EFTA01078617

Filing # 25919763 E-Filed 04/09/2015 05:30:47 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, and CASE NO. CACE 15-000072 PAUL G. CASSELL, Plaintiffs, v. ALAN DERSHOWITZ, Defendant. MOTION TO QUASH OR FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING SUBPOENA SERVED ON NON-PARTY LAW FIRM BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP Non-party law firm Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP ("BSF"), by and through undersigned counsel and pursuant to Florida Rules of Civil Procedure I.410(c)(1), hereby moves for an order quashing the subpoena duces tecum served on BSF by Defendant; or alternatively, pursuant to Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.280(c) for issuance of a protective order sharply limiting the scope of the subpoena. INTRODUCTION This Court should quash the subpoena issued to non-party law firm BSF as it is unreasonable and oppressive for the following reasons: (1) Defendant seeks entirely privileged documents from a non-party law firm of communications with a non-party client that are not subject to production; (2) Defendant's subpoena is duplicative of the subpoena Defendant served on this non-party law firm's client, Jane Doe No. 3, and is meant only to cause undue burden to this law firm in forcing a response; and (3) Defendant is abusing the subpoena power by serving EFTA01078617 subpoenas in this action that are irrelevant and, instead, intended as backdoor discovery for other actions. Defendant has publicly attacked BSF's client, Jane Doe No. 3, who was a victim of sexual trafficking, for attempting to join in a Crime Victim's Rights Act ("CVRA") case pending in federal court in the Southern District of Florida. Defendant has made very clear that he will attack anyone who dares to defend Jane Doe No. 3. Defendant has gone so far as to pledge he will find a way to send this victim of sexual trafficking to "jail" for attempting to assert her rights. Defendant stated, "The end result of this case should be she (Jane Doe No. 3J should go to jail, the lawyers should be disbarred ...". (emphasis added). See Exhibit 1, CNN International, New Day, January 6, 2015. "My goal is to bring charges against the client and require her to speak in court." (emphasis added). See Exhibit 2, Australian Broadcasting System (ABC), January 6, 2015. Defendant also stated: "[Jane Doe No. 3] was hiding in Colorado...but we found her and she will have to be deposed...The end result is that she'll go to jail because she will repeat her lies and we'll be able to prove it and she will end up in prison for perjury." See Exhibit 3, New York Daily News, April 7, 2015. Defendant also admits publicly that he is seeking the deposition of non-party Jane Doe No. 3 in this case because he hopes to bring a new lawsuit against her: "And we're considering suing herfor defamation...wefound her, we served her and now she'll be subjected to a deposition." (emphasis added). See Exhibit 4, NewsMax, April 8, 2015. These public statements make it clear that Defendant is abusing the subpoena power of this Court to try to get discovery that is irrelevant to this case in the hopes of generating a claim against Jane Doe No. 3. To that end, Defendant has wrongfully served a subpoena on a law firm. 2 EFTA01078618 ARGUMENT 1. This Court Should Quash Defendant's Abusive Subpoena In Its Entirety. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.410(c)(1) provides that the Court may "quash or modify the subpoena if it is unreasonable and oppressive." Id. The Court has discretion to evaluate the circumstances in determining whether the subpoena is "unreasonable and oppressive." Matthews v. Kant, 427 So. 2d 369, 370 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). "The sufficiency thereof is a factual determination for the trial judge who is vested with broad judicial discretion in the matter, and whose order will not be overturned absent a clear showing of abuse of discretion." Id.; see also Sunrise Shopping Center, Inc. v. Allied Stores Corp., 270 So. 2d 32 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972) (Fourth DCA quashing lengthy subpoena served on non-party who was not in control of documents as being "oppressive and unreasonable."). The documents requested in Defendant's subpoena demonstrate the oppressive and unreasonable nature of the requests. See Exhibit 5, Affidavit of Attorney Sigrid McCawley. a. A Non-Party Law Firm's Communications And Exchanges With Its Non-Party Client Are Not Subject To Production. The communications between BSF and its client were in the course of rendering legal advice and are privileged. Florida courts are unequivocal in stating that an opposing party can never obtain attorney-client privileged materials. See Quarles & Brady LLP v. Birdsall, 802 So. 2d 1205, 1206 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (quashing discovery order and noting "undue hardship is not In addition to its power to quash the subpoena, Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(c) also allows the Court to protect a non-party from discovery that would result in "annoyance, embarrassment, oppression or undue burden or expense..." Allstate Ins. Co. v. Langston, 655 So. 2d 91, 94 (Fla. 2003) (Florida Supreme Court overturning denial of protective order and holding that "[d]iscovery of certain kinds of information `may reasonably cause material injury of an irreparable nature."') (internal quotations omitted). The Court may determine that "the discovery not be had" or that "the discovery may be had only on specified terms and conditions..." Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.280(c). 3 EFTA01078619 an exception (to disclosure of privileged material), nor is disclosure permitted because the opposing party claims that the privileged information is necessary to prove their case" (internal citations omitted). Not surprisingly, Florida law does not allow a party to take a foray into the playbook of its opponent, let alone a non-party, during an ongoing litigation, and courts routinely quash subpoenas seeking the categories of documents at issue here. See Federal Exp. Corp. v. Cantway, 778 So. 2d 1052 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (quashing trial court order compelling discovery of documents subject to work product protection.). There is a reason why Florida courts do not condone this type of discovery tactic, as it would eviscerate the ability of a party and her attorneys to prepare their case. See, e.g., Publix Super Markets, Inc. v. Anderson, 92 So. 3d 922 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (quashing order compelling discovery of document and materials prepared in anticipation of litigation). In addition to the privilege protection, the law also clearly protects non-parties from having to disclose confidential information. See Westco, Inc. v. Scott Lewis' Gardening & Trimming, Inc., 26 So. 3d 620, 622 (Ha. 4th DCA 2010) (court explaining that "[w]hen confidential information is sought from a non-party, the trial court must determine whether the requesting party establishes a need for the information that outweighs the privacy rights of the non-party."). The communications and exchanges that BSF has with its client, non-party Jane Doe No. 3, are confidential in nature. Defendant's requests attempt to invade the privilege and confidential nature of these communications. For example, Request no. 23 seeks "All documents which are related to when Jane Doe No. 3 allegedly told her attorneys that Alan Dershowitz was among the men she had sexual relations with." Defendant has not established any basis to justify disclosure of privileged and confidential information from this non-party. Moreover, even if BSF had documents which were not privileged, it is not at liberty to 4 EFTA01078620 produce those documents because they are the property of its client, Jane Doe No. 3. See Sunrise Shopping Center, Inc. v. Allied Stores Corp., 270 So. 2d 32 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972) (quashing subpoena served on non-party who was not custodian of the documents sought). For example, Request no. 16 directs BSF to produce non-party Jane Doe No. 3's personal diary. In Davidson v. GEICO, Case No. 8:09-CV-727-T-33MAP, 2010 WL 4342084, at *5 (M.D. Fla. Oct. 26, 2010), GEICO served a subpoena on two non-party law firms, rather than the client/party, in an effort to obtain documents. The District Court quashed the subpoenas for the law firm's records finding among other things that the requests were overly broad and included requests for documents irrelevant to the claims at issue in the underlying action. Id. at *5. The Court held it would not require the law firms to "sift through" their client files especially considering that the party had not established it was unable to obtain similar discovery through other means. Id. Similarly here, this non-party law firm should not be placed under undue burden by having to respond to discovery relating to a non-party client. b. Defendant's Subpoena On BSF Is Duplicative Of Its Subpoena On Non-Party Jane Doe No. 3 And Is Meant Only To Cause Undue Burden. Defendant's subpoena is unreasonable and oppressive in that it contains twenty three (23) separate requests which include sub-parts served on this non-party. Not only is the subpoena lengthy, but it is duplicative of the subpoena this Defendant served on BSF's client, non-party Jane Doe No. 32 See Exhibits 6 and 7, Defendant's Subpoena to BSF and Jane Doe No. 3; and 2 BSF Request no. 1 is duplicative of Jane Doe Request no. 17; BSF Request no. 2 is duplicative of Jane Doe Request no. 18; BSF Request no. 3 is duplicative of Jane Doe Request no. 1; BSF Request no. 4 is duplicative of Jane Doe Request no. 2; BSF Request no. 5 is duplicative of Jane Doe Request no. 3; BSF Request no. 6 is duplicative of Jane Doe Request no. 5; BSF Request no. 7 is duplicative of Jane Doe Request no. 6; BSF Request no. 8 is duplicative of Jane Doe Request no. 7; BSF Request no. 9 is duplicative of Jane Doe Request no. 8; BSF Request no. 10 is duplicative of Jane Doe Request no. 9; BSF Request no. 11 is duplicative of Jane Doe Request no. II; BSF Request no. 12 is duplicative of Jane Doe Request no. 12; BSF Request no. 13 is 5 EFTA01078621 Exhibit 8, Non-Party BSF's Objections to Defendant's Subpoena Duces Tecum respectfully. Moreover, the duplicative subpoena is clearly a fishing expedition into a law firm's files in the hopes of generating a claim against a law firm's non-party client. In Sugarmill Woods Civic Assoc., Inc. v. Southern States Utilities, 687 So. 2d 1346, 1350-51 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997) the First District affirmed the trial court's order quashing a subpoena served on a lawyer and staff, under its discretionary authority, noting the subpoena to counsel was intended as a harassing fishing expedition which should not be condoned by the Court. Like the Susanna! case, Defendant's subpoena on this non-party law firm should be quashed in its entirety as a harassing fishing expedition. c. Defendant Is Abusing The Subpoena's Power By Seeking Information Irrelevant To This Case For Personal Gain. Defendant's subpoena should be quashed because it seeks information that is irrelevant to the underlying action. See Calvo v. Calvo, 489 So. 2d 833, 834 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (court quashing subpoena served on wife's bank for financial records finding them irrelevant: "indeed, the husband has failed to demonstrate what possible relevance the records might have in the proceeding below other than to harass the wife."). The face of the requests themselves demonstrate that Defendant is abusing the subpoena power of this Court to seek documents that are not relevant to the Florida Defamation Action, which deals with the discrete issue of whether Defendant made publicly defaming statements about the character of lawyers Paul Cassell, a duplicative of Jane Doe Request no. 13; BSF Request no. 14 is duplicative of Jane Doe Request no. 14; BSF Request No. 15 is duplicative of Jane Doe Request No. 15; BSF Request no. 16 is duplicative of Jane Doe Request no. 16; BSF Request no. 17 is duplicative of Jane Doe Request no. 19; BSF Request no. 18 is duplicative of Jane Doe Request no. 21; BSF Request no. 19 is duplicative of Jane Doe Request no. 22; BSF Request no. 20 is duplicative of Jane Doe Request no. 23; BSF Request no. 21 is duplicative of Jane Doe Request no. 24; and BSF Request no. 22 is duplicative of Jane Doe Request no. 25. The only Request that is not duplicative is Request no. 23. 6 EFTA01078622 retired federal judge and his colleague, Brad Edwards. Instead, Defendant's subpoena cites repeatedly to allegations in the CVRA case pending in the Southern District of Florida. In Toledo v. Publix Super Markets, Inc., 30 So. 3d 712 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010), the Fourth District Court of Appeal quashed the trial court's discovery order where party sought a law firm client file relating to a different matter. The court explained the discovery related to a different case and that a party's "curiosity" about a law firm's records does not satisfy the relevance requirement. Id. at 714. In quashing the order, the Fourth District Court of Appeal found that the content of the "subpoena is a classic 'fishing expedition' and the trial court's order departs from the essential requirements of the law." Id. Like the Toledo case, here, Defendant has wrongfully served a subpoena on a law firm seeking information that is not relevant to the underlying action. For example, Request nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 10, 14, 17, 19, and 20 specifically reference either the federal action by name, or Jeffrey Epstein, the subject of the federal action. Defendant also abuses the Court's subpoena power by seeking documents wholly unrelated to the Florida Defamation Action in an effort to drum up a claim against non-party Jane Doe No. 3 for Defendant's publicly-stated purpose of finding a way to send her to "jail." See Allstate Ins. Co. v. Langston, 655 So. 2d 91, 94 (Fla. 2003) (Florida Supreme Court holding that "we do not believe a litigant is entitled carte blanch to irrelevant discovery" and "lilt is axiomatic that information sought in discovery must relate to the issues involved in the litigation, as framed in the pleadings.") (internal citations omitted). Defendant's wrongful motive of developing claims against Jane Doe No. 3 is clear from the face of the Requests. In addition, the Requests are objectionable because they seek highly personal and confidential information. See Westco, Inc. v. Scott Lewis' Gardening & Trimming, Inc., 26 So. 3d 620, 622 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (court explaining that "[w]hen confidential information is sought from a non-party, the 7 EFTA01078623 trial court must determine whether the requesting party establishes a need for the information that outweighs the privacy rights of the non-party.") . Defendant's subpoena requests include, for example, asking this non-party law firm to produce highly personal and sensitive information from a victim of sexual trafficking, including requesting her personal diary during the time when she was being sexually abused as a minor child and writings related to her experience. See Exhibit 6, Request nos. 1, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 16, 19 and 20. Defendant also demands that this law firm produce photographs and videos of Jane Doe No. 3, as a minor child, while she was being sexually trafficked by convicted sex offender, Jeffrey Epstein. See Exhibit 6, Request nos. 4, 5, 11 and 13. Defendant also demands that the law firm produce information relating to its client's personal financial information. See Exhibit 6, Request nos. 2 and 18; see also Woodward v. Berkery, 714 So. 2d 1027, 1035-38 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (quashing lower court's discovery order and finding irreparable harm to husband in disclosure of private financial information when wife's clear purpose was to wrongfully disclose the financial information to the press). It is without question that Defendant is abusing the subpoena power in this case to conduct a fishing expedition in an effort to intimidate and harass this victim. Defendant has established no need for these highly irrelevant and confidential personal documents and any alleged need would be outweighed by the non-party's privacy rights in this instance. Accordingly, Defendant's subpoena to BSF should be quashed. CONCLUSION WHEREFORE, non-party law firm, Boies, Schiller and Flexner LLP, respectfully requests that this Court grant its Motion to Quash the subpoena served on the law firm which is duplicative of the subpoena served on its client, Jane Doe No. 3; or alternatively, that the Court 8 EFTA01078624 enter an order limiting the scope of BSF's document production. BSF also respectfully requests an award of fees and costs relating to the subpoena. Dated: April 9, 2015 Respectfully submitted, BOLES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP Sigrid S. McCawley, Esq. Florida Bar No. 129305 Attorney's for Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1200 Fort Lauderdale. Florida 33301 Telephone; Facsimile: By:/s/Sigrid S. McCawley Sigrid S. McCawley, Esq. 9 EFTA01078625 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served by Electronic Mail on April 9, 2015 to the individuals identified on the attached Service List. By: /s/Sigrid S. McCawley Sigrid S. McCawley I0 EFTA01078626 SERVICE LIST Thomas E. Scott Jack Scarola SEARCY DENNEY SCAROLA BARNHART Steven R. Safra & SHIPLEY, P.A. COLE, SCOTT & KISSANE, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. 9150 S. Dadeland Blvd., Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33409-6601 Miami. Florida 33156 Attorney for Plaintiffs char son i Mary E. Boria Ashley E. Eiler WILEY REIN, LLP 1776 K Street NW Washington, D.C. 20006 Counselfor Defendant Alan. Dershowitz 11 EFTA01078627 EXHIBIT 1 EFTA01078628 CNN SHOW: New Day 8:30 AM EST January 6, 2015 Tuesday TRANSCRIPT: 010606CN.V42 SECTION: NEWS; International LENGTH: 3114 words HEADLINE: Plan Crash Survivor's Steps; Celebrities Fight Sex Scandals; Remembering Mario Cuomo BYLINE: Alisyn Camerota, Martin Sav dge, John Berman, Michaela Pereira, Paul Callan, Chris Cuomo, Ana Cabrera GUESTS: Wendy Murphy HIGHLIGHT: Friday night, seven-year-old Sailor Gutzler freed herself from the upside down wreckage of her family's plane, moving past the bodies of her mother, father, sister and cousin, and walked nearly a mile to Larry Wilkins' home in remote western Kentucky to get help. There are new developments in the sex scandal involving Prince Andrew and famed attorne Alan Dershowitz, including the fact that Dershowitz has counter sued . Chris Cuomo, the son of the former governor of New York Mario Cuomo, reflects on his father's legacy as a politician and family man. BODY: JOHN BERMAN: All right, 32 minutes after the hour. Buckingham Palace took the rare step to speak out about the sex abuse accusations against Prince Andrew, but is talking about it really the best strategy? How to handle ugly accusations, next. CAMEROTA: New developments in the sex scandal involving Prince Andrew and famed attorney Alan Dershowitz. Moments ago we learned that Alan Dershowitz has counter sued , that's the woman who says that the lawyer sexually abused her when she was a teenager. Dershowitz is demanding his name be removed from her lawsuit and is asking for damages. Roberts says that a wealthy investor forced her into sex slavery when she was a teenager to please his powerful friends, including Dershowitz and Prince Andrew. The accuser now says she is being re-victimized. All of this raising big questions of how public figures should fight back against ugly accusations. Let's bring in Paul Callan. He's a CNN legal analyst, criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor to talk about all this, also former prosecutor Wendy Murphy will join. She's an adjunct professor of sexual violence at New England Law in Boston. EFTA01078629 Great to see both of you. OK, let's start with the news this morning. Paul, Alan Dershowitz, hours ago, has filed this countersuit in Florida because he feels he's being defamed by this lawsuit by this woman, . CNN is naming her because she has gone public with her name. So is that the best way for celebrities and high-profile people to handle allegations like this? PAUL CALLAN, CNN LEGAL ANALYST: Well, Alan Dershowitz has done something you never see done in these cases. He's gone nuclear. I mean, he's going apoplectic. He's threatening to sue Roberts and he's starting his own lawsuit. Usually you try to make the whole thing go away so it's forgotten. There's a complexity to this lawsuit because the allegations against Dershowitz, that he slept with this 15-year-old, and, incidentally, Prince Andrew as well, were included in court documents related to another lawsuit. And normally, anything you say in a court document relating to a pending lawsuit is, there's immunity. You can't sue somebody for saying that. So Dershowitz was baiting Roberts saying, why don't you say it publicly and I'm going to sue you because it's a lie. But apparently he must have stumbled on some theory that would give him grounds to sue around this court immunity doctrine. So it will be interesting to see it today. CAMEROTA: Yes. Wendy, we have an example of Alan Dershowitz being so angry and so vociferous in denying these charges yesterday on NEW DAY. Watch this. (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) ALAN DERSHOWITZ, ATTORNEY: I will take action. I am filing today a sworn affidavit denying categorically the truth. I'm seeking to intervene in the case. I am challenging her to file rape charges against me. I waive any statute of limitations, any immunity, because if she files a false rape charge against me, she goes to jail. The end result of this case should be she should go to jail, the lawyers should be disbarred and everybody should understand that I am completely and totally innocent. (END VIDEO CLIP) CAMEROTA: Wendy, what do you think about his strategy? Because there's one school of thought that says you never even dignify the allegations with a response. WENDY MURPHY, FORMER PROSECUTOR: Yes, I mean the problem is he is almost in a protest too much state of mind for me. You know, I think the way the prince is handling it is, in a sense, more credible because it's more restrained in that exact way, Alisyn, we don't dignify these kinds of things. Of course it's silly. Of course it's not true. You know, the problem with Alan Dershowitz's position is, he doesn't really know all of the evidence that they have. I mean what if this woman has, you know, intimate knowledge of things about his body parts, for example, that will be unassailable proof that, in fact, she did have access to his body. The kind of thing that no matter how much he yells and screams, he won't be able to rebut. That could be some pretty explosive proof against him. EFTA01078630 CAMEROTA: It could be but -- MURPHY: I'm glad he did it. CAMEROTA: Yes, I mean, you have to - MURPHY: Go ahead. CAMEROTA: You have to assume that because he's make so vocal and so public a response that he believes that there's nothing like that out there. Wendy, let me just stop you for a second - MURPHY: Yes. CAMEROTA: Because I want to tell you the victim in - the alleged victim in this case, , has now responded to CNN and Alan Dershowitz for calling her a liar. Let me tell you what she says. "It appears I am now being unjustly victimized again. These types of aggressive attacks on me are exactly the reason why sexual abuse victims typically remain silent and the reason why I did for a long time. That trend should change. I'm not going to be bullied into silence." Wendy, your thoughts on her response? MURPHY: Yes, I -- you know, it is a reason, in my work, you know, in decades of this work, it is something victims talk about a lot. I'm not going to speak out, especially against a wealthy, powerful, and influential person because they will have the ability to sue me falsely. That's the fear that a lot of real victims have. Look, if Alan Dershowitz wants to use the legal system to demonstrate his innocence, he has the right to do that. The problem is, now that he's filed a public claim, the airing of all the details will come out, and what's he going to do if there is some kind of unassailable evidence against him? I mean he said, for example, he's only been at Jeffrey Epstein's house once and it was with his wife and children. What if it comes out that he was actually there, and there are photographs of him there on another occasion? CALLAN: Well, you have to - you know, but, Wendy, I think you have to assume, Dershowitz can't be that stupid. I mean he taught at Harvard for long enough that I assume that basic facts like that he's going to be certain on. And if Dershowitz is in fact innocent of this charge, then he's not worried about body parts or locations where sex took place if no sex did take place. CAMEROTA: Dershowitz also called for attorneys to be disbarred. He believes they should never have taken this case. Let me quickly read to you their statement in response to Alan Dershowitz. "Out of respect for the courts desire to keep this case from being litigated in the press, we are not going to respond at this time to specific claims of indignation by anyone. Nevertheless, we would be pleased to consider any sworn testimony and documentary evidence Mr. Dershowitz would like to provide which he contends would refute any of our allegations." Paul Callan, Wendy Murphy - MURPHY: Yes. CAMEROTA: We have to leave it there. We're running out of time. But, EFTA01078631 obviously, this case is not going away with Alan Dershowitz's new legal action this morning. We'll take it up again. Thanks so much for being here. We'd love to know what you think about all this. You can tweet us @newday on the best way to handle allegations like this. Let's go over to John. BERMAN: All right, thanks, Alisyn. An American giant is gone, but his legacy lives on. Our friend and colleague, Chris Cuomo, remembers his father, former New York Governor Mario Cuomo. A touching tribute that you do not want to miss, it's coming up next. PEREIRA: So, the funeral for former New York governor Mario Cuomo gets under way in just over two hours right here in New York City. Dignitaries including Bill and Hillary Clinton, Attorney General Eric Holder are expected to pay their respects. You know, Chris mentioned to us, our NEW DAY family, that his father's life has served as a lesson for him since he was a very little boy, but that even now his pop is, as he called him, is still teaching him a lesson about what endures. (BEGIN VIDEOTAPE) MARIO CUOMO, FORMER GOVERNOR OF NEW YORK: When it's over, I want people to say, now, there was an honest person. CHRIS CUOMO, CNN ANCHOR (voice-over): Pop's body is gone. I know because I counted out his pulse until his heart fell silent, 5:15 p.m. His two favorite numbers, 5 and 15. So now his baggy, brown eyes, solid grip of soft, thick fingers, oaken body, they're all gone. But what was most important about my father and to him has passed on. Passed on as in still exists, just in a different way. His spirit passed on to his creator, the spirit of his message endures in us. Timeless and timely, a call to remember that if all do not share in America's success, there is no real success. M. CUOMO: We can make it all the way with the whole family intact, and we have more than once, wagon train after wagon train, to new frontiers of education, housing, peace, the whole family aboard, constantly reaching out to extend and enlarge that family, all those struggling to claim some small share of America. C. CUOMO: Our interconnectedness, our diversity as America's true strength. The value found in immigrants like our family desperate to work, to be part of the dream. M. CUOMO: Thank you very much. C. CUOMO: Two speeches in eight weeks would define his political life for many of you, the keynote in 1984. UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Ronald Reagan rode into the '80s on a political white horse. C.CUOMO: When he took on Ronald Reagan's shining city. EFTA01078632 M. CUOMO: There are people who sleep in the city's streets, in the gutter, where the glitter doesn't show. C. CUOMO: And his talk at Notre Dame, where he took on his church's notion of a Catholic politician. M. CUOMO: We know that the price of seeking to force our belief on others is that they might someday force their belief on us. I protect my right to be a Catholic by preserving your right to be anything else you choose. C. CUOMO: The man liked a challenge. Both relied on his core belief, we are here to help as many as we can in the best way we can, and that means protecting freedom, especially freedom from oppression. You will hear him called Hamlet on the Hudson. Question it. It's a media phrase more than a matter of fact. Pop did not think he should run for president. M. CUOMO: Has nothing to do with my chances. It has everything to do with my job as governor, and I don't see that I can do both. Therefore, I will not pursue the presidency. C. CUOMO: Many could not, or would not, accept that and tried publicly and privately to push him to do otherwise. For better or worse, that's what separated my father from other politicians. He, in fact, did not vacillate, and until the day he died, I never heard him regret the decision, period. But that is merely politics, which can't be forgotten quickly enough. What really matters has certainly been passed on to me, and my siblings, and our kids and that was pop's love, like a big bear hug on your heart kind of love. His unique sense of humor could be a weapon