EFTA00593185

SITRICK AND COMPANY A Unit of Sitrick Brincko Group, LLC A Subsidiary of Resources Global Professionals April 07, 2011 Invoice submitted to: Jeffrey Epstein via email: CC: Jay Le owl 1 c and & Ellis LLP 601 Lexington Ave New York, NY 1022-4611 In Reference To: Jeffrey Epstein Professional services and expenses through: 3/26/2011 Professional fees $70,255.00 Expenses * $1,064.07 Amount $71,319.07 Current professional fees and expenses Balance due $71,319.07 •Expenses may reflect charges from a prior period as well as the current period Terms: Due upon presentation Please Remit Payment Wire funds to: Send checks to: SITRICK BRINCKO GROUP, LLC SITRICK BRINCKO GROUP, LLC City National Bank File 1102 ABA# 122 016 066 1801 W. Olympic Blvd Credit A/C 023868806 Pasadena, CA Attn.: Dave Nathan 91109-1102 Federal Tax ID 27-1263368 1840 Cisigist, Suite 800, Los 90067 Tel Fax EFTA00593185 SITRICK AND COMPANY EPSTEIN, JEFFREY Page 2 Invoice through: 3/26/2011 Professional Summary Amount Hours Rate Name 55.75 895.00 $49,896.25 MICHAEL S. SITRICK 0.50 550.00 $275.00 TAMARA TAYLOR 11.50 595.00 $6,842.50 THOMAS S. MULLIGAN 20.00 595.00 $11,900.00 TONY KNIGHT 6.50 185.00 $1,202.50 JEAN S. TRINH 0.75 185.00 $138.75 LIZA C. NEDELMAN Professional Services Hours Amount various materials; discussion with 5.00 3/7/2011 MSS Discussions with Jeffrey and Martin; review ents; strategy development with Today Show producer, draft and revise statem team and T. Knight. coverage of the Prince 3.25 TK Planning and strategy with MSS; Internet research on dips, and review of on collec ting Andrew stories; directing efforts of J. Trinh MSS; review so ips; review of prior records from 2007 and report to of V. police records; confer with J. Trinh. ay morning to field calls 1.00 TSM Confer with T. Knight about starting early on Tuesd to prepare. other backg round from British media; review media and 0.25 JST Discussion with T. Knight re: dip searches. reporters, Jeffrey, Jay Lelicowitz, follow 6.25 3/8/2011 MSS Various discussions and emails with with T. Knight and T. Mulligan. up re: same; confer throughout the day ing the Prince 3.75 TK Early morning follow ups with journalists in the U.K. regardof Sitrick executive Andrew story and provide the statement direct ing efforts planning and strategy T. Mulligan in NY office re follows with UK journalists; ing news coverage regard with MSS; read and respond to emails from MSS review of second day and his comm uniica 0ons with client and attorn eys; phone logs. coverage and locating The Mail inaccurate story about Show; follow up with media, sending 4.50 TSM Review media, Ind clip from Noes Today ng from two statement and fielding interview requests throughout morni r on same raph; confe reporters at Mail on Sunday, two others at Teleg throughout day with T. Knight, MSS. w; email to T. Knight 1.50 JST Research US and UK dips on Epstein and Prince Andre hout the day, phone conferences, work on 7.00 3/9/2011 MSS Review and respond to email throug various materials; strategy, discussions with Jeffrey, lawyers; review discussion with defamation attorneys. PR affiliat e in London; follow up re: same. 1840 Csillat, Suite 800, Los S067 Tel Fax EFTA00593186 SITRICK AND COMPANY EPSTEIN, JEFFREY Page 3 Invoice through: 3/26/2011 Hours Amount planning with MSS and 2.00 3/9/2011 TK Read and respond to emails from client and attorneys; of the statem ent continued review of comments to him on various versions coverage; confer with T. Mullig an. next steps; take interview 1.50 TSM Review Mail story; confer with T. Knight, MSS re: request from J. Swaine, Telegraph, and forwar d to T. Knight and MSS. sions throughout the day and into 7.25 3/10/2011 MSS Review and respond to emails; phone discus rs in