From: (USANYS)" ci
To:
Cc: a' (USAIsloYall>
)11
Subject: Re: Epstein Sharing Order Part II
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 21:05:59 +0000
Yes, I think we should. Thanks for flagging.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 29, 2020, at 3:56 PM, > wrote:
M, is it the intent to share those? If so, I'll just add it to every mention of each document, but if not then it's
unnecessary. I don't think those are substantive dots but I defer.
From: (USANYS)
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 15:55
To: (USANYS)
Cc:
Subject: RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II
Please add it in the right place and send me the order. Remember, I'm not a T&E lawyer. But you are getting to
be
From:
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 3:22 PM
To: (USANYS) (USANYS)
Cc: >;
Subject: RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II
Yes, I think this document accurately describes the materials we've received, with just a note that it doesn't appear to
include revocations, so to the extent those are intended to be shared, I think that word may need to be added.
thanks,
From: (USANYS) < M>
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 10:40
To: (USANYS) <
Subject: Epstein Sharing Order Part II
MI— I've updated the sharing order application to be one to share the additional trust and will documents we have
now received. Would you take a look when you can?
EFTA00011147
- I've tried to describe the various materials we have gotten from the estate attorneys over the last two weeks.
Would you mind taking a look (or asking a paralegal to take a look) to make sure I've accurately described/characterized
the new stuff we're looking to share?
Thanks,
EFTA00011148