and a salve. M. CUOMO: Christopher, you have - - (LAUGHTER) M. CUOMO: Let me tell you, Christopher. You have found so many unusual ways to heap new expenses on this family. You really have. I mean, and you've done it not after, you know, a sweating effort, he's done it naturally. C. CUOMO: Who to be, how to be, from the simple, a handshake is firm, a tie is tied in a Windsor knot, a man shines his own shoes and does so often. He carries a hanky, one for others, one for himself. He wears a hat, not a cap, unless it's a cheese cutter. He always has cash and does not go Dutch. Pass first, shoot second. Play hard, and then play harder. From that to the sublime, all that matters in life is devotion to something bigger than yourself, family, the less fortunate, take up for them always. His passion for purpose, love recklessly, fight the good fight fiercely, outwork everyone. M. CUOMO: One of the simple things I wanted to achieve is I want to be governor, I want to be the hardest working there ever was. C. CUOMO: Compete hard or not at all. M. CUOMO: So far, you know, we haven't lost all year. C. CUOMO: And never as a function of the chance of success. M. CUOMO: This is our first game. EFTA01078633 C. CUOMO: And for all the requirements on an individual, the most important was a command for the collective. Collaborate in making this world a better place. M. CUOMO: What is our mission in this place? Your job is to make it as good as you can make it. That's all there is. There is no other significance. C. CUOMO: None of that could ever be buried. Living on in the hearts, and minds, and actions of those who bear his name, who heeded his call to action then and now, that all will pass on. The man himself is gone. The father I went to in times of distress is not there. The truth hurts, pop would say, and this truth hurts worse than I imagined. But I also know what pop would tell me to do. Wipe my face, let my kids see that I love them, be there for my family, and do the right thing. And I will, pop, just like you. M. CUOMO: Just keep going forward believing ever more deeply that it's right to give to people and to the world. (END VIDEOTAPE) PEREIRA: What a powerful tribute to his dad. BERMAN: Like a big bear hug, I think, on all of our hearts as Chris would say so nicely in that piece. CAMEROTA: And we got to know Mario Cuomo so much better through Chris' eyes. That was a real gift. BERMAN: And we got to see, you know, take the stuffing out of Chris, too, sitting there as a young boy. It was amazing. PEREIRA: But, you know, he loves in the very same way that his dad did. Have you noticed that? CAMEROTA: Yes. BERMAN: Big, big. CAMEROTA: Beautiful. We'll be right back. CAMEROTA: As you all know, Chris Cuomo loves telling the stories of people who are making an impact. So here's on such story. Former NFL player Ricardo Silva went from studying playbooks to textbooks. Today he's a high school math teacher motivating his students to impact your world. Here's Chris Cuomo. (BEGIN VIDEOTAPE) RICARDO SILVA, FORMER NFL PLAYER: You have four minutes, four minutes until competition. C. CUOMO: Ricardo Silva is using his competitive edge to make math count for these high school students in Washington, D.C. EFTA01078634 SILVA: Number three is what? My hope is to bring awareness to the students. Not just geometry, but total life outcomes. You can do whatever you want through education. C. CUOMO: Silva's first job wasn't in a classroom, it was on a football field playing for the Detroit Lions. SILVA: My mission was to get to college and start in the NFL. Now that's moved on to something more meaningful to me, which is providing opportunities to kids that do not necessarily know how to get where they need to be. C. CUOMO: Helping Silva do just that is Teach for America. The program offers free classroom training to college graduates and professionals from various backgrounds. In exchange they teach in an underserved school for two years. SILVA: Kids that have low socioeconomic status are, you know, not achieving as well as their more affluent counterparts, and we're trying to close the educational achievement gap. This is why I'm here. C. CUOMO: It's certainly not for the paycheck or the ease of the job. SILVA: Football, all you have to do is wake up every day, work out and do what the coaches tell you to do. In school you have to motivate young teenagers who are more interested in their social media outlets than math. C. CUOMO: A seemingly impossible task, but Silva is up for the challenge. SILVA: What's the first thing that we must do? All I had was one person believing in me my entire life, which was my mom, and I feel like I can bring that to the kids. Way to go, (INAUDIBLE). All they need was one person telling them that they can do it and they can be successful. (END VIDEOTAPE) PEREIRA: And he's that one person. BERMAN: Man, motivating kids tougher than any NFL linebacker, that's for sure. CAMEROTA: Yes, right. So, for more on how you can help, go to CNN.com/impact. BERMAN: All right, it is time now for "NEWSROOM" with Ana Cabrera who is in today for Carol Costello. Ana, take it away. ANA CABRERA, CNN ANCHOR: Good morning guys, and I haven't even said happy new year to you yet, so happy new year. EFTA01078635 CAMEROTA: You, too. EFTA01078636 EXHIBIT 2 EFTA01078637 SHOW: AUSTRALIAN BROADCASTING SYSTEM (ABC) 7.30 8:05 PM AEST ABC January 6, 2015 Tuesday LENGTH: 942 words HEADLINE: Prince Andrew under pressure as Palace disputes teen sex scandal claims REPORTERS: Philip Williams BODY: LEIGH SALES, PRESENTER: It's been a few years since Britain's Royal Family has been embroiled in a serious scandal, but once again, Prince Andrew has stepped forward. He's accused of having sex with an underage girl in sensational details aired in an American court case. The young woman says she was forced to entertain the Duke at the behest of his friend, billionaire and convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Prince Andrew's ex-wife, Sarah Ferguson, has leapt to his defence and Buckingham Palace is also strenuously denying the allegations. But, as Europe correspondent Philip Williams reports, the claims have blown apart the always uneasy calm between the Palace and the British press. PHILIP WILLIAMS, REPORTER: As fifth in line to the throne, whatever Prince Andrew does or says will never go unnoticed. So when media reports about a lawsuit in the US emerged linking his name with underage sex, the long period of relative Royal calm was abruptly shattered. This woman, is believed to be the person named in court papers as "Jane Doe 3". In a newspaper interview she claims she was used for underage sex by American billionaire Jeffrey Epstein and says she was lent out to his rich and powerful friends, including Prince Andrew. It's claimed she had sex with him three times when she was 17 at Jeffrey Epstein's luxury Caribbean Island home and in New York and London, all denied by Prince Andrew. VICTORIA MURPHY, UK MIRROR ROYAL CORRESPONDENT: If this doesn't go away quickly, if these allegations continue to be made, if more allegations are added, this could be incredibly damaging, not just for Andrew, but for the monarchy as a whole. PHILIP WILLIAMS: It all seems a world away from the golden glow of recent Royal events - a wedding that cemented the popularity of Prince William and his bride. Followed of course by the arrival of baby Prince George. And for the Queen, a diamond jubilee, a celebration of 60 years on the throne, reason for her to smile as the nation and beyond said thanks for her never-ending job. EFTA01078638 Over the weekend, that run of feel-good luck expired. Normally with a story like this, Buckingham Palace would be more inclined to stay quiet, not to give any oxygen whatsoever to the sort of claims that have been made. But this time, it's very, very different. Not one, but two statements saying Prince Andrew is completely innocent of all the accusations. VICTORIA MURPHY: They issued one statement initially in response to the allegations that Prince Andrew had had sex with an underage minor and that was what they were responding to and they were categorically denying that that had been the case. However, in doing that they had left the door open that perhaps he was only denying the fact that she was a minor and questions were being asked about that. So when more of her allegations surfaced, they decided that they needed to release an even stronger denial, categorically denying any sexual contact whatsoever. PHILIP WILLIAMS: What isn't in dispute is that Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein were good friends over a number of years. In 2008, Mr Epstein was sentenced to 18 months' jail for soliciting an underage girl for the purposes of prostitution. That, after a controversial plea bargain. He remains a registered sex offender. Yet in 2011, after his release, Prince Andrew was seen with his old friend in New York Central Park. That cost Prince Andrew an unpaid job he was said to have loved as the UK's Trade and Industry special representative, opening doors for British business overseas. CHRIS BRYANT, LABOUR MP (March, 2011): But I'm afraid he's now just become a national embarrassment. And my worry is that sometimes when he goes on these trips, I'm not sure whether he's helping us out or he's just helping himself. PHILIP WILLIAMS: For him, that door closed as a direct result of his association with Jeffrey Epstein. VICTORIA MURPHY: People who know Prince Andrew have said that he is very loyal to his friends and that that is one of his strong points. However, I think that those closest to him now accept that that particular friendship and the loyalty to Jeffrey Epstein that continued until after he was convicted of paedophilia, I think people are now saying, you know, he accepts that that was a mistake. However, what is being said is that Andrew is only guilty of choosing his friends badly. He's not guilty of anything else. PHILIP WILLIAMS: Prince Andrew isn't the only one named in the court documents, and while he isn't publicly defending himself, another of those accused certainly is. Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz has been doing the media rounds of the US and beyond. He denies even knowing his accuser, let alone having sex with her. ALAN DERSHOWITZ, HARVARD LAW SCHOOL: My goal is to bring charges against the client and require her to speak in court. She - if she believes she has been hurt by me and by Prince Andrew, she should be suing us for damages. I welcome that lawsuit. I welcome any opportunity which would put her under oath and require her to state under oath these false allegations. EFTA01078639 PHILIP WILLIAMS: Under the plea bargain struck with prosecutors by Jeffrey Epstein, it appears that other potential allegations may not end up tested in court and that could apply to possible co-conspirators, an arrangement alleged victims were not involved with. Through Palace statements, the Duke of York has unequivocally denied any wrongdoing. He's not charged with anything, nor has he been questioned by police. But the Queen's second son is in a spotlight he cannot wish away. His annus horribilis may have just begun. LEIGH SALES: Philip Williams reporting from London. LOAD-DATE: January 7, 2015 EFTA01078640 EXHIBIT 3 EFTA01078641 Judge losses 'sex slave' claims involving Prince Andrew - NY Daily News Page 1 of 4 ilia it'.fI rat cipti 00", Cnii ill.' win h em pc, MOGS Never Lose Your Keys Again Florida judge tosses `sex slave' claims involving Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz SY OAF ...MY tH...0:1, 00,EGCCIAN I NAV:, VO4.4 ritA: r t.u.i1 Tvflos.. Alaa1. nib fl oe Pm Itiegisf. AM! >. 2C.5. 3.1. nY AAA Roma, lo durin lop Food Ni Ti.. ewe, awe' IltirrS11O Miami WOO accused of slavery kali bra mob era: Amer.) an it o o . n rhom ig ov rape other Prince Arykow veite==1. who calms Minty El/Stet made her 'Sea slate: hai alnico A FlOnda mine hesitated out emlosice clam Pom a woman who sale the in iht anti el RUM0ST0RIES was (0•Ced into hawng sox will Elglana Mince Ahdrew when she was Pew Anat.'s •. aesslet P.ff 't-• Icawar. Kendra Sur Slave tewcti In a ruiatt; Tuesday. Judge Kenneth Malta deen:41 a Ms by -Jane Ooe No. 3 am lot Oregon vni Jane Doe No. to altervne lea lompannin3 oar. at. abeibnp late leas pave Q. as iNY pltaw pretarenial lleatneel 10 Cahalan pen Jebrey Latta Wu:Quiteler Jane Noe No. 3 - *case bnIlly hat teen revealed a IS. 31 — sal in a bombshell coin bap guy Evart turned her attO a lax save to him NJ teacher "era Foxe after relilliO 40. win Md Ns :AP erld tainous pals wham she was Alt 15. with: ng hsde t: DeCiaoi A gg NeOnd Mote SAO sad She was (saber] 4510 hawrg *slakes% were Pruite oeIenJs taint: se. acs* ."b sit.ce Andrew — Shawn w the Bohol pan, as 'Nana Aftdy. -- and lanied detente oawew.11•gw lawyer Nei Delt4,...wil2 PR0M0IL0 SD iii 4 htlp://www.nydailynews.com/newsinational/judge-tosses-sex-slave-claims-involving-prince... 4/9/20 1 5 EFTA01078642 Judge tosses 'sex slave' claims involving Prince Andrew - NY Daily News Page 2 of4 Praler Pogliew is teen learing veitMer ski moe wi Synttargand In January smid ins bevang As scannal Denken,/ <weed 0"0 daIrns a bebos smeet ene askeet Mala in rouw ad he 'OanigeOut and de; enileni adegatons In he n..no. Ite juvlpe sa z Ine soort 'hal COnnOefeC Mi Uersnotnt29 ageineins. Ind d Ihntis Mal a3 irlementicn Is unreeesseet — as wery ..ane Den /40 ts JeLlds • Texas toom ., ratild ah n an affeilinni. Robens datatIlid blovelorch t eer aasden fl at. win beau And vele. / Derstiosnili and cilrm03, incIading her Ia:* Ure. ai vod orgy met ~Mar. Cslick. • Te.. boffen, and ether apparendy widecaSed SOS South Cocci momber dis alcohol pot 'T TW laCtual details remirdoo report MT whom ard whore Me Jane A 1..kneede o Does engaged in sexual Casino hum Mac maf • 9 acOvizin we immalecal and itywertnenl to th s penaal clan 5.C. cop MI aspecally ~Wering nuit Siepel thai these de... insolve noniparies morde. of V stolt wno aa, not teleed TO me A Mae cao in resp:natel Gouw:0nm, Tapse faam wei< unciecesuey details shat be nadeed <n Tui sitclurn.'ffni iud00 WC% Monoair Mund In sic Me Mto 'Gand lieve was no high ~th c reasen lor Maner/ Dons h) Melbd .015 AD was tound s ,melkwo in re ene e: al. sInc• ananas Ceun uw angina, ene Plainleff rite ree nat oa behing aal og ET/Slenn S rans aa gram mw. 4 elsonnd a running 0./. In dine and Co,., finol thalmstice TM ION kan: deel not renire ndinCinew Stoort om Ine 'som slave' USIms made In Ine Jeffrey Cpstein case &galmt 1104511 01.40 the reen nare been tessad Dy a Florida jonge. pan ca Mis Iele in the PrOceetbrffili: tee Jotige wrote, and Is envel. anleceitany Baltimore Ier Jane Joe 3 and Jane 00e 4 to proccOd na balies in gis echec inentten Te ons reduc. santen«, r.e Iwne did 35y IM weerwil tould be cad as Meeleef Ween OIO CO,. gooi ol. emnisi to UW gang tiler Iv.14,1ag 'The necOMag9 RaniCssaton ot Jane Doe 3 and Mw. 000 4 in ;ha CaSit øn be Oenen TO! antistud bv Ofwel meer crceetly suoponed — anc idemntacIrnisstle. and 'hoving 2 t non curnulativa — lestimony as neded.' Mavo rifOle. en knal,' • CileWeeele . Me nes Wee n.i.nne • a Video show Mina. toml fan off bah http://www.nydailynews.cominews/national/judge-tosses-sex-slave-claims-involving-prince... 4/9/2015 EFTA01078643 Judge tosses 'sex slave' claims involving Prince Andrew - NY Daily News Page 3 of4 • unseemly 0 wollar Melt, el p.1unIMC d SEE IT, Fla. Snatches w ocean • SOulh Gam sue." *Ph' trylchin) a Orsig, sea c female Call rwe lerwaleC ionisers owe ~.....wt.rtna sae:scab* e Man Dershowsti was ple•sece to Mn the IIX19t IIVOve out IM `,tee slave' silegessni and says no will be vinthcaltd OerShCwItz Iced Ilse Oat News he'S Sed will ale deovon — bul he slip Oar 5 or bomb aft 'a her Mayen, lot delareson. 'See was Mina in teemed° bul we band her and she wet have lo be deposed said The end Roan N mat vial go to ;ail because ane will repeal eel kis and well be able to peeve it and ate ad end bp winger" lot Pedant' As to to own leputalory yet Edon oat irn Mt et 311be sae seise an eveybody wit undostale mil is a conolOWN noode ail Melt try:, Bockraymm Palace has denied the allegations aganst Prince rodiew, which OnACJI had bees bobs:cited by a Pieta or inc prince Nei In non *Rapped a Dame 'Al an A palace Weems' deigned to cornmeal on the judge's Ming re The Associated Meet. A lawyer lot the ton Does. Brad FewareS. vowed to press on wile lee flag for MOST RE' EpSlan's hetet. *no the reds have aclinaviledgea number n the Ones I Dena tomb 'We lee pelted by len Coon's ruing etagraang that Jane Doe 3 awl 4 nave a 2does wel gaiboisale vA howl the aced for fennel intententon.' M sale fry $1 3 Aosta erre* in a tOternewl. 'Doe 3' said I'm happy to gel to pro:vale in this Impartial Case.' 4 'orb web S &AIM • MSS pa and.. NM 4,0hordz Sc 311 6 Mn oftuenicit WAEt 7 ,9p9 s 9 R 'eds. WIy 9 sc "um KsSet sPV 0 Ong lawn. this wile Mewl beectiews May Harr Tipped Sects MITI Ilnello•naal renal' all Simply enter • Now in affdarthn Netanyakes non. Canyaion and stag et anyone yaw snow ......w. , No • • what will you learn loshild .8 n PhOlOtoonos That • dieing For Test Tan wows Reveals bailing Yassaush Out Loud' Voleanunal Heals braes we http://www.nydailynews.cominews/national/judge-tosses-sex-slave-claims-involving-prince .. 4/9/2015 EFTA01078644 Judge tosses 'sex slave' claims involving Prince Andrew - NY Daily News Page 4 of 4 MORE FROM NYOAILYNEWS —• — Michael Sager Ti.l. B.C. Kennedy Angell cep who kNed Wager passengers left S42.550 at Scan TSA ehectenwritS WE RECOMMEND Yen MOOS. Best Waterproof New Coo-weld:4e Mascara. Can arti l a GLIM Top Roth IRA reit5 0 0 A coeming Ceurses COMMEN TS O./ Stec A. COMMENI Wm* a tweet JOHNNIE COMIGNEADAWa 2 ear rep I wOICIM Ma morn Uri rad :owns. Ic judge lo rifts MassecP Las litEr.• Pupa Win 2 000 4. Sun, bece,se ors opt matter posits* KW lee NV, Sew MR, " rat a next' nay anG' "a.4 name 5004, rflir Ne RN gentles. Ws lie eat a limo, flat ,..err Me• Me rape was baste oft nOWald age WA L".: 0.• ;iµ1 MUSSY 2 ?dal" 490 Why goad the dA of ors re.* Wain C•rfroOvere OI N on** Sergrawm Ire la at RF P.• iIKtE SHOW MORE COMMEMS *JAC...In W.? A.B. as. SATE V. INCOMIAThas ...a...4 XELJANZ ISM • 4. Loan nor u•••/• Chl, Ain Alt taw ott, •se -tea wad". Sea. neasera. ri , .NJ ca'.-. MO Oft,. ••••••• washA<wµ S " , e, t- ^".• UtMsletletI WIOWSSell Mace anRd Argots. Les Gra,. • f I J.. w: :. .• .9".••• fere et_Esgagir cnr”), CriUme es. 4 .s • v., sr.- http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/judge-tosses-sex-slave-claims-involving-prince... 4/9/2015 EFTA01078645 EXHIBIT 4 EFTA01078646 After Vindication, Alan Dershowitz Vows to Sue Sex Accuser in Court — Jewish Business... Page 1 of 3 Go to DASHBOARD > Appearance > Menus to set up the menu. Thursday 09 April, 2015 Published On: Wed, Apr 8th, 2015 Court US / Canada I By Ilan Shay it After Vindication, Alan Dershowitz Vows to Sue Sex Accuser in Court Dershowitz he also planning to sue his accuser's attorneys for defamation. Professor Alan Dershowitz told Newsmax he plans to sue the woman who accused him of sexual misconduct. Dershowitz spoke after a federal judge on Tuesday U.S. District Court Judge Kenneth Marra had ordered said woman's allegations be removed from the record of an ongoing lawsuit against convicted billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Marra denied a motion by "Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4" to join the lawsuit. He also wrote that the "lurid details" ... "regarding with whom and where the Jane Does engaged in sexual activities are immaterial and impertinent to this central claim ... especially considering that these details involve non-parties who are not related to the respondent Government. These unnecessary details shall be stricken." The two "non-panics" have been Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz. http://jewishbusinessnews.com/2015/04/08/after-vindication-alan-dershowitz-vows-to-sue-s... 4/9/2015 EFTA01078647 After Vindication, Alan Dershowitz Vows to Sue Sex Accuser in Court — Jewish Business... Page 2 of 3 "We've been legally vindicated but my reputation has still been, unfortunately, tarnished in the minds of at least some people by a woman who just lied and made up a story out of whole cloth," Dershowitz told Newsmax's Steve Malzberg. "It was Tike a drive-by shooting or like somebody scribbling graffiti on a bathroom door," Dershowitz said. Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Alan- Dershowitz-Steve-Malzberg-sexual-misconduct-suing/2015/04/07/icV637044/f/ixzz3WhkDIzTe Urgent: Rate Obama on His Job Performance. Vote Here Now! Dershowitz, who originally represented Epstein in his plea deal, said he will now seek to depose "Jane Doe 3." "We will persuade the world that she made up the whole story out of whole cloth," he said. Dershowitz he also planning to sue his accuser's attorneys for defamation. "And we're considering suing her for defamation as well, but right now she was trying to hide in Colorado and avoid service, but we found her and we served her and now she'll be subjected to a deposition," he said. "And if she repeats what she said previously under oath, she will go to jail because what she said is a complete, total, made-up lie. Not only about me but about many other people." NEWSMAX STUDIOS PROF ALAI, Read more about: Alan Dershowitz, Jane Doe 3, Jeffrey Epstein, Kenneth Marra bun://je wishbusinessnews.com/2015/04/08/after-vindication-alan-dershowitz-vows-to-sue-s... 4/9/2015 EFTA01078648 After Vindication, Alan Dershowitz Vows to Sue Sex Accuser in Court — Jewish Business... Page 3 of 3 BROTEN GARAGE DOOR SALES openrg Doors For You Since 1955 RS » NERS » ENTRY JEWISH BUSIngSERVICE OPE» INSTALLATION DOORS NE • . 954.946.5555 1 561.736.5506 yip hup://jewishbusinessnews.com/2015/04/08/after-vindication-alan-dcrshowitz-vows-to-sue-s... 4/9/2015 EFTA01078649 EXHIBIT 5 EFTA01078650 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 171." JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, and CASE NO. CACE 15-000072 PAUL G. CASSELL, Plaintiffs, v. ALAN DERSHOWITZ, Defendant. AFFIDAVIT OF SIGRID S. McCAWLEY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO QUASH OR FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER 1. My name is Sigrid S. McCawley and I am a partner at the law firm of Boles. Schiller & Flexner LLP ("BSF"). 2. Jane Doe No. 3 is a non-party in the above-captioned matter and she is a client of 3. Defendant served BSF with a subpoena that is duplicative of the subpoena it served on BSF's client, Jane Doe No. 3, (See Composite Exhibit I. Defendant's Subpoena to BSF and Non-Party Jane Doe No. 3) as follows: i. BSF Request no. 1 is duplicative of Jane Doe Request no. 17; ii. BSF Request no. 2 is duplicative of Jane Doe Request no. 18; iii. BSF Request no. 3 is duplicative of Jane Doe Request no. 1; iv. BSF Request no. 4 is duplicative of Jane Doe Request no. 2; v. BSF Request no. 5 is duplicative of Jane Doe Request no. 3; vi. BSF Request no. 6 is duplicative of Jane Doe Request no. 5; vii. BSF Request no. 7 is duplicative of Jane Doe Request no. 6; EFTA01078651 viii. BSF Request no. 8 is duplicative of Jane Doe Request no. 7; ix. BSF Request no. 9 is duplicative of Jane Doe Request no. 8; x. BSF Request no. 10 is duplicative of Jane Doe Request no. 9; xi. BSF Request no. 11 is duplicative of Jane Doe Request no. 11; xii. BSF Request no. 12 is duplicative of Jane Doe Request no. 12; xiii. BSF Request no. 13 is duplicative of Jane Doe Request no. 13; xiv. BSF Request no. 14 is duplicative of Jane Doe Request no. 14; xv. BSF Request No. 15 is duplicative of Jane Doe Request No. 15; xvi. BSF Request no. 16 is duplicative of Jane Doe Request no. 16; xvii. BSI: Request no. 17 is duplicative of Jane Doe Request no. 19; xviii. BSF Request no. 18 is duplicative of Jane Doe Request no. 21; xix. BSF Request no. 19 is duplicative of lane Doe Request no. 22; xx. BSF Request no. 20 is duplicative of lane Doe Request no. 23; xxi. BSF Request no. 21 is duplicative of Jane Doe Request no. 24; and xxii. BSF Request no. 22 is duplicative of Jane Doe Request no. 25; xxiii. The only Request that is not duplicative is Request no. 23 which reads: "All documents which are related to when Jane Doe No. 3 allegedly told her attorneys that Alan Dershowitz was among the men she had sexual relations with." BSF contends that any document responsive to this Request is either privileged or of a highly confidential nature. As explained in BSF's Motion to Quash, a non-party should not be required to produce highly confidential documents, particularly when the Request is irrelevant to the underlying action. 4. Defendant's subpoena to BSF requests documents belonging to Jane Doe No. 3. For example, the Requests seek copies of Jane Doe No. 3's diary when she was a minor child. These documents arc the property of Jane Doe No. 3 and not BSF. Accordingly, BSF should not be burdened with having to comply with this subpoena. 2 EFTA01078652 5. It would cause undue burden and expense for BSF to have to comply with the 23 Requests in Defendant's subpoena. Defendant's subpoena, for example, includes instructions that demand the review of electronic files, including requiring a search of "archive" systems and "back-up tapes". Compliance with the subpoena would require this non-party law firm to have to secure the assistance of IT personnel to fulfill the subpoena demands. in addition, compliance with the subpoena will require attorney and staff time. 6. Defendant has publicly stated that he is seeking discovery in this matter, not for this matter, but instead, because he is considering an action against BSF's client, Jane Doe No. 3. A true and correct copy of the following articles are attached hereto as Composite Exhibit 2: i. CNN International, New Day, January 6, 2015. "The end result of this case should be she should go to jail, the lawyers should be disbarred and everybody should understand that I am completely and totally innocent." ii. Australian Broadcasting System, January 6, 2015. "My goal is to bring charges against the client and require her to speak in court." iii. New York Daily News, April 7, 2015. "She was hiding in Colorado... but we found her and she will have to be deposed. The end result is that she'll go to jail because she will repeat her lies and we'll be able to prove it and she will end up in prison for perjury." iv. Newsmax, April 8, 2015. "And we're considering suing her for defamation as well, but right now she was trying to hide in Colorado and avoid service, but we found her and we served her and now she'll be subjected to a deposition." 1 declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. , s tIA Executed this day of April, 2015. 3 EFTA01078653 STATE OF BROWARD) ) ss.: COUNTY OF FLORIDA) BEFORE ME, the undersigned a ority, d i y lice sed o administer oaths and take cknow ed ents personally appeared ;the a of ciNtatsw, , who being by me first duly sown, deposes and says that he/she has read the foregoing answers to interrogatories, and that they are true and correct. SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED before me this ay of , 2015. 0.4; M 0 Notary Public, State of Florida My Commission Expires: 1/ o/''" [NOTARY SEAL) ,o0 At4t, Notary Public Slab] a Flurgla Oebotah C Knowlion 0 My Commstoort FF057473 11,294017 EFTA01078654 COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1 EFTA01078655 EFTA01078656 Z ITHIHX3 aijisodwoj COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1 EFTA01078657 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAI. CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWA RD COUNT Y, FLORIDA /,/ /1./ ji CASE NO.: CACE 15-000072 • I BRADLEY J. F.DWARDS and PAUL G. CASSELL, Plaintiffs /Counterclaim Defendants. v. ALAN M. DERSIJOWITZ, Defendant / Counterclaim Plaintiff. SUBPOENA DUCES TECIIM THE STATE OF FLORIDA: To: Records Custodian Boles, Schiller & Flexner LLP 401 East Las Olin Blvd. Suite 1200 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 YOU ARE COMMANDED to produce the items described in Exhibit A which is attached to this subpoena Ibr inspection and copying. You will not be required to surrender the original items. You may comply with this subpoena by providing legible copies of the items to be produced to the attorney whose name appears on this subpoena on or before the scheduled date of production. You may condition the preparation of the copies upon the payment in advance of the reasonable cost of preparing the copies. You may mail or deliver the copies to the attorney whose name appears on this subpoena or you may appear with the items to be inspected and copied at the offices of Cole, Scott & Kissanc. 9150 South Dadcland Boulevard, Suite 1400. Miami, Florida 33156, on or bctbrc April IS. 2015. EFTA01078658 You have the right to object to the production pursuant to this subpoena at any time before production by giving notice to the attorney whose name appears on this subpoena. If you fail to appear, you may be in contempt of Court. You are subpoenaed to appear by the following attorney, and unless from this subpoena by this attorney or the Court, you shall respond to this subpoena as directed. THIS 2711 DAY OF March. 2015. By: sifhomos E. Scora THOMAS E. SCOTT For the Court Thomas E. Scott Florida Oar No. 149100 Steven R. Safra Florida Bar Nn. 057078 COLE. SCOTT & KISSANF, P.A. Cole, Scott & Kissane Building, Suite 1400 9150 South Dadeland Boulevard Miami. Florida 33156 Phone: Fax: Richard A. Simpson (admitted pro hac vice) Mary E. Boria (admitted pro hac vice) Ashley E. Eiler toro hac vice pending) WILEY REIN LLP 1776 K Street NW Washin ton. DC 20006 Phone: Fax: Counselfi r Alas; M Dershowit: EFTA01078659 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS I. This subpoena is directed to You and covers all information in Your possession and all information subject to Your custody or control, wherever they may be located. 