EFTA00180159

.(USAFLS) From: . (USAFLS) Sent: To: (FBI); (FBI) When you have a chance, can you give me the flight info for 8/6/04? Where did it leave from and who was on board. Thanks. Assistant U.S. Attorne 795 EFTA00180159 (USAFLS) (USAFLS) From: Sent: 00 11' (FBI); (FBI) To: Subject: ravel Dates : Hi guys — I am going to re-add the following travel counts 8/6/04 8/19/04 10/29/04 2/21/05 3/31/05 Does that sound alright? A U Att 796 EFTA00180160 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: 27, 0 10:14 AM To: AFLS) Cc: (USAFLS) Subject: St avert heard anything How did things go with NM Assistant U.S. Attorne Tracking: 797 EFTA00180161 Read Recipient Read: 6/27/2008 10:28 AM ana-/SAILS) Read: 612712008 10:37 AM IIIMMURAFIS) 798 EFTA00180162 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: e , 8 12:26 PM To: USAFLS) Subject: : e rey pstein the State Attorney's Office once I think that is something we should take up with able to do this is through the local this is a done deal. Another way we may be may be given an opportunity to police detective who investigated the case. He . speak if he asks for it. I will find out about that Assistant U.S. Attorney S ir Original Message From: (USAFLS) Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 11:48 AM To: galliMilalt (USAFLS) Subject: Re: Jeffr ey Epste in Gr8. BTW what about a factual proffer? Original Message From: (USAFLS) om> To: Ro BLACK <RBLACK@ royb lack .com>; Jack Goldberger <jgoldberger@agwpa.c Cc: (USAFLS) Sent: Thu Jun 26 11:1 6:04 2008 Subject: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Roy and Jack: agreement and wanted to remind you I have been reviewing the deferred prosecution de to the U.S. Attorney's Office that the agreement states: "Epstein shall provi e Attorney's Office prior to copies of all proposed agreements with the Stat de me with any proposed agreements entering into those agreements." Please provi provide me with the date and time at your earliest opportunity, and also please of the change of plea. Thank you. Assistant U.S. Attorne 805 EFTA00180163 :6uppeis 908 EFTA00180164 Recipient Read MEI (USAFLS) Read: 6/26/2008 1:09 PM 807 EFTA00180165 (USAFLS) From: USAFLS) Sent: 811:02 AM (USAFLS) To: Subject: ere it is U2onipd 813 EFTA00180166 .(USAFLS) From: . (USAFLS) Sent: ne 26, 2008 10:49 AM To: SAFLS) Subject: upgDing: Victim Notification with edit.wpd Attachments: IM Victim Notification with edit.wpd nt paragraph, so that it Hi -- I made one small change in the acknowledgme ement with the Office regarding the says the letter accurately sets forth the agre don't want him to think that all identification and notification of victims. I of the other terms and conditions went "poof." if Ken S. really wants to "bury Also, during my obsession last night I thought, to OPR making clear that no member the hatchet" he can start by sending a letter onduct in connection with the of the U.S. Attorney's Office committed any misc s to add, "and I admit that I am investigation and prosecution of 7E. If he want y. a liar, liar, pants on fire," that would be grav g file or link attachments: The message is ready to be sent with the followin Victim Notification with edit.wpd l programs may prevent sending or Note: To protect against computer viruses, I -mai Check your I -mail security settings receiving certain types of file attachments. to determine how attachments are handled. 817 EFTA00180167 (USAFLS) From: .(USAFLS) Sent: , 008 10:37 AM To: (FBI) Subject: R :J -- They were on my chair when I got back. Thank youl Hi Assistant U.S. Attorney 1111 Pri Original Messa e From: . (FBI) Sent: Thursda , June 26, 2008 10:34 AM To: . (USAFLS) Subject: Re: JE fax Did you get the fax of info? I sent the phone reports in a second t fax. because they did not scan cleanly with the firs Original Message From: (USAFLS) < To: Sent: Wed Jun 25 16:08:23 2008 Subject: JE (including lists of phone calls) Hi guys - Can you send me the stuff on so I can add her to the indictment? Thank you. Assistant U.S. Attorney 820 EFTA00180168 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: e , 8 8:31 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: : evise Victim Notification al-- I am running off to grand jury. I will call as soon as I get back, probably around 9:45. Thanks. Assistant U.S. Attorne Ori:SalMessage From: 'MIMI (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesda ,airs2s 2008 6:05 PM Cc: (USAFLS) Subject: Fw: Revi sed Vict im Notification This simplifies it. What do u think? Original Message From: Acosta li (USAFLS) To: (USAFLS) Sent: Wed Jun 25 18:00:14 2008 Subject: RE: Revised Victim Notification What do you think «U.wpd» From: (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesii ii June 25, 2008 5:43 PM To: Acosta, (USAFLS) Subject: FW: Revi sed Victim Notification From: -_Ill (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesiiii June 25, 2008 5:25 PM (USAFLS); (USAFLS) To: (USAFLS); Subject: Revi sed Victim Notification 821 EFTA00180169 that, since Epstein Hi - I have tried to phrase it in a way that suggests turn to perform. has performed certain provisions, it is now our « File: Revised Victim Notification.wpd » Assistant U.S. Attorne Tracking: 822 EFTA00180170 Road Recipient Read: 6/28/2008 9:42 AM alltISAELS) 823 EFTA00180171 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: MOINE2008 6:05 PM Cc: . (USAFLS) Subject: Fw: Revised Victim Notification Attachments: U.wpd This simplifies it. What do u think? Original Message From: Acosta (USAFLS) To: (USA FLS) Sent: Wed Jun 25 18:00:14 2008 Subject: RE: Revised Victim Notification What do you think «U.wpd» From: (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 5:43 PM To: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS) Subject: FW: Revised Victim Notification From: ill li (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesiiii June 25, 2008 5:25 PM (USAFLS) (USAFLS); (USAFLS); To: Subject: Revised Victim Notification ests that, since Epstein Hi - I have tried to phrase it in a way that sugg our turn to perform. has performed certain provisions, it is now « File: Revised Victim Notification.wpd » Assistant U.S. Attorne III 824 EFTA00180172 (USAFLS) From: . (USAFLS) Sent: June 25, 2 (USAFLS); (USAFLS) To: (USAFLS); Subject: Revised Victim Notification is that, since Epstein has performed certain provisions, it Hilt— I have tried to phrase it in a way that suggests now our turn to perform. Revised Victim Notification.wp... Assistant U.S Tracking: 825 EFTA00180173 Read Recipient (USAFLS) Road: 6/25/2008 5:32 PM (USAFLS) Read. 6/26/2008 6:26 PM (USAFLS) Read: 6125/2008 5:29 PM 826 EFTA00180174 (USAFLS) From: (CRM) MISINI2008 4:27 PM Sent: To: . (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Immunity Letter Attachments: signed VVIJUN220(11.pdf Ms. I apologize, here they are. From: (USAFLS) Sent: June 25, 2008 4:23 PM To: Subject: RE: Immunity Letter come through. Can you resend? Hi — Thank you for your I -mail, but the attachment did not A. Villafafia Assistant U.S. Attorne From: (CRM) Sent: 25, 2008 4:18 PM To: Cc: (CRM); (CRM) Subject: Immunity Letter Ms. assistance is needed on this matter call immunity authorization letter is attached to this email; if further Legal Assistant Policy and Statutory Enforcement Unit - OEO 827 EFTA00180175 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: iiiiiiiiiir 25, 2I2agjaad...,. To: (FBI); MIN=MIN. (FBI) Subject: JE . Hi guys - Can you send me the stuff on I (including lists of phone calls) so I can add her to the indictment? Thank you. ssis nt U.S. Attorne 828 EFTA00180176 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: usisne 25, 2008,1hair; To: USAFLS); USAFLS): eillaUSAFLS) Subject: Proposed Victim Notification letter, but it isn't Can you take a look and provide feedback? I know that Alex added "No more, no less" in his really "legalese," so I would prefer to omit unless the defense insists. is done. Also, please let me know if you want me to send over to Roy and Jack now or wait until the deal Victim Notification.wpd A. OIVIllafalia Assists Tracking: 829 EFTA00180177 Read Recipient (USAFLS) Read: 612512008 4:02 PM (USAFLS) Read: 6/2512008 4:04 PM MINIE (USAFLS) Read: 6/25/2008 4:07 PM 830 EFTA00180178 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: une . 008 3:08 PM To: USAFLS) Subject: : ues ions 't had a chance to work on the notice yet, but, Hi Bil— Sorry. I have an indictment going tomorrow so I haven ng on that right now. yes, I planned to use the 12/19 language. I am going to start worki think this is walking too close to a 61 As to filing the indictment under seal with the state court, I really uch, Judge McSorley would probably order it violation, and since the state judges up hem don't like us too-m 61 and because the public reaction will be — unsealed which would cause huge problems, both in terms of Rule is he skating with 18 months? if the US had the evidence to prosecute all of these counts, which about ways other than contacting the State I haven't heard anything from Roy or anyone else. Let me think Attorney's Office to accomplish our goals. tant 11.5. Att rne From: (USAFLS) Sen sd ne 25, 2008 2:53 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Questions Court judge? The agreement states that the 1. Can we file the proposed indictment under seal with the State any public record. parties anticipate that this agreement will not be made part of oratin g the language of the 12/19 letter? 2. Was your suggestion to prepare a notice to victims incorp Tracking: 831 EFTA00180179 Recipient Read (USAFLS) Read: 8/25/2008 3:10 PM (USAFLS) Read: 8125/2008 3:09 PM NMI. 832 EFTA00180180 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) 11001662008 2:53 PM Sent: To: (USAFLS) Subject: Questions the with the State Court judge? The agreement states that 1. Can we file the proposed indictment under seal . part of any public record parties anticipate that this agreement will not be made victim s incorp orating the language of the 12/19 letter? 2. Was your suggestion to prepare a notice to 833 EFTA00180181 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent Fr.