EFTA01099665

• • 5‘0/-2012 Etwavos 09J. Fier"! EFTA01099665 From: Bata._Moab To: WIllatakla Subject FW: Epstein Date: Thursday, May 28, 2039 2:16:00 PM This is your Palm beach post lady. Do you want to call her? We did not talk about the sealing of that document. Only talked about her experience with Epstein. If you want me to call. I will, but I know you have the relationship with them and were going to call them about tomorrow. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre From: Spencer Wendel, Susan (CM-Palm Beach) (mailto: Sent Thursday, may 28, 2009 2:06 PM To: Bradley 1 Edwards Subject: RE: Epstein Dear Mr. Edwards: Would you have a moment to give me a call? Was the young woman you represent interviewed by Channel 5? And did she/you touch on the sealing issues with 5? Please advise .. as we at the Post do not want to be beat to the punch. Many thanks. Susan Spencer-Wendel Courts Reporter Palm Beach Post Original Message From: Bradley J. Edwards l Sent: Fri 5/22/2009 12:13 PM To: Spencer Wendel, Susan (CNI-Palm Beach) Subject: Epstein The case in which the Non-prosecution agreement was released to the victims and victim's attorneys is Jane Doe v, United States or America. 08.80736. It was released pursuant to protective order which is why I cannot discuss the contents of the Non-Prosecution agreement. Bradley J. Edwards 02241 EFTA01099666 Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre 02242 EFTA01099667 Front: etaka.ratoo2s To: als1311$02011( Subioct FW: Epstan respooSt Data Tuesday, key 14, 2009 4:37:00 FM Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City From: Michele Dargan [mailto: Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 4:26 PM To: Bradley ). Edwards Subject: Epstein response Brad, Please don't forget about e-mailing me your response to the Fourth District. I need your document to update my story, which ran on the web today, and would really appreciate it. Thanks so much, Michele Michele Dargan, staff writer Pam Beach Dail New 02204 EFTA01099668 From: Mini -Um= To: atillat-114111SCal Subject: FW: jeffrey costal Date: Monday, AuguSt 17, 2009 10:42:00 AM I have told this guy that we are really busy and getting the information to him is just not our number one priority right now. He is really oushv and I want to send this stuff to him whenever we have some free lime. REDA t T ED WCAtc, PRODIAC.',T Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adierl Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre From: Isikoff, Michael (mailto. Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 10:31 AM To: Bradley 3. Edwards Subject: Re: Jeffrey epstein Brad- tx. Either scanning or faxing -- and put to my attention- will work. -f you cam email the name of your assistant, I can follow up with her directly. Also, let me know if you tracd down the name of that incestiga(or who heard about the fbi resignation. Tx again for your help. Mike Isikoff From: Bradley J. Edwards <la To: Isikoff, Michael Sent: Sat Aug 15 18:00:44 2009 Subject: RE: Jeffrey epstein Michael, I have gathered the documents to be faxed to you to make it an easier task for my assistant. I cannot promise when my assistant will send them, but I will remind and encourage her to get you this information this week. Hope you are having a great weekend. Sincerely. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adierl Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre 02442 EFTA01099669 From: Isikoff, Michael lmailto Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 4:40 PM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: Jeffrey epstein Hey- never heard from your assist but just heard something pretty astonishing. Can you please call asa ? From: Bradley J. Edwards To: Isikoff, Michael Sent: Mon Aug 10 18:59:51 2009 Subject: RE: Jeffrey epstein Michael, I can verify that a State court Judge granted our Motion to Unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement; however, Epstein Ned an appeal and the appellate court has not issued an Order. So, for now, it is still a sealed document and not a matter of public record. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre From: Isikoff, Michael (mailto Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 6:02 PM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Jeffrey epstein Bradley Edwards-- I sec you are on one of the lawyers suing Jeffrey Epstein. I have been told, but have not yet confirmed, that his pica agreement with federal prosmutors was recently unsealed in one of the civil cases. Do you know if that is in fact the case and if it is now a matter of public record? Michael Isikoff Newsweek 02443 EFTA01099670 From: 120121 J. To: IS.Fas &Mott: FW: here, Wein Dote: Friday, October 02, 2009 4:52:00 PM REDA‘Ta D — tkrects.. Pli•aDucT Bradley I Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre From: Isikoff, Michael (mailtofflil Sent Friday, October 02, 200 : To: Bradley 3. Edwards Subject: RE: Jeffrey epstein Brad— Hi there. Been off on other matters, but understand there have been some interesting developments on this of late. In particular, was told about an affidavit that mentions some interesting names of people who you are now about to subpoena. Would like to talk. Mike Isikoff From: Bradley 3. Edwards [mailtcl i Sent: Saturday, August 15, 2009 6:01 PM To: Isikoff, Michael Subject: RE: Jeffrey epstein Michael, I have gathered the documents to be faxed to you to make it an easier task for my assistant. I cannot promise when my assistant will send them, but I will remind and encourage her to get you this information this week. Hope you are having a great weekend. Sincerely. Bradley J Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre From: Isikoff, Michael pnailt Sent: Friday, August 14, 2001111 To: Bradley 3. Edwards Subject: Re: Jeffrey epstein 02440 EFTA01099671 Hey- never heard from your assist but just heard something pretty astonishing. Can you please call asa From: Bradley J. Edwards arn> To: lsikoff, Michael Sent: Mon Aug 10 18:59:51 2009 Subject: RE: Jeffrey epstein Michael, I can verify that a State Court Judge granted our Motion to Unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement; however. Epstein filed an appeal and the appellate court has not issued an Order. So, for now. it is still a seated document and not a matter of public record. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law From: Isikoff, Michael [mailto. Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 6:02 PM To: Bradley 3. Edwards Subject: Jeffrey epstein Bradley Edwards-• I see you are on one of the lawyers suing Jeffrey Epstein. I have been told. but have not yet confirmed. that his plea agreement with federal prosecutors was recently unsealed in one of the civil cases. Do you know if that is in fact the ease and if it is now a matter of public record? Michael Isikoff 02441 EFTA01099672 hem: To: elintratledi SuIdeet: Re. Reside • Address for Nan Alessi Diet ThindaY, SeMenber 24, 2009 6:53:21 AM Agree not good idea unless were going to get something ie alleged records... Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile From: "Bradley J. Edwards" Date:Thu 24 Se 2009 6:31:01 To: Subject: RE: Epstein - Address for Juan Alessi Renee wanted it to go to his house. Like I said though, he's already given a deposition where he testified favorably for Epstein. From Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 8:40 PM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject Re: Epstein - Address for Juan Alessi Thanks. What do I do with this? Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile From: "Bradley J. Edwards" Date: Wed, 23 Se 2009 20:05:14 -0400 To: Subject: FW: Epstein - Address for Juan Alessi From: Jacquie Johnson Sent Wednesday, September 23, 2009 3:14 PM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject Epstein - REPAr.T2 1AUF ge.bac-r worm PP.O0 tsc.T Jacquie Johnson Legal Assistant to Brad Edwards. Esq. Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler 04318 EFTA01099673 04319 EFTA01099674 Prom: To: atyrlley I Fr*INA% Subject Re: Epstein • Address for Juan Mess: Date: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 8:42:38 PM Thanks. What do I do with this? Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile From: "Bradley J. Edwards" Date: Wed, 23 Se 2009 20:05:14 -0400 To: ' Subject: : pstein - ress or Juan A essl From: Jacquie Johnson Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 3:14 PM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject Epstein - Address for Juan Alessi Jacquie Johnson Legal Assistant to Brad Edwards, Esq. Partner Rothstein Rosenteldt Adler 04320 EFTA01099675 From: To: Subject RE: Epstem - Address fa Juan Alessi Data: Thursday, September 24, 2009 6:31:00 AM Renee wanted it to go to his house. Like I said though. he's already given a deposition where he testified favorably for Epstein. From: Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 8:40 PM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: Epstein - Address for Juan Alessi Thanks. What do I do with this? Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile From: "Bradley J. Edwards" Date: Wed, 23 .Sef 2009 2C :15:14 400 To: Subject: FW: Epstein - Address for Juan Alessi From: Jacquie Johnson Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 3:14 PM To: Bradley 1 Edwards Subject: Epstein Address for Juan Alessi Jacquie Johnson Legal Assistant to Brad Edwards, Esq. Partner 04321 EFTA01099676 From: atadiaiithEna To, tlichelelltimas Sooject: RE: Epstein Date: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 2:53:00 PM Will the US attys office talk to you? Because they obviously know. FBI on the Tannin and Cioffi (Bear Steams) case knows. I doubt they will talk though. The people that are in the know are holding the info very close to the vest, as I am sure they are being told to do so. Can you contact Radar? Maybe they will reveal the source. The information about Epstein being "Major Investor Number 1" has been out for awhile. I want to say that was first leaked in November 2008. Following the timelines of the Bear Steams case as stated in the indictment and the evolution of the sex charges that ultimately lead to the Non-Prosecution Agreement with Epstein is where I started, but it is a long, somewhat confusing and complicated. trail. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre From: Michele Dargan (mailto: Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 2:39 PM To: Bradley 3. Edwards Subject: Re: epstein I also noticed that Radar is the only one to report that info. Newspapers have a higher standard than online publications and bloggers etc. and newspapers, generally, have to confirm that the Info is in fact true. However, we may be able to cite Radar as a source....8elleve me, I've been making umpteen calls trying to verify the info. On 6/23/09 2:31 PM, "Bradley J. Edwards" < wrote: I have not seen anyone else report anything similar to the Radar report anywhere. Does that media channel not share with others? I am pretty curious how Radar got the info... Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler) Attorneys at Law From: Michele Dargan Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 : 7 PM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: epstein Thanks' 05212 EFTA01099677 On 6/23/09 1:16 PM, 'Bradley 3. Edwards" < wrote: I sent the request to my secretary and she will sen ..M.Pycm eocs y. Bradley J Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler! Attorneys at Law From: Michele Dargan (mailto: Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 1:11 PM To: Bradley 3. Edwards Subject: Re: epstein Brad, Thanks for the link. I appreciate It! Also, would you e-mail those documents that we talked about - your motion to unseal - and the Posts' atty if she has a separate one and also the Epstein attorney document that was filed on Friday. Thanks so much! Michele On 6/23/09 12:52 PM, "Bradley J. Edwards" < > wrote: htlo:/Nome radaronline com/exclusiyes/2009/0R/exclusiyerjeffroy-epsteln-be-releaeed-orison-early Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler! Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre Michele Dorgan, staff writer Palm Beach Dail News 05213 EFTA01099678 From: Brae*" 1 Fr:wards To: antkitallatO Subject RE: epstein Date: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 3:12:00 IM The victims were not notified before the deal was reached (the NPA), not even conferred with about the possible deal; in fact the girls were intentionally left in the dark; they were not notified before he was out on work release, and No they will most likely not be notified before he is released. The whole thing has been very secretive from the very beginning, for reasons that are just now coming out. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre From: Michele Dargan (mailto: Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: epstein Don't the victims have to be notified before he can get out? Have you received anything from PBSO or US Atty's saying that he's getting out in the next week or so? Wouldn't they have to notify you and the other atty's? On 6/23/09 2:53 PM, "Bradley J. Edwards" a wrote: Will the US attys office talk to you? Because they obviously know. FBI on the Tannin and Cioffi (Bear Steams) case knows. I doubt they will talk though. The people that are in the know are holding the info very close to the vest. as I am sure they are being told to do so. Can you contact Radar? Maybe they will reveal the source. The information about Epstein being 'Major Investor Number 1" has been out for awhee. I want to say that was first leaked in November 2008. Following the timelines of the Bear Steams case as stated in the indictment and the evolution of the sex charges that ultimately lead to the Non•Prosecution Agreement with Epstein is where I started, but it is a long, somewhat confusing and complicated, trail. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law From: Michele Dargan (mattro Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 : To: Bradley 1 Edwards Subject: Re: epstem 05215 EFTA01099679 I also noticed that Radar is the only one to report that info. Newspapers have a higher standard than online publications and bloggers etc. and newspapers, generally, have to confirm that the Info is in fact true. However, we may be able to cite Radar as a source....8elleve me, I've been making umpteen calls trying to verify the info. On 6/23/09 2:31 PM, 'Bradley I. Edwards' <bedwardsCorra-law.com> wrote: I have not seen anyone else report anything similar to the Radar report anywhere. Does that media channel not share with others? I am pretty curious how Radar got the info... Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler) Attorneys at Law Cents From: Michele Dargan a Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 1:27 PM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: epstein Thanks! On 6/23/09 1:16 PM, "Bradley J. Edwards' wrote: I sent the request to my secretary and she will send you those does today. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosonfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law From: Michele Dargan n u ay, une , • To: Bradley 3. Edwards Subject: Re: epstein Brad, Thanks for the link. I appreciate it! Also, would you e•mail those documents that we talked about - your motion to unseal - and the Posts' atty if she has a separate one and also the Epstein attorney document that was filed on Friday. Thanks so much! 05216 EFTA01099680 Michele On 6/23/09 12:52 PM, "Bradley I. Edwards" wrote: N1Lth5MYlagallfigSDMth=lialYgla iLlable4afifflY:22Slititl-121tiftlea dX Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfoldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre Michele Dargan, staff writer Palm Beach Dail News 05217 EFTA01099681 Prom: tik:bele.DaWall To: Bradley Edwant Subject: Re: epstein Date: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 3:08:53 PM Don't the victims have to be notified before he can get out? Have you received anything from PESO or US Atty's saying that he's getting out in the next week or so? Wouldn't they have to notify you and the other atty's? On 6/23/09 2:53 PM, "Bradley 3. Edwards' wrote: Will the US attys office talk to you? Because they obviously know. FBI on the Tannin and Cioffi (Bear Steams) case knows. I doubt they will talk though. The people that are in the know are holding the info very dose to the vest, as I am sure they are being told to do so. Can you contact Radar? Maybe they will reveal the source. The information about Epstein being "Major Investor Number 10 has been out for awhile. I want to say that was first leaked in November 2008. Following the timelines of the Bear Steams case as stated in the indictment and the evolution of the sex charges that ultimately lead to the Non.Prosecution Agreement with Epstein is where I started, but it is a long, somewhat confusing and complicated, trail. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler) Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre m From: Michele Dargan Sent: Tuesday, lune 23, 2009 2:39 PM To: Bradley ). Edwards Subject: Re: epstein I also noticed that Radar is the only one to report that info. Newspapers have a higher standard than online publications and bloggers etc. and newspapers, generally, have to confirm that the info is in fact true. However, we may be able to Cite Radar as a source.... Believe me, I've been making umpteen calls trying to verify the info. On 6/23/09 2:31 PM, "Bradley J. Edwards" wrote: I have not seen anyone else report anything similar to the Radar report anywhere. Does that media channel not share with others? I am pretty curious how Radar got the info... Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre 05344 EFTA01099682 •M n n : ues ay, une , To: Bradley 3. Edwards Subject: Re: epstein Thanks! On 6/23/09 1:16 PM, "Bradley 3. Edwards" wrote: I sent the request to my secretary and she will send you those does today. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre From: Michele Dar an - < Sent: Tuesday, lune 23, 2009 1:11 PM To: Bradley 3. Edwards Subject: Re: epstein Brad, Thanks for the link. I appreciate it! Also, would you e-mail those documents that we talked about - your motion to unseal - and the Posts' atty If she has a separate one and also the Epstein attorney document that was filed on Friday. Thanks so much! Michele On 6/23/09 12:52 PM, *Bradley J. Edwards" ote: rus.'<nn-early Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre 05345 EFTA01099683 Michele Dargan, staff writer Palm Beach Daily News 05346 EFTA01099684 From: eatIletlattottla To: tIcbeleaatuaa Suowct: RE: Epstein Date: Thursday, July 30, 2009 2:36:00 PM Thank you. We have our answer then. All the pieces are public record — Complaint filed by Josephsberg regarding Epstein being at the dub with Ghislaine Maxwell and taking a 15 year old home with him, a newspaper article that indicated he was banned for similar conduct (don't remember who published it but I read it a few months back), and a no comment from Trump. He's banned. Don't worry, we will get the official word. We are setting many depositions soon and certain people that will be set will know that information. I will keep you informed. Good work. I'll be in touch. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adlerl Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre From: Michele Dargan (mailto Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 1:48 PM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: Epstein Brad, We have no way of getting the members or the banned members lists. However, I spoke to Donald Trump today - nothing like getting it from the horse's mouth/ Anyway, he said Epstein is not a member and would not confirm or deny that he ever was a member. He would not comment at all (which Is very rare for him) on whether or not Epstein got booted from the club or if he had recruited girls from Mar•A•Lago. Sorry I couldn't be more help. I really thought that he would say something. He usually does comment for all of our stories. That's why this was quite unusual. If you get any info, please pass it on....like if any Info comes out during depos of anything related to Epstein getting booted from the club or about him recruiting girls from there. You know I will run with it! Michele On 7/28/09 9:28 AM, "Bradley J. Edwards' c wrote: Hi Michele, I was wondering if you were able to get a members list at the Maralago. and even more importanUy if you were able to get a list of banned members from the Maralago? Rumor has it that he was banned for having sex with and attempting to have sex with minors at the club. and we already know of certain minors that he took from the dub to his house. I will take a deposition of someone there it we need to do that to get the true information on this. but there are so many depositions to take in this case (and we are setting them right now around the country) that I would like to avoid this one if we could get the info another way. 05535 EFTA01099685 Thanks Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre Michele ()arcane staff writer 05536 EFTA01099686 From: Bradley 3 &Manic To: SICIICILQUIRO Subject: RE: Enda Date: Thursday, July 30, 2009 6.06:00 PM Michele, I forgot to tell you that I have a hearing acourtroom (11B I think) at 8:30 on our motion to add punitive damages. Should be some interesting things said for you. Things that have not been said before. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre IMMNIMactra From: Michele Dorgan [mailtoollipp i Sent Wednesday, Arty 29, 2 To: Bradley 3. Edwards Subject Re: Epstein Brad, We have no way of getting the members or the banned members lists. However, I spoke to Donald Trump today - nothing like getting it from the horse's mouth! Anyway, he said Epstein is not a member and would not confirm or deny that he ever was a member. He would not comment at all (which is very rare for him) on whether or not Epstein got booted from the club or if he had recruited girls from Mar-A-Lago. Sorry I couldn't be more help. I really thought that he would say something. He usually does comment for all of our stories. That's why this was quite unusual. If you get any info, please pass it on....ilke if any info comes out during depos of anything related to Epstein getting booted from the club or about him recruiting girls from there. You know I will run with it! Michele On 7/28/09 9:28 AM, "Bradley 3. Edwards" wrote: Hi Michele. I was wondering if you were able to get a members list at the Maralago, and even more importantly if you were able to get a list of banned members from the Maralago? Rumor has it that he was banned for having sex with and attempting to have sex with minors at the club, and we already know of certain minors that he took from the dub to his house. I will take a deposition of someone there if we need to do that to get the true information on this, but there are so many depositions to take in this case (and we are setting them right now around the country) that I would like to avoid this one if we could get the info another way. Thanks 05538 EFTA01099687 Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre Michele Dargan, staff writer Palm / 05539 EFTA01099688 From: kaditaEatan To: Wore, wennei So<an «w-Palm Rosati Subject RE: Epstein Date: Friday, SepWnber t8, 2009 1:01:00 PM Hi Susan, I know you spoke to Bill this morning, as I just got off the phone with him. If ou want any further dissection of this somewhat encrypted document, you can get me on my cell: I have lived with the document for a year and can shed light on its true meaning. Than s Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler) Attorneys at Law Las Olas Centre From: Spencer Wendel, Susan (CNI-Palm Beach) (rnailto ) Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 2:06 PM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: RE: Epstein Dear Mr. Edwards: Would ou have a moment to give me a call? Was the young woman you represent interviewed by Channel 3? And did she/you touch on the scaling issues with 5? Please advise .. as we at the Post do not want to be beat to the punch. Many thanks, Susan Spencer-Wendel Courts Reporter Palm Beach Post Original Message From: Bradley J. Edwards (al Sent: Fri 5/222009 12:13 PM To: Spencer Wendel, Susan (CNI-Palm Beach) Subject: Epstein The case in which the Non-prosecution agreement was released to the victims and victim's attorneys is Jane Doe v. United States of America, 08.80736. It was released pursuant to protective order which is why I cannot discuss the contents of the Non-Prosecution agreement. 05619 EFTA01099689 Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adlerl Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre 0 pin 05620 EFTA01099690 From: Michele Qua To: Bradley J. Edwards Staged: Re: Epstein Date: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 11:3S:46 AM Brad, I actually got ahold of Duane yesterday. He referred me to his supervisor, saying he could not talk to the media. Then I got his supervisor, Ken Johnson, who also told me that he couldn't talk to the media and that I had to call the Dept. of Corrections in Tallahassee. There I got a very helpful woman, Jo Ann Ratcliffe, who told me that the Dept. of Corrections doesn't have any records from his stint in jail. They begin their monitoring of him today. But she did send me court records, including a document that says he WILL NOT wear an ankle monitor. I wrote about that today....Apparently, the original court record was wrong and not wearing the monitor was part of his plea deal. I will try to find out about the Virgin Islands thing. My real problem is with the PBSO, which are holding all of his jail records, his work release stuff, etc. They are really stymying me getting the records that I want....My next step Is to go directly to office, since his underlings are NOT giving me the records - that are public records. Please let me know if you have any additional info - or particularly any scoops. On 7/22/09 11:22 AM, "Bradley J. Edwards" wrote: Hi Michele. I am sure you heard that Epstein was released this morning (assuming he wasn't released last week). We are hearing that his probation is being transferred so that he can actually spend his house arrest on h' i Ian in the Vi in Islands. Anyway, this is the name of Epstein's probation officer. . Just passing it on in case you wanted to interrogate him and see if he will tell you something. I will have more news for you soon as there are a lot of things starting to happen now. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Oias City Centre Michele Dargan, staff writer 05803 EFTA01099691 From: To: Bradley J. &Mauls Subject Re: F0Stein Date: Tuesday, July 28, 21:09 10100:32 AM Hi Brad, I'm not sure if we can or can't get the info because it's not a governmental body and I don't think it has to provide those records to us....But I am going into a news meeting and will ask if there's a way we can persue this. There are other reporters here who know some key staff members there, I think, and maybe they can help get that info. What time period are we looking at? What specific years, do you know? On 7/28/09 9:28 AM, "Bradley I. Edwards" < > wrote: Hi Michele, I was wondering if you were able to get a members list at the Maralago. and even more importantly if you were able to get a list of banned members from the Maralago? Rumor has it that he was banned for having sex with and attempting to have sex with minors at the dub, and we already know of certain minors that he took from the dub to his house. I will take a deposition of someone there if we need to do that to get the true information on this, but there are so many depositions to take in this case (and we are setting them right now around the country) that 1 would like to avoid this one if we could get the info another way. Thanks Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre Michele Dargan, staff writer Palm Beach Daily News 05848 EFTA01099692 From: Lineitaltal To: endley Edwards Subject: Re: ECaeln Date: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 1:49:54 PM Brad, We have no way of getting the members or the banned members lists. However, I spoke to Donald Trump today - nothing like getting it from the horse's mouth! Anyway, he said Epstein is not a member and would not confirm or deny that he ever was a member. He would not comment at all (which is very rare for him) on whether or not Epstein got booted from the club or if he had recruited girls from Mar-A-Lago. Sorry I couldn't be more help. I really thought that he would say something. He usually does comment for all of our stories. That's why this was quite unusual. If you get any Info, please pass it on....like if any Info comes out during depos of anything related to Epstein getting booted from the club or about him recruiting girls from there. You know I will run with It! Michele On 7/28/09 9:28 AM, 'Bradley 3. Edwards" c wrote: Hi Michele, I was wondering if you were able to get a members list at the Maralago. and even more importantly if you were able to get a fist of banned members from the Maralago? Rumor has it that he was banned for having sex with and attempting to have sex with minors at the club. and we already know of certain minors that he took from the dub to his house. I will take a deposition of someone there if we need to do that to get the true information on this, but there are so many depositions to take in this case (and we are setting them right now around the country) that I would like to avoid this one if we could get the info another way. Thanks Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfoldt Adler' Attorneys at Law nr Michele Dargan, staff writer Palm Beach Daily News 05852 EFTA01099693 05853 EFTA01099694 From: =Eta To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: Epstein Date: Friday, July 31, 2009 11:20:06 MI Brad, I didn't get your e-mail until I got in this morning (Friday) so it was too late....you did mean it took place this morning, right? Anything interesting? On 7/30/09 6:06 PM, "Bradley 3. Edwards" > wrote: Michele, I forgot to tell you that I have a hearing in (11B I think) at 8:30 on our motion to add punitive damages. Should be some interesting things said for you. Things that have not been said before. Bradley .1. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre From: Michele Dargan Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 1:48 PM To: Bradley 3. Edwards Subject: Re: Epstein Brad, We have no way of getting the members or the banned members lists. However, I spoke to Donald Trump today - nothing like getting it from the horse's mouth! Anyway, he said Epstein is not a member and would not confirm or deny that he ever was a member. He would not comment at all (which is very rare for him) on whether or not Epstein got booted from the club or if he had recruited girls from Mar-A-Lago. Sorry I couldn't be more help. I really thought that he would say something. He usually does comment for all of our stories. That's why this was quite unusual. If you get any info, please pass it on...dike if any info comes out during depos of anything related to Epstein getting booted from the club or about him recruiting girls from there. You know I will run with it! Michele On 7/28/09 9:28 AM, "Bradley 3. Edwards" wrote: Hi Michele, I was wondering if you were able to get a members list at the Maralago, and even more importantly if you were able to get a list of banned members from the Maralago' Rumor 05857 EFTA01099695 has it that he was banned for having sex with and attempting to have sex with minors at the dub, and we already know of certain minors that he took from the dub to his house. I will take a deposition of someone there if we need to do that to get the true Information on this. but there are so many depositions to take in this case (and we are setting them right now around the country) that I would like to avoid this one if we could get the info another way. Thanks Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre Michele Dargan, staff writer Palm Beach Daily News 05858 EFTA01099696 From: To: Subject: Re: Epstein Data: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 11:03:54 AM Brad, Thank you very much for your help, it was a pleasure to meet you and I look forward to collaborating with you on this case. Today I received the best possible news; confirmation that is, from both the Mexican Attorney General Eduardo Medina Mora and the Mexican Ambassador to the U.S., Arturo Sarukhan, that child trafficking Is operated by the Mexican Cartels! This is the first time that 2 key Mexican government officials confirm this. In the meantime and if we can prove that JE is involved in trafficking children for his sexual needs even if she is just ONE victim, he will be linked to a federal crime that is becoming the number #1 issue in criminal investigation by ICE, FBI, Interpol and all other law enforcement agencies involved in these investigations. JEs new case (confirmed by unnamed source that FBI just opened new case against JE), might become the biggest federal case of a US non-cartel related trafficking crime!!! NOW THAT'S A WINNING CASE all round! Let me know how you want to pursue this. We'll be in touch. Aug 24, 2009 07:38:41 PM, wrote: Sorry it took me a couple days. I actually forgot about it. If the link still does not allow ou to open it, then I am also giving you all the information so that you can get it from Pacer. It is Jane Doe 102 v. Epstein, case number 09-80656. Let me know if you need nything else from me and also if you hear of anything that would be helpful. I am still orking on some things for you. ttips'llecf fisd uscourts gov/doc1/05116541941 Sincerely. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adlerl Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre 05952 EFTA01099697 05953 EFTA01099698 From: To: ad0le2LLEISS Subject: Re: IMPORTANT POTENTIAL MEDIA TACTIC Roman potanSid and 3E Date: Monday, September 28, 2009 10:10:45 AM You're right Brad, it would have to be focused (any media initiative), strictly on the Issue that is the power of power in sexual abuse. older, powerful men using their influence and money to abuse system. Original Message From: Brad Edwards To: Sent: 28 Sep 2009 10:06 Subject: RE: IMPORTANT POTENTIAL MEDIA TACTIC Roman polanskl and JE The dynamics of the two cases are so different, not factually but procedurally (meaning Epstein was already sentenced and Polanslci was not). I am unsure as to how we could use one to help in the other. Maybe Anita could help get people together on this front. I think the idea of Palm Beachers speaking out, picketing, or voicing public opinion is great irrespective of any Polanski connection, so if that can be done, then it should be done. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler! Attorneys at Law L Ola tre Original Message From: csamofflOyerizon net (Maia Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 8:07 AM To: Bradley J. Edwards Cc: Renee/Carlos Morrison Subject: IMPORTANT POTENTIAL MEDIA TACTIC Roman polanski and JE Ni Brad, The media buzz surrounding polanski's arrest in Zurich based on a 70s warrant for his arrest on charges that he had sex with 13 year old shld be leveraged in epstein's case now!!!! Maybe mother's in palm beach can create a stir and a vigil against men in power who abuse children? What are your thoughts? Warmly, Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile 06788 EFTA01099699 From: 8ecarorfletaals To: Subject RE: IMPORTANT POTENTIAL MEDIA TACTIC Roman polanst aria JE Date: Monday, September 28, 2009 l0:06:00 AM The dynamics of the two cases are so different, not factually but procedurally (meaning Epstein was already sentenced and Polanski was not). I am unsure as to how we could use one to help in the other. Maybe Anita could help get people together on this front. I think the idea of Palm Beaches speaking out, picketing, or voicing public opinion is great irrespective of any Polanski connection, so if that can be done, then it should be done. Bradley 3. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adleri Attorneys at Law Las Olas GN Centre From: Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 8:07 AM To: Bradley Edwards Cc: Renee/Carlos Morrison Subject: IMPORTANT POTENTIAL MEDIA TACTIC Roman polanski and )E Hi Brad, The media buzz surrounding polanski's arrest in Zurich based on a 70s warrant for his arrest on charges that he had sex with 13 year old shld be leveraged in epstein's case now!!!! Maybe mother's in palm beach can aeate a stir and a vigil against men in power who abuse children? What are your thoughts? via BlackBerry from T-Mobile 06789 EFTA01099700 From: leant, hbrhari To: PtMtn, I FrMaids Subject: Re: rereY epstrn Date: Friday, August 14, 2C09 4:41:41 OM Hey- never heard from your assist but just heard something pretty astonishing. Can you please call asap/ From: Bradley J. Edwards 0nt > To: Isikoff, Michael Sent: Mon Aug 10 18:59:51 2009 Subject: RE: Jeffrey epstein Michael, can verify that a State court Judge granted our Motion to Unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement: however, Epstein filed an appeal and the appellate court has not issued an Order. So, for now, it is still a seated document and not a matter of public record. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler( Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre From: Isikoff, Michael (mailtollat•COrn) Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 6:02 PM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Jeffrey epstein Bradley Edwards-- I see you are on one of the lawyers suing Jeffrey Epstein. I have been told, but have not yet confirmed, that his plea agreement with federal prosecutors was recently unsealed in one of the civil cases. Do you know if that is in fact the case and if it is now a matte of public record? Michael Isikoff Newsweek 06953 EFTA01099701 FROM: LtdLithad To: BUSIbLikbraf0S Cc: Jamleintiospa Subject RE: Jeffrey epstsn Data: Friday, Octcber 02, 2009 6:14:09 PM Tx. Good talking to you -- and I look forward to the letter, and further developments. --Original Message From: Bradley 1. Edwards Sent: Fri 10/2/2009 4:53 PM To: Isikoff, Michael Cc: lac:rule Johnson Subject: RE: Jeffrey epstein Michael, I will have someone pull the Reiter letter and send it to you soon. And, I will keep you apprised of anything else that is verified and useful. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Ofas City Centre From: Isikoff, Michael Sent: Friday, October 02, 2 . To: Bradley Edwards Subject: RE: Jeffrey epstein Brad- Hi there. Been off on other matters, but understand there have been some interesting developments on this of late. In particular, was told about an affidavit that mentions some interesting names of people who you are now about to subpoena. Would like to talk. Mike Isikoff 06955 EFTA01099702 202-626.2018 From: Bradley .). Edwards [MailinEll.a Sent: Saturday, August 15, 2009 6:01 PM To: Isikoff, Michael Subject: RE: Jeffrey epstein Michael, I have gathered the documents to be faxed to you to make it an easier task for my assistant. I cannot promise when my assistant will send them, but I will remind and encourage her to get you this information this week. Hope you are having a great weekend. Sincerely, Bradley .3. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre From: Isikoff, Michael (ma Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 4:40 PM To: Bradley ). Edwards Subject: Re: Jeffrey epstein Hey- never heard from your assist but just heard something pretty astonishing. Can you please call as.ap m Bradley ). Edwards -am> 10: Isikoff, Michael 06956 EFTA01099703 Sent: Mon Aug 10 18:59:51 2009 Subject: RE: Jeffrey epstein Michael, I can verify that a State court Judge granted our Motion to Unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement; however, Epstein filed an appeal and the appellate court has not issued an Order. So, for now, it is still a sealed document and not a matter of public record. Bradley 3. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Dias City Centre From: Isikoff, Michael Sent: Monday, August 10, 2 : To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Jeffrey epstein Bradley Edwards-- I see you are on one of the lawyers suing Jeffrey Epstein. I have been told, but have not yet confirmed, that his plea agreement with federal prosecutors was recently unsealed in one of the civil cases. Do you know if that Is in fact the case and if it is now a matter of public record? Michael Isikoff Newsweek O6957 EFTA01099704 From: Isiattaiicaael Tor ticadlecifteash Subject Re: Sere/ epstein Date: Tuesday, — II, 2009 12:39:30 PM Brad- great talking to you, you certainly gave me plenty to think about. Can you please forward me a copy of one of those letters to the victims and a couple of your complaints-- against the us attorney's office and epstein? Also, please let me know if I can talk to one of the victims. -f one or more is willing to go on the record about how they felt deceived by the fbi and prosecutors over the handling of this, I can probably arrange to come down as early as next week. Mike From: Bradley I. Edwards am> To: Isikoff, Michael Sent: Tue Aug 11 10:10:01 2009 Subject: RE: Jeffrey epstein httpIN.ww.businessinsidercom/2008/6/more-woes-for-teen-sex-afficionado-jeff-epstein-also-lost-57- million-in-bear-steams-hedge-fund Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler( Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre From: Isikoff, Michael (mailtoopiii Sent Tuesday, August 11, 2 To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: Jeffrey epstein Just left a voice message. Is there a good cell phone number? Mike Isikoff From: Bradley J. Edwards Orri> To: Isikoff, Michael Sent: Tue Aug 11 08:43:42 2009 Subject: RE: Jeffrey epstein anytime Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre 06959 EFTA01099705 From: Isikoff, Michael (mailto Sent: Monday, August 10, 2 . To: Bradley ). Edwards Subject: Re: Jeffrey epstein Tx much. I had a few questions about this and will give you a call tomorrow. From: Bradley 3. Edwards To. Isikoff, Michael Sent: Mon Aug 10 18:59:51 2009 Subject: RE: Jeffrey epstein Michael, I can verify that a State court Judge granted our Motion to Unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement; however, Epstein filed an appeal and the appellate court has not issued an Order. So, for now, it is still a sealed document and not a matter of public record. Bradley J Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre From: Isikoff, Michael Sent: Monday, August 10, 2 . To: Bradley 1 Edwards Subject: Jeffrey epstein Bradley Edwards-- I see you are on one of the lawyers suing Jeffrey Epstein. I have been told, but have not yet confirmed, that his plea agreement with federal prosecutors was recently unsealed in one of the civil cases. Do you know if that is in fact the cast and if it is now a matter of public record? Michael Isikoff Newsweek 06960 EFTA01099706 To: 10b0500...Bad Subject: RE: Jeffrey epster Data: Muratlav, October Oa. 2009 9.11:57 PM Attachmenb: 2na Amerered Ccmolaint revised W Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosonfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre From: Johnson, Richard [mark Sent: Thursday, October 08, 21PRI MMII To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Jeffrey epstein Thanks. Please copy me one of the lawsuits This message and its attachments may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient (or responsible for delivery of the message to the intended recipient), you are hereby notified that you have received this transmission in error; any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this transmission is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in er notify us immediately by reply or by telephone (call us at nd immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Any content of this message and its attachments that does not relate to the official business of NYP Holdings, Inc. must be taken not to have been sent or endorsed by any of them. No warranty is made that the e-mail or attachment(s) are free from computer viruses or other defects. 