From: (USANYS)"
To: ' llIEWNYS)" (USANYS)"
Subject: RE: MCC discovery/notes
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2020 15:10:22 +0000
Agreed
From: (USANYS)
Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020 11:10 AM
To: (USANYS)
Cc: (USANYS)
Subject: RE: MCC discovery/notes
I think that because it discusses suicidality, it's tangentially related to the case and we should produce it, but I don't think
there's any basis to get and produce the other Epstein files. Do you guys have a different view?
From: (USANYS)
Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020 9:57 AM
To: (USANYS)
Cc: (USANYS)
Subject: RE: MCC discovery/notes
I think we haven't produced it previously, as removed everything that we had already produced. While I don't see a
harm in producing this 302, I wonder if it opens us up to having to produce more of the Epstein case file or whether we
can rationally limit it since it discusses suicidality. Thoughts?
From: (USANYS)
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2020 9:56 AM
To: (USANYS)
Cc: (USANYS) < >
Subject: RE: MCC discovery/notes
I've never seen those notes before and it's not my handwriting — they came from MCC? Maybe they are Lt. ?I
would check with on that to make sure it's not her handwriting.
I remember seeing this 302, but I don't remember where — I don't have a memory of producing it, but I could be wrong.
=should be able to tell if we produced it previously). MI and I never had access to the Epstein shared and never got
or produced the underlying case files.
From: (USANYS)
Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020 9:51 AM
To: (USANYS)
Cc: (USANYS)< >
Subject: MCC discovery/notes
In reviewing additional documents for the latest MCC discovery production, I found these notes of an interview labeled
"Unknown?' Any idea who this might be? Also, FBI provided us with a supplemental 302 about Epstein's arrest. Do you
know if we produced the original 302 about Epstein's arrest?
ThanksI
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney's Office
Southern District of New York
EFTA00026565