2. Each request in this subpoena is to be responded to separately and as thoroughly as possible. The fad that investigation is continuing shall not be used as an excuse for failure to respond to each request as fully as possible. The omission of any document, thing or item of information shall be deemed a representation that such document is not known to You. your counsel, or other representatives at the time of the service of the response. 3. If the attorney/client privilege or a work product protection is asserted in response to any production request. identify the document by its: (a) date; (b) general nature. e.g.. letter. memorandum, photograph, computer printout, etc.; (c) subject matter: (d) author or originator. (e) each person indicated as an addressee or copy recipient, or known or believed by you to have received a copy of the document: (1) present custodian of each copy of the document; (g) alleged ground or grounds for withholding production; and (h) sufficient particulars to allow Dcrshowitz to evaluate the claim of privilege or immunity asserted. DEFINITIONS As used in this subpoena, the following definitions shall apply: I. "All" and "Each" mean all, each, any, and every. 2. "Concerning- and "Concern" mean relates to, refers to, contains, describes, embodies. mentions, constitutes, constituting, supports. corroborates, demonstrates. proves. evidences, shows, refutes, disputes, rebuts, controverts, undercuts and contradicts. 3. "Dershowitz" means Alan M. Dershowitz. 4. "Document(s)" means any and All written, typed, printed. recorded or graphic matter, however produced. reproduced or stored, whether an original or a copy. and whether EFTA01078660 prepared. published or released by any person or entity , including but not limited to letters. reports, agreements, correspondence. Mira -Once or inter-office correspondence. telegrams. minutes or records of meetings, reports or summaries, expressions or statements, lists, drafts and revisions. invoices, receipts, original and preliminary notes, sketches. records, ledgers, contracts, hills of lading. bills. inventories, financial data. maps, mentor ands, accounting and financial records, diaries . Journals, calendars, statements, work papers, videotapes, photographs, pamphlets, brochures, advenisentents, trade letters, press releases, drawings. recaps. tables . articles, summaries of conversations, computer cards, tapes. diskettes, or other means of electronically or magnetically maintaining information, and printouts. The term "Document(s)" also includes electronically stored data from which information can he obtained either directly or by translation through detect ion devices or readers; any such document is to be produced in a reasonably legible and usable form. The term "Document(s)- includes All drafts of a Document and All copies that differ in any respect from the original, including any notation, underlining, marki ng, or information not on the original. The term also includes information stored in, or access ible through, computer or other information retrieval systems (including any computer archives or back-up systems), together with instructions and All other materials necess ary to use or interpret such data compilations. Without limitation on the term "control" as used in the preceding paragraph, a Document is deemed to be in Your control if You have the right to secure the Document or a copy thereof from another person. 5. "Epstein" means Jeffrey Epstein. 6. "Federal Action" means the matter styled Jane Doe #1, el at v. United Slates ofAmerica, Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRABOHNSON (S.D. Fla.). 7. "Jane Doe # 3" means the individual referred to as "Jane Doe p3" in the Federal Action. 8. "You- and "Your" means the entity to whom this subpoena is addres sed, including the Entity's members, employees, past employees, accountants, agents , attorneys. representatives, and all other persons acting or purporting to act urn its behalf. EFTA01078661 EXHIBIT "A" 1. Al! Documents Concerning any actual or potential book. television or movie contracts or deals concerning Janc Doe #3's allegations about being a sex slave. 2. All Documents Concerning any monetary payments or other consideration received by Jane Doe #3 from any media outlet in exchange for her statements (whether "on the record" or "off the record") regarding Epstein. Dershowitz, Prince Andrew, Duke of York, and/or being a sex slave. 3. All Documents that reference Dershowitz by name, which support and/or confirm the allegations set forth in Paragraphs 24-31 of Jane Doc #3's Declaration dated January 19, 2015 (Docket Entry 1291-1) and/or Paragraph 49 of Jane Doe #3's Declaration dated February 5, 2015 (Docket Entry #310-1). which were tiled in the Federal Action. 4. All photographs and video in the original. native format in which they were taken (not a paper copy) of Jane Doe #3 with Dershowitz. 5. All photographs and video in the original, native format in which they were taken (not a paper copy) not produced in response to Request No. 4, above, of Dershowitz at (i) Epstein's Manhattan home in New York City, New York; (ii) Epstein's home in Palm Beach, Florida; (iii) Epstein's Zorro Ranch in Santa Fe, New Mexico; (iv) Little Saint James island in the U.S. Virgin Islands; and (v) Epstein's airplane. on the same date and time that Jane Doe #3 were also present at such location. 6. Any documents and information that support and/or confirm Jane Doe #3's presence at the various locations named in Paragraphs 24.31 of Jane Doe #3's January 19,2015 Declaration in the Federal Action on the particular dates and times when Dershowitz was also present. 7. Any documents and information that show Dershowitz was present at the various locations named in Paragraphs 24-31 of Jane Doe #3's January 19. 2015 Declaration in the Federal Action on the particular dates and times when Jane Doe #3 alleges to have been present. S. All statements, written or recorded. that Jane Doe #3 has provided to anyone that reference Dershowitz by name or other description. 9. All notes of, or notes prepared for, any statements or interviews in which Jane Doe #3 referenced Dershowitz by name or other description. 10. All Documents Concerning any communications by Jane Doe #3 or on Jane Doe 43's behallwith any media outlet concerning Dershowitz or the Federal Action, whether or not such communications were "on the record" or "olt the record." All notes, writings, photographs, and/or audio or video recordings made or recorded by or of Jane Doc #3 on the dates on which Jane Doe #3 alleges she was present with Dershowitz, including but not limited to Jane Doe #.3's calendar, diary or journal entries EFTA01078662 on those dates, regardless whether the notes, writings, photographs. and/or audio or video recordings refer to Dershowitz. To the extent that any responsive materials are photographs or video recordings, please provide them in the original, native format in which they were taken (not a paper copy). 12. All Documents Concerning Jane Doe 113's travel tour from locations for those occasions when she alleges she was present with Dershowitz. 13. To the extent not produced in response to the above list of requested Docuntents. all notes, writings, photographs. and/or audio or video recordings made at any time that refer or relate in any way to Dershowitz. 14. All drafts of declarations or affidavits by Jane Doe #3 that relate in any way to Dershowitz and/or Epstein. I S. All Documents Concerning any telephone, including any cellular telephone. used by Jane Doe #3 between January I, 1999 and December 31, 2002. 16. A ny diary, journal or calendar Concerning June Doe #3's activities between January:, 1999 and December 31, 2002. 17. All Documents Concerning Jane Doe *3's presence at or on 0) Jeffrey Epstein's Manhattan home in New York City, New York; (ii) Mr. Epstein's home in Palm Beach, Florida; (iii) Mr. Epstein's Zorro Ranch in Santa Fe, New Mexico; (iv) little Saint James island in the U.S. Virgin Islands; and (v) Mr. Epstein's airplane from January I, 1999 through December 31, 2002. IS. All travel records of any kind, including hut not limited to tickets, hotel room receipts or other documents Concerning any travel undertaken by Jane Doe 43 between January I, 1999 and December 31, 2002. 19. All records of any interviews given by Jane Doe #3 tc any party Concerning Dershowitz. Epstein, or any of their agents or associates. 20. All manuscripts and/or other writings. whether published or unpublished, created in whole or in part by Jane Doe #3. Concerning Epstein and any of his agents or associates. 21. All Documents Concerning Jane Doe #3's allegations that she met former President Dill Clinton, former Vice President Al Gore and/or Mary Elizabeth "Tipper" Gore on Little Saint James island in the U.S. Virgin Islands. 22. All Documents Concerning your retention by Jane Doe #3, including, but not limited to: signed letter of retainer, retention agreement. explanation of fees and/or any document describing the scope of retention. EFTA01078663 23. All Documents which are related to when Jane Doe #3 allegedly told her attorneys that Alan Dershowitz was among the men she had sexual relations with, 7 EFTA01078664 Piling 4 25416606 E-Filed 03/27/2015 02:18:21 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY. FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO.: CACE 15-000072 BRADLEY J. EDWARI)S and PAUL. C CASSELI., Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants, vs. ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff. CERTIFICATE OF NON OBJECTION Defendant ALAN M. DERSDOWITZ ("Defendant"), by and through his undersigned counsel. hereby Ales this certificate that no objections were received to the subpoena duces teem directed to Boies, Schiller & Pinner, LLP. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ga was sent via E-mail WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the .foregoing on March 27, 2015 to: Jack Scarola, Esquire, Searcy Denny ct a and counsel for Plaintiff. COLE, SCOTT & KISSANE, P.A. Cole, Scott & Kissane Building, Suite 1400 9150 South Dadeland Blvd. Miami, Florida 33156 P: F: By: . - IsUANna.S.h.CPII II 1OMAS E. SCOT'. FBN: 149100 STEVEN R. SAFRA FBN: Ft-Mail E-Maii Seco Seco EFTA01078665 Richard A. Simpson (admitted pro hac vice) Mary E. Borja (admitted pro hac vice) mborja@wileyrein.com Ashley E. Eller (pro hac vice pending) WILEY REIN LIP 1776 K Street NW Wushin ton. DC 20006 Phone: Fax: (..aunselfor Alan M. Dershowni -2- EFTA01078666 tt Court Fremont County. Cctrado Cowl Address: 136 Justice Center Rd Canon City, CO 81212 Plooldf(e)./Pelitioner;5), tclwarcs, el al. A COURT USE ONLY V Case Nunmer Cefendant(s)fRespondengs): Dersncwi: Division: Courtroom SUBPOENA TO ()ATTEND *ATTEND AND PRODUCE To o aye ordered to attend and give testirrmty at the District Court of Frerrinni County located at 136 Justice "2-an:e, Pogo. Ca,on City, CO 31212 Room *105 on Tuesday May 12 2015 el 9 30 a in. as P witness fur the OPla rl."'syPell oner(s) libefendam(”Mespondent(s) in this artier: R. rat Eire ar.d elace. you also shall produce the Mowing items now in youi custody a coital. See attached Schedule A addresses and telephone nut of all COWS& at record in this ache,' ano of any party represented Cy =t,nsei are as WOWS Name For Plaintiffs Bradley .1 Edwards Address I 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. TelephoneNumber rd Paul C Cassell West Palm Beat*.h. FL 33409 Jack Scarnla. FI. Bar No 169440 Sere/ Denney Scatola Barnhart & Shipley, PA For DetendaM Alan M. Dershowitz 9150 South Daleiand Blvd .#1400 Thomas E Scott, Florida Bar No 149100 : Miami, FL 33156 Steven R. Sacra, Florida bar No. 057026 . Cola. Scott Et Kissahe, PA Clerk/Deputy Clerk or Attorney JUF &J2 COUNTY COURT SUBPOENA TO ATTEND OR AT AND PROMCE 1/13 battik] nepPTINell Our Inc in the ( met of relnrulis EFTA01078667 /WIT OF -zt tarty h. re scm- „ 4civity • ••••• ' 4. (Sin • 4" 071% 4-4 4.. .4:;474 JA L systiosttl..s..?”.)- z • n -^a IA/tress or or easy • wr-rovriaC vie-Mg "oresigeiStaorr..•, .-:ac-nn; ha have 'lc; tile rawerSnn Now- Ceiinty acnAltre z•• • Name (Print or 1st* Nciefy 'ublIc ;Dept :yr • xc nc rj :3r" nyNTgryt -- TEND C' A—END FIROCASX ”i3 EFTA01078668 AN • ••••••••. ea. SC:DELI:1.1c "A" MI documents that reference bs name Akin M Dershawrm ' which support rotor confirm the allegations !et fern% in Paragraphs 24.31 of your Declaration tinted January 19. 2015 and/or Paragraph 49 of your Declaration dated February S. 2015, which were fled %%int fat United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. in hang Doe ri) and Jane Doe .42, v. United States of America. Case Ka. 0$-80736•CIV•MA kR1/JOIINSON, lECF No. 291.11 (the "Federal Action"). 2. All photographs and video in the original, native format in which they were taken (not a paper cop)) of you with Alan M. Dershowitz. All photographs and video in the original, native format in which they were taken (not a paper copy) not produced in response to Request No 2. above. of Alan M. Dershowim at (1) Jetty Epstein's Manhattan home in New York City, New York; (ii) Mr. Epstein's home in Paint Beach. Florida: (iii) Mr. Epstein's Zorro Ranch in Santa Fe. New Mexico; (iv) I rule Saint larn, island in the U.S. Virgin islands; and (v) Mr Emtein's airplane, on the same date and time that you were also present at such location. 4, Al! photographs and video in the original, native format in which they were taken (not a paper copy) of you not produced in response to Request No. 3, above. that evidence andior show you were present al the same location as Alan M. Dershowitz on that same dole and time. 5. Any documents and information that support and/or confirm your presence at the carious locations named in Paragraphs 14 -31 of your Declaration on the particular dates and times when Alan M. Dershowitz was also present. 6. Any documents and In that show Alan M. Dershowiir was present at the locations named in Paragraphs 24-31 of your Declaration various on the particular dates and times when you allege to have been present in your response In Request No. 5, above. 7. Ail statements; written or recorded, which you have provided to anyone that reference by name, Alan M. Dershowitz. R. All notes of, or notes prepared tor. any statements or interviews in which you referenced by name or other description, Alan M. I krshowite 9. All documents concerning any communications by you or on your behalf with any media outlet concerning Alan M. Dershowitz or the Federal Action , whether ur not such communications were "on the record' or "oil' the record." 10 All notes, writings, photographs. and/or audio or video rzcord ings made or recorded by or of you on the dates on which you allege you were piescao with Alm M. Dershowitz; incicding but not limited to your calendar, diary or journal entries on tiu dates, regardless whether the notes, writings, photographs. and/or audio or video recordings tier to Mr. Dershowitz. Ta the extent 1 For purposes of this Schedule "A", reference to "Alan M. Dershowitz" herein shall mean and refer to any reference to the Defendant in this action, including but not limited to. as "Alan", "Alan M. Dershownz". "Professor Dershowitz". or "Dershowitz", and the like. JOF 802 COUNTY COURT SUBPOENA TO ATTENO OR ArtErtD AND PROCU .O 20t2 Cuturad CE Ins o Judicial Dcpannicin for me in the Courts arCelorado EFTA01078669 CAT•laC. that y retro:Kin: materials are phimmr.tirs ur ACC, recordings. please provide them in the original. native format in which they were 'Shell 6,41i a parer copy) II All Jozumerts relating to your travel to or ou were present with Alan XL Dersbnw,r7 U. To the extent not produced in response to the above list of rerprested documents. all notes, writings. photographs, and/or audio or idco PCCOldiNgs made :it any time that refer or relate in any way to Alan M. Dershowstz. 14 All drafts of declarations or affidavits by you that ;elate in any way to Alan M. Dersbowitz andiorleffivy Epstein. 15. An documents relating toany telephone, including any cellular telephone, used by you between January I, 1999 and December 31, 2002. 16. Any diary, journal or calendar concerning your activities between January 1. 1999 and December 31. 2002. 17. All documents concerning any actual or potential honk, television or movie dots concerning your allegations about being a sex slave. IS. All documents concerning any monetary peryinenis in other consideration received by yott from any media outlet in exchange for your statements (whether "on the record" or "off the record") regarding Jeffrey Epstein. Man M. Dershowilz. Prince Andrew. Duke of York, andior being a sex slave. 19. All documents showing, concerning. relating or referring to when you were at or OD Jeffrey Epstein's Manhattan home in New York City. New York: (ii) Mr. Epstein's home in Palm Brach. Florida: (iii) Mr. Epstein's Znrro Ranch in Santa Fe. New Mexico. (iv) Link Saint lames island in the U.S. Virgin Islands; and (v) Mr. Fpstein's airplane from January I. 1999 through December 31. 2002. 20. All documents showing an) payments CA remuneration of an) kind made by Jeffrey Epstein or any of his agent nr associates to you from January I, 1%9 through December 31. 2001 21 All travel records of any kind, including hut not limited to tickets, hotel room receipt,: or other documents concerning, relating or referring to any travel undertaken by you between January I. 1999 and December 31. 2002. 22. Alf records of an) interviews given by you to any parry concerning, relating or referring Ili Jeffrey Epstein or am of Ins agents or associates. 23. All manuscripts andfor other writings. whether published or unpublished. created in whole or in rum by you. uoncerning. relating or referring to Jeffrey Epstein and any of his agents 01 AVA)ClaIeS. 24. All documents concerning. ;elating or referring 10 your assenions that you met former President Bill Clinton, former Vice President Al Gore and/or Mary Elizabeth "Tipper" Gore en Little Saint James island in the 11.S Virgin Islands. JD, *0.2 COUNTY COUP.T SUBPOENA TO ATTEND CR ATTEND AND nnootce ins 0 2012 Colenido ludic eal Dcaartnyal tar we in its caves of (Mantic EFTA01078670 U1 documents concerning yuw retention of the i•n firm Boles. Schircr ec Flexner LLP, Including but not limited to. signed letter of retainer, retention agreement. explanation of fees, andior any doctitnents &set ibing the scope of retention. JO, 03 2 COUNTY COURT SUOPOCNA TO ATTEND CR Adreun trio Pnobuct 1/13 c1:1017 Cinlora haliriaf Depagir.em fw un: In the Cosa: c: Colot.nin EFTA01078671 Minot Court Fremont Courny Colorado Cow: Addiess, I3$ Jume Centor Ro Ceron City. CO 81212 Ptaevelf(syPe: tinnolat; Eatuaras ?a 3 COURT USE ONLY Can" hunter. Dagenoant'sPRespoodan:(s) Dersheeraz _..• SUBPOENA TO °ATTEND 111÷ATTEND AND PRODUCE . 13. JEus_reso Fa_ facere.ss sedated psvOOSe nl cD...:1111o2) You ere ordered to anerri and cove lestanOny at trie Oisar ct Ccur! of Fronton: Coo:vv. Itcaleo al. 136 Juslito Confer Roar) Ca ton Ceti. CO 01212. Hrbid": en Tt:esday. May 12 211s. ;.t .:?'s in. as a witness for the OThainliFfS)/Pelllioner(c) triCelercircs Posoondrogslir Pas natty, Al Mar bine act: Place. you ass shaV pmducre the Fero...I:19 :terns fl aw ,( 1 WV( study ca CailVOL .igszachace, atheav'e A NarneS. Dr1CresseS arse :clefhone 0t an col mse.1 teicr) ern! 4(9 pons tepresentve by counsel am as follows. ------- Tanta Address "ITT e ep lona • I Plairths Biaoloy J. Eatvaido 212:1 Palm Sent. Lakes Eivd ono Pad G. Cassell Wes. Pan) fte:o:n trt. 3.7.4:;• Jack Searda, FL Sar No 16S.44) Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart .4 Ship'e. I lrA I For Delaroant Nan ftl.Oonthowitr I Th.:Ares E Scott, Florida Bar No 149100 I TE-6-7..uirThai;orad etva7 —E7.1 . smiln S*.evec R Saha rorida Bar No 057028 fttlarat rL 1.1f5d Cole Scott 81955one, PA De;e. _- : " AIV.:M25 , I • EFTA01078672 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE I ewes uncle, oath ittal, I am Id years ol &0ar aid not a C•acy to Ste action and that I Weed a't s Su^•aoene IC Unnend arillend aial Prodoce to toe WilfieSS CCv ty (SIa•e) on iClan3)al the ttabOvang location Chock one J By handing it to a person dentince ter me as the WrascSs or by lorrei with Ins Wnness vest refused serwce, O ! enterciltd IO serve Sse Witness On occasion• nut nave rut Peen aisle lo 1oct10 Inc Witness. • Private process sewer • Sacter. County Fee S Mileage S Signature pr0CeSs Serve, Naine (anal 414 typo) My Corrimission Expire" Malty Public /Depot), t"erx Dote DT SOT COsiellY COURT SU0fC£rSA SC? ATTCND OR artSsD AND PRCDUC£ In 3 trr Zirl 2 Colorado Litwin! Departs:0u for use to the Cows ti t Co °fad° EFTA01078673 CliF.DLII,J; 4 A" 1. All documents that reference by name, Alan M. Dcrshowitz. ' which support and. or confirm the allegations set forth in Paragraphs 24.31 of your Declar ation dated January 19, 2015 andror Paragraph 49 of your Declaration dated Fehno ry 5, 2015, which were filed with the United States District Court for the Southern Distric t of Florida, in Jane Dos HI and Jane Dosfij v. _United Stales ..f Amerigg, Case No. 0640736-C1V. MA RRA/JOI4NSON, (ECF No. 291-11 (the "Federal Action"). 2 All photographs and video in the originalomrivc format in which they were taken (not a paper copy) of you with Alan M Dershowitz. 3. All photographs and video in the original native format in which they were taker. (not paper copy) not produced in response to Request No. 2, above, of Alan M. Dershowitz at (i) Jeffrey Epstein's Manhattan home in New York City. New York; (h) Mr. Epstein's home rn Palm Beach, Florida; ('ii) Mr. hpstesn's Zonu Ranch in Santa Fe, New Mexico; (Iv) Little Saint James island in the U S Virgin Islands ; and (v) Mr Epsiein's airplane, on the same date and tame that you were also present as such locatio n. 4. All photographs and video in the original, native format in which they were taken (not a paper copy) of you nut produced in response to Request No. 3, above, that evidence ;Indio: show you were present at the sank location as Alan M. Dershowitz on that same date and time. S. Any documents and information that support and/or confirm your presence at the various locations named in Paragraphs 24-31 of your Declaration on the particular dates and times when Alan M. Dershowitz was also present. 6. Any documents and information that show Alan M. Dcrshowitz was present at the various locations named in Paragraphs 24.31 of your Declaration on the particular dates and times when you allege to have been present iu your respon se to Request No. 5. above. 7. All stateroom:. written or recorded, which you have provided to anyone that reference by name, Alan M. Dershowitz. 8. All notes of, or notes prepared for. any statements to interviews in which you referenced by name or other description, Alan M Dcrshowitz. 9. All documents concerning any communications by you or on your behalf with any media outlet concerning Alan M. Dershowitz or the Federal Action, whether or not such communications were "on the record" or "off the record." 1 For purposes of this Schedule "A". reference to "Alan M. Dersh owitz" herein shall mean and refer to any reference to the Defendant in this action. including but not limited to, as "Man", "Alan M. Dershowitz", 'Professor Vershowitz". or "Dershowitz". and the like J0F DO 2 COLItilY COURT SUBPOENA CO so C/Eor) OR AT TEND AND PRODUCE PITS 2012 Colorado judicial iknelingnl forces Re Covell of COlondo EFTA01078674 10 All notes. writings. photographs and o• auch or video recordings made or recorded by or of you on the dates on which you allege you were present with Alan M Dershowirz, including but not limited to your adendar, diary or journal entries on those dates, regardless whether the notes, wrongs, photographs, and/or audio or video recordings refer to Mr. Dershowirz. To the event that any responsive materials arc photographs or video recordings, please provide them m the original, native format in which they were taken (not a paper copy). 12. All documents relating to your travel to or from locations for those occasions when you allege you were present with Alan NI Dershownz 13. To the extent not produced in response to the above list of requested documents, all notes. writings. photographs, andlor auto or video recordings made at any time that refer or relate in any way to Alan hi Dcrshowirz. 14. All drafts of declarations or affidavits by you that relate in any way to Alan M. Dershowitz and/or Jeffrey Epstein IS. All documents relating to any telephone including any cellular telephone, used by you between January I, 1999 and December 31, 2002 16. Any diary•, journal or calendar concerning your activities between January I, 1999 and December 31, 2002. 17 All documents concerning any actual or potential book, television or movie deals concerning your allegations about being a sex slave 18. All dot:um:nib concerning any monetary payments or other consideration received by you from any media outlet in exchange for your statements (whether "on the record" or "off the record") regarding Jeffrey Epstein. Alan M. Dershowita, Prince Andrew, Duke of York, antor being a sex slave. 19. MI documents showing, concerning, relating or referring to when you were at or on (i) Jeffrey Epstein's Manhattan home in New York City, New York; (n) Mr. Epstein's home in Palm Beach, Florida; (iii) Mr. Epstein's Zorn; Ranch in Santa Fe, New Mexico; (iv) Little Saint James island in the U.S. Virgin Islands; and (c) Mr. Epstein's airplane from January 1, 1999 through December 31, 2002. 20. All documents showing any payments or remuneration of any kind made by Jeffrey Epstein or any of his agents or associates to you from January 1. 1999 through December 31, 2002. 21. All travel records of any kind, including but not limited to tickets. hotel room receipts or other documents concerning, relating or referring to any travel undertaken by you between January I. 1999 and December 31. 2002. JOF 60 2 COUNTY COURT SUUPOENA TO ATTEND OR ArTENO AND PRODUCT: Ill) t, 2012 Colorado Judicial Dcpartncn4 for use in the Coons of Colorado EFTA01078675 22. All records of any interviews given by you to any party concerning, relating or referring to Jeffrey Epstein or any ofhis agents or associa tes. 23. All manuscripts and/or other wntings, whether publish ed or unpublished, cornied in whole or in part by you, concerning, relating or referring to Jeffrey Epstein and any of his agents or associates. 24 All documents concerning, relating or refernng to your assertions that you met former President Bill Clinton. forma Vice President Al Gore nnellor Mary Elizabeth •"Tipper" Gore on Little Saint James island in the U.S. Virgin Islands . 