= :2QQAjkam. (USAFLS) To: (USAFLS);MMEIM(USAFLS); Subject ange a Procedure can vary Hi all — I just spoke withII= She said that it varies from judge to judge, and Judge McSorley ed to no contest), there should be a writte n plea from day to day, but since Epstein is pleading guilty (as oppos terms of the plea agreement and a factual proffer agreement and a full plea colloquy that goes through all of the of the colloquy is finished, the judge asks the that the defendant has to agree to. She said that, after the rest the factual proffer into the record. After it is prosecutor to state the factual basis, and the prosecutor then reads in the proffer and/or if he agrees that the State read, the judge asks the defendant is he did the things recited could prove those facts. from prosecutor to prosecutor and thought that She said that the length and detail of the factual proffer varies Lanna was less detailed than most. oon. I will try to send you a proposed factual proffer later this aftern *stant U.S. Att me Tracking: 834 EFTA00180182 Read Recipient Read: &25i2008 11:23 AM MilligUSAFLS) Read: 8/251200812:13 PM IIIMIDUSAFLS) Read: 8/25/2008 10:57 AM alIMMUSAFIS) 835 EFTA00180183 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: June 25, 2008 8:40 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein Agreement 2255 issue and I will call Hi -- I think I have designed a solution to the g up these search warrants. As soon you to discuss the plea. I am still finishin as they are done, I will give you a call. Assistant U.S. Attorney Original Message From: (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesda , June 24, 2008 9:14 PM To: . (USAFLS) Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epste in Agreement Let's talk about going to the COP Ori inal Messa e From: . (USAFLS) Goldberger <jgoldberger@agwpa.com> To: Roy BLACK <RBLACK@royblack.com>; Jack Cc: (USAFLS) Sent: Tue Jun 24 16:04:55 2008 Subject: Jeffrey Epstein Agreement Dear Roy and Jack: Government's position that we have a I am just writing to re-state that it is the is no need for further modification. signed, binding agreement and that there of the change of plea and Please keep us informed of the date and time sentencing. Thank you. Assistant U.S. Attorne 836 EFTA00180184 :Buiveil Ift3 EFTA00180185 Road Recipient (USAFLS) Read: 6/25/2008 8:46 AM 838 EFTA00180186 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: 8 9:14 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: e: e myEpsteinAgreement Let's talk about going to the COP Original Message From: . (USAFLS) To: Roy BLACK <RBLACK@ royb lack .com>; Jack Goldberger <jgoldberger@agwpa.com> Cc: IIMMEMIll (USAFLS) Sent: Tue Jun 24 16:04:55 2008 Subject: Jeffrey Epstein Agreement Dear Roy and Jack: the Government's position that we have a I am just writing to re-state that it is is no need for further modification. signed, binding agreement and that there of the change of plea and Please keep us informed of the date and time sentencing. Thank you. Assistant U.S. Attorne 839 EFTA00180187 Road Recipient Roy BLACK' 'Jack Goldberger (USAFLS) Read: 6(24/2008 4:38 PM (USAFLS) Read: 612412008 4:05 PM NES (USAFLS) Read: 6(2412008 4:16 PM 841 EFTA00180188 (USAFLS) From: . (USAFLS) Sent: 4.2008 . (FBI); . (FBI) To: s Subject: Keep an eye on Epstein's planesIll Will call in a few minute Assistant U.S. Attorne 842 EFTA00180189 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: e US USAFLS) To: Subject: ase ca asap Assistant U.S. Attorne Tracking: 643 EFTA00180190 Read Recipient Read: 6/24/2098 3:53 PM INIMMIUSAFLS) Read: 6124/2008 3:52 PM IMMIII(USAFLS) 844 EFTA00180191 (USAFLS) From: USAFLS) Sent: 5:30 PM To: (USAFLS) Cc: Subject: Thank you. I agree. can you make this communication today please. Orj.ginalMessage From: Sill (USAFLS) Sent : Mond ay, June 23, 2008 6:45 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Epstein a If we get the go-ahead, I think should immediately notify Lefkowitz that JE the 9/24 Agreement as modified by the has until COB Monday June 30 to comply with him in breach. What say you? USA's 12/17 letter otherwise the Office will deem 859 EFTA00180192 (USAFLS) From: SAFLS) 5:28 PM Sent: (USAFLS) To: Subject: scan0001.pdf 860 EFTA00180193 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) /C r . 2:44 PM Sent: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS) To: USAFLS); allalliUSAFLS); Subject: ny wor rom DC? Ili all — Sorry to bother. I are wondering if you have heard from the DAG. I- Assistant U.S. Attorney Tracking: 861 EFTA00180194 Read Recipient Read: 6/23/2008 2:57 PM MINIOUSAFLS) allanUSAFLS) Read: 6/23/2008 3:18 PM Acosta, Alex (OWLS) 862 EFTA00180195 (USAFLS) From: USAFLS) Sent: 10:08 AM (FBI) (USAFLS): (FBI): To: LS) Cc: Subject: ork, etc. talk when that decision is made. Ok. hoping to hear from DAG's office today giving the green light. Let's From: (USAFLS) Sen June 23, 2008 9:15 AM To: (FBI); (FBI) Cc: (USAFLS); USAFIS) Subject Trip to New York, etc. ey gave a copy of the grand jury subpoena to We will not be interviewing Ellin New York. Her attorn complaining, yet again, about me. So, I do Epstein's lawyers. They, in turn, promptly sent it on to Washington put her in the grand jury. not want to do an interview with him present, and we will have to so we can present the indictment Tuesday Given that, let's take the New York section out of the indictment makes sense morning. Then we can do interview in the afternoon with plans to supersede. It probably has to say, so let's plan to do the New York trip to wait on the rest of the interviews until we hear what in a few weeks. We have another girl from Florida, so I I will revise everything accordingly and send it down to you. will replace our New York Jane Doe with her. ssista t U.S. Att rne 867 EFTA00180196 (USAFLS) (USAFLS) From: 9 15AM Sent: To: (FBI 1111111(FSABI) SAF),L , U FLS) Cc: Subject: np o ew ' o etc. ena to We will not be interviewing in New York. Her attorney gave a copy of the grand jury subpo ington complaining, yet again , about me. So, I do Epstein's lawyers. They, in turn, promptly sent it on to Wash to put her in the grand jury. not want to do an interview with him present, and we will have so we can present the indictment Tuesday Given that, let's take the New York section out of the indictment oon with plans to supersede. It probably makes sense morning. Then we can do lallinterview in the aftern has to say, so let's plan to do the New York trip to wait on the rest of the interviews until we hear what in a few weeks. We have another girl from Florida, so I 1 will revise everything accordingly and send it down to you. will replace our New York Jane Doe with her. si U.S. At orne Tracking: 868 EFTA00180197 Read Recipient (FBI) (FBI) Read: 8/23/2008 9:32 AM I(UW AM (USAFLS) Read: 6123/2008 9:40 869 EFTA00180198 (USAFLS) From: (FBI) IMEMPIMIT3litle . :04 PM Sent: (USAFLS) To: Subject: e: rave o lew •0 AUSA on NY drug case is . Original Message From: (USAFLS) To: Sent: Thu Jun 19 15:37:58 2008 Subject: Travel to New York lawyer saying that, if we get the Hi all - I just got an 'Email from Earn June 27th, in New York. immunity, we can meet with her on Friday, be a sure thing, but you never know. The application is up in DC now. It should Let's talk tomorrow about planning the trip. Assistant U.S. Attorney 870 EFTA00180199 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: To: ' AFLS)TISIN(USAFLS) Cc: USAFL Subject: which makes me atilesr, all of the blatant I am just reading through all of the new submissions. I don't know orry I got you into lies, or telling them (Lilly, no doubt), that I am "unsupervisable." • this. motions to stay the four federal lawsuits against On another, ironic, note. Today, Epstein's lawyers are filing that a cause of action for recovery of Epstein, under 18 USC 3509(k), which states: "If, at any time , a criminal action is pending which arises out compensation for damage or injury to the person of a child exists civil action shall be stayed until the end of all of the same occurrence and in which the chili is the victim, the during the criminal proceeding is prohibited." phases of the criminal action and any mention of the civil action indict. I guess it saves me the trouble of filing the motion after we r illaw partner" nor his "law school And, for the record, I still haven't met Bert 0., and he is neithe roommate." Assi tant U.S. Attorne Tracking: 871 EFTA00180200 Recipient Read Read: W20/2008 3:47 PM IMMIBUSAFIS) Read: 6/2012008 3:46 PM IMISUSAFLS) Read: 6231200810:58 AM allailliUSAFIS) SAFES) Read: 6/20/2008 3:46 PM 872 EFTA00180201 (USAFLS) From: USAFLS) Sent: 2008 :37 PM To: (USAFLS) . ps am - n a f of Jay Lefkowitz and Ken Star Subject: etter.pdf; Summary Of Attachments: Letter to J. Roth from S. Thacker.pdf; Response to ■ Misconduct.pdf; Principal Submission.pdf fyi From: Roth, John(ODAG)(SMO) Sent1,Si4. ale 20, 2008 1:56 PM To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: FW: Epstein - On behalf o Jay efkow itz and Ken Star think it will be best to wait until Monday to call Lefkowitz. This was just dropped on me. Given the volume of material, I Let me know if that upsets your plans too much. From: Ami Sheth [mailto:ASheth@ldrkland.com] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 12:26 PM To: Roth, John (ODAG) Cc: Jay Lefkowitz; Kenneth Starr; Ken Starr Subject: Epstein - On behalf of Jay Lefkowitz and Ken Star Dear Mr. Roth, the followin documents to this email: (1) Principal As promised in yesterday's letter to you, we have attached Letter and (4) Response to CEOS's Letter by Submission, (2) Summary of Misconduct, (3) Response to Stephanie Thacker. unity to speak with you in person about this matter. We respectfully request and would greatly appreciate the opport Kind Regards, Kenneth W. Starr and Jay P. Lefkowitz Kirkland & Ellis LLP is The information contained in this communication may be attor ney-c lient privi leged , confidential, may only for constitute inside information, and is intended the use of the addressee. It is the prope rty of nal LLP. Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Ellis Internatio Unauthorized use, discl osure or copyi ng of this prohibited communication or any part thereof is strictly and may be unlawful. If you have recei ved this iately by communication in error, please notify us immed com, and return l-mail or by I -mail to postmasterOkirk land. 873 EFTA00180202 s thereof, destroy this communication and all copie including all attachments. 