US and UK; the night from media, Jeffrey, lawyers, defamation lawye strategy development sion of The Daily 2.75 TK Review of coverage; planning with T. Mulligan and discus MSS and forwarding Mall coverage and recent reque st for answe rs; briefin g with A. Wolfe of Daily Mail message to client and attorneys; phone cal MSS and client. quest ions for Newsweek, fact checking, draft fact check Tunes repoprter K 3.50 TSM Review media; field interview request from London with S. Churcher, Mansey; take cal from and exchange follow up email supposed FBI investigative reporter for Mail on Sunday, regarding in; discuss request with investigation surrou nding promi nent friend s of J. Epste T. Knight, MSS. t. 1.00 JST Research nips on Epstein and Prince Andrew for T. Knigh video; strategy 4.75 3/11/2011 MSS Review and respond to various emails; t.draft script for discussions with T. Taylor and T. Knigh U.K media calls; review 1.75 TK Review of coverage and report to MSS; responding to strategy memos from MSS. excha nge with T. Knight. 0.50 TSM Review media; compile media contacts to date and 0.50 TT Discuss media strategy, possible video with MSS. US and UK media contacts 2.25 JST Review coverage on Epstein for bylines; research for T. Knight research News of the World story. Knigh t 0.75 LCN Assisted J. Trinh on compiling media list per T. d, Jeffrey Epstein; work on strategy; 4.75 3/12/2011 MSS Various discussions with Paul Twee review and respond to review documents and news dips; follow up re: same; email. Mail, strategy and Fergie; work on letter 4.75 3/13/2011 MSS Review and respond to email re: Daily y; follow up re: same. to Telegraph; email to Paul Twee d, Jeffre 1840 COalt, Suite 800, Los Tel Fax EFTA00593187 SITRICK AND COMPANY EPSTEIN, JEFFREY Page 4 Invoice through: 3/26/2011 Hours Amount Sunday Mail; discussion with 6.75 3/14/2011 MSS Review and respond to email re: Telegraph, various clips, Mark Bolland in UK; email to and from Paul on letter, review strate gy with T. Knigh t. email to and from Jeffrey; work on media ing media strategy 1.75 TK Review of coverage and forwarding key clips to MSS; plann with MSS. 0.50 JST Research UK and US media contacts for T. Knight. to Mail; review and 6.00 3/15/2011 MSS Discussions and email with Mark Rolland; draft letter Weinb erg and Jay respond various emails with Jeffrey; calls to Marty for Fergie ; review variou s mater ials, work on Lefkowitz; work on statement ; strate discussion T. gy ongoing strategy, review op-eds and other approaches Knight. gy meeting 2.50 TK Review of media coverage and toward key dips to MSS; strate with MSS; drafting strategy memo proposal and send to MSS. from Paul Twee d. 0.50 3/16/2011 MSS Review and respond to emails including d, revise sugge sted statement 1.50 3/17/2011 MSS Review and respond to email from Paul Twee for Fergie; review materials. ey of Sunday limes; 1.50 TK Review coverage; phone conversation with Kate Mans review of recent Mansey stories; report to MSS. t; research media 0.50 JST Research Kate Mansey dips in the Times for T. Knigh contacts for fist. S. 0.50 3/18/2011 TSM Mall from A.1Aitheridge, Mail on Sunday, re: J. Epstein colleagues S. Cowles. UK print and report 0.75 3/23/2011 TK Review on going coverage in Miami Business Review and to MSS. Epstein; email to T. Knight 0.50 JST Research most recent clips on Prince Andrew and on media strate gy, calls to Jeffrey 1.25 3/24/2011 MSS Respond to email from Jeffrey, draft note and Paul Tweed. 