25. All documents concerning your retention of the law limn Buies, Schiller R Flcxner LLP, including but not limited to: signed letter of retainer, retenti on agreement. explanation of fees, and/or any documents describing the scope of retenti on. Jar 6a'[ COON 1Y COON SLISPOENci "0.01040 OR ATTENO OM PRODU CE an 3 C 2012 Colorado Judicial Depannianc for use in Mc Cowls of Colorado EFTA01078676 ATTAcliMENT A C.R.C.P. 45 requires the party issuing a subpoena for the production of records or a tangthle thing to provide the following informarion (c) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena. (I ) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; Sanctions. A party or attorney responsible for issuing and serving a subpoena must take reasonable steps :o avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a person subject to the subpoena. The issuing court must enforce this duty and impose an appropriate sanction, which may include lost earnings and reasonable attorney's fees, on a party or attorney who fails to comply. (2) Command to Produce Records or Tangible Things. (A) Attendance not required. A person commanded to produce records or tangible things need no: attend in person at the place of production unless also commanded to attend for a deposition, hearing, or trial. (B) For production of privileged records. (I) If a subpoena commands production of records from a person who provides services subject to one of the privileges established by C.R.S. § 13.90.107, or front the records custodian for that person, which records pertain to services performed by or at the direction of that person ("privileged records"), such a subpoena must he accompanied by an authorization signed by the privilege holder or holders or by a court order authorizing production of such records. (II) Prior to the entry of an order for a subpoena to obtain the privileged records, the court shall consider the rights of the privilege holder or holders in such privileged records, including an appropriate means of notice to the privilege holder or holders or whether any objection to production may be resolved by redaction. (Ill) If a subpoena for privileged records does not include a signed authorization or court order permitting the privileged records to be produced by means of subpoena, the subpoenaed person shalt not appear to testify and shall not disclose any of the privileged records to the party who issued the subpoena. (C) Objections. Any party or the person subpoenaed to produce records or tangible things may submit to the party issuing the subpoena a written objection to inspecting, copying, testing or sampling any or all of the materials. The objection must be submitted before the earlier of the time specified for compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served. if objection is made, the party issuing the subpoena shall promptly serve a copy of the objection un all other parties. If an objection is made, the party issuing the subpoena is not entitled to inspect, ropy, test or sample the materials except pursuant to an order of the court from which the subpoena was issued. If an objection is made, at any time on notice to the subpoenaed person and the other parties, the party issuing the subpoena may move the issuing court for an order compelling production. (3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena EFTA01078677 (A) When required. On motion made promptly and in any event at or before !he rime specified in the subpoena for compliance, the issuing court must quash or modify a subpoena that: (I) Fails to allow a reasonable time to comply; (II) Requires a person who is neither a party nor a party's office r to attend a deposition in any county other than where the person resides or is employed or transa cts his business in person, or at such other convenient place as is fixed by an order of coon; (ill) Requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter, if no exception or waiver applies; or (IV) Subjects a person to undue burden. (B) When permitted. To protect a person subject to or affected by a subpoena, the issuing court may, on motion made promptly and in any event at or before the time specified in the subpoena for compliance, quash or modify the subpoena if it requires: (I) Disclosing a trade secret or other confidential, research, development, or commercial information; or (li) Disclosing an unretained expert's opinion or information that does not describe specific matters in dispute and results from the expert's study that was not requested by a party. (C) Specifying conditions as an alternative. In the circumstance s described in Rule 45(c)(3)(B), the court may, instead of quashing or modifying a subpoena, order attendance or production under specified conditions if the issuing party: (I) Shows a substantial need for the test;mony or material that canno t he othenvise met without undue hardship; and (II) Ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonably compe nsated. (d) Duties in Responding to Subpoena. (I) Producing Records or Tangible Things. (A) Unless agreed in writing by all parties, the privilege holder or holders and the person subpoenaed, production shall not be made until at least 14 days after service of the subpoena, except that, in the case of an expedited hearing pursuant to these rules or any statute, in the absence of such agreement, production shall be made only at the place, date and time for compliance set forth in the subpoena; and (B) If not objected to, a person responding to a subpoena to produce records or tangible things must produce them as they are kept in the ordinary course of business or must organize and label them to correspond to the categories in the demand and must permit inspection, copying, testing. or sampling of the materials. (2) Claiming Privilege or Piotection EFTA01078678 (A) Information withheld. Unless the subpoena is subject to subsection (c)(2)(B) of this rule relating to production of privileged records, a person withholding subpoenaed infommtion under a claim that it is privileged or subject to protection as trial-preparation material must: (1) Make the claim expressly; and (II) Describe the nature of the withheld records or tangible things in a manner that, without revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the claim. (B) Information produced. If information produced in response ro a subpoena is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trial-preparation material, the person making the claim may notify any party that received the infonnation of the claim and the basis for it. After being notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use or disclose the infonnation until the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to retrieve the information if the pany disclosed it before being notified; and may promptly present the infonnation to the court wider seal for a determination of the claim. The person who produced the information must preserve the information until the claim is resolved. EFTA01078679 COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 2 EFTA01078680 CNN SHOW: New Day 8:30 AM EST January 6, 2015 Tuesday TRANSCRIPT: 010606CN.V42 SECTION: NEWS; International LENGTH: 3114 words HEADLINE: Plan Crash Survivor's Steps; Celebrities Fight Sex Scandals; Remembering Mario Cuomo BYLINE: Alisyn Camerota, Martin Savidge, John Berman, Michaela Pereira, Paul Callan, Chris Cuomo, Ana Cabrera GUESTS: Wendy Murphy HIGHLIGHT: Friday night, seven-year-old Sailor Gutzler freed herself from the upside down wreckage of her family's plane, moving past the bodies of her mother, father, sister and cousin, and walked nearly a mile to Larry Wilkins' home in remote western Kentucky to get help. There are new developments in the sex scandal involving Prince Andrew and famed attorney Alan Dershowitz, including the fact that Dershowitz has counter sued . Chris Cuomo, the son of the former governor of New York Mario Cuomo, reflects on his father's legacy as a politician and family man. BODY: JOHN BERMAN: All right, 32 minutes after the hour. Buckingham Palace took the rare step to speak out about the sex abuse accusations against Prince Andrew, but is talking about it really the best strategy? How to handle ugly accusations, next. CAMEROTA: New developments in the sex scandal involving Prince Andrew and famed attorney Alan Dershowitz. Moments ago we learned that Alan Dershowitz has counter sued I , that's the woman who says that the lawyer sexually abused her when she was a teenager. Dershowitz is demanding his name be removed from her lawsuit and is asking for damages. Roberts says that a wealthy investor forced her into sex slavery when she was a teenager to please his powerful friends, including Dershowitz and Prince Andrew. The accuser now says she is being re-victimized. All of this raising big questions of how public figures should fight back against ugly accusations. Let's bring in Paul Callan. He's a CNN legal analyst, criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor to talk about all this, also former prosecutor Wendy Murphy will join. She's an adjunct professor of sexual violence at New England Law in Boston. EFTA01078681 Great to see both of you. OK, let's start with the news this morning. Paul, Alan Dershowitz, hours ago, has filed this countersuit in Florida because he feels he's being defamed by this lawsuit by this woman, . CNN is naming her because she has gone public with her name. So is that the best way for celebrities and high-profile people to handle allegations like this? PAUL CALLAN, CNN LEGAL ANALYST: Well, Alan Dershowitz has done something you never see done in these cases. He's gone nuclear. I mean, he's going apoplectic. He's threatening to sue Roberts and he's starting his own lawsuit. Usually you try to make the whole thing go away so it's forgotten. There's a complexity to this lawsuit because the allegations against Dershowitz, that he slept with this 15-year-old, and, incidentally, Prince Andrew as well, were included in court documents related to another lawsuit. And normally, anything you say in a court document relating to a pending lawsuit is, there's immunity. You can't sue somebody for saying that. So Dershowitz was baiting Roberts saying, why don't you say it publicly and I'm going to sue you because it's a lie. But apparently he must have stumbled on some theory that would give him grounds to sue around this court immunity doctrine. So it will be interesting to see it today. CAMEROTA: Yes. Wendy, we have an example of Alan Dershowitz being so angry and so vociferous in denying these charges yesterday on NEW DAY. Watch this. (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) ALAN DERSHOWITZ, ATTORNEY: I will take action. I am filing today a sworn affidavit denying categorically the truth. I'm seeking to intervene in the case. I am challenging her to file rape charges against me. I waive any statute of limitations, any immunity, because if she files a false rape charge against me, she goes to jail. The end result of this case should be she should go to jail, the lawyers should be disbarred and everybody should understand that I am completely and totally innocent. (END VIDEO CLIP) CAMEROTA: Wendy, what do you think about his strategy? Because there's one school of thought that says you never even dignify the allegations with a response. WENDY MURPHY, FORMER PROSECUTOR: Yes, I mean the problem is he is almost in a protest too much state of mind for me. You know, I think the way the prince is handling it is, in a sense, more credible because it's more restrained in that exact way, Alisyn, we don't dignify these kinds of things. Of course it's silly. Of course it's not true. You know, the problem with Alan Dershowitz's position is, he doesn't really know all of the evidence that they have. I mean what if this woman has, you know, intimate knowledge of things about his body parts, for example, that will be unassailable proof that, in fact, she did have access to his body. The kind of thing that no matter how much he yells and screams, he won't be able to rebut. That could be some pretty explosive proof against him. EFTA01078682 CAMEROTA: It could be but -- MURPHY: I'm glad he did it. CAMEROTA: Yes, I mean, you have to - MURPHY: Go ahead. CAMEROTA: You have to assume that because he's make so vocal and so public a response that he believes that there's nothing like that out there. Wendy, let me just stop you for a second - MURPHY: Yes. CAMEROTA: Because I want to tell you the victim in - the alleged victim in this case, has now responded to CNN and Alan Dershowitz for calling her a liar. Let me tell you what she says. "it appears I am now being unjustly victimized again. These types of aggressive attacks on me are exactly the reason why sexual abuse victims typically remain silent and the reason why I did for a long time. That trend should change. I'm not going to be bullied into silence." Wendy, your thoughts on her response? MURPHY: Yes, I -- you know, it is a reason, in my work, you know, in decades of this work, it is something victims talk about a lot. I'm not going to speak out, especially against a wealthy, powerful, and influential person because they will have the ability to sue me falsely. That's the fear that a lot of real victims have. Look, if Alan Dershowitz wants to use the legal system to demonstrate his innocence, he has the right to do that. The problem is, now that he's filed a public claim, the airing of all the details will come out, and what's he going to do if there is some kind of unassailable evidence against him? I mean he said, for example, he's only been at Jeffrey Epstein's house once and it was with his wife and children. What if it comes out that he was actually there, and there are photographs of him there on another occasion? CALLAN: Well, you have to - you know, but, Wendy, I think you have to assume, Dershowitz can't be that stupid. I mean he taught at Harvard for long enough that I assume that basic facts like that he's going to be certain on. And if Dershowitz is in fact innocent of this charge, then he's not worried about body parts or locations where sex took place if no sex did take place. CAMEROTA: Dershowitz also called for attorneys to be disbarred. lie believes they should never have taken this case. Let me quickly read to you their statement in response to Alan Dershowitz. "Out of respect for the courts desire to keep this case from being litigated in the press, we are not going to respond at this time to specific claims of indignation by anyone. Nevertheless, we would be pleased to consider any sworn testimony and documentary evidence Mr. Dershowitz would like to provide which he contends would refute any of our allegations." Paul Callan, Wendy Murphy - MURPHY: Yes. CAMEROTA: We have to leave it there. We're running out of time. But, EFTA01078683 obviously, this case is not going away with Alan Dershowitz's new legal action this morning, We'll take it up again. Thanks so much for being here. We'd love to know what you think about all this. You can tweet us @newday on the best way to handle allegations like this. Let's go over to John. BERMAN: All right, thanks, Alisyn. An American giant is gone, but his legacy lives on. Our friend and colleague, Chris Cuomo, remembers his father, former New York Governor Mario Cuomo. A touching tribute that you do not want to miss, it's coming up next. PEREIRA: So, the funeral for former New York governor Mario Cuomo gets under way in just over two hours right here in New York City. Dignitaries including Bill and Hillary Clinton, Attorney General Eric Holder are expected to pay their respects. You know, Chris mentioned to us, our NEW DAY family, that his father's life has served as a lesson for him since he was a very little boy, but that even now his pop is, as he called him, is still teaching him a lesson about what endures. (BEGIN VIDEOTAPE) MARIO CUOMO, FORMER GOVERNOR OF NEW YORK: When it's over, I want people to say, now, there was an honest person. CHRIS CUOMO, CNN ANCHOR (voice-over): Pop's body is gone. I know because I counted out his pulse until his heart fell silent, 5:15 p.m. His two favorite numbers, S and 15. So now his baggy, brown eyes, solid grip of soft, thick fingers, oaken body, they're all gone. But what was most important about my father and to him has passed on. Passed on as in still exists, just in a different way. His spirit passed on to his creator, the spirit of his message endures in us. Timeless and timely, a call to remember that if all do not share in America's success, there is no real success. M. CUOMO: We can make it all the way with the whole family intact, and we have more than once, wagon train after wagon train, to new frontiers of education, housing, peace, the whole family aboard, constantly reaching out to extend and enlarge that family, all those struggling to claim some small share of America. C. CUOMO: Our interconnectedness, our diversity as America's true strength. The value found in immigrants like our family desperate to work, to be part of the dream. M. CUOMO: Thank you very much. C. CUOMO: Two speeches in eight weeks would define his political life for many of you, the keynote in 1984. UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Ronald Reagan rode into the '80s on a political white horse. C.CUOMO: When he took on Ronald Reagan's shining city. EFTA01078684 M. CUOMO: There are people who sleep in the city's streets, in the gutter, where the glitter doesn't show. C. CUOMO: And his talk at Notre Dame, where he took on his church's notion of a Catholic politician. M. CUOMO: We know that the price of seeking to force our belief on others is that they might someday force their belief on us. I protect my right to be a Catholic by preserving your right to be anything else you choose. C. CUOMO: The man liked a challenge. Both relied on his core belief, we are here to help as many as we can in the best way we can, and that means protecting freedom, especially freedom from oppression. You will hear him called Hamlet on the Hudson. Question it. It's a media phrase more than a matter of fact. Pop did not think he should run for president. M. CUOMO: Has nothing to do with my chances. It has everything to do with my job as governor, and I don't see that I can do both. Therefore, I will not pursue the presidency. C. CUOMO: Many could not, or would not, accept that and tried publicly and privately to push him to do otherwise. For better or worse, that's what separated my father from other politicians. He, in fact, did not vacillate, and until the day he died, I never heard him regret the decision, period. But that is merely politics, which can't be forgotten quickly enough. What really matters has certainly been passed on to me, and my siblings, and our kids and that was pop's love, like a big bear hug on your heart kind of love. His unique sense of humor could be a weapon and a salve. M. CUOMO: Christopher, you have - - (LAUGHTER) M. CUOMO: Let me tell you, Christopher. You have found so many unusual ways to heap new expenses on this family. You really have. I mean, and you've done it not after, you know, a sweating effort, he's done it naturally. C. CUOMO: Who to be, how to be, from the simple, a handshake is firm, a tie is tied in a Windsor knot, a man shines his own shoes and does so often. He carries a hanky, one for others, one for himself. He wears a hat, not a cap, unless it's a cheese cutter. He always has cash and does not go Dutch. Pass first, shoot second. Play hard, and then play harder. From that to the sublime, all that matters in life is devotion to something bigger than yourself, family, the less fortunate, take up for them always. His passion for purpose, love recklessly, fight the good fight fiercely, outwork everyone. M. CUOMO: One of the simple things I wanted to achieve is I want to be governor, I want to be the hardest working there ever was. C. CUOMO: Compete hard or not at all. M. CUOMO: So far, you know, we haven't lost all year. C. CUOMO: And never as a function of the chance of success. M. CUOMO: This is our first game. EFTA01078685 C. CUOMO: And for all the requirements on an individual, the most important was a command for the collective. Collaborate in making this world a better place. M. CUOMO: What is our mission in this place? Your job is to make it as good as you can make it. That's all there is. There is no other significance. C. CUOMO: None of that could ever be buried. Living on in the hearts, and minds, and actions of those who bear his name, who heeded his call to action then and now, that all will pass on. The man himself is gone. The father I went to in times of distress is not there. The truth hurts, pop would say, and this truth hurts worse than I imagined. But I also know what pop would tell me to do. Wipe my face, let my kids see that I love them, be there for my family, and do the right thing. And I will, pop, just like you. M. CUOMO: Just keep going forward believing ever more deeply that it's right to give to people and to the world. (END VIDEOTAPE) PEREIRA: What a powerful tribute to his dad. BERMAN: Like a big bear hug, I think, on all of our hearts as Chris would say so nicely in that piece. CAMEROTA: And we got to know Mario Cuomo so much better through Chris' eyes. That was a real gift. BERMAN: And we got to see, you know, take the stuffing out of Chris, too, sitting there as a young boy. It was amazing. PEREIRA: But, you know, he loves in the very same way that his dad did. Have you noticed that? CAMEROTA: Yes. BERMAN: Big, big. CAMEROTA: Beautiful. We'll be right back. CAMEROTA: As you all know, Chris Cuomo loves telling the stories of people who are making an impact. So here's on such story. Former NFL player Ricardo Silva went from studying playbooks to textbooks. Today he's a high school math teacher motivating his students to impact your world. Here's Chris Cuomo. (BEGIN VIDEOTAPE) RICARDO SILVA, FORMER NFL PLAYER: You have four minutes, four minutes until competition. C. CUOMO: Ricardo Silva is using his competitive edge to make math count for these high school students in Washington, D.C. EFTA01078686 SILVA: Number three is what? My hope is to bring awareness to the students. Not just geometry, but total life outcomes. You can do whatever you want through education. C. CUOMO: Silva's first job wasn't in a classroom, it was on a football field playing for the Detroit Lions. SILVA: My mission was to get to college and start in the NFL. Now that's moved on to something more meaningful to me, which is providing opportunities to kids that do not necessarily know how to get where they need to be. C. CUOMO: Helping Silva do just that is Teach for America. The program offers free classroom training to college graduates and professionals from various backgrounds. In exchange they teach in an underserved school for two years. SILVA: Kids that have low socioeconomic status are, you know, not achieving as well as their more affluent counterparts, and we're trying to close the educational achievement gap. This is why I'm here. C. CUOMO: It's certainly not for the paycheck or the ease of the job. 514VA: Football, all you have to do is wake up every day, work out and do what the coaches tell you to do. In school you have to motivate young teenagers who are more interested in their social media outlets than math. C. CUOMO: A seemingly impossible task, but Silva is up for the challenge. SILVA: What's the first thing that we must do? All I had was one person believing in me my entire life, which was my mom, and I feel like I can bring that to the kids. Way to go, (INAUDIBLE). All they need was one person telling them that they can do it and they can be successful. (END VIDEOTAPE) PEREIRA: And he's that one person. BERMAN: Man, motivating kids tougher than any NFL linebacker, that's for sure. CAMEROTA: Yes, right. So, for more on how you can help, go to CNN.com/impact. BERMAN: All right, it is time now for "NEWSROOM" with Ana Cabrera who is in today for Carol Costello. Ana, take it away. ANA CABRERA, CNN ANCHOR: Good morning guys, and I haven't even said happy new year to you yet, so happy new year. EFTA01078687 CAMEROTA: You, too. EFTA01078688 SHOW: AUSTRALIAN BROADCASTING SYSTEM (ABC) 7.30 8:05 PM AEST ABC January 6, 2015 Tuesday LENGTH: 942 words HEADLINE: Prince Andrew under pressure as Palace disputes teen sex scandal claims REPORTERS: Philip Williams BODY: LEIGH SALES, PRESENTER: It's been a few years since Britain's Royal Family has been embroiled in a serious scandal, but once again, Prince Andrew has stepped forward. He's accused of having sex with an underage girl in sensational details aired in an American court case. The young woman says she was forced to entertain the Duke at the behest of his friend, billionaire and convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Prince Andrew's ex-wife, Sarah Ferguson, has leapt to his defence and Buckingham Palace is also strenuously denying the allegations. But, as Europe correspondent Philip Williams reports, the claims have blown apart the always uneasy calm between the Palace and the British press. PHILIP WILLIAMS, REPORTER: As fifth in line to the throne, whatever Prince Andrew does or says will never go unnoticed. So when media reports about a lawsuit in the US emerged linking his name with underage sex, the long period of relative Royal calm was abruptly shattered. This woman, , is believed to be the person named in court papers as "Jane Doe 3". In a newspaper interview she claims she was used for underage sex by American billionaire Jeffrey Epstein and says she was lent out to his rich and powerful friends, including Prince Andrew. It's claimed she had sex with him three times when she was 17 at Jeffrey Epstein's luxury Caribbean Island home and in New York and London, all denied by Prince Andrew. VICTORIA MURPHY, UK MIRROR ROYAL CORRESPONDENT: If this doesn't go away quickly, if these allegations continue to be made, if more allegations are added, this could be incredibly damaging, not just for Andrew, but for the monarchy as a whole. PHILIP WILLIAMS: It all seems a world away from the golden glow of recent Royal events - a wedding that cemented the popularity of Prince William and his bride. Followed of course by the arrival of baby Prince George. And for the Queen, a diamond jubilee, a celebration of 60 years on the throne, reason for her to smile as the nation and beyond said thanks for her never-ending job. EFTA01078689 Over the weekend, that run of feel-good luck expired. Normally with a story like this, Buckingham Palace would be more inclined to stay quiet, not to give any oxygen whatsoever to the sort of claims that have been made. But this time, it's very, very different. Not one, but two statements saying Prince Andrew is completely innocent of all the accusations. VICTORIA MURPHY: They issued one statement initially in response to the allegations that Prince Andrew had had sex with an underage minor and that was what they were responding to and they were categorically denying that that had been the case. However, in doing that they had left the door open that perhaps he was only denying the fact that she was a minor and questions were being asked about that. So when more of her allegations surfaced, they decided that they needed to release an even stronger denial, categorically denying any sexual contact whatsoever. PHILIP WILLIAMS: What isn't in dispute is that Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein were good friends over a number of years. In 2008, Mr Epstein was sentenced to 18 months' jail for soliciting an underage girl for the purposes of prostitution. That, after a controversial plea bargain. He remains a registered sex offender. Yet in 2011, after his release, Prince Andrew was seen with his old friend in New York Central Park. That cost Prince Andrew an unpaid job he was said to have loved as the UK's Trade and Industry special representative, opening doors for British business overseas. CHRIS BRYANT, LABOUR MP (March, 2011): But I'm afraid he's now just become a national embarrassment. And my worry is that sometimes when he goes on these trips, I'm not sure whether he's helping us out or he's just helping himself. PHILIP WILLIAMS: For him, that door closed as a direct result of his association with Jeffrey Epstein. VICTORIA MURPHY: People who know Prince Andrew have said that he is very loyal to his friends and that that is one of his strong points. However, I think that those closest to him now accept that that particular friendship and the loyalty to Jeffrey Epstein that continued until after he was convicted of paedophilia, I think people are now saying, you know, he accepts that that was a mistake. However, what is being said is that Andrew is only guilty of choosing his friends badly. He's not guilty of anything else. PHILIP WILLIAMS: Prince Andrew isn't the only one named in the court documents, and while he isn't publicly defending himself, another of those accused certainly is. Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz has been doing the media rounds of the US and beyond. He denies even knowing his accuser, let alone having sex with her. ALAN DERSHOWITZ, HARVARD LAW SCHOOL: My goal is to bring charges against the client and require her to speak in court. She - if she believes she has been hurt by me and by Prince Andrew, she should be suing us for damages. I welcome that lawsuit. I welcome any opportunity which would put her under oath and require her to state under oath these false allegations. EFTA01078690 PHILIP WILLIAMS: Under the plea bargain struck with prosecutors by Jeffrey Epstein, it appears that other potential allegations may not end up tested in court and that could apply to possible co-conspirators, an arrangement alleged victims were not involved with. Through Palace statements, the Duke of York has unequivocally denied any wrongdoing. He's not charged with anything, nor has he been questioned by police. But the Queen's second son is in a spotlight he cannot wish away. His annus horribilis may have just begun. LEIGH SALES: Philip Williams reporting from London, LOAD-DATE: January 7, 2015 This is the first to 1 I tccspec _Iscspet selectedTextaocl Z•WA-A-V2-VZ- closed 295 1 4 FULL 1 1 133e57c0-9778- chent%a4999800 %a3lorever%a6. dGLzVzt-zSkAz I c5f936f2d11f16C EFTA01078691 Judge tosses `sex slave' claims involving Prince Andrew - NY Daily News Page I of 4 J1.: 1: 'Ar.; h I i Ws :-, (N I 7.10N <Awl CIE WEEk NEVA RCS kiCS Never Lose Your Keys Again óńtyS28 . Florida judge tosses `sex slave' claims involving Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz Jr ORAN OWP. lOPLGOalm. VEW Yealk OPa r NIMI t hb/116.1 'orb, fa. I 2211. i>4•114 r upseoir %wow. Pr. I 2011. 3.II PM „AA SP mln tleli G1381403 Remaims lo SIGs* clorin or Food No •le d stan Jew Owes • •Ort•.113 Miaml Wolt accused of slavery Mid Txv ••••• • Axle:np a It ▪ re. • Ohio mans aiding bast Prince Andrew IVOJI who claims Jersey Corwin male her s "sex Nave." rape d her A SM COLE/ P., anon A Fionstairigt has loosed Ovl eallellive dotes hate a woman WNP Said she tILA3(DST%IIS the nt.: c, was bread into horns se. wit E rolanCs Pi etel1.1..1141W wnen she was a p , a Mf menage. sra, Kendo Sur skand wit n a hang Teel:lay. srogo Kenneth Mara Oct esie Cl by 'Jane ]oe No for Oregon J:hi te, st . 3 and .en* Doe ho C so intymne In o 'ono i anitir4 cohl case alleging VW leda gave Gags, s Ora WC" Koal . .—...... Prele:enhal uer.:most 10 trhonaire pety .,,glhay toster‚ 94 NI a lea A-dgew gw Nest • kr ‚emisarce, fester Gia nawa il••Inveri. Jare Dor No. 3 — whose szentily nas ocen revealed as - -•.—. 31 — sled m a borna Shed Saun targ IN FpSles1lorded hel into 'Sex Slave. fe" blm NJ teacher nape se. Mik* cannne pep wen and hn rich and ,e/NNIS pals when the wal rap 15. aRer /walio 00 aro-. Kenn slucisr • - • a hew lewy alas Denewais swa Aciong Mon. IM sea she was pushed inI0 I' Su „g 'ela.'ens wee Pince neta* gsl i Words awe te. Andrew — knOoal n me Olga piso as 'Handy Andy arm ‚wawa. tams was Or and lamed doleoec lawyer Alan Dear:Owls MONOM STI Mtp://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/judge-tosses-sex-slave-claims-involving-prince... 4/9/2015 EFTA01078692 Judge tosses 'sex slave' claims involving Prince Andrew - NY Daily News Page 2 of 4 Vance Andrew is '<enamel:8g Wrest al enrol in Sw*cerland in Jentrery amid the b scandal ()ember. It Celled Me Clem* a libelous Smear. and aged Maws to wow Out II* Muiragesus and impeninent aliegalioM In ois ruing. Me SAO Said Me Caul, h85 cam/deed Mr. Dershcontr's midis:noon. bbl it Ands coal ms rtlervenSor is unnecessary — as were Jane Doe NO. Ts Surd eletarb* worn arrested all In an all:devil. Roberts detailed blowtorch z het aleged trysts wen beau AlTed Wilt a I CICIShOwiti and Others Inoiaang seer lase sew. a wile orgy win Andrew. Weer; • tea EpSten7. end other apogrevy urderaged gels South Caro member die alcohol poi 'The factual details regarang report von wheal ens where 1114 Jar a A unueisis Doos engaged n seaual . ConAtur Slva a...flaw a $ acirazies me enmities& and Import non lo hos cerium damn S.C. cop Mi espectsily constdenng that Sieger char mese COOPS incisive non-parties murder of V Scott who are not related to &whileCVO. respondent GOvemment Tnese C Ivole• *as. unnecessary deals Shall be P.1.0C4e W Tad SVSken.