879 EFTA00180203 (USAFLS) (USAFLS) From: 8 :12 AM Sent: F USAFLS) To: LS) Cc: Subject: FW: Epstein I am in shock. Could this really happen? Assistant U.S. Attorney Ori inal Message From: (USAFLS) 1 AM Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 9:1 (USAFLS) To: Roth, John (ODAG) (SMO); Cc: Soffer, Gil •(ODAG) (SMO) Subject: Re: Epstein Thanks John. Original Message From: Roth, John (ODAG) (SMO) (USAFLS); (USAFLS) To: Cc: Soffer, Gil (ODAG) (SMO) Sent: Fri Jun 20 09:01:18 2008 Subject: FW: Epstein stitute our review. Even if we were to sub FYI. Gil and I have finished our app rop riately in that this case is one that is judgment for yours, we believe that gives us any l cou rt. We als o see not hing in the conduct of the USAO federa We briefed the being handled professionally. reason to doubt that the case is . DAG on it yesterday and he agrees but I think we ows a slight wrinkle into this, The attached late submission thr kowitz for an . I have asked Starr and Lef can still satisfy your timetable morning. I c ver sio n of wha tev er he is going to send, to be sent this electroni or this evening to one conference for this afternoon am going to schedule a teleph planning. Please the m kno w, but I tho ugh t you should know so you can start let l until we let them know. don't reach out to defense counse From: Kenneth Starr [mailto: 1 PM Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 9:1 878 EFTA00180204 To: Roth, John (ODAG) Cc: Jay Lefkowitz; li Subject: Re: Epstein Dear Mr. Roth, supplemental submissions and binder of As you have requested, we are sending our tomorrow. Attached here is our materials to the Department for delivery introductory letter. y ask that you contact my colleague I will be traveling abroad next week and kindl telephone at in this matter, Jay Lefkowitz, by email or by Kind regards. Kenneth W. Starr Kirkland & Ellis LLP NM "Roth, John (ODAG)" <John.Roth3Ousdoj.gov> 06/11/2008 07:08 AM To u> <IIIIIIIINSIII, <Ken.StarrOpepperdine.ed CC Subject Epstein letters to both SDFL and the Sorry for the phone tag. We have all of your nt that if you wish. It is best Criminal Division, but feel free to suppleme to your contact in the USAO. If simply to send it by 'Email to me, with a copy 879 EFTA00180205 most useful to get it by the you do decide to send us something, it would be middle of next week. Thanks. John Roth Associate Deputy Attorney General **** ***********###********* ******************************** The information contained in this communication is may confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, inte nded only for constitute inside information, and is the use of the addressee. It is the property of ional LLP. Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Ellis Internat Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this prohibited communication or any part thereof is strictly and may be unlawful. If you have received this ely by communication in error, please notify us immediat com, and return l[mail or by ♦mail to postmasterQkirkland. copies ther eof, destroy this communication and all including all attachments. *****************44***** *******###************************* Tracking: 880 EFTA00180206 Read Recipient (USAFLS) Read: 6/23/2008 10:59 AM (USAFLS) 881 EFTA00180207 (USAFLS) From: pii iUSAFLS) n ay, une 0, 2008 9:11 Sent: USAFLS) To: Roth, JohnfDAG) (SMO); Cc: Soffer, Gil (ODAG) (SMO Subject: Re: Epstein Thanks John. Original Message From: Roth, John (ODAG) (SMO) To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Cc: Soffer, Gil (ODAG) (SMO) Sent: Fri Jun 20 09:01:18 2008 Subject: FW: Epstein if we were to substitute our FYI. Gil and I have finished our review. Even is one that is appropriately in judgment for yours, we believe that this case that gives us any federal court. We also see nothing in the conduct of the USA° ed professionally. We briefed the reason to doubt that the case is being handl DAG on it yesterday and he agrees. wrinkle into this, but I think we The attached late submission throws a slight Starr and Lefkowitz for an can still satisfy your timetable. I have asked send, to be sent this morning. I electronic version of whatever he is going to for this afternoon or this evening to am going to schedule a telephone conference so you can start planning. Please let them know, but I thought you should know let them know. don't reach out to defense counsel until we From: Kenneth Starr [mailto: Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 9:11 PM To: Roth, John (ODAG) Cc: Jay Lefkowitz; Subject: Re: Epstein Dear Mr. Roth, lemental submissions and binder of As you have requested, we are sending our supp . Attached here is our materials to the Department for delivery tomorrow introductory letter. ask that you contact my colleague I will be traveling abroad next week and kindly phone at in this matter, Jay Lefkowitz, by email or by tele Kind regards. 882 EFTA00180208 Kenneth W. Starr Kirkland & Ellis LLP "Roth, John (ODAG)" <John.Roth3Ousdoi.gov> 06/11/2008 07:08 AM To MIIIIIINIMIL, < CC Subject Epstein letters to both SDFL and the Sorry for the phone tag. We have all of your nt that if you wish. It is best Criminal Division, but feel free to suppleme to your contact in the USAO. If simply to send it by 'Email to me, with a copy be most useful to get it by the you do decide to send us something, it would middle of next week. Thanks. John Roth Associate De uty Attorney General **********************###** ******************************** n is The information contained in this communicatio ed, may confidential, may be attorney-client privileg nded only for constitute inside information, and is inte of the use of the addressee. It is the property Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Elli s Inte rnational LLP. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this prohibited communication or any part thereof is strictly and may be unlawful. If you have recei ved this 883 EFTA00180209 ely by communication in error, please notify us immediat and.com, and return limail or by oilman to postmasterPkirkl eof, destroy this communication and all copies ther including all attachments. **4* ******************** #*##******************************* 884 EFTA00180210 Read Recipient 11... (LEO) Read: 6/19/2008 4:48 PM INNIMINUSAFLS) Read: 6/19/2008 4:47 PM jimmilUSAFLS) 886 EFTA00180211 (USAFLS) From: Sent: To: (FBI); (FBI) Subject: ravel to ew ork Hi all — I just got an 'mail from )'lawyer saying that, if we get the immunity, we can meet with her on Friday, June 27'h, in New York. never know. Let's talk tomorrow about The application is up in DC now. It should be a sure thing, but you planning the trip. i U. . to 887 EFTA00180212 (USAFLS) (USAFLS) From: Sent: ne 1 , 008 2.51 PM (USAWAW) To: Subject: RE: Vanity Fair Was that not the harshest article ever? right, the DAG! — they claim that I ant persecuting Ironically, in their latest appeal — to the DAG, yes, that is him because of his close ties to the Clintons. Assistant U.S. Attorne From: (USAWAW) sentimadiu,s12,2008 2:38 PM To: a (USAFLS) Subject: Vanity Fair article. Saw your man/case mentioned in the Bill Clinton Tracking: 896 EFTA00180213 Recipient Road FaUSAWAVV) Read: 6/1972008 3:26 PM 897 EFTA00180214 . (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: 19, 2008 2:02 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: -mail to Bany Black to Barry Hi - I talked with about communicating the substance of our conversation with Roy do you think of this? to avoid the miscommunication that the defense loves to do. What Dear Barry: Roy I just wanted to let you know that and I spoke with Roy Black yesterday regarding the Epstein case. ion simultaneously and mentioned your asked whether there was a way to resolve the federal and state litigat the Office's position is that if Epstein desire to wrap up the case before you retired. We informed him that ment, we will end our investigation. If Mr. promptly abides by the terms of the signed non-prosecution agree is his prerogative, but we will consider it a Epstein chooses to go forward with a different plea in the State, that dingly. breach of the non-prosecution agreement and will proceed accor the state indictment and also to a state charge The terms of the agreement call for Mr. Epstein to plead guilty to of procuring minors to engage in prostitution, at that requires sex offender registration, specifically the charge s can pursue damages claims as though Mr. least 18 months imprisonment, and an agreement that the victim does not address probationary periods Epstein had been convicted of the federal offenses. Our agreement on the federal side, so we have left that issue to the following the term of incarceration. Those arc statutorily set defense to negotiate with you. If you have any questions, please let me know. Tracking: 898 EFTA00180215 EFTA00180216 668 rid gvz soontwg :peed (914Va l plum tuatdpos .(USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: ASS, 2008 1:42 PM To: . (FBI) Subject: RE: Epstein — Call with Roy Black Hi -- I sent an to about the Clark case asking for the info nt. regarding the cp so I can prepare the indictme it is now up with Washington. Our office has approved the immunity request so I also am still waiting to hear Don't know how long they will take to review it. we have to wait from lawyer about whether he will agree to meet or if for the grand jury. • Assistant U.S. Attorne III Ori inal From: (FBI) Sent: Thursda Jun2.21.2008 1:37 PM To: IIIIIIIIIIII (USAFLS) Subject: Re: Epstein -- Call with Roy Black it could be. Anything from your Sounds fishy to us. Not sure what the benef her note, how do you want to office on the immunity letter and NY trip. On anot next Thursday? She handle' other case (Jonathan Clark). Is grand jury is meeting with tomorrow 43 images of CP transmitted. Ori inal Messa e From: II (USAFLS < (USA FLS) ; Acosta USAFLS); (USAFLS) To: Cc: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Sent: Wed Jun 18 13:5 3:07 2008 Subject: Epstein -- Call with Roy Black ed because he had heard and I spoke with Roy. Roy said that he had call Roy wanted to see that had discussed the matter with Barry Krischer and 7th. Roy also said that he had if there was any wail", iiiiiihis up before July seen a letter from that said that the matter of incarceration would er he is referring to, but I be left to the State. (I am not certain what lett e Epstein would be think wrote a letter about not taking a position on wher ered whether we would go away incarcerated, not the length of time.) So, Roy wond if Epstein took Barry's 60-day deal. 903 EFTA00180217 y about explained that had not had substantive discussions with Barr g the case is being handled by the case and that all communication regardin her there was anything that could and me. In response to the question of whet is that if Epstein stops the "make this go away," we said that our position ce with the terms of the signed process in Washington and pleads in accordan explained that the agreement. agreement, then we will perform pursuant to sentenced to a lower amount, then we if Epstein pleads to something else or gets we will proceed accordingly. will consider that a breach of our agreement and Washington? On that note, has there been any word from Thank you. Assistant U.S. Attorney 909 EFTA00180218 (USAFLS) From: (USAFIS) Sent: 19, 2008 1;22,JA (USAFLS); MEIN (USAFLS) To: Subject: Hi ■ and W— Two things: conversation with Roy and the Do you think and I should call Barry Krischer and tell him about our Office's position? r state prosecutor and seems like a good guy. He One of our best witnesses has hired an attorney. He is a forme is that it remains my hope that we will charge JE. He asked me for a status and I told him that all I could say forward. Would the DAG consider hearing from would like to advocate on behalf of his client that we move the victims? Tracking: 905 EFTA00180219 Recipient • Read Read: 6/1912008 1:31 PM IIIMIEUSAFLS) Read: 6119120081:38 PM 906 EFTA00180220 (USAFLS) From: .