EFTA00944346

From: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacationggmail.corn> To: Eileen Alexanderson < Subject: Re: FW: Tax considerations Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 03:38:51 +0000 structured by UK not US experts. On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Eileen Alexanderson < > wrote: From: jrnailto: Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 7:51 AM To: Eileen Alexanderson Cc: 'Brad R Okun'; David Lakhdhir; 'Thomas Turrin'; Subject: Tax considerations - follow up from last nights call Eileen As promised, please find below our thoughts on the questions raised last night on which I agreed to reply to. Nature of Partnership As we discussed on the call last night, the choice of a Scottish LP is due to the fact that the Scottish LP is a well recognised and established vehicle used for tax planning, particularly with the US, where as a result of its separate legal personality it entity classification as a partnership is clear in overseas jurisdictions. This compares to the English LP's where due to the fact that these do not have separate legal personality this can lead to complications regarding the entity classification and can lead to problems in how they are recognised in tax planning arrangements with foreign partners. As such the SLP is the preferred choice in tax planning arrangements. In terms of the formation of an SLP, Macfarlanes are correct in that Scottish counsel would be needed to form the SLP and that the General Partner would need to have a Scottish registered address, however, this is often solved in practice by the General Partner having its registered address at the offices of the Scottish Counsel. The alternative is the limited liability partnership which Macfarlanes have also mentioned which is a partnership in the UK which like the SLP also has separate legal personality and therefore would be an alternative to use. The one point to note with using an LLP, however, is that the financial statements of the LLP would require to be prepared and audited here in the UK so there would be a cost associated with that. From a tax perspective, however, the LLP is like the SLP in that it is transparent and would not be subject to UK taxation since the partnership is only holding investments in the UK. Economic interest of the General partner In terms of whether the General partner is required to have an economic interest in the partnership, the General partner would be expected to have an interest however this interest would be nominal i.e. something like 0.001%. The majority of the income profits and any capital profits would then be allocated to the limited partners (see below for comments on limited partners). Debt Due to the timing for completion and the importance of getting the documentation correct and everyone comfortable on EFTA00944346 the tax position for the debt what we would suggest is undertaken at this time is that a short term loan is put in place between the Partnership and Midco. This loan should be for a maximum period of 360 days and the intention will be to replace this within this time frame. What this will provide is as follows: • Interest charged on the short term loan will be deductible (provided amount of debt and the interest rate charged is arms length as we have discussed previously) in the period in which the interest is charged. • Asa short term loan, the settlement of the interest when the loan is replaced (which can be achieved on cash free basis) will not be subject to any UK withholding tax. • We will have 360 days in which to come up with a form of debt which everyone is comfortable with and which manages both the timing of future deductions and the withholding tax position on the debt. It also allows us the time to make sure that the documentation for such debt is acceptable from UK tax perspective and avoids any risk of things being missed pre-completion. As a short term loan agreement this should be something which is relatively straight forward to draft and then as noted above post completion we can consider the best method to get the long term debt planning drafted. In terms of the partners in the partnership and whether we should have the trusts come through an LLC rather than as being partners themselves, we believe that having the trusts invest in to the partnership through an LLC would be the most appropriate method. We would suggest that the 3 trusts which are not currently members of an LLC become members in the new LLC and that LLC becomes the first of the limited partners in the partnership whilst the 2nd LLC (being the one that currently exists and in which the 4 Delaware trusts are members) becomes the 2nd limited partner in the partnership. I think that covers the open questions that we had. Let me know if there is anything I have missed or if you wish to discuss further. Best regards Gregor Gregor Lindsay PwC Senior Man:nr Tax ------------------ End of message text We're proud to sponsor the PwC Under 25s Club at the Old Vic: Opening up the arts to the under 25s, because support for the arts benefits business and society as a whole. Find out more about the PwC Under 25s Club at http://www.pwc.co.uk/who-we-arelthe-old-vic-helping-to-start-something.jhtml -------------------------------------------------- This email is confidential and is intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, please delete the email and do not use it in any way. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP does not accept or assume responsibility for any use of or reliance on this email by anyone, other than the intended addressee to the extent agreed in the relevant contract for the matter to which this email relates (if any). PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England under registered number OC303525, with its registered address at 1 Embankment Place, London WC2N 6RH. It is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority for designated investment business. PwC may monitor outgoing and incoming emails and other telecommunications on its email and telecommunications systems; by replying to this email you give your consent to such monitoring. ------------------ ---------- ------------------- Visit our website This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the person or entity to whom they are addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this EFTA00944347 information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email in error please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Apollo Global Management, LLC The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA00944348