From: ' (USANYS)" ctl
To: "I
Cc: "I
>, ausANImMays,„
Subject: RE: RE: attorneys asking about confidentiality
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 23:06:33 +0000
Sorry, I just realized I mixed up and M. All three witnesses have not met with us but has indicated she won't
come in, right?
From: (USANYS)
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2020 5:50 PM
To:
Cc:
(USANYS)
Subject: RE: RE: attorneys asking about confidentiality
Is the following fair/accurate? If there are specific concerns they raised, feel free to add/edit as appropriate. Thanks
Following comments about Prince Andrew on January 27, the team heard from counsel for several witnesses who
had seen remarks and had concerns. Specifically, the team heard from counsel for
and each of whom referenced comments about Prince Andrew and sough to confirm that their own
communications with the team about their clients would remain confidential. =, as you know, has already met with us
several times. and — both of whom are believed to have worked in some capacity for Maxwell/Epstein
during relevant time periods — have never been interviewed before but have expressed a willingness to come in, and we
have been working with their counsel now to arrange for interviews.
From:
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2020 5:34 PM
To: (USANYS)
Cc: ) ca '*;
Subject: RE: attorneys asking about confidentiality
•
Following up on our discussion earlier, the attorneys who have asked about confidentiality since the public comments
about Prince Andrew include counsel for counsel for and counsel for
Separately, just a reminder to please send us email on the Maxwell depositions? We're going through them
separately as well, but would be helpful to know what jumped out to him in his read.
thanks,
Mi•
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Southern District of New York
EFTA00029275