(USAFLS) Sent: ne 18, 20081:53 P SAFLS); A FLS); (USAFLS) To: (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS); Subject: pstein — Cal wkh Roy Black heard that had discussed the and I spoke with Roy. Roy said that he had called because he had matter with Barry 1Crischer and Roy wijac if there was any way to wrap this up before July 7th. Roy also said that he had seen a letter from MI that said thatSag matter of incarceration would be left to the wrote a letter about not taking a position on State. (1 am not certain what letter he is referring to, but I think El Roy wondered whether we would go away if where Epstein would be incarcerated, not the length of time.) So, Epstein took Barry's 60-day deal. and that all explained that had not had substantive lesions with Barry about the case communication regarding the case is being handled by and me. In response to the question of whether position is that if Epstein stops the process there was anything that could "make this go away," we said that our perform pursuant in Washington a s in accordance with the terms of the signed agreement, then we will thing else or gets senten ced to a lower amount, to the agreementliexplained that if Epstein pleads to some will proceed accordingly. then we will consider that a breach of our agreement and we On that note, has there been any word from Washington? Thank you. Tracking: 930 EFTA00180221 Recipient Read (USAFLS) Read: 611812008 2:19 PM Acosta. Alex (USAFLS) (USAFLS) Read: 6/18/2008 2:06 PM (USAFLS) Read: 6118(2008 5:48 PM (USAFLS) Read: 6(18120081:59 PM . (FBI) . (FBI) (USAFLS) Read: 6/18/2008 3:17 PM 931 EFTA00180222 (USAFLS) From: . (USAFLS) Sent 20081:10 PM 8,AT? To: (USAFLS) Subject: Roy Black Called Will you be back soon or do you want to do a conference call? 11-' 111 1I1 nt .' At 932 EFTA00180223 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent MS June 18, 2gg itaarjA, To: (USAFLS);MIIMM (USAFLS) Subject: Epstein ailable," so we left a message. Hi guys — and t put in a call to Roy Black this morning. He was "unav victims/recruiters. NM is out so we are has approved an immunity request for one of the New York to first, one of you or Ken? going to send it down to you, but I wondered who it should go Thanks. Tracking: 933 EFTA00180224 Road Recipient (USAFLS) Read: 8/181'20081:07 PM (USAFLS) Read: 6/1812008 12:08 PM 934 EFTA00180225 (USAFLS) From: . (USAFLS) Sent: e 17, 2008 4:02 PM To: aill (USAFLS) Subject: Roy and JE an that he should call out of the office, so Hi.— Well, Roy took your message is going to call him there hasn't been any communication. I= and I may call Roy later today or back and tell him to call me. an A Tracking: 941 EFTA00180226 Redalont Read (USAFLS) Road: 6/17/2008 4:15 PM 942 EFTA00180227 (USAFLS) From: Sent: 3:00 PM To: illell i(U SAF LS) Subject: Re: lis her address. Source info Unfortunately, the only info we have for alli name matches in ice records. We indicates she's from Brazil. There are numerous closest to determine her dob need to review the a files of the ones that match ars through her attorney?(Needed for and soc. Any way we could get those particul travel arrangements?) Ori inal Messa e From: USAFLS To: Sent: Tue Jun 17 14:45:31 2008 Subject: MIN info about i asap so I can Hi guys - sorry to bother you, but I need this get the paperwork down to Miami. Thanks. Birth Date of Witness: FBI I.D. No.: Birthplace: Social Security No.: Alias: Address of Witness: AUSA in New York? I want to run Also, do you have the name and number of the this by him/her first. Thanks. Assistant U.S. Attorney Phone 944 EFTA00180228 xej Stt EFTA00180229 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: aploW0 B80.2a F0 To: (FBI) Subject: I-li guys — sorry to bother you, but I need this info about asap so I can get the paperwork down to Miami. Thanks. Birth Date of Witness: FBI ID. No.: Birthplace: Social Security No.: Alias: Address of Witness: first. Also, do you have the name and number of the AUSA in New York? I want to run this by him/her Thanks. istar 946 EFTA00180230 (USAFLS) From: .(USAFLS) Sent: Tuesda 17, 2008 • AFLS); LS); (USAFLS) To: (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS); Subject: Epstein laint about us not Hi all — and I just spoke with Barry Krischer. He began with his usual comp were blocking the channels of communicating with him. I explained that it was the defense who communication. Goldberger is 60 days in the County Jail, 2 He then told us that the current deal he has worked out with Jack Epstein has agreed to plead to "attempted years community confinement, and 3 years probation. He says that Barry to send us the proposed lewd conduct," which, Barry says, will require registration. We asked will be required. It also sounds like it will not Information so I can look to see whether, in fact, registration involve a child sex offense. Epstein's plea to the procurement charge and to I told Barry that the defense had told us that Barry objected to ony in the grand jury would support the his having to register as a sex offender. Barry said that the testim er registration. procurement charge and that they have never discussed sex offend d by DOJ's internal investigation into my Apparently Jack Goldberger told Barry that the delay was cause We explained that the delay is caused by the conduct referring business to my boyfriend's "law partner." . defense appealing our decisions throughout the Justice Department MI Acosta about having to plead in two weeks. He also said that Jack Goldberger had shown him a letter from tell him if it is okay to go ahead He asked and Ito get back to him after we review the Information to with the plea deal. Strangely enough, I haven't heard from Roy Black. I will let you know when we receive the Information. Tracking: 947 EFTA00180231 Recipient Read Acosta. Alex (USAFLS) (USAFLS) Read: 6/17/2008 11:54 AM (USAFLS) Read: 6/17/2008 11:09 AM (USAFLS) Read: 6/17/200811:29 AM (USAFLS) Read: 6/17/2008 1:50 PM (FBI) (FBI) (USAFLS) Read: 6/17200811:11 AM 948 EFTA00180232 (USAFLS) From: (FBI) Sent: 8 10:45 AM To: Subject: Re: Call Urgent! Hi an issue though). I I have support for the New York trip (funding may be s of travel when we get them. Talk have the request prepared but need to add date to you later. Original Messa From: I. (USAFLS) < To: USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS) Sent: Fri Jun 13 15:0 6:07 2008 Subject: FW: Call -- Urgen tl I am happy to do so, if you want, -- Someone really needs to talk to Barry. and I will be very nice about it. Original Message From: (USAFLS) Sent: Frid a June 21 .2p0 8 3:03 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Call h the deal was 60 days--he was He got a strange voice mail from Barry K whic and the defense knows the deal as calling him back to say that is not the deal want and if it is not in accordance does his ASA. So they should do what they to do. with our agreement we will do whatever we have Original Message From: I. (USAFLS) Sent: Frida June 13, 2008 2:52 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Call pected? Can you give the heads up so he doesn't do something unex Ori inal Message From: (USAFLS) Sent: Frid a June 2.16.22gp 2:23 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Call Are you coming back home? 949 EFTA00180233 Original Messa e From: . (USAFLS) Sent: Frida June 13, 2008 11:56 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Call of staff. The leem ready to Hi . We had a good call with the dag's chief roy black called= to propose a greenlight us. Strangely, just an hour later told him to call me. (Imagine that). "final solution" (his words not mine). he actually calls? So are you free later for a conf call if 950 EFTA00180234 (USAFLS) From: USAFLS) Sent: 8 6:15 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: pstem Sorry, forgot to cc you. From: USAFLS) Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 6:09 PM To: R th John ODAG) (SMO) Cc: (USAFLS) Subject: Epstein John, Epstein is facing trial on a felony charge of solicitation of prostitution. This does not resemble the charges that Epstein agreed to plead guilty to in the September 24th Agreement nor what he would face federally. That case is set for trial on Monday July 7. If we are given the go ahead from the DAG's office, we would give Epstein one final chance to comply with the September 24th Agreement. In that regard, it would be most preferable to have a decision by next week. That would give us the opportunity to seek an indictment on Tuesday July 1“ if Epstein fails to comply with the September 24 th Agreement by Monday June 30th The reason this timetable is important is to address our concern that Epstein may continue to keep us in a holding pattern if he pleads to the pending state solicitation of prostitution charge before a federal indictment is returned. In that scenario, I anticipate Epstein's counsel raising petit policy issues, thus throwing another possible monkey wrench in the process. Although I don't believe that the petit policy would be affected, I can imagine someone calling a timeout until the issue is vetted. That's why I would prefer being able to seek an indictment before Epstein pleads to the pending charge and after he has repudiated the September 24th Agreement. Thanks, a 951 EFTA00180235 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: :06 PM To: AFLS) Cc: USAFLS) Subject: a I mem! Importance: High MI-- Someone really needs to talk to Barry. I am happy to do so, if you want, and I will be very nice about it. Original Message From: (USAFLS) Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 3:03 PM To: 'MIMS= (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Call He got a strange voice mail from Barry K which the deal was 60 days--he was calling him back to say that is not the deal and the defense knows the deal as does his ASA. So they should do what they want and if it is not in accordance with our agreement we will do whatever we have to do. Ori inal Message From: . (USAFLS) Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 2:52 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Call Can you give the heads up so he doesn't do something unexpected? Original Message From: (USAFLS) Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 2:23 PM To: . (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Call Are you coming back home? Original Message From: . (USAFLS) Sent: Frida , June 13, 2008 11:56 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Call Hi . We had a good call with the dag's chief of staff. They seem ready to greenlight us. Strangely, just an hour later roy black called to propose a "final solution" (his words not mine). told him to call me. Imagine that). So are you free later for a conf call if he actually calls? 