95.00 $70,255.00 Total time charges Suite 800, Los 067 1840 Tel Fax EFTA00593188 SITRICK AND COMPANY EPSTEIN, JEFFREY Invoice through: 3/26/2011 Page 5 Summary of out-of-pocket expenses Amount ON-LINE RESEARCH 873.00 TELEPHONE 191.07 Total out-of-pocket expenses $1,064.07 1840 Ciiiiiiiit, Suite 800, Los 067 Tel Fax EFTA00593189 SITRICK AND COMPANY A Unit of Sitrick Brincko Group, LLC A Subskary of Resotteces Global Piofesslonals May 03, 2011 Invoice submitted to: Jeffrey Epstein via email: CC: Jay Le owl 1 ca & Ellis LIP 601 Lexington Ave New York, NY 1022-4611 In Reference To: Jeffrey Epstein Professional services and expenses through: 4/23/2011 Professional fees $23,171.25 Expenses • $5,000.00 Amount 526,171.26 Current professlohal fees and expenses $71,319.07 Previous balance $99,490.32 Balance due *Expenses may reflect charges from a prior period as well as the current period Terms: Due upon presentation Please Remit Payment Wire funds to: Send checks to: SITRICK BRINCKO GROUP, LLC SITRICK BFUNCKO GROUP, LLC City National Bank File 1102 ABAN 122 016 066 1801 W. Olympic Blvd Credit A/C 023868806 Pasadena, CA Atm.: Dave Nathan 91109-1102 Federal Tax ID 27-1263368 1840 Ca l i: SS East, Suite 800. Los An eles CA 90067 Tcl Fax EFTA00593190 SITRICK AND COMPANY EPSTEIN, JEFFREY Invoice through: 4/23/2011 Page 2 Professional Summary Name Hours Rate Amount MICHAEL S. SITRICK 13.75 895.00 $12,306.25 TONY KNIGHT 8.25 595.00 $4,908.75 BRIAN D. GLICKLICH 2.00 550.00 $1,100.00 AARON CURTISS 9.25 525.00 $4,856.25 Professional Services Hours Arnourg 3/28/2011 MSS Review, respond and send various emails. 0.75 TK Email to attorneys requesting information, read and respond to emails from 0.50 MSS; respond to client emails. 3/31/2011 MSS Review and respond to emails re: op-eds; review materials/back up 0.75 documents for op-ed. TK Briefing A. Curtiss on op-ed project, marshaling backup documents for 1.00 A.Curtiss; emails with MSS. 4/1/2011 TK Further discussion of strategic approach to op-ed with A Curtiss; review first 0.50 draft of op-ed. AC Research media coverage and court history of case; draft and edit op-ed 7.00 response; confer with T. Knight r.e same. 4/3/2011 MSS Discussion with Roy Black 0.50 3.75 4/4/2011 MSS Review Newsweek/Daily Beast article, discussions with reporter, call to editor, draft note for Roy Black to review, discussion with T. Knight. TK Multiple phone calls and emails with MSS regarding correction of story posted 2.25 to The Daily Beast review of story, draft correction request; phone calls to reporter A. Wolfe, emails with R. Black and J. Perzcek at Black's office. AC Review and assess DailyBeast article; confer with T. Knight re: changes to 1.00 op-ed. 4/5/2011 MSS Review materials; review and comment on op-ed; email to Paul Tweed. 2.00 TK Op-ed strategy with A. Curtiss. 0.25 AC Confer with T. Knight re: facts of case and status of op-ed. 0.25 1840 Century Park East, Suite 800, Los An eles CA 90067 Tel Fax EFTA00593191 SITRICK AND COMPANY EPSTEIN, JEFFREY Invoice through: 4/23/2011 Page 3 Hours Amount 4/6/2011 MSS Review various materials; review and edit op-ed; work on digital strategy; 4.75 review and edit memo on same; discussion with Roy Black TK Planning and strategy with MSS; conference call with MSS and R. Black; 2.50 review of older Epstein case news clips and revisions to op-ed and further edits to it after MSS edits; review of strategic digital media proposal. BDG Call and email with MSS, draft best practices memo. 2.00 AC Confer with T. Knight re: op-ed; review edits and changes to same. 0.75 4/7/2011 MSS Strategy discussions with T. Knight re: op-ed placement. 0.25 TK Planning and strategy with MSS; discussion of op-ed placement; further review 1.25 of old files for more on Ashley D.; review email from R. Black. AC Confer with T. Knight re: op-ed and plea documents. 