- the 'Age wrote. Homeless r found in all He also lord there was ro with moth s reason for the new Dees to shwa Lett .0 ryes bona int nicertne m the ease al as moo angers Gain the original two plairards had Pled wit on babel of all of Fosten's victims sir yews ago. I charged running ow in dine and 'The Crain rinse we NODS Thr bw Moe *0 does rid :Ewe edsimg new el ruswo 0.5 The 'sea slave' claims made Lel the Jens y Epstein clue against mother otter ine Nes have been tossed by a Florida lodge. WW1MS isle int?* prcceedep' the judge Mote. and enfrely tnneCESSAry Baltimore g foe Jens Doe 3 end Jane Doe a SO proceed at panes in this scion: member T pelt redder Sentence The judge did 'Sy the wanes could be called as witnesses when the can goes He CAnner4. leinal Deno -are 'nc necessary Parlsrpahon' or Jane Do* 3 sad Jane Doe a in Ids case can be Detroit ',tor mooed by cinema bled propo.ly supicittc and robs/One. admissible, and shoving 2 e rassciagiathie — intenbcy as needed: Maria wrote. in freezer: r • thew maw fro.,* tete, rkalvilorr; a y: Video show Minn. aoiOr fall oft with http://www.nydailynews.cominews/national/judge-losses-sex-slave-claims-involving-prince... 4/9/2015 EFTA01078693 Judge tosses 'sex slave' claims involving Prince Andrew - NY Daily News Page 3 of 4 Lemertrly C atrain ptilS“Mte S2E IT: Fla, snaiches sl «na %un friam ~es] e ah sFaxong Drog, sex c Med agains femnte Cali mo Man C reaTelf Med Ay>nt Alan Cleishositz raa ph...ed lo Mar the ludo, Inro. out the 'sea slave' MepalkOns and 'gyt he rit be vink areal 1,wilierbe Dall.b0W.:2 Idd The poans an pora; hej p1M5b3 wilh re denSiOn — bul he 'Yl her iewycys b netamakenk '51w vem hazang In Cclor•Co .. Ø aereSee: ne 494 ' ft we baune tam me vitset hem le be end resut is thai snel to lo ja , MOMSe sto vall team, C he. les and mill tat Gale IO prove it and sne anitsmi UP in precia teu As lot his own mp-nation PeØ,,irr • in confadent the! al the er cl ro be vendiceled and .1 1 meryboily tvil Unaeinand tiss isa cl:m{.1.101y made se cliary.' BuClungham Poem has dm ed the allegalions agaenal Ponce Anotew, Makt helloOt milleaml by s loClure el Ihe prime vikla IM mal maPped max ncl fora Mal sur A pace sycitevnan aectised logoer nitø on the Nape's (Ang lo the ASSOOalea Press A lawyea la the IMF COOL Broa Fcliwards, voveed lo 9,1 55 On MOSTRE. W'rh Me r9ht ta E p%Inn'S yOmS, who the leds have cchnomeopea IVnbet 'n the eierens I Who moe 'We are pianoa ty the Coma*s rating recognaing last Jane Due 3 ard a hase a cm,. 2 right b paitypata mthOyil the neo, kn gurmet nomentien: M mad rerya' 3 Ara.: %+å. Ina stagemaint 'CIM 3' ard. tel happy lo got lo pisaaMast• e the immunt CaS• ' 4 Form 5 men i 'kok ame &cpm tiir J•e•cw Som 6 endo PROMOTED STORIES ~na 7 APIA Snet 8 tem tratte 9 5C c 10 50.-. kW> ro bant con AMt betona e orgel Gomling daern. IN, ml* Mnal ~ass Ilay Hin Teppal Secret Wrth sinna/ smt revens ell SienPlY 8r4• •• tent 11•NiewnloMetany~ Fant Latinga • and nabo/ anyW yeu kne., .rPM.vweeruau Mal rlll you Nem teetty? Tem Hasta Remals Starane Masi*. kan NM http://www.nydailynews.corninewsinafionalijudge-tosses-sex-slave-claims-involving-prince... 4/9/2015 EFTA01078694 Judge tosses `sex slave' claims involving Prince Andrew - NY Daily News Page 4 of 4 NOM MON NYOMLYIKWE iliChnl Slags.: The S C. irrf tMa.... :. 7. Kennedy Airport cep Woo lolled Wallet . itiCi 961ePl. penmen, kft $42.5$0 at Stall ISA checkpoints JI • - •ii• t. .r — . .2 Yore Moan: WE RECOMMEND im am Bast Wats/WOO Maw COMMONS Maaceras Can -de iibra\ 0 Accou.Kw couras COMMENTS ON 0.10001, .74".*Ifini Nol•• 11 POST A OOMMENI Wm* a <remn, C JOHNNIE POSITOrVEADAAIN S Gays Av. weft e( 'VW Math try had n promo ire a10)(110 Wald tdfar L•e b., 5,4 MARK days atyl Sore I*111,11 ca not rolOWY Hoed, lfM Mt WOO fa MI SNO a wvai POry and could ha... Dail 4nO No nee pattaso N M *vs go we, a lieded nal Oat, V an pcgo *as ', win off .1,04d SW** ...• 94Rt TIM ovau.Ev 2 (an 4,60 Wt.; would 'Pa 04 al the I:Iv/mane ;0, MC:. , Swat% •• t.% hoi. 110111 SHOW MORE COMMENTS detOtIANI SAI I rr ma:AMINO% XELJANZ %ELJAU — C•cal on.. MO id* Idin••••• I Hertz.... ai •114.4 wsO.a waM'.aar. %JAW • wooden. et Imulowa.... 4,....na..tr %kr N • ara.•••.. 114.4.• RA 1•041, Dann litrafellen firma An -eh Co,* • at, • Until ha ...ant. 'WI. VIM' tfi#U•Oto• 14.9 Yu . creoljwav• I PO Da/0+r.. Al http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/judge-tosses-scx-slave-claims-involving-prince.. 4/9/2015 EFTA01078695 After Vindication, Alan Dershowitz Vows to Sue Sex Accuser in Court — Jewish Business... Page 1 of 3 a Go to DASHBOARD > Appearance > Menus to set up the menu. Thursday 09 April, 2015 Published On: Wed, Apr 8th, 2015 Court / US / Canada I By Han Shavit After Vindication, Alan Dershowitz Vows to Sue Sex Accuser in Court Dershowitz he also planning to sue his accuser's attorneys for defamation. Professor Alan Dershowitz told Newsmax he plans to sue the woman who accused him of sexual misconduct. Dershowitz spoke after a federal judge on Tuesday U.S. District Court Judge Kenneth Marra had ordered said woman's allegations be removed from the record of an ongoing lawsuit against convicted billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Marra denied a motion by "Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doc 4" to join the lawsuit. He also wrote that the "lurid details" ... "regarding with whom and where the Jane Does engaged in sexual actisities are immaterial and impertinent to this central claim ... especially considering that these details involve non-parties who are not related to the respondent Government. These unnecessary details shall be stricken." The two "non-parties" have been Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz. http://jewishbusinessnews.com/2015/04/08/after-vindication-alan-dershowitz-vows-to-sue-s... 4/9/2015 EFTA01078696 Afier Vindication, Alan Dershowitz Vows to Sue Sex Accuser in Court — Jewish Business... Page 2 of 3 "We've been legally vindicated but my reputation has still been, unfortunately, tarnished in the minds of at least some people by a woman who just lied and made up a story out of whole cloth," Dershowitz told Newsmax's Steve Malzberg. "It was like a drive-by shooting or like somebody scribbling graffiti on a bathroom door," Dershowitz said. Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.cont/NewsfronUAlan- Dershowitz-Steve-Malzberg-sexual-misconduct-suing/20 I 5/04/07/icV637044Mixzz3WhkDIzTe Urgent: Rate Obama on His Job Performance. Vote Here Now! Dershowitz, who originally represented Epstein in his plea deal, said he will now seek to depose "Jane Doc 3." "We will persuade the world that she made up the whole story out of whole cloth," he said. Dershowitz he also planning to sue his accuser's attorneys for defamation. "And we're considering suing her for defamation as well, but right now she was trying to hide in Colorado and avoid service, but we found her and we served her and now she'll be subjected to a deposition," he said. "And if she repeats what she said previously under oath, she will go to jail because what she said is a complete, total, made-up lie. Not only about me but about many other people." NEWSMAX STUDIOS PROF. ALAI, Read more about: Alan Dershowitz, Jane Doe 3, Jeffrey Epstein, Kenneth Marra http://jewishbusinessnews.corn/2015/04/08/after-vindication-alan-dershowitz-vows-to-sue-s... 4/9/2035 EFTA01078697 After Vindication, Alan Dershowitz Vows to Sue Sex Accuser in Court — Jewish Business... Page 3 of 3 - BROTEN • GARAGE DOOR SALES " Iller open no Door:. FO, 'rout Since 1955 RS $ OPENERS * ENTRY DOORS JEWISH BUSIeg ERVICE » INSTALLATION NE http://jewishbusinessnews.corn/20 I 5/04/08/after-vindication-alan-dershowitz-vows-to-sue-s... 4/9/2015 EFTA01078698 EXHIBIT 6 EFTA01078699 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA/ / CASE NO.: CACE 15-000072 /. it" BRADLEY J. EDWARDS and g.1T PAUL G. CASSELL, s/6e/4. 44 Plaintiffs I Counterclaim Defendants, v. ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, Defendant I Counterclaim Plaintiff. I SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM THE STATE OF FLORIDA: To: Records Custodian Boles, Schiller & Flexner LLP 401 East Las Olas Blvd. Suite 1200 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 YOU ARE COMMANDED to produce the items described in Exhibit A which is attached to this subpoena for inspection and copying. You will not be required to surrender the original items. You may comply with this subpoena by providing legible copies of the items to be produced to the attorney whose name appears on this subpoena on or before the scheduled date of production. You may condition the preparation of the copies upon the payment in advance of the reasonable cost of preparing the copies. You may mail or deliver the copies to the attorney whose name appears on this subpoena or you may appear with the items to be inspected and copied at the offices of Cole, Scott & Kissane, 9150 South Dadeland Boulevard, Suite 1400, Miami, Florida 33156, on or before April 15, 2015. EFTA01078700 You have the right to object to the production pursuant to this subpoena at any time before production by giving notice to the attorney whose name appears on this subpoena. If you fail to appear, you may be in contempt of Court. You are subpoenaed to appear by the following attorney, and unless from this subpoena by this attorney or the Court, you shall respond to this subpoena as directed. THIS 27th DAY OF March, 2015. By: s/Thomas E. Scoff THOMAS E. SCOTT For the Court Thomas E. Scott Florida Bar No. 149100 Steven R. Safra I:1 Kin ilic7A19 ULh. SW I I & KISSANE, P.A. Cole, Scott & Kissane Building, Suite 1400 9150 South Dadeland Boulevard Miami. Florida 33156 Phone: Fax: Richard A. Simpson (admitted pro hac vice) Mary E. Boria (admitted pro hac vice) Ashley E. Eiler (pro hac vice pending) WILEY REIN LLP 1776 K Street NW Washin ton DC 200 Phone: Fax: Counselfor Alan Al. Dershowitz 2 EFTA01078701 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS I. This subpoena is directed to You and covers all information in Your possession and all information subject to Your custody or control, wherever they may be located. 2. Each request in this subpoena is to be responded to separately and as thoroughly as possible. The fact that investigation is continuing shall not be used as an excuse for failure to respond to each request as fully as possible. The omission of any document, thing or item of information shall be deemed a representation that such document is not known to You, your counsel, or other representatives at the time of the service of the response. 3. If the attorney/client privilege or a work product protection is asserted in response to any production request. identify the document by its: (a) date; (b) general nature. e.g.. letter, memorandum, photograph, computer printout, etc.; (c) subject matter; (d) author or originator; (e) each person indicated as an addressee or copy recipient. or known or believed by you to have received a copy of the document; (f) present custodian of each copy of the document; (g) alleged ground or grounds for withholding production; and (h) sufficient particulars to allow Dershowitz to evaluate the claim of privilege or immunity asserted. DEFINITIONS As used in this subpoena, the following definitions shall apply: "All" and "Each" mean all, each, any, and every. 2. "Concerning" and "Concern" mean relates to. refers to, contains, describes, embodies, mentions, constitutes, constituting. supports, corroborates, demonstrates, proves, evidences, shows, refutes, disputes, rebuts, controverts, undercuts and contradicts. 3. "Dershowitz" means Alan M. Dershowitz. 4. "Document(s)" means any and All written, typed, printed, recorded or graphic matter, however produced. reproduced or stored, whether an original or a copy, and whether 3 EFTA01078702 prepared, published or released by any person or entity, including but not limited to letters, reports, agreements, correspondence. intra-office or inter-office correspondence, telegrams, minutes or records of meetings, reports or summaries, expressions or statements, lists, drafts and revisions. invoices, receipts, original and preliminary notes, sketches, records, ledgers, contracts, bills of lading, bills. inventories, financial data, maps, memoranda, accounting and financial records, diaries, journals. calendars, statements, work papers, videotapes, photographs. pamphlets, brochures, advertisements, trade letters, press releases, drawings, recaps, tables, articles, summaries of conversations, computer cards, tapes, diskettes, or other means of electronically or magnetically maintaining information, and printouts. The term "Document(s)" also includes electronically stored data from which information can be obtained either directly or by translation through detection devices or readers; any such document is to be produced in a reasonably legible and usable form. The term "Document(s)" includes All drafts of a Document and All copies that differ in any respect from the original, including any notation, underlining, marking, or information not on the original. The term also includes information stored in, or accessible through, computer or other information retrieval systems (including any computer archives or back-up systems), together with instructions and All other materials necessary to use or interpret such data compilations. Without limitation on the term "control- as used in the preceding paragraph, a Document is deemed to be in Your control if You have the right to secure the Document or a copy thereof from another person. 5. "Epstein" means Jeffrey Epstein. 6. "Federal Action" means the matter styled Jane Doe #1, el al. v. United Stales ofAmerica, Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOI-INSON (S.D. Ha.). 7. "Jane Doe # 3" means the individual referred to as "Jane Doe #3" in the Federal Action. 8. "You" and "Your" means the entity to whom this subpoena is addressed, including the Entity's members, employees, past employees, accountants, agents, attorneys, representatives, and all other persons acting or purporting to act on its behalf. 4 EFTA01078703 EXHIBIT "A" I. All Documents Concerning any actual or potential book, television or movie contracts or deals concerning Jane Doe #3's allegations about being a sex slave. 2. All Documents Concerning any monetary payments or other consideration received by Jane Doe #3 from any media outlet in exchange for her statements (whether "on the record" or "off the record") regarding Epstein, Dershowitz, Prince Andrew, Duke of York, and/or being a sex slave. 3. All Documents that reference Dershowitz by name, which support and/or confirm the allegations set forth in Paragraphs 24-31 of Jane Doe #3's Declaration dated January 19, 2015 (Docket Entry #291-1) and/or Paragraph 49 of Jane Doe #3's Declaration dated February 5, 2015 (Docket Entry #310-1), which were filed in the Federal Action. 4. All photographs and video in the original, native format in which they were taken (not a paper copy) of Jane Doe #3 with Dershowitz. 5. All photographs and video in the original, native format in which they were taken (not a paper copy) not produced in response to Request No. 4, above, of Dershowitz at (i) Epstein's Manhattan home in New York City, New York; (ii) Epstein's home in Palm Beach, Florida; (iii) Epstein's Zorro Ranch in Santa Fe, New Mexico; (iv) Little Saint James island in the U.S. Virgin Islands; and (v) Epstein's airplane, on the same date and time that Jane Doe #3 were also present at such location. 6. Any documents and information that support and/or confirm Jane Doe #3's presence at the various locations named in Paragraphs 24-31 of Jane Doe #3's January 19, 2015 Declaration in the Federal Action on the particular dates and times when Dershowitz was also present. 7. Any documents and information that show Dershowitz was present at the various locations named in Paragraphs 24-31 of Jane Doc #3's January 19, 2015 Declaration in the Federal Action on the particular dates and times when Jane Doe #3 alleges to have been present. 8. All statements, written or recorded, that Jane Doe #3 has provided to anyone that reference Dershowitz by name or other description. 9. All notes of, or notes prepared for, any statements or interviews in which Jane Doe #3 referenced Dershowitz by name or other description. 10. All Documents Concerning any communications by Jane Doe #3 or on Jane Doe #3's behalf with any media outlet concerning Dershowitz or the Federal Action, whether or not such communications were "on the record" or "off the record." II. All notes, writings, photographs, and/or audio or video recordings made or recorded by or of Jane Doe #3 on the dates on which Jane Doe #3 alleges she was present with Dershowitz, including but not limited to Jane Doe #3's calendar, diary or journal entries 5 EFTA01078704 on those dates, regardless whether the notes, writings, photographs, and/or audio or video recordings refer to Dershowitz. To the extent that any responsive materials are photographs or video recordings, please provide them in the original, native format in which they were taken (not a paper copy). 12. All Documents Concerning Jane Doe #3's travel to or from locations for those occasions when she alleges she was present with Dcrshowitz. 13. To the extent not produced in response to the above list of requested Documents, all notes, writings, photographs, and/or audio or video recordings made at any time that refer or relate in any way to Dershowitz. 14. All drafts of declarations or affidavits by Jane Doe #3 that relate in any way to Dershowitz and/or Epstein. 15. All Documents Concerning any telephone, including any cellular telephone, used by Jane Doe #3 between January I, 1999 and December 3I, 2002. 16. Any diary, journal or calendar Concerning Jane Doe #3's activities between January 1, 1999 and December 31, 2002. 17. All Documents Concerning Jane Doe #3's presence at or on (i) Jeffrey Epstein's Manhattan home in New York City, New York; (ii) Mr. Epstein's home in Palm I3each, Florida; (iii) Mr. Epstein's Zorro Ranch in Santa Fe, New Mexico; (iv) Little Saint James island in the U.S. Virgin Islands; and (v) Mr. Epstein's airplane from January I, 1999 through December 31, 2002. 18. All travel records of any kind, including but not limited to tickets, hotel room receipts or other documents Concerning any travel undertaken by Jane Doe #3 between January I, 1999 and December 31, 2002. 19. All records of any interviews given by Jane Doe #3 to any party Conccming Dershowitz, Epstein, or any of their agents or associates. 20. All manuscripts and/or other writings, whether published or unpublished, created in whole or in part by Jane Doe #3, Concerning Epstein and any of his agents or associates. 21. All Documents Concerning Jane Doe #3's allegations that she met former President Bill Clinton, former Vice President Al Gore and/or Mary Elizabeth "Tipper" Gore on Little Saint James island in the U.S. Virgin Islands. 22. All Documents Concerning your retention by Jane Doe #3, including, but not limited to: signed letter of retainer, retention agreement. explanation of fees and/or any document describing the scope of retention. 6 EFTA01078705 23. All Documents which are related to when Janc Doc 43 allegedly told her attorneys that Alan Dershowitz was among the men she had sexual relations with. 7 EFTA01078706 Filing # 25416606 E-Filed 03/27/2015 02:18:21 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY. FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO.: CACE 15-000072 BRADLEY J. EDWARDS and PAUL G. CASSELL, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants, vs. ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff CERTIFICATE OF NON OBJECTION Defendant ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ ("Defendant"), by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby files this certificate that no objections were received to the subpoena duces tecum directed to Boies, Schiller & Flexner, LLP. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-mail on March 27, 2015 to: Jack Scarola, Esquire. Searcy Denny et al and counsel for Plaintiff. COLE, SCOTT & KISSANE, P.A. Cole, Scott & Kissane Building, Suite 1400 9150 South Dadeland Blvd. P: F: By: isi-ThQMS-5O21 THOMAS E. SCOTI' FBN: 149100 STEVEN R. SAFRA FBN: 057028 E-Mail: thnnins sentteccklepal enT E-Mail: Secondary E-mail: renee nailaccklemal ram Secondary E-mail: EFTA01078707 Richard A. Simpson (admitted pro hac vice) Mary E. Soria (admitted pro hac vice) Ashley E. Filer (pro hac vice pending) WILEY REIN LLP 1776 K Street NW Washin ton DC 20006 Fax Fax: Counselfor Alan Al Derchowitz -2- EFTA01078708 EXHIBIT 7 EFTA01078709 ast:ict Court Fremont County, Colorado Court Address: 136 Justice Center Rd Canon City, CO 81212 PlaintifffsliPetitioner(s): Edwards, et al. A COURT USE ONLY A Case Number 23:5;:v3:30n; Defendant(s)/Respondent(s): Dershowitz Division: Courtroom-. SUBPOENA TO OATTEND eATTEND AND PRODUCE To You are ordered to attend and give testimony at the District Court of Fremont County, located at 136 Justice Center Road. Canon City, CO 81212. Room *105. on Tuesday. May 12 2015. at 9 30 a.m. as a witness for the OPlartfifspent oner(s) ElDefendant(s)Respondent(s) in this action A! tat time and olace, you also shall produce the following items now in your custody or control: See attached Schedule A Names, addresses and telephone numbers of all counsel of record in this action and of any party represented by =tinsel are as follows. L.Narne For Plaintiffs Bradley J Edwards V2139 ddress . Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. I TetephoneNumber and Paul G Cassell West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack Scarola, FL Bar No 169440 Searq Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, PA For Defendant Alan M. Dershowitz 9150 South Dadeland Blvd., #1400 Thomas E Scott, Florida Bar No. 149100 Miami, Ft. 33156 Steven R. Safra, Florida Bar No. 057028 I Cole, Scott & KIssane, PA •-• Clerk/Deputy Clerk or Attorney JD€ 80.2 COUNTY COURT SUBPOENA TO ATTEND OR ATTEND AND PRODUCE 1/13 O 7012 Colon& With! Department the the in the (nuns ofCcInntin EFTA01078710 %/IT OF SEWCIE ext a pelf Ic to t -^-o• lutameetlbet'S.' aura to (Stec a tie Witness o' by oavng • et- I:raft's-Ay err vitae ger 47' cccasions bul have not h4'• a s t er.,,Fe. ?.-.'aeeen County Signature cti ZTV:346 ---+_- Name (Prvil or tyre, Notary 'Labile rDept4 Cie., a !CC 7.7ani neat C17.31-1,C AV:: PRODUCE 1/13 EFTA01078711 - ao-•••••••••••• ices SCHEDULE "A" . All documents that reference by name. Alan M. Dershowitz,' which support auctlor confirm the allegations set forth in Paragraphs 24-31 of your Declaration dated January 19. 2015 and/or Paragraph 49 of your Declaration dated February 5. 2015, which were filed with the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. in lane Doe :/) and jane Doe *2 v. United States of America. Case No. 08-807.16-CTV-MARRAIIOIINSON, fECF No. 291-1] (the "Federal Action"). 2. All photographs and video in the original, native format in which they were taken (not a paper copy) of you with Alan M. Dershowitz. 3. All photographs and video in the original, native format in which they were taken (not a paper copy) not produced in response to Request No. 2, above, of Alan M. Dershowitz at (i) Jeffrey Epstein's Manhattan home in New York City, New York; (ii) Mr. Epstein's home in Palm Beach, Florida; (iii) Mr. Epstein's Zorro Ranch in Santa Fe. New Mexico; (iv) Little Saint James island in the U.S. Virgin islands; and (v) Mr. Epstein's airplane, on the same date and time that you were also present at such location. 4. All photographs and video in the original, native format in which they were taken (not a paper copy) of you not produced in response to Request No. 3, above, that evidence and/or show you were present at the same location as Alan M. Dcrshowitz on that same date and time. 5, Any documents and information that support and/or confirm your presence at the various locations named in Paragraphs 24-31 of your Declaration on the particular dates and times when Alan M. Dershowitz was also present. 6. Any documents and information that show Alan M. Dershowitz was present at the various locations named in Paragraphs 24-31 of your Declaration on the particular dates and times when you allege to have been present in your response to Request No. 5, above. 7. All statements, written or recorded, which you have provided to anyone that reference by name, Alan M. Dershowitz. 8. All notes of, or notes prepared for. any statements or interviews in which you referenced by name or other description, Alan M. Dershowitz. 9. All documents concerning any communications by you or on your behalf with any media outlet concerning Alan M. Dershowitz or the Federal Action, whether ur not such communications were "on the record" or "off the record." 10. All notes, writings. photographs. and/or audio or video recordings matte or recorded by or of you on the dates on which you allege you were present with Alan M. Dcrshowitz, including but not limited to your calendar, diary or journal entries on those dates, regardless whether the notes, writings, photographs, and!or audio or video recordings refer to Mr. lkrshowitz. To the extent I For purposes of this Schedule "A", reference to "Alan M. Dershowitz" herein skill mean and refer to any reference to the Defendant in this action, including but not limited to, as "Alan", "Alan M. Dershowitz", "Professor Dershowitz", Of "Dershowitz", and the like. JOE 80.2 COUNTY COURT SUBPOENA TO ATTEND OR ATTEND AND PRODUCE 1/13 O 2012 Colorado Judicial Department for use in the Couns of Colorado EFTA01078712 that any responsive materials arc photographs or video recordings, please provide them in the original. native format in which they were taken (not a paper copy). 12. All documents relating to your travel to or from locations for those occasions when you allege you were present with Alan NI. Dershowitz. 13. To the extent not produced in response to the above list of requested documents, all notes, writings, photographs, and/or audio or video recordings made at any time that refer or relate in any way to Alan M. Dershowitz. 14. All drafts of declarations or affidavits by you that relate in any way to Alan M. Dershowitz and/or Jeffrey Epstein. 15. All documents relating to any telephone, including any cellular telephone, used by you between January 1, 1999 and December 31, 2002. 16. Any diary, journal or calendar concerning your activities between January I. 1999 and December 31, 2002. 17. AU documents concerning any actual or potential book, television or movie deals concerning your allegations about being a sex slave. 18. All documents concerning any monetary payments or other consideration received by you from any media outlet in exchange for your statements (whether "on the record" or "off the record') regarding Jeffrey Epstein. Man M. Dershowitz, Prince Andrew, Duke of York, ant/or being a sex slave. 19. All documents showing, concerning, relating or referring to when you were at or on (i) Jeffrey Epstein's Manhattan home in New York City, New York; (ii) Mr. Epstein's home in Palm Reach, Florida; (iii) Mr. Epstcin's L' otto Ranch in Santa Fe, New Mexico; (iv) Little Saint .lames island in the U.S. Virgin Islands; and (v) Mr. Epstein's airplane from January I. 1999 through December 31.2002. 20. All documents showing any payments or remuneration of any kind made by Jeffrey Epstein or any of his agents or associates to you from January I, 1999 through December 31. 2002. 21. All travel records of any kind, including but not limited to tickets, hotel room receipt% or other documents concerning, relating or referring to any travel undertaken by you between January I. 1999 and December 31, 2002. All records of any interviews given by you to any party concerning, relating or referring to Jeffrey Epstein or any of his agents or associates. 23. All manuscripts and/or other writings, whether published or unpublished, created in whole or in part by you, concerning. relating or referring to Jeffrey Epstein and any of his agents or associates. 24. All documents concerning, relating or referring to your assertions that you met Fortner President Bill Clinton, former Vice President Al Gore and/or Mary Elizabeth "Tipper" Gore on Little Saint James island in the IJ.S. Virgin Islands. JDF 80.2 COUNTY COURT SUBPOENA TO ATTEND OR ATTEND AND PRODUCE 1113 4 2012 Colorado Judicial Department fur use in the Courts of Ce/orado EFTA01078713 Z5. Ail documents concerning your retention of the law firm Boles. SOUI:er h FieNiter LLP. including but not limited to: signed letter of retainer, retention agreement, explanation of fees, and/or any documents describing the scope of retention. JDF 80.2 COUNTY COURT SUBPOENA TO ATTEND OR ATTEND AND PRODUCE 1113 C. 2012 Colorado Judicial Department fin use in the Courts ct Colorado EFTA01078714 District Court Fremont County Colorado Court Address. t 36 Justice Center Rd Canon City, CO 81212 Plaintiff(syPetitioneds). Edwards. el al. COURT USE ONLY ,Number: Derendant(s)/Respondent(s): Dershowitz DiASIOn7 COUrrr0!)m. SUBPOENA TO OATTEND **ATTEND AND PRODUCE To: _lane Doe F3_(aodress redacted :Or purpose of court Mom You are ordered to attend and give testimony at the DIStnet Court of Fremont Cocain. located at: 136 Justice Center Road, Canon City. CO 81212. Room s _1 on Tuesday. May 12. 