06961 EFTA01099707 From: To: Bradice1-Eceatsh Subject: Re: Jere/ epsteln Date: Tuesday, August II, 2009 9:29:05 AM Just left a voice message. Is there a good cell phone number? Mike Isikoff From: Bradley J. Edwards To: Isikoff, Michael Sent: Tue Aug 11 08:43:42 2009 Subject: RE: Jeffrey epstein anytime Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler] Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre From: Isikoff, Michael [mailt Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 7:22 PM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: Jeffrey epstein Tx much. I had a few questions about this and will give you a call tomorrow. From: Bradley J. Edwards a> To: Isikoff, Michael Sent: Mon Aug 10 18:59:51 2009 Subject: RE: Jeffrey epstein Michael, I can verify that a State court Judge granted our Motion to Unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement; however, Epstein filed an appeal and the appellate court has not issued an Order. So, for now, it is still a sealed document and not a matter of public record. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt /WW1 Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre 06963 EFTA01099708 From: Isikoff, Michael [mail Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 6:02 PM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Jeffrey epstein Bradley Edwards-- I see you are on one of the lawyers suing Jeffrey Epstein. I have been told, but have not yet confirmed, that his plea agreement with federal prosecutors was recently unsealed in one of the civil eases. Do you know if that is in fact the case and if it is now a matter of public record? Michael Isikoff Newsweek 06964 EFTA01099709 From: fkradlev n Fdward% In: Isadr M Suoject: RE: Jeffrey epstein Date: Monday, August 10, 2009 6'59.00 PM Michael, I can verify that a State court Judge granted our Motion to Unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement; however. Epstein filed an appeal and the appellate court has not issued an Order. So, for now, it is still a sealed document and not a matter of public record. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosonfeldt Adler( Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre From: Isikoff, Michael imailt&:1111.1 Sent: Monday, August 10, 2 To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Jeffrey epstein Bradley Edwards— I see you are on one of the lawyers suing Jeffrey Epstein. I have been told, but have not yet confirmed, that his plea agreement with federal prosecutors was recently unsealed in one of the civil taus. Do you know if that is in fact the case and if it is now a matter of public record? Michael Isikoff Newsweek 06965 EFTA01099710 Front: Isan77 My-haal ;Varney J Fdwardc SRoject: Re: Jeffrey egsten Date: Monday, August 10, 2009 7:23:12 PM Tx much. I had a few questions about this and will give you a call tomorrow. From: Bradley J. Edwards 'ohl> To: Isikoff, Michael Sent: Mon Aug 10 18:59:51 2009 Subject: RE: Jeffrey epstein Michael, I can verify that a State court Judge granted our Motion to Unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement; however, Epstein filed an appeal and the appellate court has not issued an Order. So, for now, it is still a sealed document and not a matter of public record. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre From: Isikoff, Michael Sent: Monday, August 10, 2 To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Jeffrey epstein Bradley Edwards-- !see you are on one of the lawyers suing Jeffrey Epstein. I have been told, but have not yet confirmed, that his plea agreement with federal prosecutors was recently unsealed in one of the civil eases. Do you know if that is in fact the case and if it is now a matter of public record? Michael Isikoff Newsweek 06967 EFTA01099711 From: gralev 3. Edward( Subject: RE: Jeffrey town Date: Tbesday, August It 2009 8:43:00 AM anytime Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre From: Isikoff, Michael (mailto: Sent: Monday, August 10, 2 . To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: Jeffrey epstein Tx much. I had a few questions about this and will give you a call tomorrow. From: Bradley J. Edwards ont> To: Isikoff, Michael Sent: Mon Aug 10 18:59:51 2009 Subject: RE: Jeffrey epsteln Michael. I can verify that a State court Judge granted our Motion to Unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement: however. Epstein filed an appeal and the appellate court has not issued an Order. So. for now, it is still a sealed document and not a matter of public record. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adlori Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre From: Isikoff, Michael Sent Monday, August 10, 2 . To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: jeffrey epstein Bradley Edwards-- I see you are on one of the lawyers suing Jeffrey Epstein. I have been told, but have not yet • irmcd. that his plea agreement with federal prosecutors was recently unsealed in one of the civil cases. Do you if that is in fact the case and if it is now a matter of public record? 06968 EFTA01099712 Michael Isikoff Newsweek 06969 EFTA01099713 From: ararilra/..Etoxib To: Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein Woo Tuesday, August 11, 2009 10:1040 01 htlp://www.businessinsidercomf2008/8/more-woes-for-biten-sex-afilcionado-jeff-epstein-aiso-iost- 57- million-in-bear-steams-hedge-fund Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre From: Isikoff, Michael [mail Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 21 1./I ll To: Bradley 3. Edwards Subject: Re: Jeffrey epstein Just left a voice message. Is there a good cell phone number? From: Bradley 3. Edwards To: Islkoff, Michael Sent: Tue Aug 11 08:43:42 2009 Subject: RE: Jeffrey epstein anytime Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfoldt Adlcal Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre From: Isikoff, Michael Sent: Monday, August 10, 2 . To: Bradley 3. Edwards Subject: Re: Jeffrey epstein Tx much. I had a few questions about this and will give you a call tomorrow. From: Bradley 3. Edwards apill> To: lsikoff, Michael Sent: Mon Aug 10 18:59:51 2009 06970 EFTA01099714 Subject: RE: jeffrey epstein Michael. I can verify that a State court Judge granted our Motion to Unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement; however. Epstein filed an appeal and the appellate court has not issued an Order. So. for now. it Is still a sealed document and not a matter of public record. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler) Attorneys at Law From: Isikoff, Michael [mallto Sent: Monday, August 10, 20 To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: jeffrey epstein Bradley Edwards.- I see you are on one of the lawyers suing Jeffrey Epstein. I have been told, but have not yet confirmed, that his plea agreement with federal prosecutors was recently unsealed in one of the civil cases. Do you know if that is in fact the case and if it is now a matter of public record? Michael Isikoff Newsweek 06971 EFTA01099715 From: efightaiSh1021 To: talsofLtIcluel Subject: RE: gertY tester Date: Saturday, August IS, 2009 6:00:00 PM Michael. I have gathered the documents to be faxed to you to make it an easier task for my assistant. I cannot promise when my assistant will send them, but I will remind and encourage her to get you this information this week. Hope you are having a great weekend. Sincerely. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adlei Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre From: Isikoff, Michael [mailto Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 4:40 PM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: Jeffrey epstein Hey- never heard from your assist but just heard something pretty astonishing. Can you please call asap? From: Bradley J. Edwards am> To: Isikoff, Michael Sent: Mon Aug 10 18:59:51 2009 Subject: RE: Jeffrey epstein Michael. I can verily that a State court Judge granted our Motion to Unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement; however, Epstein filed an appeal and the appellate court has not issued an Order. So. for now. it is still a sealed document and not a matter of public record. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler! Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre From: Isikoff, Michael (mailholimig Sent: Monday, August 10, 2 To: Bradley J. Edwards 06972 EFTA01099716 r Subject: Jeffrey epstein Bradley Edwards-- I see you arc on one of the lawyers suing Jeffrey Epstein. I have been told, but have not yet confirmed, that his plea agreement with federal prosecutors was recently unsealed in one of the civil cases. Do you know if that is in fact the case and if it is now a matter of public record? Michael Isikoff Newsweek 06973 EFTA01099717 From: EtitatraElmvsla To: IstaLttchael Cc: 110111k22D0591 subject: RE: Jeffrey epstein Date: Friday, October 02, 2009 4:53:00 PM Michael, I will have someone pull the Reiter letter and send it to you soon. And. I will keep you apprised of anything else that is verified and useful. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre From: Isikoff, Michael (mak° Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 4:28 PM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: RE: jeffrey epstein Brad— Hi there. Been off on other matters. but understand there have been some interesting developments on this of late. In particular, was told about an affidavit that mentions some interesting names of people who you are now about to subpoena. Would like to talk. Mike Isikoff From: Bradley J. Edwards [mallto Sent: Saturday, August 15, 2009 6:01 PM To: Isikoff, Michael Subject: RE: jeffrey epstein Michael, I have gathered the documents to be faxed to you to make it an easier task for my assistant. I cannot promise when my assistant will send them, but I will remind and encourage her to get you this information this week. Hope you are having a great weekend. Sincerely. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler( Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre O6974 EFTA01099718 From: Isikoff, Michael [rnailtc Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 4:40 PM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: Jeffrey epstein Hey- never heard from your assist but just heard something pretty astonishing. Can you please call asa From: Bradley J. Edwards 3m> Isikoff, Michael Sent: Mon Aug 10 18:59:51 2009 Subject: RE: Jeffrey epstein Michael. I can verify that a State court Judge granted our Motion to Unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement. however, Epstein filed an appeal and the appellate court has not issued an Order. So, for now, it is still a sealed document and not a matter of public record. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law L Olas Cit entr From: Isikoff, Michael [mailto: .com) Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 6:02 PM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Jeffrey epstein Bradley Edwards-- I see you are on one of the lawyers suing Jeffrey Epstein. I have been told, but have not yet confirmed, that his plea agreement with federal prosecutors was recently unsealed in one of the civil cases. Do you know if that is in fact the case and if it is now a matter of public record? Michael IsikofT 06975 EFTA01099719 From: (Sk0ff,14matl To: Ikagitra.Edistals Subject Re: Jeffrey Poston Date: Momlay, August It 2004 10:32:43 AM Brad- lx. Either scanning or faxing -- and put to my attention- will work. -f you cam email the name of your assistant. I can follow up with her directly. Also, let me know if you tracd down the name of that incestiga(or who heard about the fbi resignation. Tx again for your help. Mike Isikoff From: Bradley J. Edwards INMEN.M.Miorn> To: Isikoff, Michael Sent: Sat Aug 15 18:00:44 2009 Subject: RE: Jeffrey epstein Michael, I have gathered the documents to be faxed to you to make it an easier task for my assistant I cannot promise when my assistant will send them, but I will remind and encourage her to get you this information this week. Hope you are having a great weekend. Sincerely. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre From: Isikoff, Michael [mailb3 Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 4:40 PM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: Jeffrey epstein Hey- never heard from your assist but just heard something pretty astonishing. Can you please call From: Bradley J. Edwards To: Isikoff, Michael Sent: Mon Aug 10 18:59:51 2009 Subject: RE: Jeffrey epstein Michael, I can verify that a State court Judge granted our Motion to Unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement; however, Epstein filed an appeal and the appellate court has not issued an Order. So. for now, it is still a sealed document and not a matter of public record. 06976 EFTA01099720 Bradley J Edwards ier.er Rothstein Rosenfoldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre From: Isikoff, Michael [rnailto:flccom) Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 6:02 PM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Jeffrey epstein Bradley Edwards-- I see you are on one of the lawyers suing Jeffrey Epstein. I have been told, but have not yet confirmed, that his plea agreement with federal prosecutors was recently unsealed in one of the civil cases. Do you know if that is in fact the case and if it is now a matter of public record? Michael Isikoff Newsweek 06977 EFTA01099721 From: hasCfattchisi To: Subject RE: Whey epsten Date: Friday, October 02, 2009 4:28:47 PM Brad— Hi there. Been off on other matters, but understand there have been some interesting developments on this of late. In particular, was told about an affidavit that mentions some Interesting names of people who you are now about to subpoena. Would like to talk. Mike Isikoff From: Bradley J. Edwards Sent: Saturday, August 15, To: Isikoff, Michael Subject: RE: Jeffrey epstein Michael. I have gathered the documents to be faxed to you to make it an easier task for my assistant. I cannot promise when my assistant will send them, but 1 will remind and encourage her to get you this information this week. Hope you are having a great weekend. Sincerely. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adlerl Attorneys at Law From: Isikoff, Michael [mailto: Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: Jeffrey epstein Hey- never heard from your assist but just heard something pretty astonishing. Can you please call asa ? From: Bradley J. Edwards CM> To: Isikoff, Michael Sent: Mon Aug 10 18:59:51 2009 Subject: RE: Jeffrey epstein Michael. I can verify that a State court Judge granted our Motion to Unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement: however, Epstein filed an appeal and the appellate court has not issued an Order. So, for now, it is still a sealed document and not a matter of public record. Bradley J Edwards 06979 EFTA01099722 Partner Rothstein Rosenfelt:it Adler' Attomoys at Law Las Olas City Centre From: Isikoff, Michael [made): corn) Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 6:02 PM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Jeffrey epstein Bradley Edwards-- I see you are on one of the lawyers suing Jeffrey Epstein. I have been told, but have not yet confirmed that his plea agreement with federal prosecutors was recently unsealed in one of the civil cases. Do you know if that is in fact the case and if it is now a matter of public record? Michael Isikoff Newsweek 06980 EFTA01099723 From: To: eadleXikkata Subject Re: Please can u email the does Date: Monday, September 07, 2009 7:00:29 PM Thanks so very much Bradl By the way are you sure u can go back to work tomorrow? Isn't it a bit early? Don't sit aM day it will hurt your back, have them bring a cot into your office so u can lay downiffI :) Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile Original Message From: "Bradley 1 Edwards" aDm> Date: Mon 07 Se 2009 18:49:00 To: Subj : : ease can u email the dors I will get to work before 11:00 tomorrow, and you will be my first priority (before trying to even look at my inbox that I am sure has grown a life of its own). I will get you everything I can. If you don't hear from me by noon, call my direct work line nd then my cell. I am sure I will get bombarded because the office hasn't seen I may need a phone call. Either way, you will at least know all that I know tomorrow, but I still do not have the concrete-caught-red-handed information that you need on his child sex trafficking. We will. And hopefully we will soon. I just hope it's soon enough for you. But I will get you all I have. Talk to you tomorrow! Brad Original Message From To: Bradley 1 Edwards Subject: Re: Please can u email the docs J Oh that's too bad Brad! What can u tell me on the record from those doom now? Can u send an email with Info? • be able to send them ? Yes, I need •mina) file and whatever other on the record file pertaining to epsteln's trafficking/pros l on crimes Many thanks Original Message From: Brad Edwards To Sent: Sep 7, 2009 13:08 Subject: RE: Please can u email the docs I just found out that we cannot release the docs that were under seal yet (the Non-Prosecution Agreement), until the Judge si it. I will call you later and we will deal with this issue. Don't worry. I am trying to get you criminal record today. Anything else you need from me right now. O From: Sent: Monday, September 07, 2009 1:03 PM To: Bradley 1 Edwards Subject: Re: Please can u email the docs Hl Brad, 07605 EFTA01099724 I'm delighted you're feeling better. As you can imagine I have to meet certain deadlines with my editor. This particular chapter is due pretty soon and I have a lot to write. Please can you see that I have the docs soonest, thank you so much. Wishing you a Godspeed recovery, Original Message- From: Brad Edwards To: Sent: Sep 7, 2009 13:01 Subject: RE: Please can u email the does I asked my investigator to send it to you, and he apparently didn't. I am going into the office tomorrow for a few hours and will send it personally if you don't get it before then. lam getting better. Thanks. Brad From: Sent: Monday, September 07, 2009 12:39 PM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Please can u email the docs HI Brad, Hope you're feeling better and enjoying the weekend. Please can you email the docs we discussed. Induding all unsealed docs Many thanks, Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile 07606 EFTA01099725 From: /paler .1. Edward; To: amamotfleverOon we Subject: RE: Please can u nil the does Date: Monday, September 07, 2009 8:12.00 PM You are right. Doctor said NOT to go back for at least one more week, but I have a lot of people counting on me, and as much as I LOVE my wife and kids, I am going stir crazy arid at least need to get in and see everyone, and see my office and my inbox, etc. And I need to take care of some things for youl Also, I have a new case to sign up tomorrow that I was called at home about today, so I have to meet with this new dient tomorrow. Anyway, twill not over do it. I will call you tomorrow. Take care. -----Original Message From: csamoffl@verizon net (majlto:csamofflgtiverizon.npt) Sent: Monday, September 07, 2009 6:59 PM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: Please can u email the docs Thanks so very much Brad! By the way are you sure u can go back to work tomorrow? Isn't it a bit early? Don't sit all day It will hurt your back, have them bring a cot into your office so u can lay down!!! :) Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile Original Message From: "Bradley J. Edwards" am> Date: Mon 07 2009 18:49:00 To: Subject: RE: Please can u email the docs I will get to work before 11:00 tomorrow, and you will be my first priority (before trying to even look at my Inbox that I am sure has grown a life ill get you everything I can. If you don't hear from me by noon, call my direct work line and then my cell. I am Sure I will get bombarded because the office hasn't seen me in a w , so I may need a phone call. Either way, you will at least know all that I know tomorrow, but I still do not have the concrete-caught-red-handed information that you need on his child sex trafficking. We will. And hopefully we will soon. I just hope it's soon enough for you. But I will get you all I have. Talk to you tomorrow! Brad Ori inal Messa From: Sent: Mon ay, Septem er 07, 2009 1:38 PM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: Please can u email the docs Oh that's too bad Brad! What can u tell me on the record from those docs now? Can u send an email with info? When will u be able to send them ? Yes, I need criminal file and whatever other on the