0.25 4/19/2011 MSS Email from Roy Black and his partners re: media inquiry; call reporter at Roy's 1.00 request (DOR), participate in interview with reporter and Roy, review and respond to email re: same. 33.25 $23,171.25 Total time charges Summary of out-of-pocket expenses OTHER 5,000.00 Total out-of-pocket expenses $5,000.00 1840 Centu Park East, Suite 800, Los An eles, CA 90067 Tel Fax EFTA00593192 SITRICK AND CO MPANY Group, LLC A Unit of Sitrick Brincko A Subsidly), ol Flacon:es Global Professionals June 08, 2011 Invoice submitted to: Jeffrey Epstein via email: CC: Jay Lia lirged & Ellis LLP 601 Lexington Ave New York, NY 1022.4611 In Reference To: Jeffrey Epstein 5/28/2011 Professional services and expenses through: $4,027.50 Professional fees 50.00 Expenses * Amount $99,490.32 Previous balance $103,517.82 Balance due as well as the current period °Expenses may reflect charges from a prior period Terms: Due upon presentation Please Remit Payment Send checks to: Wire funds to: SITRICK BRINCKO GROUP, LLC SITRICK BRINCKO GROUP, LLC File 1102 City National Bank Olympic Blvd ABA" 122 016 066 1801 W. Pasade na, CA Credit A/C 023868806 91109 -1102 Attn.: Dave Nathan Federal Tax ID 27-1263368 1840 Coal, Suite 800, IF: 1161 Tel EFTA00593193 SITRICK AND COMPANY EPSTEIN, JEFFREY Page 2 Invoice through: 5/28/2011 Professional Summary Amount Hours Rate Name 4.50 895.00 54,027.50 MICHAEL S. SITRICK Professional Services Hours Amount Paul Tweed, work on letter from D 2.50 4/29/2011 MSS Review and respond to email, meeting with of Y. y, Paul; work on letter from D-O-Y; 2.00 4/30/2011 MSS Review and respond to email from Jeffre follow up re: same . 4.50 $4.027.50 Total time charges t, Suite 800, Los 67 1840 C Tel Fax EFTA00593194 HENNIGAN DORMAN LLP LAWYERS 865 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET SLTTE 2900 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017 TELEPHON Diner PIKS HENNIGANOHDLITIGATION.00111 July 12, 2011 VIA EMAIL Mr. Roy Black Mr. Jay Lcfkowitz Black, Srebnick, Komspan & Stumpf Kirkland & Ellis LLP 201 S. Biscayne Blvd. 601 Lexington Avenue Suite 1300 New York, NY 10022-4611 Miami, FL 33131 Pelicowitz@kirldand.comj [royb@royblack.com) Dear Roy and Jay: Our firm represents Sitrick And Company. In early March of this year, your client Jeffrey Epstein called Michael Sitrick to ask for his and his firm's help in stemming a tsunami of negative publicity resulting from a photograph of Prince Andrew and Mr. Epstein walking in Central Park. The focus of the publicity, as you are aware, was that Prince Andrew was friends with Mr. Epstein who the British press called a pedophile. Mr. Epstein said this was not only disturbing, but threatening the viability of his business. At the onset of this engagement, Mr. Sitrick asked if he should have Black Srebnick sign a new engagement letter. As you know, the Black Srebnick firm signed the 2005 letter (which by the way was never terminated and therefore is still in effect). Mr. Epstein responded that the letter should be sent to Jay Lcfkowitz of Kirkland & Ellis. On March 11, Mr. Sitrick sent Mr. Lefkowitz a copy of Sitrick And Company's standard engagement letter. Given the urgency of the situation and his prior relationship with Mr. Epstein, Mr. Sitrick and one of the firm's senior partners Tony Knight dropped everything, got up to speed and immediately began to work with Mr. Epstein and his attorneys. This was despite the fact that they had not received either a retainer or a newly executed engagement letter. (You both were involved in the work that Sitrick did and were part of many, many email chains reflecting same.) iMaziaget1756557.1 EFTA00593195 HENNIGAN DORM.A_N LLP July 12, 2011 Page 2 The media frenzy, again as you both are aware, required Messrs. Sitrick and Knight to work days, nights and weekends. When the Duchess of York, who said she had considered Mr. Epstein a friend, chimed in and also called Mr. Epstein