2015.:4 9 10 a m. as a wttness for the OF1aintiff(sYPoUtioneds) ODefendant(sLResPondent(s1in this action. At that time and place, you also shall produce the folrowing items now in your custody or control: acragaghpsackteulstal Names, addresses and telephone numbers el all counsel of iinord in this action and of any party represented try counsel are as follows: p ante Address 1 Telephone i : For Plaintiffs Bradley J. Edwards 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. and Paul G. Cassell West Palm Beach. FL 33403 Jack Scarola, FL Bar No 169440 I I • Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley. i PA For Defendant Alan M. Dershowitz 9150 Swirl Dadelond Blvd. Thomas E Scott, Florida Bar No 149100 #1400 Steven R Satre. Florida Bar No. 057028 Miami. FL 33156 Cole. Scott S Kissane PA Dr F30R/AH 5/7EHEIR S'rRINGARi •- • Date: • t0 .ut Attorney (10 • , JE21Li1 sk, Viz\ ..14$ 570-i-st irc 81-y 2 Cy)NIY S-..391 C,Ctiik 7e ....' 7 E'V) &ND PROCIL:ZE 1/13 ' II: et.!otatto j“(17;;;I: Dcp:iti,wrt •,I i , ...Is ,. C.,I,.rado EFTA01078715 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE I declare under oath that. I am 18 years or older and not a parry 10 the action and that I served Subpoena to ❑Attend °Attend and Produce to the Witness in (County) (Slate) an (date)at the following location Chock one 3 By handing it to a person identified 10 me as the Witness or by leaving it with the Witness wbo refused service. ! attempted to serve the Wdness on occasions but have not been able to locate Ins Witness. CI Private process server 0 Sheriff. County Foe Si Mileages Signalise of Process Serve. Name (Print or typo) My Commission Expires Notary Public /Deputy Cie* Date J0S 50.2 COUNTY COURT SUBPOENA TO ATTEND OR ATTEND AND PRODUCE 1113 O 2012 Colorado Judicial ()epicures* for use In the Coats of Colorado EFTA01078716 SCHEDULE, "A" 1. All documents that reference by name, Alan M. Dershowitz, ) which support and/or confirm the allegations set forth in Paragraphs 24-31 of your Declaration dated January 19, 2015 and/or Paragraph 49 of your Declaration dated February 5, 2015, which were filed with the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in Jane Dsss and JaneDoe t12 v. United States of Amerlyl, Case No. 08.80736-CIV- RRAIJOHNSON, (ECF No. 291-1l (the "Federal Action"). 2. All photographs and video in the original, native format in which they were taken (not a paper copy) of you with Alan M. Dershowitz. 3. All photographs and video in the original, native format in which they were taken (not a paper copy) not produced in response to Request No. 2, above, of Alan M. Dershowitz at (i) Jeffrey Epstein's Manhattan home in Ncw York City, New York; (ii) Mr. Epstein's home in Palm Beach, Florida; (tit) Mr. Epstein's Zorro Ranch in Santa Fe, New Mexico; (iv) Little Saint James island in the U.S. Virgin Islands; and (v) Mr. Epstein's airplane, on the same date and time that you were also present at such location. 4. All photographs and video in the original, native format in which they were taken (not a paper copy) of you not produced in response to Request No. 3, above, that evidence and/or show you were present at the same location as Alan M. Dershowitz on that same date and time. 5. Any documents and information that support and/or confirm your presence at the various locations named in Paragraphs 24-31 of your Declaration on the particular dates and times when Alan M. Dershowitz was also present. 6. Any documents and infomtation that show Alan M. Dershowitz was present at the various locations named in Paragraphs 24-31 of your Declaration on the particular dates and times when you allege to have been present in your response to Request No. 5, above. 7. All statements, written or recorded, which you have provided to anyone that reference by name, Alan M. Dershowitz. 8. All notes of, or notes prepared for, any statements or interviews in which you referenced by name or other description, Alan M. Dershowitz. 9. All documents concerning any communications by you or on your behalf with any media outlet concerning Alan M. Dershowitz or the Federal Action, whether or not such communications were "on the record" or "off the record." 1 For purposes of this Schedule "A", reference to "Alan M. Dershowitz" herein shall mean and refer to any reference to the Defendant in this action, including but not limited to, as "Alan", "Alan M. Dershowitz", "Professor Dershowitz", or "Dershowitz", and the like. .1DP 802 COUNTY COURT SUBPOENA TO ATTEND OR ATTEND ANDPRODUCE lit 3 20t2 Colorado Judicial Department for /..SC in the COWIN of Colorado EFTA01078717 10, All notes. writings, photographs, and Of Mon or video recordings made or recorded by or of you on the dates on which you allege you were present with Alan M Dershowitz, including hut not limited to your calendar, diary or journal entries on those dates, regardless whether the notes, wnnngs, photographs, and/or audio or video recordings refer to Mr. Dershowitz. To the extent that any responsive materials are photographs or video recordings, please provide them in the original, native format in which they were taken (not a paper copy). 12. All documents relating to your travel to or from locations for those occasions when you allege you were present with Alan NI Dershowitz 13. To the extent not produced in response to the above list of requested documents, all notes, writings, photographs, andfor audio or video recordings made at any time that refer or relate in any way to Alan M. Dershowi . 14. All drafts of declarations or affidavits by you that relate in any way to Alan M. Dershowitz and/or Jeffrey Epstein IS. All documents relating to any telephone, including any cellular telephone, used by you between January I, 1999 and December 31, 2002. 16. Any diary. journal or calendar concerning your activities between January 1, 1999 and December 31, 2002. 17. Ali documents concerning arty actual or potential book, television or movie deals concerning your allegations about being a sex slave IS. All documents concerning any monetary payments or other consideration received by you from any media outlet in exchange for your statements (whether "on the record" or "off the record") regarding Jeffrey Epstein. Alan M. Dershowitz, Prince Andrew, Duke of York, andfor being a sex slave. 19. All documents showing, concerning, relating or referring to when you were at or on (i) Jeffrey Epstein's Manhattan home in New York City. New York; (ii) Mr. Epstein's home in Palm Beach, Florida; (iii) Mr. Epstein's Zorn, Ranch in Santa Fe, New Mexico; (iv) Little Saint James island in the V.S. Virgin Islands; and (v) Mr. Epstein's airplane from January 1, 1999 through December 3 I , 2002. 20. All documents showing any payments or remuneration of any kind made by Jeffrey Epstein or any of his agents or associates to you from January I, 1999 through December 31, 2002. 21. All travel records of any kind, including but not limited to tickets, hotel room receipts or other documents concerning, relating or referring to any travel undertaken by you between January 1, 1999 and December 31. 2002. JDF 00.2 COUNTY COURT SUBPOENA TO A- TENO OR ATTEND AND PRODUCE ill2 t) 2012 Colorado Judicial Depanment for use in me Courts rircolorato EFTA01078718 22. All records of any interviews given by you to any party concerning, relating or referring to Jeffrey Epstein or any of his agents or associates. 23. All manuscripts and/or other writings, whether published or unpublished, created in whole or in part by you, concerning, relating or referring to Jeffrey Epstein and any of his agents or associates. 24. All documents concerning, relating or referring to your assertions that you met former President Bill Clinton, former Vice President Al Gore and/or Mary Elizabeth - Tipper" Gore on Little Saint James island in the U.S. Virgin islands. 25. All documents concerning your retention of the law firm Boles, Schiller & Flcxner LLP, including but not limited to: signed letter of retainer, retention agreement, explanation of fees, and/or any documents describing the scope of retention. JOE All 2 COUNTY COURt SUBPOENA TO ATTEND OR ATTEND AND PRODUCE 1(13 C 2012 Colorado Judicial Department for ow m the Courts of Colorado EFTA01078719 ATTACHMENT A C.R.C.P. 45 requires the party issuing a subpoena for the production of records or a tangible thing to provide the following information: (c) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena. (I) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; Sanctions. A party or attorney responsible for issuing and serving a subpoena must take reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a person subject to the subpoena. The issuing court must enforce this duty and impose an appropriate sanction, which may include lost earnings and reasonable attorney's fees, on a party or attorney who fails to comply. (2) Command to Produce Records or Tangible Things. (A) Attendance not required. A person commanded to produce records or tangible things need not attend in person at the place of production unless also commanded to attend for a deposition, hearing, or trial. (B) For production of privileged records. (1) If a subpoena commands production of records from a person who provides services subject to one of the privileges established by C.R.S. § 13-90.107, or from the records custodian for that person, which records pertain to services performed by or at the direction of that person ("privileged records"), such a subpoena must be accompanied by an authorization signed by the privilege holder or holders or by a court order authorizing production of such records. (II) Prior to the entry of an order for a subpoena to obtain the privileged records, the court shall consider the rights of the privilege holder or holders in such privileged records, including an appropriate means of notice to the privilege holder or holders or whether any objection to production may be resolved by redaction. (III) If a subpoena for privileged records does not include a signed authorization or court order permitting the privileged records to be produced by means of subpoena, the subpoenaed person shall not appear to testify and shall not disclose any of the privileged records to the party who issued the subpoena. (C) Objections. Any party or the person subpoenaed to produce records or tangible things may submit to the party issuing the subpoena a written objection to inspecting, copying, testing or sampling any or all of the materials. The objection must be submitted before the earlier of the time specified for compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served. If objection is made, the party issuing the subpoena shall promptly serve a copy of the objection on all other parties. If an objection is made, the party issuing the subpoena is not entitled to inspect, copy, test or sample the materials except pursuant to an order of the court from which the subpocna was issued. If an objection is made, at any time on notice to the subpoenaed person and the other parties, the party issuing the subpoena may move the issuing court for an order compelling production. (3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena. EFTA01078720 (A) When required. On motion made promptly and in any event at or before the time specified in the subpoena for compliance, the issuing court must quash or modify a subpoena that: (I) Fails to allow a reasonable time to comply; (11) Requires a person who is neither a party nor a party's officer to attend a deposition in any county other than where the person resides or is employed or transacts his business in person, or at such other convenient place as is fixed by an order of court; (III) Requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter, if no exception or waiver applies; or (IV) Subjects a person to undue burden. (B) When permitted. To protect a person subject to or affected by a subpoena, the issuing court may, on motion made promptly and in any event at or before the time specified in the subpoena for compliance, quash or modify the subpoena if it requires: (I) Disclosing a trade secret or other confidential, research, development, or commercial information; or (Ii) Disclosing an unretained expert's opinion or information that does not describe specific matters in dispute and results from the expert's study that was not requested by a party. (C) Specifying conditions as an alternative. In the circumstances described in Rule 45(c)(3)(B), the court may, instead of quashing or modifying a subpoena, order attendance or production under specified conditions if the issuing party: (I) Shows a substantial need for the testimony or material that cannot be otherwise met without undue hardship; and (II) Ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonably compensated. (d) Duties in Responding to Subpoena. (1) Producing Records or Tangible Things. (A) Unless agreed in writing by all parties, the privilege holder or holders and the person subpoenaed, production shall not be made until at least 14 days after service of the subpoena, except that, in the case of an expedited hearing pursuant to these rules or any statute, in the absence of such agreement, production shall be made only at the place, date and time for compliance set forth in the subpoena; and (B) If not objected to, a person responding to a subpoena to produce records or tangible things must produce them as they are kept in the ordinary course of business or must organize and label them to correspond to the categories in the demand and must permit inspection, copying, testing, or sampling of the materials. (2) Claiming Privilege or Protection. EFTA01078721 (A) Information withheld. Unless the subpoena is subject to subsection (c)(2)(B) of this rule relating to production of privileged records, a person withholding subpoenaed information under a claim that it is privileged or subject to protection as trial-preparation material must: (I) Make the claim expressly; and (II) Describe the nature of the withheld records or tangible things in a manner that, without revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the claim. (B) Information produced. If information produced in response to a subpoena is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trial-preparation material, the person making the claim may notify any party that received the information of the claim and the basis for it. After being notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use or disclose the infonnation until the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to retrieve the information if the party disclosed it before being notified; and may promptly present the information to the court under seal for a determination of the claim. The person who produced the information must preserve the information until the claim is resolved. EFTA01078722 EXHIBIT 8 EFTA01078723 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO: CACE 15-000072 BRADLEY J. EDWARDS and PAUL O. CASSELL, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants v. ALAN DERSHOWITZ, Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff NON-PARTY BOLES, SCHILLER AND FLEXNER LLINS OBJECTIONS TO ALAN DERSHOWITZ'S SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM The law firm of Boies, Schiller and Flexner LLP, a non-party to this action, pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.410(e)(1), hereby objects to the Subpoena Duces Tenon noticed by Defendant Alan Dershowitz in its entirety and submits these responses and objections ("Responses") to the document requests ("Requests") contained therein. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT AND GENERAL OBJECTIONS Defendant, Alan Dershowitz has served the law firm of Boies, Schiller and Flexner LLP ("BSF") with a subpoena duces team seeking an array of documents that are both irrelevant to this matter and entirely privileged. Specifically, the subpoena seeks documents and communications between BSI' and its client, Jane Doe 3, which are protected by the attorney- client privilege and work product doctrine. Notably, the face of the subpoena demonstrates that Defendant is not even seeking documents relevant to the matter before this Court and is, instead, attempting to obtain backdoor discovery for other actions including a federal action for which 1 EFTA01078724 BSF is also a non-party as explained more fully in BSF's Motion to Quash Defendant's Subpoena. Defendant's subpoena on BSF is solely meant to harass and place an undue burden on this law firm for its representation of non-party, Jane Doe 3. Defendant has made very public his disdain for Jane Doe 3, who was a victim of sexual trafficking, including calling her in the media a "prostitute," a "bad mother" and someone that he is determined to send to "jail." Defendant stated, "The end result of this case should be she pane Doe No. 3] should go to jail, the lawyers should be disbarred and everybody should understand that I am completely and totally innocent." (emphasis added). See Exhibit I, CNN International, New Day, January 6, 2015. "My goal is to bring charges against the client andrequire her to speak in court" (emphasis added). See Exhibit 2, Australian Broadcasting System (ABC), January 6, 2015. "She was hiding in Colorado...but we found her and she will have to be deposed. The end result is that she'll go to jail because she will repeat her lies and we'll be able to prove it and she will end up in prison for perjury." (emphasis added). See also Exhibit 3, New York Daily News, April 7, 2015. As part of his harassment campaign, Defendant served a subpoena (which is a virtual duplicate to the subpoena he served on Jane Doe No. 3) on BSF simply to force this non- party law firm to engage in unnecessary work in having to respond to the disingenuous subpoena. Any appropriate and relevant document Requests should properly be directed to Jane Doe No. 3 and the subpoena to BSF should be quashed in its entirety. Accordingly, BSF has filed a Motion to Quash this Subpoena. BSF's Responses are subject to the following qualifications, explanations and objections which apply to each and every Request and are incorporated in full by this reference into each and every Response below as if fully set forth therein: 2 EFTA01078725 1. BSF responds to the Requests as the firm reasonably interprets and understands the Requests. Should Defendant subsequently assert an interpretation of any individual Request that differs from BSF's understanding, BSF reserves the right to supplement the Responses. 2. To the extent a Request seeks documents protected from discovery by the attorney-client privilege, the work product doctrine, the joint defense doctrine, the common interest privilege, or any other privilege or protection, no such documents shall be produced even if no specific objection is asserted in response to each individual request. Inadvertent identification or production of privileged documents or information is not a waiver of any applicable privilege. 3. BSF objects to the Definitions and Instructions and to each Request to the extent they seek to alter or expand upon the obligations imposed by the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure or the Local Rules. For example, BSF objects to Instruction no. 3 in that it seeks to impose an obligation for the production of a privilege log on a non-party in response to a subpoena duces tecum when no such log is required under Florida law. See West Co., Inc. v. Scott Lewis' Gardening & Trimming, Inc., 24 So. 3d 620, 623 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (a privilege log is not required from a non-party). 4. BSF objects to the Definitions and Instructions and to each Request to the extent that it calls for the production of documents that are not in the firm's custody, possession, or control. BSF specifically objects to any Request that seeks documents that are in the possession, custody and control of any client of BSF. 5. A statement in response to a specific Request that BSF will produce documents is not a statement that any such documents exist but, rather, means only that such documents that do exist and are responsive to a specific Request will be produced. 3 EFTA01078726 6. To the extent that BSF produces documents in response to specific Requests to which the firm has objected, the firm reserves the right to maintain such objections with respect to any additional information and such objections are not waived by the production of responsive documents. 7. BSF objects to the Requests to the extent they seek private and confidential financial information or other confidential information of any kind. 8. BSF objects to the Requests to the extent they seek personal and confidential financial information related to third-parties. 9. BSF objects to the Requests to the extent that they seek documents already in defendant's possession or to the extent they are publicly available. 10. BSF objects to the Requests as overbroad as no time limit has been specified for any of the Requests. To the extent the Court directs discovery from this non-party. it should be limited to the date of the filing of this action on January 6, 2015 to the present. 11. BSF objects to the Requests as they seek to place an undue burden on a law firm handling the representation of a client who is a non-party to the pending litigation. 12. BSF objects to the Requests as they are duplicative of the subpoena Request served on BSF's Client, Jane Doe No. 3. RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS I. All Documents concerning any actual or potential book, television or movie contracts or deals concerning Jane Doe 143's allegations about being a sex slave. Response: In addition to the Preliminary Statement and General Objections, BSF objects to this Request in that it is a non-party law firm and this requests seeks privileged communications between a non-party law firm and its non-party client. Specifically, BSF objects to this Request to the extent that it seeks documents protected by the attorney-client 4 EFTA01078727 privilege, the work product doctrine, the joint defense doctrine, the common interest privilege, or any other privilege or protection. BSF further objects to this Request in that it is vague and ambiguous with respect to its reference to "deals." BSF further objects to this Request as overbroad, harassing and not calculated to lead to discoverable evidence relevant to the Florida Defamation Action. BSF objects to this Request to the extent it seeks confidential financial information from a non-party. BSF objects to this Request in that it places an undue burden on this non-party law firm including, for example, requiring the non-party to search for "documents," which has been defined by Defendant to include a broad definition of electronically stored data, including a requirement of searching "archives" and "back-up systems." 2. All Documents concerning any monetary payments or other consideration received by Jane Doe /13 from any media outlet in exchange for her statements (whether "on the record" or "off the record") regarding Epstein, Dershowitz, Prince Andrew, Duke of York, and/or being a sex slave. Response: In addition to the Preliminary Statement and General Objections, BSI' objects to this Request in that it is a non-party law firm and this requests seeks privileged communications between a non-party law firm and its non-party client. Specifically, BSF objects to this Request to the extent that it seeks documents protected by the attorney-client privilege, the work product doctrine, the joint defense doctrine, the common interest privilege, or any other privilege or protection. BSF further objects to this Request to the extent it seeks documents already in Defendant's possession, custody or control or which have been previously produced in this matter. BSF objects to this Request in that it seeks confidential financial information from a non-party. BSI? further objects to this Request as overbroad, harassing and not calculated to lead to discoverable evidence relevant to the Florida Defamation Action. BSF objects to this Request in that it places an undue burden on this non-party law firm including, for 5 EFTA01078728 example, requiring the non-party to search for "documents", which has been defined by Defendant to include a broad definition of electronically stored data, including a requirement of searching "archives" and "back-up systems." 3. All Documents that reference Dershowitz by name, which support and/or confirm the allegations set forth in Paragraphs 24-31 of Jane Doe #3's Declaration dated January 19, 2015 (Docket Entry #291-1) and/or Paragraph 49 of Jane Doe #3's Declaration dated February 5, 2015 (Docket Entry #310-1), which were filed in the Federal Action. Response: In addition to the Preliminary Statement and General Objections, BSF objects to this Request in that it is a non-party law firm and this requests seeks privileged communications between a non-party law firm and its non-party client. Specifically, BSF objects to this Request to the extent that it seeks documents protected by the attorney-client privilege, the work product doctrine, the joint defense doctrine, the common interest privilege, or any other privilege or protection. BSF thriller objects to this Request in that the face of the Requests demonstrates that the Defendant is seeking to abuse the subpoena power by serving a subpoena on a non-party that seeks discovery unrelated to the underlying matter but, instead. allegedly relevant to a declaration tiled in a "Federal Action" which is defined in Defendant's definition section as "the matter styled Jane Doe #1, ci al. v. VisaedStates ofAmerica. Case No. 08-80736-OV-MARRABOFINSON (S.D. Fla.). BSF further objects to this Request to the extent it seeks documents already in Defendant's possession, custody or control or which have been previously produced. BSF further objects to this Request as overbroad, harassing and not calculated to lead to discoverable evidence relevant to the Florida Defamation Action. BSF objects to this Request in that it places an undue burden on this non-party law firm including, for example, requiring the non-party to search for "documents", which has been defined by Defendant to include a broad definition of electronically stored data, including a requirement of searching "archives" and "back-up systems." 6 EFTA01078729 4. All photographs and video in the original, native format in which they were taken (not a paper copy) of Jane Doe #3 with Dershowitz. Response: In addition to the Preliminary Statement and General Objections, BSF objects to this Request in that it seeks information that is irrelevant to the Florida Defamation Action and is intended to harass this non-party. BSF further objects to this Request to the extent it seeks documents already in Defendant's possession. custody or control or which are in the control of Defendant's client and/or upon information and belief, in the possession, custody and control of the state or federal government. BSF further objects to this Request to the extent that it seeks documents protected by the attorney-client privilege, the work product doctrine, the joint defense doctrine, the common interest privilege, or any other privilege or protection. BSF objects to this Request to the extent it seeks confidential materials from a non-party. BSF objects to this Request in that it seeks photographs and videos of BSF's non-party client when she was a minor child and is intended to harass and intimidate BSF's client. 5. All photographs and video in the original, native format in which they were taken (not a paper copy) not produced in response to Request No.4, above, of Dershowitz at (i) Epstein's Manhattan home in New York City, New York; (ii) Epstein's home in Palm Beach, Florida; (iii) Epstein's Zorro Ranch in Santa Fe, New Mexico; (iv) Little Saint James island in the U.S. Virgin Islands; and (v) Epstein's airplane, on the same date and time that Jane Doe #3 were also present at such location. Response: In addition to the Preliminary Statement and General Objections, BSF objects to this Request to the extent it seeks documents already in Defendant's possession, custody or control or which are in the control of Defendant's client and/or upon information and belief, in the possession, custody and control of the state or federal government. BSF further objects to this Request to the extent that it seeks documents protected by the attorney-client privilege, the work product doctrine, the joint defense doctrine, the common interest privilege, or any other privilege or protection. BSF further objects to this Request as overbroad, harassing and not calculated to lead to discoverable evidence relevant to this matter. BSF objects to this Request to 7 EFTA01078730 the extent it seeks confidential materials from a non-party. BSI: objects to this Request in that it seeks photographs and videos of BSF's non-party client when she was a minor child and is intended to harass and intimidate BSF's client. 