record file pertaining to epstein's trafficldng/prostitution crimes Many thanks Original Message From: Brad Edwards To: IIIIIIIRa EMS Sent: Sep 7, 2009 13:08 07607 EFTA01099726 Subject: RE: Please can u email the docs I just found out that we cannot release the dots that were under seal yet (the Non-Prosecution Agreement), until the Judge s' ns off on it. I will call you later and we will deal with this issue. Don't worry. I am trying to get you criminal record today. Anything else you need from me right now. From Sent: Monday, September 07, 2009 1:03 PM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: Please can u email the docs Hi Brad, I'm delighted you're feeling better. As you can imagine I have to meet certain deadlines with my editor. This particular chapter is due pretty soon and I have a lot to write. Please can you see that I have the docs soonest, thank you so much. Wishing you a Godspeed recovery, Message From: Brad Edwards To: INIIIINta inn Sent: Sep 7, 2009 13:01 Subject: RE: Please can u email the docs I asked my investigator to send it to you, and he apparently didn't. I am going into the office tomorrow (or a few hours and will send it personally if you don't get it before then. I am getting better. Thanks. Brad Ori inal Messa e From: Sent: nay, ep em er , • To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Please can u email the docs Hi Brad, Hope you're feeling better and enjoying the weekend. Please can you email the docs we discussed. Including all unsealed docs Many thanks, Sent via BladcBerry from T-Mobile Sent via BladcBerry from T-Mobile Sent via BladcBerry from T-Mobile 07608 EFTA01099727 From: To: Subject: Re: Please can u email the does Data Monday, September 07, 2009 10:5S:16 PM Brad, 1 hardly know you but please allow me to suggest that as much as you're going stir crazy your priority is to heal. If you don't heal properly it will take 4 times as long and you will be much worse off down thew road. So go in, say hello, raid< up your files, forget about what u need to do for me and go back home and lay down! Sorry to act like your mother but your #1 priority is to heal. Speak soon :) Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile Original Message From: "Bradley J. Edwards" am> Date: Moo 07 Se 2009 20:12:42 To: Sub) : : ease can u ema e oks You are right. Doctor said NOT to go back for at least one more week, but I have a lot of people counting on me, and as much as I LOVE my wife and kids, I am going stir crazy and at least need to get in and see everyone, and see my office and my inbox, etc. And I need to take care of some things for you! Also, I have a new case to sign up tomorrow that I was called at home about today, so I have to meet with this new client tomorrow. Anyway, I will not over do it. I will call you tomorrow. Take care. Oti inal Hesse e From: Sent: y, ep em r , • To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: Please can u email the does Thanks so very much Brad! By the way are you sure u can go back to work tomorrow? Isn't it a bit early? Don't sit all day It will hurt your back, have them bring a cot into your office so u can lay downllll :) Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile Original Message From: "Bradley J. Edwards" <bedwards@rra-law.com> m Mon..07 Se 2009 18:49: Date: To: Subject: RE: Please can u email the clocs I will get to work before 11:00 tomorrow, and you will be my first priority (before trying to even look at my inbox that I am sure has grown a life of its own . I will get you everything I can. If you don't hear from me by noon, call my direct work line and then my cell. I am sure I will get bombarded because the office hasn't seen me in a wee , so I may need a phone call. Ether way, you will at least know all that I know tomorrow, but I still do not have the concrete-caught-red-handed information that you need on his child sex trafficking. We will. And hopefully we will soon. I just hope it's soon enough for you. But I will get you all I have. Talk to you tomorrow! 07609 EFTA01099728 Brad Original Massa • --- From: Sent: Monday, September 07, 2009 1:38 PM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: Please can u email the dors Oh that's too bad Brad! What can u tell me on the record from those docs now? Can u send an email with info? When will u be able to send them ? Yes, I need NM. criminal file and whatever other on the record file pertaining to epstein's traffiddng/prosbtution crimes Many thanks Original Message From: Brad Edwards To: Sent: Sep 7, 2009 13:08 Subject: RE: Please can u email the docs I Just found out that we cannot release the docs that were under seal yet (the Non-Prosecution Agreement), until the Judge sins on It. I will call you later and we will deal with this Issue. Don't worry. I am trying to get you criminal record today. Anything else you need from me right now. Ori Ina! Messes e From: Sent: „ . To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: Please can u email the docs Hi Brad, I'm delighted you're feeling better. As you can Imagine I have to meet certain deadlines with my editor. This particular chapter is due pretty soon and I have a lot to write. Please can you see that I have the docs soonest, thank you so much. Wishing you a Godspeed recovery, =Ma Original Message From: Brad Edwards To: Minna Mt Sent: Sep 7, 2009 13:01 Subject: RE: Please can u email the docs I asked my Investigator to send it to you, and he apparently didn't. I am going into the office tomorrow for a few hours and will send it personally if you don't get it before then. I am getting better. Thanks. Brad Original Message From Sent: n To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Please can u email the does Hi Brad, Hope you're feeling better and enjoying the weekend. Please can you email the docs we discussed. Including all unsealed docs Many thanks, 07610 EFTA01099729 Sent via BladcBerry from T-Mobile Sent via Bladdrerry from T-Mobile Sent via BladcBerry from T-Mobile 07611 EFTA01099730 From: To: nradlev J. Edwards Subject: Re: Please can u email the does Date: Monday, September 07, 2009 1:39:25 PM Oh that's too bad Brad! What can u tell me on the record from those docs now? Can u send an email with info? When will u be able to send them ? Yes, I need s criminal file and whatever other on the record file pertaining to epstein's trafficking/prostitution crimes Many thanks Original Message From: Brad Edwards To: IIMMa IM• Sent: Sep 7, 2009 13:08 Subject: RE: Please can u email the docs I just found out that we cannot release the docs that were under seal yet (the Non-Prosecution Agreement), until the Judge si ns off on it. I will call you later and we will deal with this Issue. Don't worry. I am trying to get you criminal record today. Anything else you need from me right now. Ori inal Messes e From: Sent: , , To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: Please can u email the dots Hi Brad, I'm delighted you're feeling better. As you can imagine I have to meet certain deadlines with my editor. This particular chapter Is due pretty soon and I have a lot to write. Please can you see that I have the dots soonest, thank you so much. Wishing you a Godspeed recovery, a Original Message From: Brad Edwards To: Walt liMif Sent: Sep 7, 2009 13:01 Subject: RE: Please can u email the docs I asked my investigator to send it to you, and he apparently didn't. I am going into the office tomorrow for a few hours and will send it personally if you don't get it before then. I am getting better. Thanks. Brad O' i I M From: Sent: • To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Please can u email the docs Hi Brad, Hope you're feeling better and enjoying the weekend. Please can you email the docs we discussed. Including all unsealed docs Many thanks, sa Sent via BlackBeny from T-Moblle 07612 EFTA01099731 Sent via Waal:terry from T-Mobile Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile 07613 EFTA01099732 From: To: Subject: RE: Neese can u email the boa Date: Monday, September 07, 2009 6:49:00 PM I will get to work before 11:00 tomorrow, and you will be my first priority (before trying to even look at my inbox that I am sure has grown a life of i own . I will get you everything I can. If you don't hear from me by noon, call my direct work lin nd then my cell. I am sure I will get bombarded because the office hasn't seen me in a week, so I may need a phone call. Ether way, you will at least know all that I know tomorrow, but I still do not have the concrete-caught-red-handed information that you need on his child sex trafficking. We will. And hopefully we will soon. I just hope it's soon enough for you. But I will get you all I have. Talk to you tomorrowl Brad O • Mal Messa e From: Sent: on ay, ep em • To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: Please can u email the dots Oh that's too bad Bradl What can u tell me on the record from those dots now? Can u send an email with info? When will u be able to send them ? Yes, I need IIIIIIIIIs alminal file and whatever other on the record file pertaining to epstein's trafficking/prostitution crimes Many thanks Original Message From: Brad Edwards To: Sinnlia Sent: Sep 7, 2009 13:08 Subject: RE: Please can u email the does I just found out that we cannot release the docs that were under seal yet (the Non-Prosecution Agreement), until the Judge si ns off on it. I will call you later and we will deal with this Issue. Don't worry. I am trying to get you criminal record today. Anything else you need from me right now. O • • MI MeSSe• From: Sent: Monday, September 07, 2009 1:03 PM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: Please can u email the docs Hi Brad, I'm delighted you're feeling better. As you can Imagine I have to meet certain deadlines with my editor. This particular chapter is due pretty soon and I have a lot to write. Please can you see that I have the docs soonest, thank you so much. Wishing you a Godspeed recovery, IIMMa Original Message From: Brad Edwards To: UMW Sent: Sep 7, 2009 13:01 Subject: RE: Please can u email the docs I asked my investigator to send it to you, and he apparently didn't. I am going Into the office tomorrow for a few hours and will send it personally if you don't get it before then. I am getting better. Thanks. 