a pedophile, the already frenetic pace of media hysteria accelerated. News publications from The Daily Telegraph to Newsweek jumped on the story. Despite the salaciousness of the coverage in both the U.K. and the U.S., Mr. Sitrick and his team were able to stop stories that would have aired on TV and in the mainstream media in the U.S. Among the media outlets that discussed the "story" with Mr. Sitrick were "60 Minutes" and "Piers Morgan." While they mitigated the damage as much as could be done, Mr. Sitrick and his team believe they would have been able to do a great deal more -- particularly with respect to the pedophilia allegations -- if what they had been told by Mr. Epstein agreed with what they were told by the attorneys representing him with respect to the ages of the girls who provided the massages and other facts of the case. Because the lawyers involved disputed Mr. Epstein's version of the facts, the lawyers intervened and told Sitrick not to move forward on their plan. Sitrick also believes the media allegations about Mr. Epstein being a pedophile could have been put to a stop earlier if their advice had been heeded earlier with respect to forcing the Duchess of York to retract her statement calling Mr. Epstein a pedophile. (Getting this term out of the headlines and the stories was, as you are aware, Mr. Epstein's top priority.) Mr. Sitrick has repeatedly tried to get a signed copy of his new engagement letter returned and his invoices paid, but to no avail. On March 31, Mr. Sitrick wrote Darren Indyke ofMr. Epstein's office stating that he understood that Mr. Leficowitz bad forwarded him a copy of the Sitrick engagement letter and that he would appreciate getting it executed and returned. On Saturday April 30 (while Mr. Sitrick was working on a project for Mr. Epstein and in the midst of several email exchanges, he wrote Mr. Epstein that he had not received a response back from Mr. Indyke on his letter. Mr. Epstein apologized and said he would check on Monday. On May 6, Mr. Indyke finally responded with one sentence: "I have reviewed your engagement letter and it is unacceptable." When Mr. Sitrick responded that this was exactly the same letter which was executed in 2005, except for an adjustment in billing rates (a letter which he pointed out was still in effect, since it had not been cancelled) and asked what was unacceptable about it, Mr. Indyke responded that Mr. Epstein was traveling and he would have to wait until Mr. Epstein returned. Once again several weeks passed. On Tuesday, May 31, Mr. Indyke wrote, "1just returned from vacation and will get back to you with comments at the end of the week. In general, however, there is no detail whatsoever in the engagement letter, including but not limited to detail re fees, approvals, or obligations, and that is just for starters." Mr. Sitrick responded that in fact the engagement letter does include detail about the fees and obligations, but if they wanted more he would be happy to provide it. Mr. Indyke never did get back to Mr. Sitrick. INhAls617565571 EFTA00593196 HENNIGAN DORMAN LLP July 12, 2011 Page 3 Given Mr. Sitrick's long relationship with Mr. Epstein, he is hopeful that Mr. Epstein will sign the letter and, that if he does not want to sign it, that he will just pay Sitrick's invoices and Messrs. Sitrick and Epstein can just part friends. The amount due is $103,518. As stated, Mr. Epstein is obligated to pay both on the basis of the earlier letter, an implied contract and quantum meruit. Mr. Sitrick does not want to have to pursue legal remedies and turn what has been a good relationship into an adversarial one. Thank you for your attention to this matter. JMH/ebm cc (via email]: Michael Sitrick iManagA1756557A EFTA00593197