From:
To:
Subject: FW: Meet and Confer
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 23:43:30 +0000
Attachments: 2021.02.26_Govemment_Omnibus_Opposition_to_Maxwell_Defense_Motions_FINAL_(Pr
oposed_Redactions_Per Order_and_Defense_Requested_Redaction).pdf; 2021-03-
22_GM_letter_re_pre-trial_opposition_redactions.docx
Inline-Images: image00 Ljpg; image002.jpg
Here is a draft letter to the Court. I'm going to send to the chiefs in 10 minutes so please let me know if you have any
edits.
Subject: RE: Meet and Confer
Judge Nathan agreed with us that sections of the deposition transcripts that appear unredacted in the publicly filed
indictment should still be redacted in your opposition because they were sealed in the defamation case. The redactions
we are proposing refer to those sections. So the fact that the language appears in the indictment does not mean it should
not be redacted.
That said, to move this along, we will preserve this objection and raise it with the Court at a later time, if we choose to.
However, we do ask that you redact "[Minor Victim-2]" at the bottom of page 134 so that it is consistent with the
redactions ordered by Judge Nathan on the top of the same page.
Thanks,
Chris
r
Chris,
We have confirmed that our proposed redactions to Exhibit 11 and those you circulated to Exhibit 11 are the same. As to
your newly proposed redactions, we understand that you are requesting that we redact portions of our brief that either
quote or generally refer to unredacted portions of your publicly filed opening brief (Dkt. 136 at pages 14 to 17) or
language contained in the publicly filed indictment. We don't understand why you are requesting that this language now
be sealed. Can you please explain your position?
EFTA00019474
Thanks,
Subject: RE: Meet and Confer
■
I believe we agree on the redactions to Exhibit 11. I have attached our proposed redacted version of Exhibit 11. I have
checked it against yours and I believe they track exactly, but maybe you could double check. We also agree that no
redactions to the cover letter are necessary. We also confirm that you should keep the redactions on pp. 118-119.
We also noticed that on pages 130-134 of the opposition brief there are a few quotations and other references to
testimony in the civil case that are still sealed. In light of Judge Nathan's order, we think those should be redacted as
well. We have attached the relevant pages. The additional redactions are noted in red boxes.
Please let me know if you want to discuss further.
Thanks,
Chris
Subject: RE: Meet and Confer
Chris,
Thanks for your email. In accordance with Judge Nathan's order, we are writing to confer regarding Exhibit 11 and your
cover letter dated March 9, 2021. Attached please find proposed redactions to Exhibit 11. We do not believe any
redactions are necessary to your cover letter.
We intend to the file the brief with the redactions as set forth in Judge Nathan's March 18, 2021 order, attached here for
your convenience. We note that the redactions contained on pages 118 to 119 redact quotations from and references to
a document that you filed under seal (Exhibit H). We understand that the quoted portions of that document are also
under seal on the civil docket before Judge Preska. Given those facts, we wanted to double check with you to see
whether you in fact want those redactions removed. We will defer to you on whether these should be redacted.
Best,
EFTA00019475
Subject: Meet and Confer
Per Judge Nathan's order, we need to meet and confer today about proposed redactions to Exhibit 11 of your opposition
and to our letter dated March 9, 2021 regarding redactions. We are free from now through the rest of the afternoon.
Please let us know what works for you.
Regards,
Chris
Christian R Everdell
COHEN & GRESSER LLP
New York I Pans Washington DC I London
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended to be reviewed initially by only
the individual named above. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or a representative of the intended recipient. you are hereby notified that any
review dissemination or copying of this e-mail or the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error. please immediately notify
the sender by telephone and permanently delete this e-mail. Thank you.
PRIVACY: A complete copy of our privacy policy can be viewed at: SI os:/Avww.cohengressercom/privacpolicx
EFTA00019476