EFTA01024235

From: Lawrence Krauss To: "Jeffrey E." <jeevacation®gmail.com> Cc: Lawrence Krauss Subject: Re: Proposed revised email to Kevin.--VP and Chief Human Resources Officer- Erin and Carla's boss Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2018 20:13:58 +0000 Thanks. good news btw is that woman on conciliation committee seems like a sweetie.. she is old.. not some young metoo bitch. Investigating them more now. Lawrence M. Krauss Professor School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department Arizona State University, P.O. Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 85287.1404 Research Office: I twitter.com/Ikraussl I www.lawrencemkrauss.com On Sep 5, 2018, at 1:05 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation®gmail.com> wrote: Agreed On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 3:55 PM Lawrence Krauss < > wrote: these are two separate things.. the Dean doesn't talk to OEI and vice-versa... two separate parts of the university. I will push forward with conciliation process strongly and with focus.. that is big step.. But giving up on the separate OEI process makes me more vulnerable down the line.. I learned this by not demanding a formal process at Case, when I went to their office and they said, oh, this is just informal.. just don't talk to the woman and everything will be ok.. and down the road, I got that letter. I need to ensure that I follow up every avenue available to me, and/or show that those avenues were not made available to me, for the big lawsuit down the road. after I send these letters today, assuming I do, I agree that all effort should be focused on conciliation process.. Lawrence M. Krauss Professor School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department Arizona State University, P.O. Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404 Research Office: I twitter.com/Ikraus— I www.lawrencemkrauss.com On Sep 5, 2018, at 12:38 PM, jeffrey E. leevacation®gmail.com> wrote: not smart , the dean has made his decision dismissal. thought shoud be given to what you propsoe to concilaiton . the next step is the big one On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 1:50 PM, Lawrence Krauss < > wrote: EFTA01024235 Proposed revised memo to Kevin: Kevin: On Aug 29th and 30th I sent two memos to Carla Mahnke providing new evidence related to the matter associated with the allegation of harassment in Australia. The first memo provides new evidence that casts additional doubt on the claims of the chief witness in that event and suggests that the second witness was not a witness at all. The second explicitly shows that ASU did not support any of my travel to the Skeptics event, and invalidates the claim that it was an ASU sponsored and supported event. As I indicated to Carla, I believe this new information justifies re-opening the matter to determine whether a different conclusion is warranted, according to the information provided in your email to me of March 20th, from which I have excerpted the relevant parts below. I alerted the Provost and President about my memos to Carla, and the Provost got back to me yesterday with a statement that OEI does not re-open investigations that have been concluded. This confuses me, given both the history of your investigations in this matter, and your March email to me. I would thus like clarification from you whether OEI will revisit their conclusion about this matter on the basis of the new information provided, and if not, why. Thanks very much. Lawrence Krauss Begin forwarded message: From: "Kevin Salcido (HR)" Subject: RE: clarification - my commitment to the investigation Date: March 20, 2018 at 4:50:06 PM PDT To: Lawrence Krauss <I Carla Mahnke < Professor Krauss, The Office of Equity and Inclusion reports up to me in my role as Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer for the University. I have received and ready your emails from March 9, 19 and 20th noting your question on the basis for OEI to re-open its review of the complaint that was received last fall over alleged conduct at the 2016 Skeptics Conference in Australia. When new information is received on a matter that was not previously available, OEI will re-open the matter so that a determination can be made on whether the original conclusion stands or if a different conclusion is warranted. (ACD 401 does not impose any time limitation on when complaints may be brought forward to that office.) Lawrence M. Krauss Professor School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department Arizona State University, P.O. Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 852874404 Research Office: I twitter.com/ikrauss1 I www.lawrencemkrauss.com please note EFTA01024236 The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA01024237