952 EFTA00180236 .(USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: 3:03 PM To: .(USAFLS) Subject: RE: Call the deal was 60 days--he was He got a strange voice mail from Barry K which the defense knows the deal as calling him back to say that is not the deal and and if it is not in accordance does his ASA. So they should do what they want do. with our agreement we will do whatever we have to Original Message From: I. (USAFLS) Sent: Frida iiiii13, 2008 2:52 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Call pected? Can you give the heads up so he doesn't do something unex Ori inal From: (USAFLS) Sent: Frida June Sis.2028 2:23 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Call Are you coming back home? Oatiliiie s . li From: (USAFLS) Sent: Fr' ii13, 2008 11:5 6 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Call of staff. Thagmeem ready to Hi . We had a good call with the dag's chief r roy black called to propose a greenlight us. Strangely, just an hour laig me. (Ima gine that). told him to call "final solution" (his words not mine). IIII he actually calls? So are you free later for a conf call if 953 EFTA00180237 (USAFLS) ‘ (USAFLS) From: Sent: To: isi s20082:52 PM USAFLS) Subject: RE Call Can you give IIIIIIIIthe heads up so he doesn't do something unexpected? Ori inal Messa e From: (USAFLS) Sent: Frida June 13 2008 2:23 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Call Are you coming back home? Ori inal Messa e From: (USAFLS) Sent: Frida June 13, 2008 11:56 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Call Hi I We had a good call with the dag's chief of staff. Thumar m ready to greenlight us. Strangely, just an hour later roy black called J to propose a "final solution" (his words not mine). illItold him to call me. (Imagine that). So are you free later for a conf call if he actually calls? 954 EFTA00180238 .(USAFLS) From: .(USAFLS) 2008 2:52 PM Sent: To: Subject: MIS RE: Call (USAFLS) decision by end of next week so we One week. We told the DAG that we need his e trial. can indict on July 1st before the July 7th stat Ori inal Mesa From: (USAFLS) Sent: Frida June 13 2008 2:51 PM To: Ill II. (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Call is such a thing--does he have before How long after the final decision--if there we indict? Original Message From: I. (USAFLS) Sent: Frida June 13, 2008 2:45 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Call -- Not today. I am going to meet with about the indictment. Hi Ori inal Message From: (USAFLS) Sent_: Fr June 11 .2.2 6 8 ( USA PM To: U FLS) Subject: RE: Call Are you coming back home? Original Me iiii From: I. (USAFLS) Sent: Frida June 13, 2008 11:56 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Call f. This eem ready to Hi We had a good call with the dag's chief of staf r roy black called to propose a greenlight us. Strangely, just an hour told him to call me. (Imagine that). "final solution" (his words not mine). ill actually calls? So are you free later for a conf call if he 955 EFTA00180239 .(USAFLS) From: .(USAFLS) Sent: SSE 2008 2:45 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Call -- Not today. I am going to meet with about the indictment. Hi Ori inal Message From: (USAFLS) Sent: Frida June jjsmi008 2:23 PM To: IIIIIIIIIIII. (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Call Are you coming back home? Ori in l Message From: I. (USAFLS) Sent: Fri a iii 13, 2008 11:56 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Call staff. Thagm eem ready to Hi . We had a good call with the dag's chief of black called to propose a greenlight us. Strangely, just an hour 1212r roy gine that). told him to call me. (Ima "final solution" (his words not mine). ally calls? So are you free later for a conf call if he actu 956 EFTA00180240 (USAFLS) From: USAFLS) Sent: :23 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: : a Are you coming back home? Original Message From: (USAFLS) Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 11:56 AM To: =EMI= (USAFLS) Subject: Call Hi la We had a good call with the dag's chief of staff. They seem ready to greenlight us. Strangely, just an hour later roy black called Illlito propose a "final solution" (his words not mine). lillitold him to call me71Imagine that). So are you free later for a conf call if he actually calls? 957 EFTA00180241 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: :15 PM To: (FBI) Subject: e:Epstein Sorry. I am at birthday lunch now. I will call as soon as I can. Overall it went well. There is a new development. I will call soon Original Message From: (FBI) To: (USAFLS) Sent: Fri Jun 13 13:05:14 2008 Subject: Epstein How did the conf call gol Sorry couldn't wait longer! 958 EFTA00180242 (USAFLS) From: USAFLS) Sent 2:04 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: : a Not free but good!! Yes but want to talk to you first. We don't want to change our terms!!! Original Message From: (USAFLS) Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 11:56 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Call Hi I We had a good call with the dag's chief of staff. They seem ready to greenlight us. Strangely, just an hour later roy black called illito propose a "final solution" (his words not mine). illitold him to call rui7Timagine that). So are you free later for a conf call if he actually calls? 959 EFTA00180243 .(USAFLS) From: .(USAFLS) Sent: — 2008 11:56 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Call Hi . We had a good call with the dag's chief of staff. The seem ready to greenlight us. Strangely, just an hour later roy black called IIII to propose a "final solution" (his words not mine). told him to call me. (Imagine that). So are you free later for a conf call if he actually calls? 960 EFTA00180244 . (USAFLS) From: . (USAFLS) Sent: e11,2008427PM To: (FBI) Subject: YahooSVVAffiapd Attachments: Yahoo Aff.wpd The message is ready to be sent with the following file or link attachments: Yahoo SW Aff.wpd Note: To protect against computer viruses, I -mail programs may prevent sending or receiving certain types of file attachments. Check your I -mail security settings to determine how attachments are handled. 964 EFTA00180245 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: =200 • To: (FBI); (FBI) Subject: FYI A few things. a and I are having a conference call on Friday with the DAG. Time not yet confirmed. attorneys (at least the father) are no small shakes. http://www.wtop.com/?nid=104&sid=14 12018 I am going to try to move to the 24th or, preferably, the 1' of July. Let me know if anything new is going on on your end. Thanks. A '. nt U.S. Attorne 966 EFTA00180246 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: une , 00811:49 AM To: SAFLS) Cc: USAFLS) Subject: ccep e : ps einicall in from John Roth Mr. Ill end Cyndee - I have an 8:30 sentencing with Judge I lurley and then I am headed down to Miami. If Roth is available later in the morning I could be there live. Otherwise, please call me on my cell,. 967 EFTA00180247 .(USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: 2008 3:04 PM To: (FBI) Subject: RE: Call from attorney Does she have any criminal history? And can you subpoena her driver's license and autotrack? Thanks. Assistant U.S. Attorney Ori inal MessaLs. From: WI. (FBI) Sent: Frida June 20 8 2:50 PM To: . (USAFLS) Subject: Re: Call from attorney I can do a more extensive phone interview with and cont IS and locate . Idont know of anyone else that would have info on , other I'll check on A file on Monday. Previous phone numbers and/or bills friiiiii05,I istanl ang about gifts, cards and such pertaining to Epstein, , and Original Message From: To: Sent: Fri Jun 06 14.Lg2:06 2008 Subject: Call from III attorney attorney called and she would really like full immunity. I said no, so she will have to come and testify in front of the grand jury and assert the fifth as to each question. I will start putting together a list of questions for her and send it to you. I also am wondering whether we should subpoena any records from her to bring with her to the grand jury. I told him that we will need to see her on a Tuesday in June, he is going to call me back with a date. I also told him that we would pay for her plane ticket but not his. 968 EFTA00180248 Can you try to find out if she has an A-file and, if so, get a copy before then? And do you want to try to interview some other New York people before she comes to testify? Thank you. Assistant U.S. Attorney 969 EFTA00180249 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: r i'l 82 To: (FBI): ISIMII. (FBI) Subject: Call from a orney attorney called and she would really like NI immunity. I said no, so she will have to come and testify in front of the grand jury and assert the fifth as to each question. I will start putting together a list of questions with for her and send it to you. I also am wondering whether we should subpoena any records from her to bring her to the grand jury. told I told him that we will need to see her on a Tuesday in June, he is going to call me back with a date. I also him that we would pay for her plane ticket but not his. Can you try to fund out if she has an A-file and, if so, get a copy before then? And do you want to try to interview some other New York people before she comes to testify? Thank you. Assist nt U.S. Attorne 970 EFTA00180250 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: 8 2:54 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: F SDFL pstem From: Roth, John (ODAG) (SMO) Sen : Tuesd 03, 2008 1:30 PM To: (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: SDFL - Epstein thanks. We will be in touch. From: (USAFLS) [malito:Cyndee.Campos@usdoj.gov] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 12:53 PM To: ODAG) Cc: (USAFLS) Subject: SDFL - Epstein S SDFL. «Epstein kr Ofc of DAG 06 03 08.pdf» Sent on behalf of Fi Original signed letter with attachments to follow via Fed Ex. Staff Assistant U.S. Attorney's Office S.D. of Florida 971 EFTA00180251 .(USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: 8 2:54 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: FW: SDFL - Epstein I was also going to send you a hard copy, with fancy tabs. Do you still want? From: (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 12:53 PM To: th John ODAG) (SMO) Cc: (USAFLS) Subject: SDFL - Epstein Epstein Itr Oft of DAG 06 03 0... Sent on behalf ofilnEEMIMMI. SDFL. Original signed letter with attachments to follow via Fed Ex. Staff Assistant U.S. Attorney's Office S.D. of Florida 972 EFTA00180252 (USAFLS) From: Ann . (USAFLS) Sent: MOS 2008 2:55 PM To: USAFLS) Subject: RE: SDFL - Epstein Yes, please. Thank you! Assistant U.S. Attorne From: Set 1008 2:54 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: FW: SDFL - Epstein I was also going to send you a hard copy, with fancy tabs. Do you still want? From: laM Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 12:53 PM To: DAG) (SMO) Cc: (USAFLS) Subject: SDFL - Epstein SDFL. « File: Epstein Itr Ofc of DAG 06 03 08.pdf » Sent on behalf o Original signed letter with attachments to follow via Fed Ex. Staff Assistant U.S. Attorney's Office iS DdiSla Tracking: 973 EFTA00180253 Recipient Road (USAFLS) Read: G/312008 2:55 PM 974 EFTA00180254 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: 2:19 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: atter to Hi - Can you send a copy of the letter to me for the file? Thanks. Assistant U.S. Attorne Tracking: 975 EFTA00180255 Recipient Road MIIIIIMIUSAFLS) Read: 6/3/2008 2:53 PM 976 EFTA00180256 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: 03, 2008 1filla m . To: (USAFLS); .(USAFLS) Subject: w: D L - Epstein Fyi Original Message From: Roth John ODAG) (SMO) To: (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS) Sent: Tue Jun 03 13:29:39 2008 Subject: RE: SDFL - Epstein thanks. We will be in touch. From: (USAFLS) (mailto:Cyndee.Campos@usdoj.gov] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 12:53 PM To: aally_n210DAG) Cc: MM.= (USAFLS) Subject: SDFL - Epstein «E stein ltr Ofc of DAG 06 03 08.pdf» Sent on behalf ofl SDFL. Original signed letter with attachments to follow via Fed Ex. • Staff Assistant U.S. Attorney's Office S.D. of Florida 977 EFTA00180257 . (USAFLS) From: . (USAFLS) Sent: 3, 2 812:14 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Epstein question Hi I know is running out to the NAC, so I didn't want to bother him about this now. Here is my question. We think that one of the victims in New York has had contact with Epstein's counsel, so the cat is probably out of the bag about our interest in New York. When Epstein signed the Non-Prosecution A reement we withdrew several subpoenas, including a subpoena of one of Epstein's New York assistants, a subpoena for the computer equipment that Roy Black's investigator removed from Epstein's house, and sub oenas to Bear Steams. Can't renew those subpoenas? Bear Stears is about to disappear into JP Morgan, we now believe may be a target, rather than a subject (obviously I would need to let her lawyer know that), and Epstein's motion to quash the computer subpoena was never ruled upon by Judge Marra, who is on the duty wheel again this month. Defense counsel will jump up and down and scream, but do we care anymore? s i tant U.S. Att rne Tracking: 978 EFTA00180258 Recipient Read (USAFLS) Read: 6/3/2008 12:27 PM 979 EFTA00180259 (USAFLS) From: . (USAFLS) Sent: e 03, 200811:33 AM To: (USAFLS)' Subject: RE: please review Importance: High Excellent! Only one typo. At the top of page 13, the sentence that starts "As soon as I became aware of these allegations," you left out the word "I" and you refer to it as the Office of Professional Regulation rather than Responsibility. Also, since you included the self-reports to OPR by you and you may want to include my self-disclosure in the paragraph at the middle of page 14 where I discuss the appointment issue. You also may want to put in a footer reading "Confidential and Privileged — Attorney Work Product" to avoid possible disclosure to the defense. Thanks. From: (USAFLS) Sem 008 10:40 AM To: (US Cc: (USAFLS)11.. (USAFLS) Subject: please review « File: 2DAG060208.wpd » Tracking: 980 EFTA00180260 Recipient Read (OWLS) Read: 8/3/2008 11:48 NA allEli 981 EFTA00180261 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: 118 10:43 AM To: (USAFLS) Cc: SAFLS) Subject: Ora Indictment iI — called and said that Eneeded a copy of this. The first copy has a "draft" watermark on it, and the second is exactly the same except that the watermark is removed. 080429 revised ndictment with... Thanks! 080429 revised ndictment with... Assis S. Attorne Tracking: 982 EFTA00180262 Recipient Road (USAFLS) Read: 6!3/200810:44 AM (USAFIS) Read: 6131200811:08 AM 983 EFTA00180263 .(USAFLS) From: In (USAFLS) Sent: 8 10.40 AM To: (USA Cc: (USAFLS);11... (USAFLS) Subject: please review rif 2DAG060208.wp 984 EFTA00180264 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: e , 8 9:12 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: 'bona n o Hi 5_ You might want to add that Epstein's publicist, Howard Rubenstein, is also the publicist for The New York Post where the article quoting Lefcourt's letter appeared. Assistant U.S. Attorne Tracking: 985 EFTA00180265 Recipient Read (USAFLS) Read: 6/312008 10:19 AM 986 EFTA00180266 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent e , 9:10 AM To: USAFLS) Subject age i e re Lefcourt Ltr to Acosta.pdf Here it is. Page 6 Article re Lefcourt Ltr... 987 EFTA00180267 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: on , 7:02 PM To: SAFLS) Cc: USAFLS); .( USAFLS) Subject: . . Hi .■ Apparently some fairly reputable news sources are reporting that Epstein has moved significant assets off shore and intends to flee. We are going to try to find out if they have any legitimacy. Assistant U.S. Attorn Tracking: 988 EFTA00180268 Recipient Read SIMIUSAFLS) Read: 6/2/2008 7:02 PM MIIIME(USAELS) Read: 6/3/2008 10:18 AM SIMBIUSAELS) Read: 6/3/2008 8:38 AM 989 EFTA00180269 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: e 6:57 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Iii I like it. Any chance we can participate in the meeting? I would like to see these guys in action. Here arc my suggested changes. Feel free to keep or reject any and all. Thanks. Addition to be nserted on pag... Assistant U.S. Attorne Tracking: 990 EFTA00180270 Recipient Read (USAFLS) Read: 6/2/2008 7:00 PM 991 EFTA00180271 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: 8 4:25 PM To: .(USAFLS) Subject: ra t letter to DAG DAG060208.wpd 992 EFTA00180272 .(USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: e 02, 2008 12:47 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Emailing: Conf Plea Negotiations final.wpd Attachments: Conf Plea Negotiations final.wpd Hi -- Here it is. It was presented at the July 31st meeting, I believe. The message is ready to be sent with the following file or link attachments: Conf Plea Negotiations final.wpd or Note: To protect against computer viruses, I-mail programs may prevent sending receiving certain types of file attachments. Check your I -mail security settings to determine how attachments are handled. 993 EFTA00180273 .(USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent e 02, 2008 jj.glialg. To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: Epstein Hi sand■ — I am back. I will be meeting with this afternoon to go over the latest developments. I was wiling whether you had received a copy of all of Epstein's submissions to the AAG? I don't want to bother if we already have everything. Can you let me know? And have you heard anything about timing? moved for By the way, I am on the CWECF list for the civil suits against Epstein and Mr. Herman's firm has entry of default judgment in one of the civil cases. Could be interesting. Thanks. Assi Tracking: 994 EFTA00180274 Recipient Read (USAFLS) Road: 6/2/2008 4:26 PM (USAFLS) 995 EFTA00180275 .