6. Any documents and information that support and/or confirm Jane Doe #3's presence at the various locations named in Paragraphs 24-31 of Jane Doe #3's January 19, 2015 Declaration in the Federal Action on the particular dates and times when Dershowitz was also present. Resnonse: In addition to the Preliminary Statement and General Objections, BSF objects to this Request in that it is a non-party law firm and this requests seeks privileged communications between a non-party law Finn and its non-party client. Specifically, BSF objects to this Request to the extent that it seeks documents protected by the attorney-client privilege, the work product doctrine, the joint defense doctrine, the common interest privilege, or any other privilege or protection. BSF objects to this Request to the extent it seeks confidential information from a non-party. BSF further objects to this Request in that the face of the Request demonstrates that the Defendant is abusing the subpoena power by serving a subpoena on a non- party that seeks discovery unrelated to the underlying matter but instead allegedly relevant to a declaration filed in a "Federal Action" which is defined in Defendant's definition section as "the matter styled Jane Doe NI, et at v. United States of America. Case No. 08-80736-CIV- MARRA/JOHNSON (S.D. Fla.)". BSF further objects to this Request to the extent it seeks documents already in Defendant's possession. custody or control or which have been previously produced. BSF further objects to this Request as overbroad, harassing and not calculated to lead to discoverable evidence relevant to the Florida Defamation Action. BSF objects to this Request in that it places an undue burden on this non-party law firm including, for example, requiring the non-party to search for "documents", which has been defined by Defendant to include a broad 8 EFTA01078731 definition of electronically stored data, including a requirement of searching "archives" and "back-up systems." 7. Any documents and information that show Dershowitz was present at the various locations named in Paragraphs 24-31 of Jane Doe #3's January 19, 2015 Declaration in the Federal Action on the particular dates and times when Jane Doe #3 alleges to have been present. Response: In addition to the Preliminary Statement and General Objections, BSF objects to this Request in that it is a non-party law firm and this Request seeks privileged communications between a non-party law firm and its non-party client. Specifically, BSF objects to this Request to the extent that it seeks documents protected by the attorney-client privilege, the work product doctrine, the joint defense doctrine, the common interest privilege, or any other privilege or protection. BSF objects to this Request to the extent it seeks confidential information from a non-party. BSF further objects to this Request in that the face of the Requests demonstrate that the Defendant is abusing the subpoena power by serving a subpoena on a non-party that seeks discovery unrelated to the underlying matter but, instead, allegedly relevant to a declaration tiled in a "Federal Action" which is defined in Defendant's definition section as "the matter styled Jane Doe #1, et al v. United States of America. Case No. 08-80736- C1V-MARRA/JOHNSON (S.D. Fla.)". BSF further objects to this Request to the extent it seeks documents already in Defendant's possession, custody or control or which have been previously produced. BSF further objects to this Request as overbroad, harassing and not calculated to lead to discoverable evidence relevant to the Florida Defamation Action. BSF objects to this Request in that it places an undue burden on this non-party law firm including, for example, requiring the non-party to search for "documents," which has been defined by Defendant to include a broad definition of electronically stored data, including a requirement of searching "archives" and "back-up systems." 8. All statements, written or recorded, that Jane Doe #3 has provided to 9 EFTA01078732 anyone that reference Dershowitz by name or other description. Response: In addition to the Preliminary Statement and General Objections, BSF objects to this Request in that it is overly broad and unduly burdensome in that it requests this non-party law firm to produce "all statements" that it's non-party client has "provided to anyone." BSF further objects to this Request in that it is a non-party law firm and this Request seeks privileged communications between a non-party law firm and its non-party client. Specifically, BSF objects to this Request to the extent that it seeks documents protected by the attorney-client privilege, the work product doctrine, the joint defense doctrine, the common interest privilege, or any other privilege or protection. BSF objects to this Request to the extent it seeks confidential information from a non-party. BSF further objects to this Request to the extent it seeks documents already in Defendant's possession, custody or control or which have been previously produced. BSF further objects to this Request as overbroad, harassing and not calculated to lead to discoverable evidence relevant to the Florida Defamation Action. BSI; objects to this Request in that it places an undue burden on this non-party law firm including, for example, requiring the non-party to search for "documents," which has been defined by Defendant to include a broad definition of electronically stored data, including a requirement of searching "archives" and "back-up systems." 9. All notes of, or notes prepared for, any statements or interviews in which Jane Doe #3 referenced Dershowitz by name or other description. Response: In addition to the Preliminary Statement and General Objections, BSF objects to this Request in that it is a non-party law firm and this Request seeks privileged communications between a non-party law firm and its non-party client. Specifically, BSI: objects to this Request to the extent that it seeks documents protected by the attorney-client privilege, the work product doctrine, the joint defense doctrine, the common interest privilege, or 10 EFTA01078733 any other privilege or protection. BSF objects to this Request to the extent it seeks confidential information from a non-party. BSF further objects to this Request to the extent it seeks documents already in Defendant's possession, custody or control or which have been previously produced. BSF further objects to this Request as overbroad, harassing and not calculated to lead to discoverable evidence relevant to the Florida Defamation Action. BSF objects to this Request in that it places an undue burden on this non-party law firm including, for example, requiring the non-party to search for "documents", which has been defined by Defendant to include a broad definition of electronically stored data, including a requirement of searching "archives" and "back-up systems." 10. All Documents concerning any communications by Jane Doe #3 or on Jane Doe #3's behalf with any media outlet concerning Dershowitz or the Federal Action, whether or not such communications were "on the record" or "off the record." Response: In addition to the Preliminary Statement and General Objections, BSF objects to this Request in that it is a non-party law firm and this Request seeks privileged communications between a non-party law firm and its non-party client. Specifically, BSF objects to this Request to the extent that it seeks documents protected by the attorney-client privilege, the work product doctrine, the joint defense doctrine, the common interest privilege, or any other privilege or protection. BSF objects to this Request to the extent it seeks confidential information from a non-party. BSF further objects to this Request in that the face of the Request demonstrates that the Defendant is seeking to abuse the subpoena power by serving a subpoena on a non-party that seeks discovery unrelated to the underlying matter but, instead, allegedly relevant to a "Federal Action" which is defined in Defendant's definition section as "the matter styled Jane Doe #I. et al. v. United States ofAmerica. Case No. 08-80736-CIV- MARRA/JOHNSON (S.D. Fla.)". BSF further objects to this Request to the extent it seeks documents already in Defendant's possession, custody or control or which have been previously 1I EFTA01078734 produced. BSF further objects to this Request as overbroad, harassing and not calculated to lead to discoverable evidence relevant to the Florida Defamation Action. BSF objects to this Request in that it places an undue burden on this non-party law firm including, for example, requiring the non-party to search for "documents," which has been defined by Defendant to include a broad definition of electronically stored data, including a requirement of searching "archives" and "back-up systems." 11. All notes, writings, photographs, and/or audio or video recordings made or recorded by or of Jane Doe #3 on the dates on which Jane Doe #3 alleges she was present with Dershowitz, including but not limited to Jane Doe #3's calendar, diary or journal entries on those dates, regardless whether the notes, writings, photographs, and/or audio or video recordings refer to Dershowitz. To the extent that any responsive materials are photographs or video recordings, please provide them in the original, native format in which they were taken (not a paper copy). Response: In addition to the Preliminary Statement and General Objections, BSF objects to this Request to the extent that it seeks documents protected by the attorney-client privilege, the work product doctrine, the joint defense doctrine, the common interest privilege, or any other privilege or protection. BSF objects to this Request to the extent it seeks confidential information from this non-party. BST further objects to this Request to the extent it seeks documents already in Defendant's possession, custody or control, or upon information and belief, in the possession, custody and control of the state or federal government. BSF further objects to this Request as overbroad, harassing and not calculated to lead to discoverable evidence relevant to the Florida Defamation Action. BSF objects to this Request to the extent it seeks confidential materials from a non-party. BSF objects to this Request in that it seeks photographs and videos of BSF's non-party client when she was a minor child and is intended to harass and intimidate BSF's client. BSF objects to this Request in that it places an undue burden on this non-party law firm including, for example, requiring the non-party to search for "documents," which has been defined by Defendant to include a broad definition of 12 EFTA01078735 electronically stored data, including a requirement of searching "archives" and "back-up systems." 12. All Documents concerning Jane Doe #3's travel to or from locations for those occasions when she alleges she was present with Dershowitz. Response: In addition to the Preliminary Statement and General Objections, BSF objects to this Request to the extent that it seeks documents protected by the attorney-client privilege, the work product doctrine, the joint defense doctrine, the common interest privilege, or any other privilege or protection. BSF further objects to this Request to the extent it seeks documents already in Defendant's possession, custody or control, or upon information and belief, in the possession. custody and control of the federal or state government. BSF objects to this Request to the extent the information is already publicly available or previously produced. BSF objects to this Request to the extent it seeks confidential information from a non-party. BSF further objects to this Request as overbroad, harassing and not calculated to lead to discoverable evidence relevant to the Florida Defamation Action. BSF objects to this Request in that it places an undue burden on this non-party law firm including, for example, requiring the non-party to search for "documents", which has been defined by Defendant to include a broad definition of electronically stored data, including a requirement of searching "archives" and "back-up systems." 13. To the extent not produced in response to the above list of requested Documents, all notes, writings, photographs, and/or audio or video recordings made at any time that refer or relate in any way to Dershowitz. Response: In addition to the Preliminary Statement and General Objections. BSI' objects to this Request in that is overly broad and unduly burdensome in that it seeks "all writings" "made at any time" that "refer or relate in any way to Dershowitz." Specifically, there is no time or scope limitation on this Request, nor is the Request tied to the underlying case. In addition, 13 EFTA01078736 BSF objects to this Request to the extent that it seeks documents protected by the attorney-client privilege, the work product doctrine, the joint defense doctrine, the common interest privilege, or any other privilege or protection. BSF objects to this Request to the extent it seeks confidential materials from a non-party. BSF objects to this Request in that it seeks photographs and videos of BSF's non-party client when she was a minor child and is intended to harass and intimidate BSF's client. BSF further objects to this Request to the extent it seeks documents already in Defendant's possession, custody or control, or upon information and belief, in the possession, custody and control of the federal or state government. BSF objects to this Request to the extent the information is already publicly available or previously produced. BSF further objects to this Request as overbroad, harassing and not calculated to lead to discoverable evidence relevant to the Florida Defamation Action. BSF objects to this Request in that it places an undue burden on this non-party law iirm including, for example, requiring the non-party to search for "documents," which has been defined by Defendant to include a broad definition of electronically stored data, including a requirement of searching "archives" and "back-up systems." BSF objects to this Request because it would be incredibly costly, time consuming and cause undue burden on this non-party to be forced to search for this incredibly broad Request that is not limited in any way by a time period nor limited to the underlying case. 14. All drafts of declarations or affidavits by Jane Doe #3 that relate in any way to Dershowitz and/or Epstein. Response: In addition to the Preliminary Statement and General Objections, BSF objects to this Request in that it is a non-party law firm and this Request seeks privileged communications between a non-party law firm and its non-party client. Specifically, BSF objects to this Request to the extent that it seeks documents protected by the attorney-client privilege, the work product doctrine, the joint defense doctrine, the common interest privilege, or 14 EFTA01078737 any other privilege or protection. BSF objects to this Request to the extent it seeks confidential information from this non-party. BSF further objects to this Request in that the lace of the Request demonstrates that the Defendant is abusing the subpoena power by serving a subpoena on a non-party that seeks discovery unrelated to the underlying matter but, instead, allegedly relevant to a "Federal Action" which involves "Epstein" who is not a party to the Florida Defamation Action. BSF further objects to this Request as overbroad, harassing and not calculated to lead to discoverable evidence relevant to the Florida Defamation Action. BSF objects to this Request in that it places an undue burden on this non-party law firm including, for example, requiring the non-party to search for "documents," which has been defined by Defendant to include a broad definition of electronically stored data, including a requirement of searching "archives" and "back-up systems." IS. All Documents concerning any telephone, including any cellular telephone, used by Jane Doe #3 between January 1, 1999 and December 31, 2002. Response: In addition to the Preliminary Statement and General Objections, BSF objects to this Request to the extent that it seeks documents protected by the attorney-client privilege, the work product doctrine, the joint defense doctrine, the common interest privilege, or any other privilege or protection. BSF objects to this Request in that it seeks confidential information from a non-party. BSF objects to this Request as overbroad in that it seeks "all documents" for a three year period. BSF objects to this Request in that it seeks documents in the possession, custody and control of the Defendant or the Defendant's client, Mr. Epstein. 16. Any diary, journal or calendar concerning Jane Doe #3's activities between January 1, 1999 and December 31, 2002. Response: In addition to the Preliminary Statement and General Objections, BSF objects to this Request to the extent that it seeks documents protected by the attorney-client privilege, the work product doctrine, the joint defense doctrine, the common interest privilege, I5 EFTA01078738 or any other privilege or protection. BSF objects to this Request to the extent it seeks confidential and highly sensitive personal information in the form of a "diary" or "journal" sought only to harass BSF's non-party client. BSF objects to this Request in that it seeks information irrelevant to the underlying Florida Defamation Action. 17. All Documents concerning Jane Doe #3's presence at or on (i) Jeffrey Epstein's Manhattan home in New York City, New York; (ii) Mr. Epstein's home in Palm Beach, Florida; (iii) Mr. Epstein's Zorro Ranch in Santa Fe, New Mexico; (iv) Little Saint James island in the U.S. Virgin Islands; and (v) Mr. Epstein's airplane from January 1, 1999 through December 31, 2002. Response: In addition to the Preliminary Statement and General Objections. BSF objects to this Request in that it is a non-party law firm and this Request seeks privileged communications between a non-party law firm and its non-party client. Specifically, BSF objects to this Request to the extent that it seeks documents protected by the attorney-client privilege, the work product doctrine, the joint defense doctrine, the common interest privilege, or any other privilege or protection. BSF objects to this Request to the extent it seeks confidential information from a non-party. BSF further objects to this Request in that the face of the Request demonstrates that the Defendant is abusing the subpoena power by serving a subpoena on a non- party that seeks discovery unrelated to the underlying matter but, instead, allegedly relevant to a "Federal Action" which involves "Epstein" who is not a party to the Florida Defamation Action. BSF objects to this Request to the extent the documents are in the possession, custody and control of the Defendant and the Defendant's client, Mr. Epstein. BSF objects to this Request to the extent the documents are in the possession. custody and control of the federal and state government. BSF further objects to this Request as overbroad, harassing and not calculated to lead to discoverable evidence relevant to the Florida Defamation Action. BSI: objects to this Request in that it places an undue burden on this non-party law firm including, for example, requiring the non-party to search for "documents," which has been defined by Defendant to 16 EFTA01078739 include a broad definition of electronically stored data, including a requirement of searching "archives" and "back-up systems." 18. All travel records of any kind, including but not limited to tickets, hotel room receipts or other documents concerning any travel undertaken by Jane Doe #3 between January I, 1999 and December 31, 2002. Response: In addition to the Preliminary Statement and General Objections, BSF objects to this Request to the extent that it seeks documents protected by the attorney-client privilege, the work product doctrine, the joint defense doctrine, the common interest privilege, or any other privilege or protection. BSF objects to this Request to the extent the documents are in the possession, custody and control of the Defendant and the Defendant's client, Mr. Epstein or have already been produced. BSI; objects to this Request to the extent it seeks confidential information from a non-party. BSF objects to this Request to the extent the documents are in the possession, custody and control of the state or federal government. BSF further objects to this Request as overbroad, harassing and not calculated to lead to discoverable evidence relevant to the Florida Defamation Action. 19. All records of any interviews given by Jane Doe #3 to any party concerning Dershowitz, Epstein, or any of their agents or associates. Response: In addition to the Preliminary Statement and General Objections, BSF objects to this Request in that it is a non-party law firm and this Request seeks privileged communications between a non-party law firm and its non-party client. Specifically, BSF objects to this Request to the extent that it seeks documents protected by the attorney-client privilege, the work product doctrine, the joint defense doctrine, the common interest privilege, or any other privilege or protection. BSF objects to this Request to the extent it seeks confidential information from a non-party. BSF further objects to this Request in that the face of the Request demonstrates that the Defendant is seeking to abuse the subpoena power by serving a subpoena 17 EFTA01078740 on a non-party that seeks discovery unrelated to the underlying matter but, instead, allegedly relevant to a "Federal Action" which involves "Epstein" who is not a party to the Florida Defamation Action. BSF objects to this Request in that it is overly broad and vague in its failure to identify the "agents or associates" rendering it impossible for BSF to interpret the Request. SSE objects to this Request to the extent the documents are in the possession, custody and control of the Defendant and the Defendant's client, Mr. Epstein. BSF objects to this Request to the extent the documents arc, upon information and belief, in the possession, custody and control of the federal and state government. BSF further objects to this Request as overbroad, harassing and not calculated to lead to discoverable evidence relevant to the Florida Defamation Action. BSF objects to this Request in that it places an undue burden on this non-party law firm including, for example, requiring the non-party to search for "documents," which has been defined by Defendant to include a broad definition of electronically stored data, including a requirement of searching "archives" and "back-up systems." 20. All manuscripts and/or other writings, whether published or unpublished, created in whole or in part by Jane Doe 83, concerning Epstein and any ofhis agents or associates. Response: In addition to the Preliminary Statement and General Objections. BSF objects to this Request in that it is a non-party law firm and this Request seeks privileged communications between a non-party law firm and its non-party client. Specifically, BSF objects to this Request to the extent that it seeks documents protected by the attorney-client privilege, the work product doctrine, the joint defense doctrine, the common interest privilege, or any other privilege or protection. BSF objects to this Request to the extent it seeks contidential information from a non-party. BSF further objects to this Request in that the face of the Request demonstrates that the Defendant is abusing the subpoena power by serving a subpoena on a non- party that seeks discovery unrelated to the underlying matter but, instead, allegedly relevant to a 18 EFTA01078741 "Federal Action" which involves "Epstein" who is not a party to the Florida Defamation Action. Indeed, this Request does not even reference the Defendant in this matter. BSF objects to this Request in that it is overly broad and vague in its failure to identify the "agents or associates" rendering it impossible for BSF to interpret the Request. BSF objects to this Request to the extent the documents are upon information and belief, in the possession, custody and control of the state or federal government. BSI? further objects to this Request as overbroad, harassing and not calculated to lead to discoverable evidence relevant to the Florida Defamation Action. BSF objects to this Request in that it places an undue burden on this non-party law firm including, for example, requiring the non-party to search for "documents", which has been defined by Defendant to include a broad definition of electronically stored data, including a requirement of searching "archives" and "back-up systems." 21. All Documents concerning Jane Doe #3's allegations that she met former President Bill Clinton, former Vice President Al Gore and/or Mary Elizabeth "Tipper" Gore on Little Saint James island in the U.S. Virgin Islands. Response: In addition to the Preliminary Statement and General Objections, BSF objects to this Request in that on its face, it has absolutely nothing to do with the Florida Defamation Action. Former President Bill Clinton and the Gores are not in any way relevant to the Florida Defamation Action. Instead, this is a clear example of Defendant's attempt to abuse the subpoena power and rules of discovery by seeking information from a non-party law firm that is wholly unrelated to the case from which the subpoena has been issued. Defendant has gone on a very deep fishing expedition here and BSF objects to the overbroad and abusive nature of this Request. In addition, BSF objects to this Request in that it is a non-party law firm and this Request seeks privileged communications between a non-party law firm and its non-party client. Specifically, BSF objects to this Request to the extent that it seeks documents protected by the attorney-client privilege, the work product doctrine, the joint defense doctrine, the common 19 EFTA01078742 interest privilege, or any other privilege or protection. BSF objects to this Request to the extent it seeks confidential information from this non-party. BSF objects to this Request to the extent the documents are, upon information and belief, in the possession, custody and control of the federal and state government and the Defendant and Defendant's client, Mr. Epstein. BSF further objects to this Request as overbroad, harassing and not calculated to lead to discoverable evidence relevant to the Florida Defamation Action. BSF objects to this Request in that it places an undue burden on this non-party law firm including, for example, requiring the non-party to search for "documents," which has been defined by Defendant to include a broad definition of electronically stored data, including a requirement of searching "archives" and "back-up systems." 22. All Documents concerning your retention by Jane Doe #3, including, but not limited to: signed letter of retainer, retention agreement, explanation of fees and/or any document describing the scope of retention. Response: In addition to the Preliminary Statement and General Objections, BSF objects to this Request in that it is a non-party law firm and this Request seeks privileged communications between a non-party law firm and its non-party client. Specifically, BSF objects to this Request to the extent that it seeks documents protected by the attorney-client privilege, the work product doctrine, the joint defense doctrine, the common interest privilege, or any other privilege or protection. BSF objects to this Request in that it seeks confidential information from a non-party. BSF further objects to this Request in that the face of the Request demonstrates that the Defendant is abusing the subpoena power by serving a subpoena on a non- party that seeks privileged information that has nothing to do with the Florida Defamation Action. BSF objects to this Request in that it is irrelevant to the Florida Defamation Action and is, instead, Defendant's abuse of the subpoena power to gain discovery for unrelated matters. 23. All Documents which are related to when Jane Doe #3 allegedly told her 20 EFTA01078743 attorneys that Alan Dershowitz was among the men she had sexual relations with. Response: In addition to the Preliminary Statement and General Objections, BSF objects to this Request in that it is a non-party law firm and this Request seeks privileged communications between a non-party law firm and its non-party client. Specifically. BSF objects to this Request to the extent that it seeks documents protected by the attorney-client privilege, the work product doctrine, the joint defense doctrine, the common interest privilege, or any other privilege or protection. BSF objects to this Request in that it seeks confidential information from a non-party. BSF objects to this Request in that it is irrelevant to the Florida Defamation Action and is, instead, Defendant's abuse of the subpoena power to gain discovery for unrelated matters. Dated: April 9, 2015 Respectfully submitted, Bows, SCHILLER & FLEXN ER LLP Sigrid S. McCawley, Esq. Florida Bar No. 129305 Attorney's for Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1200 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone: Facsimile: By: /s/ Sim S. Mecawlev Sigrid S. McCawley, Esq. 21 EFTA01078744 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served by Electronic Mail and U.S. Mail on April 9, 2015 to the individuals identified on the attached Service List. By: Is / Sigrid S. McCawley Sigrid S. McCawley 22 EFTA01078745 SERVICE LIST Thomas E. Scott Jack Scarola SEARCY DENNEY SCAROLA BARNHART & Steven R. Satra CHIP! PA COLE, SCOTT & KISSANE, P.A. 21- 9 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. 