From: "G. Max" IMMIMIMI=>
To: < Ma> (WJC wjc)
Subject: Re:
Date: Sat, 01 Jan 4501 05:00:00 +0000
<html>
Ew- matchmaker definitely, social not. It implies that it is only one type of person and
simply does not acknowledge the rich and textured panacea of those whom who are beginning and
shall continue to er converse with. <br>
Last night was a classic. I told you that I was best man - well it was hysterical. I stood by
the groom went to the urinal w/him - stood and peed - told him the helicopter was waiting if
he changed his mind and gave the rings at the ceremony as I stood by his side in my pinstripe
suit. The officiating minister or whom ever it was got so confused - he kept referring to the
best man and then having to correct himself and then blushing it was a hoot<br>
<br>
Gx<br>
<br>
<br>
At 10:01 AM 4/21/2002 -0400, you wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite>By the way, the social matchmaker part is pretty right
on... I would have told them that you are my pimp but that at the same time, you are my lover
</blockquote></html>
From ???@??? Sun Apr 21 13:07:13 2002
To: < (WJC wjc)
From: "G. Max"
Subject: Re:
Cc:
Bcc:
X-Attachments:
In-Reply-To:
References: <27e>
Message-Id:
X-Eudora-Signature: <Standard>
EFTA00579691