(USAFLS) From: (FBI) Sent: 53 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Epstein I just heard from attorney, Brendan White. He informed me that he is representing and that she would not be able to make the June 3rd date and that she will invoke her 5th amendment right unless she is granted immunity. I informed him that was considered a victim/witness but he said that she would still invoke w/o immunity. SOUNDS like he has been well informed. Anyway Mr. White advised he had left you a message so I told him I would let the two of you work out the details. We can meet Monday afternoon and I will fill you in on the rest. I'll let Odell and Atkinson know we are off for Tuesday. Have a great weekend. From: . (USAFLS) Sent: Thursda , Ma 29, 2008 3:24 PM To: I. Subject: Re: Epstein Hi . Very intereting. Is she coming down on her own dime? If she wants us to pay we have to set up the travel. Can you figure that out and if she is showing up this tuesday call atkinson to reserve grand jury time. Ask to bring put us last in case she is willing to do an interview and them we will not her to gj. We may want to video her. Since we aren't indicting on tuesday let's meet monday afternoon to go over everything. Thanks. Ori inal Messa e From: FBI) To: . (USAFLS) Sent: Thu May 29 12:18:50 2008 Subject: RE: Epstein The NY agents made contact with today. She met them at the door with her attorney's card. (she is connected to a target in another FBI investigation) I'll explain later. Anyway, she contacted the agent a few minutes ago and sounded surprised when she was informed it was about Epstein. She switched the conversation immediately about coming to Grand Jury on Tues. The agent left the door open to contact her if she decides to talk to her. I think we should let her travel down here and let and I attempt to interview her prior to putting her in the G3. What do you think? I told the NY agent if should 996 EFTA00180276 reach out to her again to provide her with my name and information as her contact once she gets down here. I do not know if she plans on getting her attorney involved or not. His info is as follows: Diarmuid White of White and White, III telephone number . I have a feeling she will reach out to Epstein, so it could get interest ing. We have to schedule time for her in front of G]. Let me know. From: (USAFLS) [ Sent: Thursda May 29, 2008 9:03 AM To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS); GIs; I Subject: Epstein Hi and III. I received I-mail stating that the DAG agreed to meet with epstein's people. Does this mean that Tuesday is off? I need to let the gj coordinator know. Also, I am sure that you remember I. She was the person whom we initially classified as a victim until epstein's attorneys complained. Well, has just interviewed a girl who was 14 or 15 when she first went to epstein's house who reports that epstein told her that he had sex with .( probably would have been 15 or 16 when this conversation occurred.) The girl also reports that she told epstein her true age and epstein told her that he doesn't care about age. I know that epstein's people will, no doubt, continue to tell the dag and others that epstein didn't know about the girls' ages so I thought you should know. Please let me know about tuesday so I don't needlessly spoil sunday. And, any chance the case was discussed with the ag when he was in town? Thanks. 997 EFTA00180277 .(USAFLS) From: .(USAFLS) Sent: 9, 2008 3:24 PM To: . (FBI) Subject: e: Epstein Hi . Very intereting. Is she coming down on her own dime? If she wants us to pay we have to set up the travel. Can you figure that out and if she is showing up this tuesday call atkinson to reserve grand jury time. Ask to put us last in case she is willing to do an interview and them we will not bring her to gj. We may want to video her. Since we aren't indicting on tuesday let's meet monday afternoon to go over everything. Thanks. Ori inal Messa e From: FBI) To: . (USAFLS) Sent: Thu May 29 12:18:50 2008 Subject: RE: Epstein The NY agents made contact with today. She met them at the door with her attorney's card. (she is connected to a target in another FBI investigation) and sounded I'll explain later. Anyway, she contacted the agent a few minutes ago surprised when she was informed it was about Epstein. She switched the left the conversation immediately about coming to Grand Jury on Tues. The agent let door open to contact her if she decides to talk to her. I think we should and I attempt to intervie w her prior to her travel down here and let GJ. What do you think? I told the NY agent if should putting her in the her contact reach out to her again to provide her with my name and information as once she gets down here. I do not know if she plans on getting her attorney III involved or not. His info is as follows: Diarmuid White of White and White, , telephone number . I have a feeling she will reach out to Epstein, so it could get interesting. We have to schedule time for her in front of GJ. Let me know. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Thursda May 29, 2008 9:03 AM To: USAFLS); USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS); ; Subject: Epstein Hi and III. I received I -mail stating that the DAG agreed to meet gj with epstein's people. Does this mean that Tuesday is off? I need to let the coordinator know. 998 EFTA00180278 Also, I am sure that you remember= I. She was the person whom we initially classified as a victim until epstein's attorneys complained. Well, has just interviewed a girl who was 14 or 15 when she first went house who reports that epstein told her that he had sex with= probably would have been 15 or 16 when this conversation occurred.) The girl also reports that she told epstein her true age and epstein told her that he doesn't care about age. I know that epstein's people will, no doubt, continue to tell the dag and others that epstein didn't know about the girls' ages so I thought you should know. Please let me know about tuesday so I don't needlessly spoil sunday. And, any chance the case was discussed with the ag when he was in town? Thanks. 999 EFTA00180279 (USAFLS) From: (FBI) Sent: — ' 8 12:19 PM To: . (USAFLS) Subject: E Epstein The NY agents made contact with today. She met them at the door with her attorney's card. (she is connected to a target in another FBI investigation) I'll explain later. Anyway, she contacted the agent a few minutes ago and sounded surprised when she was informed it was about Epstein. She switched the conversation immediately about coming to Grand Jury on Tues. The agent left the door open to contact her if she decides to talk to her. I think we should let her travel down here and let and I attempt to interview her prior to putting her in the GJ. What do you think? I told the NY agent if should reach out to her again to provide her with my name and informat ion as her contact once she gets down here. I do not know if she plans on getting her attorney involved or not. His info is as follows: Diarmuid White of White and White, III Ella telephone number . I have a feeling she will reach out to Epstein, so it could get interesting. We have to schedule time for her in front of GJ. Let me know. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Thursda May 29, 2008 9:03 AM To: USAFLS); 911.6USAFLS Cc: (USAFLS); I'll; I Subject: Epstein Hi and I received -mail stating that the DAG agreed to meet I with epstein's people. Does this mean that Tuesday is off? I need to let the gj coordinator know. Also, I am sure that you remember It She was the person whom we initially classified as a victim until epstein's attorneys complained. Well, has just interviewed a girl who was 14 or 15 when she first went toliiiiin' s house who reports that epstein told her that he had sex with ( probably would have been 15 or 16 when this conversation occurred .) The girl also reports that she told epstein her true age and epstein told her that he doesn't care about age. I know that epstein's people will, no doubt, continue to tell the dag and others that epstein didn't know about the girls' ages so I thought you should know. Please let me know about tuesday so I don't needlessly spoil sunday. And, any chance the case was discussed with the ag when he was in town? 1000 EFTA00180280 • sNuetu 1001 EFTA00180281 (USAFLS) From: is, 9,2 4USAFLS) Sent: To: AFLS); FLS) Cc: (USAFL ; (FBI); (FBI) Subject: Epstein Hi and III. I received 'Email stating that the DAG agreed to meet with epstein's people. Does this mean that Tuesday is off? I need to let the gj coordinator know. Also, I am sure that you remember I. She was the person whom we initially classified as a victim until epstein's attorneys complained. Well, has just interviewed a girl who was 14 or 15 when she first went to epstein's house who reports that epstein told her that he had sex with .( probably would have been 15 or 16 when this conversation occurred.) The girl also reports that she told epstein her true age and epstein told her that he doesn't care about age. I know that epstein's people will, no doubt, continue to tell the dag and others that epstein didn't know about the girls' ages so I thought you should know. Please let me know about tuesday so I don't needlessly spoil sunday. And, any chance the case was discussed with the ag when he was in town? Thanks. 1002 EFTA00180282 (USAFLS) From: (FBI) Sent: 008 6:33 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Hey we emailed 1IIIIMOST:) of your comments re any further delays and added a few of our own. The US Atty Gen was here today in MM. I would love to know if Epstein came up. and Acosta were going to present to the DAG reasons not to delay any further. Hopefully they were successful and we ilstill on for Tues. We interviewed Illtoday. She told Epstein her true age, she belvd was 14 or 15. Phone records show contact @ age 16. She said Epstein told her he did not care about age. She also said that E told her he had f***d • 'brought Anyways, I'll fill u in later. NY getting close to locating III We have cell an good address. Keep your fingers crossed. Talk to u soon. Original Message From: (USAFLS) < To: (USAFLS); Sent: Tue May 27 23:45:06 2008 Subject: Re: Epstein Aaaargh. The statute of limitations issue is the state statute of limitations. I think joe says it is two years. The issue is implicated in two ways. First, because of the state's leniency for the first set of girls, the second set have been presented only to us for prosecution. If we cannot go forward, then there will be no prosecution of those crimes. (In response to the argument that joe should just present them now, we believe that some of the victims are unknown to the defense and disclosing them further weakens our case by allowing them to depose and harass those victims.) Second, our "state resolution" of the case requires epstein to plead to something that hasn't been charged yet so further delay will allow him to escape one of the terms of the deal he signed several months ago. (There also is a sol on the private cause of action under 2255 pursuant to which he must pay damages to the girls. The delay will allow him to escape responsibility for that term, too.) Other reasons: The victims are getting older. Clearly one of epstein's arguments will be that he did not know they were minors. The older they are when they testify the more plausible epstein's argument becomes. The grand jury we are using will expire soon. We have already presented more than a dozen hours of testimony and the grand jury is invested and wants to indict. We romised the girls swift justice so they could move on with their lives. is a perfect example of why this is needed. The delay so far has led many to reach out to private lawyers which, in turn, let's e argue that they are only in it for money. 