9150 S. Dadeland Blvd., Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33409-6601 Miami. Flori aill 6 Attorneyfor Plaintiffs Richard A. Simpson Mary E. Boria 1776 K Street NW Washington, D.C. 20006 Counselfor Defendant Alan Dershowitz 23 EFTA01078746 EXHIBIT 1 EFTA01078747 CNN SHOW: New Day 8:30 AM EST January 6, 2015 Tuesday TRANSCRIPT: 010606CN.V42 SECTION: NEWS; International LENGTH: 3114 words HEADLINE: Plan Crash Survivor's Steps; Celebrities Fight Sex Scandals; Remembering Mario Cuomo BYLINE: Alisyn Camerota, Martin Savidge, John Berman, Michaels Pereira, Paul Callan, Chris Cuomo, Ana Cabrera GUESTS: Wendy Murphy HIGHLIGHT: Friday night, seven-year-old Sailor Gutzler freed herself from the upside down wreckage of her family's plane, moving past the bodies of her mother, father, sister and cousin, and walked nearly a mile to Larry Wilkins' home in remote western Kentucky to get help. There are new developments in the sex scandal involving Prince Andrew and famed a sued. showitz, including the fact that Dershowitz has counter Chris Cuomo, the son of the former governor of New York Mario Cuomo, reflects on his father's legacy as a politician and family man. BODY: JOHN BERMAN: All right, 32 minutes after the hour. Buckingham Palace took the rare step to speak out about the sex abuse accusations against Prince Andrew, but is talking about it really the best strategy? How to handle ugly accusations, next. CAMEROTA: New developments in the sex scandal involving Prince Andrew and famed attorney Alan Dershowitz. Moments ago we learned that Alan Dershowitz has counter sued I I, that's the woman who says that the lawyer sexually abused her when she was a teenager. Dershowitz is demanding his name be removed from her lawsuit and is asking for damages. Roberts says that a wealthy investor forced her into sex slavery when she was a teenager to please his powerful friends, including Dershowitz and Prince Andrew. The accuser now says she is being re-victimized. All of this raising big questions of how public figures should fight back against ugly accusations. Let's bring in Paul Callan. He's a CNN legal analyst, criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor to talk about all this, also former prosecutor Wendy Murphy will join. She's an adjunct professor of sexual violence at New England Law in Boston. EFTA01078748 Great to see both of you. OK, let's start with the news this morning. Paul, Alan Dershowitz, hours ago, has filed this countersuit in Florida because he feels he's being defamed by this lawsuit by this woman, CNN is naming her because she has gone public with her name. So is that the best way for celebrities and high-profile people to handle allegations like this? PAUL CALLAN, CNN LEGAL ANALYST: Well, Alan Dershowitz has done something you never see done in these cases. He's gone nuclear. I mean, he's going apoplectic. He's threatening to sue Roberts and he's starting his own lawsuit. Usually you try to make the whole thing go away so it's forgotten. There's a complexity to this lawsuit because the allegations against Dershowitz, that he slept with this 15-year-old, and, incidentally, Prince Andrew as well, were Included in court documents related to another lawsuit. And normally, anything you say In a court document relating to a pending lawsuit is, there's immunity. You can't sue somebody for saying that. So Dershowitz was baiting Roberts saying, why don't you say it publicly and I'm going to sue you because it's a lie. But apparently he must have stumbled on some theory that would give him grounds to sue around this court immunity doctrine. So it will be interesting to see it today. CAMEROTA: Yes. Wendy, we have an example of Alan Dershowitz being so angry and so vociferous in denying these charges yesterday on NEW DAY. Watch this. (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) ALAN DERSHOWITZ, ATTORNEY: I will take action. I am filing today a sworn affidavit denying categorically the truth. I'm seeking to intervene in the case. I am challenging her to file rape charges against me. I waive any statute of limitations, any immunity, because If she files a false rape charge against me, she goes to jail. The end result of this case should be she should go to jail, the lawyers should be disbarred and everybody should understand that I am completely and totally innocent. (END VIDEO CLIP) CAMEROTA: Wendy, what do you think about his strategy? Because there's one school of thought that says you never even dignify the allegations with a response. WENDY MURPHY, FORMER PROSECUTOR: Yes, I mean the problem is he is almost in a protest too much state of mind for me. You know, I think the way the prince is handling it is, in a sense, more credible because it's more restrained in that exact way, Alisyn, we don't dignify these kinds of things. Of course it's silly. Of course it's not true. You know, the problem with Alan Dershowitz's position is, he doesn't really know all of the evidence that they have. I mean what if this woman has, you know, intimate knowledge of things about his body parts, for example, that will be unassailable proof that, in fact, she did have access to his body. The kind of thing that no matter how much he yells and screams, he won't be able to rebut. That could be some pretty explosive proof against him. EFTA01078749 CAMEROTA: It could be but -- MURPHY: I'm glad he did it. CAMEROTA: Yes, I mean, you have to - MURPHY: Go ahead. CAMEROTA: You have to assume that because he's make so vocal and so public a response that he believes that there's nothing like that out there. Wendy, let me just stop you for a second - MURPHY: Yes. CAMEROTA: Because I want to tell you the victim in - the alleged victim in this case, has now responded to CNN and Alan Dershowitz for calling her a iar. Let me tell you what she says. "It appears I am now being unjustly victimized again. These types of aggressive attacks on me are exactly the reason why sexual abuse victims typically remain silent and the reason why I did for a long time. That trend should change. I'm not going to be bullied into silence." Wendy, your thoughts on her response? MURPHY: Yes, I -- you know, it is a reason, in my work, you know, in decades of this work, it is something victims talk about a lot. I'm not going to speak out, especially against a wealthy, powerful, and influential person because they will have the ability to sue me falsely. That's the fear that a lot of real victims have. Look, if Alan Dershowitz wants to use the legal system to demonstrate his innocence, he has the right to do that. The problem is, now that he's filed a public claim, the airing of all the details will come out, and what's he going to do if there is some kind of unassailable evidence against him? I mean he said, for example, he's only been at Jeffrey Epstein's house once and it was with his wife and children. What if it comes out that he was actually there, and there are photographs of him there on another occasion? CALLAN: Well, you have to - you know, but, Wendy, I think you have to assume, Dershowitz can't be that stupid. I mean he taught at Harvard for long enough that I assume that basic facts like that he's going to be certain on. And if Dershowitz is in fact innocent of this charge, then he's not worried about body parts or locations where sex took place if no sex did take place. CAMEROTA: Dershowitz also called for attorneys to be disbarred. He believes they should never have taken this case. Let me quickly read to you their statement in response to Alan Dershowitz. "Out of respect for the courts desire to keep this case from being litigated in the press, we are not going to respond at this time to specific claims of indignation by anyone. Nevertheless, we would be pleased to consider any sworn testimony and documentary evidence Mr. Dershowitz would like to provide which he contends would refute any of our allegations." Paul Callan, Wendy Murphy - MURPHY: Yes. CAMEROTA: We have to leave it there. We're running out of time. But, EFTA01078750 obviously, this case is not going away with Alan Dershowitz's new legal action this morning. We'll take it up again. Thanks so much for being here. We'd love to know what you think about all this. You can tweet us @newday on the best way to handle allegations like this. let's go over to John. BERMAN: All right, thanks, Alisyn. An American giant is gone, but his legacy lives on. Our friend and colleague, Chris Cuomo, remembers his father, former New York Governor Mario Cuomo. A touching tribute that you do not want to miss, it's coming up next. PEREIRA: So, the funeral for former New York governor Mario Cuomo gets under way in just over two hours right here in New York City. Dignitaries including Bill and Hillary Clinton, Attorney General Eric Holder are expected to pay their respects. You know, Chris mentioned to us, our NEW DAY family, that his father's life has served as a lesson for him since he was a very little boy, but that even now his pop is, as he called him, is still teaching him a lesson about what endures. (BEGIN VIDEOTAPE) MARIO CUOMO, FORMER GOVERNOR OF NEW YORK: When it's over, I want people to say, now, there was an honest person. CHRIS CUOMO, CNN ANCHOR (voice-over): Pop's body is gone. I know because I counted out his pulse until his heart fell silent, 5:15 p.m. His two favorite numbers, 5 and 15. So now his baggy, brown eyes, solid grip of soft, thick fingers, oaken body, they're all gone. But what was most important about my father and to him has passed on. Passed on as in still exists, just in a different way. His spirit passed on to his creator, the spirit of his message endures in us. Timeless and timely, a call to remember that if all do not share in America's success, there is no real success. M. CUOMO: We can make it all the way with the whole family intact, and we have more than once, wagon train after wagon train, to new frontiers of education, housing, peace, the whole family aboard, constantly reaching out to extend and enlarge that family, all those struggling to claim some small share of America. C. CUOMO: Our interconnectedness, our diversity as America's true strength. The value found in immigrants like our family desperate to work, to be part of the dream. M. CUOMO: Thank you very much. C. CUOMO: Two speeches in eight weeks would define his political life for many of you, the keynote in 1984. UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Ronald Reagan rode into the '80s on a political white horse. C.CUOMO: When he took on Ronald Reagan's shining city. EFTA01078751 M. CUOMO: There are people who sleep in the city's streets, in the gutter, where the glitter doesn't show. C. CUOMO: And his talk at Notre Dame, where he took on his church's notion of a Catholic politician. M. CUOMO: We know that the price of seeking to force our belief on others is that they might someday force their belief on us. I protect my right to be a Catholic by preserving your right to be anything else you choose. C. CUOMO: The man liked a challenge. Both relied on his core belief, we are here to help as many as we can in the best way we can, and that means protecting freedom, especially freedom from oppression. You will hear him called Hamlet on the Hudson. Question it. It's a media phrase more than a matter of fact. Pop did not think he should run for president. M. CUOMO: Has nothing to do with my chances. It has everything to do with my job as governor, and I don't see that I can do both. Therefore, I will not pursue the presidency. C. CUOMO: Many could not, or would not, accept that and tried publicly and privately to push him to do otherwise. For better or worse, that's what separated my father from other politicians. He, in fact, did not vacillate, and until the day he died, I never heard him regret the decision, period. But that is merely politics, which can't be forgotten quickly enough. What really matters has certainly been passed on to me, and my siblings, and our kids and that was pop's love, like a big bear hug on your heart kind of love. His unique sense of humor could be a weapon and a salve. M. CUOMO: Christopher, you have - - (LAUGHTER) M. CUOMO: Let me tell you, Christopher. You have found so many unusual ways to heap new expenses on this family. You really have. I mean, and you've done it not after, you know, a sweating effort, he's done it naturally. C. CUOMO: Who to be, how to be, from the simple, a handshake is firm, a tie is tied in a Windsor knot, a man shines his own shoes and does so often. He carries a hanky, one for others, one for himself. He wears a hat, not a cap, unless it's a cheese cutter. He always has cash and does not go Dutch. Pass first, shoot second. Play hard, and then play harder. From that to the sublime, all that matters in life is devotion to something bigger than yourself, family, the less fortunate, take up for them always. His passion for purpose, love recklessly, fight the good fight fiercely, outwork everyone. M. CUOMO: One of the simple things I wanted to achieve is I want to be governor, I want to be the hardest working there ever was. C. CUOMO: Compete hard or not at all. M. CUOMO: So far, you know, we haven't lost all year. C. CUOMO: And never as a function of the chance of success. M. CUOMO: This is our first game. EFTA01078752 C. CUOMO: And for all the requirements on an individual, the most important was a command for the collective. Collaborate in making this world a better place. M. CUOMO: What is our mission in this place? Your job is to make it as good as you can make it. That's all there is. There is no other significance. C. CUOMO: None of that could ever be buried. Living on in the hearts, and minds, and actions of those who bear his name, who heeded his call to action then and now, that all will pass on. The man himself is gone. The father I went to in times of distress is not there. The truth hurts, pop would say, and this truth hurts worse than I imagined. But I also know what pop would tell me to do. Wipe my face, let my kids see that I love them, be there for my family, and do the right thing. And I will, pop, just like you. M. CUOMO: Just keep going forward believing ever more deeply that it's right to give to people and to the world. (END VIDEOTAPE) PEREIRA: What a powerful tribute to his dad. BERMAN: Like a big bear hug, I think, on all of our hearts as Chris would say so nicely in that piece. CAMEROTA: And we got to know Mario Cuomo so much better through Chris' eyes. That was a real gift. BERMAN: And we got to see, you know, take the stuffing out of Chris, too, sitting there as a young boy. It was amazing. PEREIRA: But, you know, he loves in the very same way that his dad did. Have you noticed that? CAMEROTA: Yes. BERMAN: Big, big. CAMEROTA: Beautiful. We'll be right back. CAMEROTA: As you all know, Chris Cuomo loves telling the stories of people who are making an impact. So here's on such story. Former NFL player Ricardo Silva went from studying playbooks to textbooks. Today he's a high school math teacher motivating his students to impact your world. Here's Chris Cuomo. (BEGIN VIDEOTAPE) RICARDO SILVA, FORMER NFL PLAYER: You have four minutes, four minutes until competition. C. CUOMO: Ricardo Silva is using his competitive edge to make math count for these high school students in Washington, D.C• EFTA01078753 SILVA: Number three is what? My hope is to bring awareness to the students. Not just geometry, but total life outcomes. You can do whatever you want through education. C. CUOMO: Silva's first job wasn't in a classroom, it was on a football field playing for the Detroit Lions. SILVA: My mission was to get to college and start in the NFL. Now that's moved on to something more meaningful to me, which is providing opportunities to kids that do not necessarily know how to get where they need to be. C. CUOMO: Helping Silva do just that is Teach for America. The program offers free classroom training to college graduates and professionals from various backgrounds. In exchange they teach in an underserved school for two years. SILVA: Kids that have low socioeconomic status are, you know, not achieving as well as their more affluent counterparts, and we're trying to close the educational ach'evement gap. This is why I'm here. C. CUOMO: It's certainly not for the paycheck or the ease of the job. SILVA: Football, all you have to do is wake up every day, work out and do what the coaches tell you to do. In school you have to motivate young teenagers who are more interested in their social media outlets than math. C. CUOMO: A seemingly impossible task, but Silva is up for the challenge. SILVA: What's the first thing that we must do? All I had was one person believing in me my entire life, which was my mom, and I feel like I can bring that to the kids. Way to go, (INAUDIBLE). All they need was one person telling them that they can do it and they can be successful. (END VIDEOTAPE) PEREIRA: And he's that one person. BERMAN: Man, motivating kids tougher than any NFL linebacker, that's for sure. CAMEROTA: Yes, right. So, for more on how you can help, go to CNN.com/impact. BERMAN: All right, it is time now for "NEWSROOM" with Ana Cabrera who is in today for Carol Costello. Ana, take it away. ANA CABRERA, CNN ANCHOR: Good morning guys, and I haven't even said happy new year to you yet, so happy new year. EFTA01078754 CAMEROTA: You, too. EFTA01078755 EXHIBIT 2 EFTA01078756 SHOW: AUSTRALIAN BROADCASTING SYSTEM (ABC) 7.30 8:05 PM AEST ABC January 6, 2015 Tuesday LENGTH: 942 words HEADLINE: Prince Andrew under pressure as Palace disputes teen sex scandal claims REPORTERS: Philip Williams BODY: LEIGH SALES, PRESENTER: It's been a few years since Britain's Royal Family has been embroiled in a serious scandal, but once again, Prince Andrew has stepped forward. He's accused of having sex with an underage girl in sensational details aired in an American court case. The young woman says she was forced to entertain the Duke at the behest of his friend, billionaire and convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Prince Andrew's ex-wife, Ferguson, has leapt to his defence and Buckingham Palace is also strenuously denying the allegations. But, as Europe correspondent Philip Williams reports, the claims have blown apart the always uneasy calm between the Palace and the British press. PHILIP WILLIAMS, REPORTER: As fifth in line to the throne, whatever Prince Andrew does or says will never go unnoticed. So when media reports about a lawsuit in the US emerged linking his name with underage sex, the long period of relative Royal calm was abruptly shattered. This woman, , is believed to be the person named in court papers as "Jane Doe 3". In a newspaper interview she claims she was used for underage sex by American billionaire Jeffrey Epstein and says she was lent out to his rich and powerful friends, including Prince Andrew. It's claimed she had sex with him three times when she was 17 at Jeffrey Epstein's luxury Caribbean Island home and in New York and London, all denied by Prince Andrew. VICTORIA MURPHY, UK MIRROR ROYAL CORRESPONDENT: If this doesn't go away quickly, if these allegations continue to be made, if more allegations are added, this could be incredibly damaging, not just for Andrew, but for the monarchy as a whole. PHILIP WILLIAMS: It all seems a world away from the golden glow of recent Royal events - a wedding that cemented the popularity of Prince William and his bride. Followed of course by the arrival of baby Prince George. And for the Queen, a diamond jubilee, a celebration of 60 years on the throne, reason for her to smile as the nation and beyond said thanks for her never-ending job. EFTA01078757 Over the weekend, that run of feel good luck expired. Normally with a story like this, Buckingham Palace would be more inclined to stay quiet, not to give any oxygen whatsoever to the sort of claims that have been made. But this time, it's very, very different. Not one, but two statements saying Prince Andrew is completely innocent of all the accusations. VICTORIA MURPHY: They issued one statement initially in response to the allegations that Prince Andrew had had sex with an underage minor and that was what they were responding to and they were categorically denying that that had been the case. However, in doing that they had left the door open that perhaps he was only denying the fact that she was a minor and questions were being asked about that. So when more of her allegations surfaced, they decided that they needed to release an even stronger denial, categorically denying any sexual contact whatsoever. PHILIP WILLIAMS: What isn't in dispute is that Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein were good friends over a number of years. In 2008, Mr Epstein was sentenced to 18 months' jail for soliciting an underage girl for the purposes of prostitution. That, after a controversial plea bargain. He remains a registered sex offender. Yet in 2011, after his release, Prince Andrew was seen with his old friend in New York Central Park. That cost Prince Andrew an unpaid job he was said to have loved as the UK's Trade and Industry special representative, opening doors for British business overseas. CHRIS BRYANT, LABOUR MP (March, 2011): But I'm afraid he's now just become a national embarrassment. And my worry is that sometimes when he goes on these trips, I'm not sure whether he's helping us out or he's just helping himself. PHILIP WILLIAMS: For him, that door closed as a direct result of his association with Jeffrey Epstein. VICTORIA MURPHY: People who know Prince Andrew have said that he is very loyal to his friends and that that is one of his strong points. However, I think that those closest to him now accept that that particular friendship and the loyalty to Jeffrey Epstein that continued until after he was convicted of paedophilia, I think people are now saying, you know, he accepts that that was a mistake. However, what is being said is that Andrew is only guilty of choosing his friends badly. He's not guilty of anything else. PHILIP WILLIAMS: Prince Andrew isn't the only one named in the court documents, and while he isn't publicly defending himself, another of those accused certainly is. Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz has been doing the media rounds of the US and beyond. He denies even knowing his accuser, let alone having sex with her. ALAN DERSHOWITZ, HARVARD LAW SCHOOL: My goal is to bring charges against the client and require her to speak in court. She - if she believes she has been hurt by me and by Prince Andrew, she should be suing us for damages. I welcome that lawsuit. I welcome any opportunity which would put her under oath and require her to state under oath these false allegations. EFTA01078758 PHILIP WILLIAMS: Under the plea bargain struck with prosecutors by Jeffrey Epstein, it appears that other potential allegations may not end up tested in court and that could apply to possible co-conspirators, an arrangement alleged victims were not involved with. Through Palace statements, the Duke of York has unequivocally denied any wrongdoing. He's not charged with anything, nor has he been questioned by police. But the Queen's second son is in a spotlight he cannot wish away. His annus horribilis may have just begun. LEIGH SALES: Philip Williams reporting from London. LOAD-DATE: January 7, 2015 This is the first to tccspec JSCSOCIC selectedText.doc Z-WA-A-VZ-VZ- closed 295 4 I FULL I dGLzVzl-zSkAz I c51936f2d11(161. 133e57c0-9/78-1 ciient%a49998C0 %a3forever%aS EFTA01078759 EXHIBIT 3 EFTA01078760 Judge losses `sex slave' claims involving Prince Andrew - NY Daily News Page I of 4 AOSLD Can* nri weae pawl ease r.0 Never Lose Your Keys Again Florida judge tosses `sex slave' claims involving Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowilz Jr Oat% how; O.K./ a/tannin/U. I HE de 1.4R LUAY ht.Va I >.atMlwrd ...Jag 4.4 7 NIS lb 12 PM i LOOM.] Tusuy 01P+ 201S 3:11 51. C AA 72 44 Hy.. IG:3.1Vi9 Remains fo Steve duMul fOr Food Ni The metre" /Van elalri$ el &flie.* Miami WOO accused of slavery hide Twe nVee sit 444uClelp eat vtlele.) $14. Ohio mom aiding boyf MKS Andrnv with wee Mao Jenny Epstein MOO her s "sea slant fan of her Via pity net chows A Fiona judge has tossed ma ergs nine claims from a woman who said she ore scant CRATES SIOPICS win forced into having as with Cngbrels Mince MON* eaten snit was a Ps.c Andrew' er tittones Pat 'ae• teenager. OR' wall Kendra Sin Slapped wit rm mall liana et a ruing Tuesday. Ja-Ige Kennel, Marla deemed a bid oy 'MIMS DOe No 3 and for Oregon awes beaten'. M. :line Doe No v to:awns re a tang "ming court east alleging vie reds gave Ge$0.1's now Wee Mani •• • • • ' -• preferenr earth o sampans pen .teerey Couch. On Ms a new Attire ;Weary 1043.4•4* rumps M [Pan Ita Mint assesenry Jane Doe ho 3 — fence alell!V has Deere revealed 31 — • • ••• •• laid in a ticanbanell Vault Atka that Entreat lowed het mid Fax bud teecnon Monad sex tart I Ws Nast' for his, dOnitsm sex ton and his nos and renews ems when she was ji.St IS aaa rentli0 with studio • iwnlints NW 'OmSees ** ids Among most she said ens was th:Shett into. hanr4 relabel s went Pinig,re Sew, i coil Orsales eg Psi to. Andrew — /mown en Me BnliSh pen as *Randy Ants' — and 'mined defense KM slubt.:. Canto as on law Nan DetsbOraQ MOMOILDSIe tr- • hup://vvww.nydailynews.conilnews/nationalfjudge-tosses-scx-slave-claims-involving-prince.. 4/9/2015 EFTA01078761 Judge tosses 'sex slave' claims involving Prince Andrew - NY Daily News Page 2 of 4 ras~ Prince Andrew is seen leaving gannet ski /non In Swrtrlirllrel in January anna the brewing ses Mandel Del StOWII/ Caed no claims a °Matra Smear. IMO Shied Matta to Wren Col the "outrageous end ~neat alegeliOnS ' In his ruirno. ve oklge said the wol TNs CM.Srdaed Mi. Der stoentr's arguments bid rildf till h4 inlenrentain 5 unnecessary' as mete Jar. DOW No 33 lurid ~ale' Tuxes worn *neared elt rn an zt!rdo,I. Roberts drilared blOwtOrCh her allege:, trysts mil. NNW Dershow It and °then IrclulinG weiretiin al 'vibe.. nu wid orgy with Andles. inlet, a To. Epstein and nines appmentw undernr,en girl; South Caro member dit alcohol poi 'The fricital daldess regarding report wilt whom and where Vie Jane A ta.a•tcyC Does ebgaged N sexual Carresna liner Sue •••• • S acinulcs are immatena and impertinent to Ina Central GSM S.C. cop Mi espeCielly eCeSadenng mat Slave char 'hest debt% invorve nomparTres murder of V Scott who are not lead to ne •••• COP N respondent Government. Trine Cared ni. unneCeSsary des% shal ba fitC0(0, 'ui sir 'even' Me page wore HOM•11111 r found n eh Ile Oa° foranOlhere was no Withmeth reason tor the new Ceti to Nib LpI ap intervene at the Cale al all, Meat etw dni Aneeln CP.^ the Original NO Mair.lilts had tied za,1 On to•Nall 0' al ol bpsloin's victims Six yews nyu. 4 charged • 'WINN OV. IN <fine and 'The Court kids run *.irace 'ne lournonr 4, does nor motive adding sow orraring ote The "sex slave' claims Made In the Jamey Epstein Cu. again« ererrer «roe the kris nare been towed by *Fiend. loige. pezben the late tithe prrxehongs; the Ardge mine. ana'.: is (WNW/ inner-05'NY Baltimore g lø Jane Doe 3 ard Jane One 4 la proceed as panes in this action • member Ta gets ruduo sentence The lodge do say the women 'odd M Caned at witnesses when the else goes 1.•On.nNemOi lo tr al WO one ar toter pa 'In. no:4504y Oanrcipaliwr cr' Jane 3ne 3 and Jane Doe ri in 0* s Ctife Can be Detroh mor t•,,,r,ee oh ollonnti lher Plchreny 4JP?Ofle0 — 111, 1 relovanl. ErrniShtle, and shoving 1 c nomcumulaire — Cessna/1y as needed: Mama wrote in freezer: eircri •Mel It W.> FrO•tfri • .0. Video show M.nn som, fall off bred, hup://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/judge-tosses-sex-slave-claims-involving-prince... 4/9/2015 EFTA01078762 Judge tosses 'sex slave' claims involving Prince Andrew - NY Daily News Page 3 of 4 A Janney° wanly mew. pesonsde SEE IT: Fla Snatches SI °teen A limn. I Ire 'moped DP, windy.; a S. Drop. see c vied *pains female Cale Tro Irma. C lennWit pawl etrrss win CcOan-. Alan Denthowila was pleased to Mar INNage throw cell the - sea slave ailagabont and says he wig be vindicated DerShOwitz lad Me Dal ws nes pealed with In. detspOn — but 1* bins on gong Oka nd lawyetS 100 dela, mtign 'she Acta Mop n Galahad° but we *sad he and she wIl have b be deposed! he said. IN end less IS Mal steel go so lad /*cause Sht wW repeat her lee ale wee b able lo pate it and she oar add up n onSOri ICC pe'MY Mt., In own rehurelion. tin confelenl Mal el Me end :11 ca YIN:Scaled and tvelybOtty M1 uryienlend Min os o CoMplelety made up Wei RuclonOtiart Palace ea. denied Me eaegaten. eiganst Prince Andinv. wrath had been bolidefed by a *Neel the pace win It s arm wrapped Wound M atti' A palace spokesman defined to comment on the judge'* rang tai Tie Paso/Ned Press A lowyet Ice the hour Does Dial Edwards. vowed to press on** , the MOSTA./ Sold for Epetein's NOM.. rAo the leas have aeanowledged "al-Del WI Me dozens Caw bore 'We lie plena() by Me Coals ruling reakausing that Jane use 3 and a row 2 Oa el right to parlOpatewilboat lee Meld tor tarMat Nero/sign; he Said. si 3 ACC.. tiny. In a statement. 'Dee Y said. 'I'm happy to get to panicipate ir. Mn important Case 4 'TA^ we,: TAGS pre-Anna alas 40.1 5 Man, Son Ci WA, WO. 7 Ann am h 8 Tome WM". 9 sc I MAO 0 Sn" SAY Secret van slingeangt/ reveals M. Sisa•TT tritt• MAW n Beeneln Nahlvinghte HAW Cempattis tad stay al anyone yaw know. •• it kr! what wit you lawn lona? 25 /legs/amen That TAR Make Canon' Tea Gradient Tan Nana Henan SI Map You Laugh OW Swell Mannino. Ali Ann Nan Na' http://www.nydailynews.cominews/national/judge-tosses-sex-slave-claims-involving-prince... 4/9/2015 EFTA01078763 Judge tosses 'sex slave' claims involving Prince Andrew - NY Daily News Page 4 of 4 NW I/10M NY011ILYIEWS MIChaal Stager: The S.C. y Kets*Cly AVp0f I cop who lolled Welter passengers len 142,55I) at Scan TSA f beckpOltIM VvE RECOMMEND 1 Ol ir best Waterproof NaviCorwartMle Mascaras Cu. w• 0,.. 0 010 onMq • lop Roth IRA e A0 .. AccoJating .Mly Cosines ra0 COMMENTS DIIMAI11•1•/' •• 0 0$• A• O1NEN1 %V+. tornnve Uesweet JOHNNIE CONTGIVEAOARN 5 oe,> eau I wonder hnvies.r., l'A), had Ic caSo nor once tore IMMO> Sr.ski MARK mys esc Sue r 01 'minor LINO.° ma; no pipe as IPat she race •117•01 vary arC could ”A Nel iy.no^ •04 Domino Y MI Pert Oa will a igloo nal aunty Mal TIC MOM alla Lxylil oil oink:Hi she,' CS SAWS:: ..... TIM alIALLEY 2 ?GNI ape Why would We NA M P. blue axial Oars, 3vall' Or as PeoCae, Samel..... Net • Nee SHOW MORE COMMENTS 1.0, Xi • W. 4% ILt1:1111A, pep.(11Ard . I .A.1 I. I • Pa UllWaldi XELJANZ At A., • sta... ,inal. We elle • been ontsteent All . „ sok : , esey: .Wain. I . • .......eser”.4: Acircewlime“ Arm. sevja Ki t Hem Darn letveslaes KJIAINMIS PVI[A. to pa AJOJI Cid Ad]. COIASCI Os (Alin , ) I .4 :yin.. le ow JN Ctorrist 201SNIIII•Metes. esta Ai '41a anomie http://www.nydailynews.comffiews/nationalijudge-tosses-sex-slave-claims-involving-prince... 4/9/2015 EFTA01078764