [Contractor]"
To: .1r>
(1 ' 'USANYS)
[Contractor)"
Cc: )" <
Subject: RE: US v. Maxwell - missing testifying witness materials
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2021 17:02:36 +0000
Attachments: 3521-003.pdf; 3521-004.pdf
the two re-stamped versions are attached. I'll call BM chambers and set a time for me to bring over the thumb
drive containing the supplemental 3500 production (with the correct 3521-003 and 3521-004 included). Thanks!
From (USANYS) [Contractor]
Sent: Monday, November 8, 2021 9:48 AM
To: (USANYS) USANYS) [Contractor)
Cc:
Subject: RE: US v. Maxwell - missing testifying witness materials
Thanks so much for flagging, I just re-stamped the materials as 3521-003 and 3521-004, saved here. I've loaded the
two files to the thumb drive for that contains the supplemental 3500 production and swapped out the incorrect
versions. If that sounds good to go, I can bring it over to chambers later this morning.
Since I'm joining this production a bit late, do these two re-stamped files need to be sent out anywhere else? Thanks!
From: (USANYS) >
Sent: Saturday, November 6, 2021 5:59 PM
To: (USANYS) [Contractor] <J >; USANYS) [Contractor)
Cc:
Subject: FW: US v. Maxwell - missing testifying witness materials
The index listed this correctly as 3521-003 and 3521-004, but we produced as 3521-004 and 3521-005 (I think). When you
have a chance, can you please confirm? If so, I think let's reproduce as 3521-003 an 3521-004, but let me know if you
think that will be more confusing/make more work.
Thanks,
From: Laura Menninger
Sent: Saturday, November 6, 2021 5:53 PM
To: >; (USANYS) < >*,
<
Cc: Jeff Pagliuca
Subject: [EXTERNAL] US v. Maxwell - missing testifying witness materials
Counsel —
We were not provided 521-003 material.
EFTA00009981
Can you please confirm whether that was intentional, and if not, provide it?
Thank you,
Laura
Laura A. Henninger I Partner
Haddon, Morean & Foreman, P.C.
EFTA00009982