1003 EFTA00180283 Why give him more time? He has had more than a year's delay already for no reason other than the names of the attorneys he can afford to hire. This is not a white collar or other non-violent crime. This is a child exploitation crime with more than 20 known child victims. We are mandated by statute and doj policy to prosecute those cases vigorously and in a timely fashion - whether the children were prostitutes or unwilling victims. Why is this case being treated so differently? Original Message From: (FBI) To: F . (USAFLS) Cc: . (FBI) Sent: Tue May 27 18:45:37 2008 Subject: RE: Epstein Hey Sorry to bother you on your vacation. Apparently the DAG is inclined to allow Epstein's counsel to present further arguments. has requested and i to prepare, in email format, arguments to present to the DAG supporting why the case should not be stalled any further. mentioned statute of limitation issues. I don't know what the specific statute of limitations are (if there are any) for the various counts. Seems like the Other statute of limitations was for the life of the victim but III not certain. points that can be made include the private investigators continuing to contact the victims and the relocation of our victims to various parts of the country. on? Do you have any suggestions as to what would be our best course of persuasi Thanks and happy travels. From: . (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesda May 27, 2008 2:54 PM To: USAFLS); (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS) Subject: Epstein Hi sent me an email about epstein wanting to do less time. I hope that his request will be denied. The original deal was supposed to be 2 years so he has already gotten a big break. Plus we have identified more victims since we agreed to the 18 months. Please keep me posted. Thanks. 1004 EFTA00180284 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: 00811:17 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: epste n the info about 90 days was something the thought Barry said to him at a meeting. He was trying to confirm it. Talked to and she said the state statute is three years and will run on the victims they have In Oct or so of this year. They are working on the memo for Please don't let this spoil your trip—I know I am spitting Into the wind with this advice but try anywayllII Thought for the day for. —You know you are a redneck if you have ever bought your underwear at a yard saleiIIIII 1006 EFTA00180285 (USAFLS) From: USAFLS) Sent: 28, 2008 To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: Epstein Please fill me in. Original Message From: (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 9:21 AM To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Epstein This was info that got from Barry, the state attorney, but he was waiting for an email to confirm. I am much to lowly to have communications with the "star" team. Original Message From: (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 3:09 PM To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Epstein No one has contacted anyone in Miami. Please copy me and on all communications. Thanks, Original Message From: . (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 2:54 PM To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS) Subject: Epstein Hi sent me an email about epstein wanting to do less time. I hope that his request will be denied. The original deal was supposed to be 2 years so he has already gotten a big break. Plus we have identified more victims since we agreed to the 18 months. Please keep me posted. Thanks. 1007 EFTA00180286 .(USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: ilill.2008 1j.4.9,pai.... To: .(FBI); (USAFLS), AFB0 Subject: Re: Epstein Aaaargh. The statute of limitations issue is the state statute of limitations. I think joe says it is two years. The issue is implicated in two ways. First, because of the state's leniency for the first set of girls, the second set have been presented only to us for prosecution. If we cannot go forward, then there will be no prosecution of those crimes. (In response to the argument that joe should just present them now, we believe that some of the victims are unknown to the defense and disclosing them further weakens our case by allowing them to depose and harass those victims.) Second, our "state resolution" of the case requires epstein to plead to something that hasn't been charged yet so further delay will allow him to escape one of the terms of the deal he signed several months ago. (There also is a sol on the private cause of action under 2255 pursuant to which he must pay damages to the girls. The delay will allow him to escape responsibility for that term, too.) Other reasons: he The victims are getting older. Clearly one of epstein's arguments will be that did not know they were minors. The older they are when they testify the more plausible epstein's argument becomes. The grand jury we are using will expire soon. We have already presented more than a dozen hours of testimony and the grand jury is invested and wants to indict. We romised the girls swift justice so they could move on with their lives. is a perfect example of why this is needed. The delay so far has led many to reach out to private lawyers which, in turn, let's e argue that they are only in it for money. Why give him more time? He has had more than a year's delay already for no reason other than the names of the attorneys he can afford to hire. This is not a white collar or other non-violent crime. This is a child exploitation crime with more than 20 known child victims. We are mandated by statute and doj policy to prosecute those cases vigorously and in a timely fashion - whether the children were prostitutes or unwilling victims. Why is this case being treated so differently? Ori inal Messa e From: FBI) To: . (USAFLS) Cc: . (FBI) Sent: Tue May 27 18:45:37 2008 1008 EFTA00180287 Subject: RE: Epstein Hey I Sorry to bother you on your vacation. Apparently the DAG is inclined to allow Epstein's counsel to present further arguments. IM=Inhas requested elElland I to prepare, in email format, arguments to present to the DAG supporting why the case should not be stalled any further. liMmentioned statute of limitation issues. I don't know what the specific statute of limitations are (if there are any) for the various counts. Seems like the statute of limitations was for the life of the victim but not certain. Other points that can be made include the private investigators continuing to contact the victims and the relocation of our victims to various parts of the country. Do you have any suggestions as to what would be our best course of persuasion? Thanks and happy travels. From: (USAFLS) [ Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 2:54 PM To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS) Subject: Epstein Hi MI GM sent me an email about epstein wanting to do less time. I hope that his request will be denied. The original deal was supposed to be 2 years so he has already gotten a big break. Plus we have identified more victims since we agreed to the 18 months. Please keep me posted. Thanks. 1009 EFTA00180288 (USAFLS) From: (FBI) Sent: 6:46 PM To: (USAFLS) Cc: Subject: Hey Sorry to bother you on your vacation. Apparently the DAG is inclined to allow E stein's counsel to present further arguments. has requested and I to prepare, in email format, arguments to present to the DAG supporting why the case should not be stalled any further. mentioned statute of limitation issues. I don't know what the specific statute of limitations are (if there are any) for the various counts. Seems like the statute of limitations was for the life of the victim but I'm not certain. Other points that can be made include the private investigators continuing to contact the victims and the relocation of our victims to various parts of the country. Do you have any suggestions as to what would be our best course of persuasion? Thanks and happy travels. From: . (USAFLS) [ Sent: Tuesda May 27, 2008 2:54 PM To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS) Subject: Epstein Hi sent me an email about epstein wanting to do less time. I hope that his request will be denied. The original deal was supposed to be 2 years so he has already gotten a big break. Plus we have identified more victims since we agreed to the 18 months. Please keep me posted. Thanks. 1010 EFTA00180289 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: 4:03 PM To: Subject: Hi la Just heard back from Theu haven't heard anything from epstein's people and they aren't interested in renegotiating so I msg is a non - starter. Let's plan to meet sunday at 1:30 at my house775a is okay. Then I will spend monday with miami. Thanks. Original Message From (FBI) To: (USAFLS) Sent: Tue May 27 12:24:22 2008 Subject: RE: Mtg Hope you are having a Great time and resting up. afraid our days will be busy when u get back:) BEI is out on Sunday, but I think u and I should be able to handle it. Let me know what time, I will keep the day open. New York is not going well. The Agents are still trying to locate IIIIII (we now know here last name) but no luck thus far. When we ran the name in TECS, a IIIIIII dob departed Miami on Jan 28, 2008 for Brazil and has not returned. We can not connect this with New York so although the age matches this may not be our gal. There is no record of a IIIIII in Choicepoint or Accurint matching her description. We'll keep trying. We have spoken to the parents and a family attorney for but she does not want to speak with us. The Agents will keep at it this wee in hopes that they will be able to locate and interview her. I'll email you as soon as I have more to report. It appears . is residing in North Carolina now. Her house here is up for sale. We spoke with her mother and asked her to have contact us. The subpoenas u left have all been served. We had to redo Verizon's at their request but they said they could get us the info this week. Negative results at the storage unit. Unfortunately not much to report but we will stay at it. Email a time for Sunday and I let u know if we have any further developments. From: . (USAFLS) ( Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 9:37 AM loll EFTA00180290 To: Subject: Mtg Hi guys. Hope all is well. I understand that has explained the status. Can we meet on sunday june 1st to finalize everything so I can meet with ■ on monday and we can present on tuesday? And what is the status of new york? Thanks 1012 EFTA00180291