07614 EFTA01099733 Brad On inal Messa From: Sent: on ay, epem er , • To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Please can u email the dots Hi Brad, Hope you're feeling better and enjoying the weekend. Please can you email the dots we discussed. Including all unsealed dots Many thanks, —a Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile Sent via Bladtheny from T-Mobile Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile 07615 EFTA01099734 From: To: Subject: Re: RE: D0CS Dote: Tuesday, September 08, 200911:50:36 MI Brad, Yes you had given me i tele last week, thank you. I already spoke with her. Unlike you I feel she is more ear based than Ma especially because she has more to loose at this point... by the way they speak to each other everyday!!! Ma and she spoke at least twice when I was interviewing hat day, s MOM son godmother! blood runs deep between e o. Can you tell me where in South Africa she is and I will find her. Just rang you back, call me when you can, thanks. What can you tell me from the sealed docs? and other docs? pertaining to JE and trafficked girls? Thank ou Sep 8, 2009 11:43:57 AM, hprlwardsarra-law.com wrote: haven t forgotten about anything. I m feeling a little better, which you know can also be problem because you then think you can do more, and of course I busted a suture out this morning. That de yed me going into work personally, but I will get you things SAP. I found number, the other lath that worked for MC2 in NY. I think she I be very he e knows everything knows but is much less sketchy. Also, f you lead on tha already told you rs d that, then she will give you more. Her number is Iso, Epstein sent his main personal assistant to South Africa to live for good, and I heard it was because he couldn t risk her getting deposed on the trafficking stuff. Her ame is I don t know how to go about getting her, but I would like to find er. I wi ca you a er. In fact. I just called and left a message for you. Brad From: nt: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 10:47 AM o: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: DOCS Hi Brad, Hope you're feeling better this morning. Just a reminder please not to forget to end me the does, thank you Don't sit down too long and try to lie down as much as possible. even if its on the floor! place towel underneath you and lie down! :) 07646 EFTA01099735 From: Endlitakkeacds To: Subject: RE: RE: boa Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 11:53:00 AM Wow, they seem so dissimilar to me. That surprises me. I will call you to speak today. I think knows where was sent, I can try to find out too. I'll talk to you later. From: Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 11:50 AM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: RE: DOCS Brad, Yes you had given tele last week, thank you. I already spoke with her. Unlike m' ear ased than NES especially because she has more to loose at this you I feel she is more point... by the way they speak to each other everyda !! and she spoke at least twice when I was interviewing -tat day, is son godmother! blood runs deep between the two. Can you tell me where in South Africa she is and I will find her. Just rang you back, call me when you can, thanks. What can you tell me from the sealed dots? and other does? pertaining to JE and trafficked girls? Thank you , Sep 8, 2009 1 1:43:57 AM te a, I haven't forgotten about anything. I'm feeling a little better, which you know can also be a problem in because you then think you can do more, and of course I busted a suture out this morning. That delayed me going into work personally. but I will get you things ASAP. I found other lady that worked for MC2 In NY. I think she will be ve helpful. She kno number the thing l l knows but is much less sketchy. Also. hat already told you this and that, then she will give you more. Her number is •• Also, Epstein sent his main personal assistant to South Africa to live for good, an because he couldn't risk her getting deposed on the trafficking stuff. Her name is I don't know how to go about getting her, but I would like to find her. I will call you later. ..1 1,,s called and left a message for you. Brad From: Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 10:47 AM To: Bradley I. Edwards Subject: DOCS Eli Brad, I-lope you're feeling better this morning. Just a reminder please not to forget to send me the does, thank you Don't sit down too long and try to lie down as much as possible. even if its on the floor! place towel underneath you and lie down! :) O7647 EFTA01099736 From: To: Bradley 1 FdwatO[ Subject Re: RE: RE: DOCS Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 1:59:21 PM Brad, when was epstein convicted, need day ,month and year (07)? Sep 8, 2009 11:53:24 AM 'ow, they seem so dissimilar to me. That surprises me. I will call you to speak today. I hinklMnOws wher 'as sent. I can try to find out too. I II talk to you later. rom: nt: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 11:50 AM o: Bradley J. Edwards ubject: Re: RE: DOCS Brad, es you had given ma tele last week, thank you. I already spoke with er. Unlike you I feel she is more fear based than MOM especially because she as more to loose at this point... by the way they speak to each other everyday!!! and she s ke at least twice when I was interviewingMt that day, is son godmother! blood runs deep between the two. an you tell me where in South Africa she is and I will find her. Just rang you ack, call me when you can, thanks. What can you tell me from the sealed does? nd other does? pertaining to JE and trafficked girls? hank you , ep 8, 2009 11:43:57 AM rote: a, haven t forgotten about anything. I m feeling a little better, which you know can also be problem because you then think you can do more, and of course I busted a suture out is morning. Th layed me going into work personally, but I will get you things SAP. I foun s number, the otherlacilhat worked for MC2 in NY. I think she ill be very he he knows everything knows but is much less sketchy. Also, f you lead on th already told you this and that, then she will give you more. er number is Iso. Epstein sent his main personal assistant to South Africa to live for good, and I eard it he couldn t risk her getting deposed on the trafficking stuff. Her ame is I don t know how to go about getting her, but I would Ilke to find er. I wt ca you a er. In fact. I just called and left a message for you. rad 07674 EFTA01099737 From. Sent: Tuesday, September OB, 2009 10:47 AM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: DOGS Hi Brad, Hope you're feeling better this morning. Just a reminder please not to forget to send me the does, thank you Don't sit down too long and try to lie down as much as possible. even if its on the floor! place towel underneath you and lie down! 07675 EFTA01099738 From: To: ficaltUrvl Fermis Subject: Re: RE: RE: COLS Date: Tuesday, September 08, 200912:04:12 PH Not at all, thats an act! has A GREAT DEAL TO LOOSE! Ma already lost the war! Theflein kahoots (is that how you spell it???) anyway please tell me a bit more about where is she from, nationality, age, last US address, I will find her have many friends in S Africa. Sep 8, 2009 11:53:24 AM, a wrote: ow. they seem so dIssirrite. That surprises me. I will call you to speak today. I ink knows where as sent I can try to find out too. I II talk to you later. Fro Sent: ue y, em r o: Bradley J. Edwards object: Re: RE: DOGS Brad, Ycs you had given me= tele last week, thank you. I already spoke with ter. Unlike you 1 feel she is more fear based than MIL especially because she as more to loose at this point... by the way they speak to each other everyday!!! and she spoke at least twice when I was interviewing ,at day, s Minn son godmother! blood runs deep between the two. Can you tell me where in South Africa she is and I will find her. Just rang you back, call me when you can, thanks. What can you tell me from the sealed does? and other does? pertaining to JE and trafficked girls? op 8, 2009 II:43:57 AM, wrote: haven t forgotten about anything. I m feeling a little better, which you know can also be a problem because you then think you can do more, and of course I busted a suture out his morning. That delayed me going into work personally, but I will get you things SAP. I found s number, the other la that worked for MC2 in NY. I think she ill be very her u. e knows everythin' knows but is much less sketchy. Also, If you lead on that already told you this and that, then she will give you more. Her number is Iso, Epstein sent his main personal assistant to South Africa to live for good, and I eard it was because he couldn t risk her getting deposed on the trafficking stuff. Her ame is I don t know how to go about getting her, but I would like to find er. I will call you later. In fact. I just called and left a message for you. 07676 EFTA01099739 ad From: nt: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 10:47 AM o: Bradley 1. Edwards ubject: DOCS Hi Brad, Hope you're feeling better this morning. Just a reminder please not to forget to send tne the does, thank you Don't sit down too long and try to lie down as much as possible. even if its on he floor! place towel underneath you and lie down! 07677 EFTA01099740 From: To: Subject: RE: RE: RE: DOCS Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 2:04:00 PM June 30, 2008 Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law From: csamoffl@vedzon.net [mailto:csamoff1@vedzon.net] Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 1:59 PM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: RE: RE: DOCS Brad, when was epstein convicted, need day ,month and year (07)? Sep 8, 2009 11:53:24 AM, agm wrote: Wow, they seem so dissimilar to me. That surprises me. I will call you to speak today. I think Marisa knows where Cedia was sent. I can try to find out too. I'll talk to you later. From: Sent: To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: RE: DOCS Brad, Yes you had given mew tele last week, thank you. I already spoke with her. Unlike you I feel she is more fear based than MUM especially because she has more to loose at this point... by the way they speak to each other everyda and she spoke at least twice when I was interviewing that day, yawn is son godmother! blood runs deep between the two. Can you tell me where in South Africa she is and I will find her. Just rang you back, call me when you can, thanks. What can you tell me from the sealed does? and other does? pertaining to JE and trafficked girls? Thank you , Sep 8, 2009 11:43:57 AM, am wrote: I haven't forgotten about anything. I'm feeling a little better, which you know can also be a problem because you then think you can do more, and of course I busted a suture out this morning. That delayed me going into work personally, but I will get you things ASAP. I found MIEls number, the 07678 EFTA01099741 other lady that worked for MC2 in NY. I think she will be vs.elpful. She knows everything knows but Is much less sketchy. Also, ifyou lead on that already told you this and that, then she will give you more. Her number is Also, Epstein sent his main personal assistant to ou Africa to live for good, and I heard it was because he couldn't risk her getting deposed on the trafficking stuff. Her name is I don't know how to go about getting her, but I would like to find her. I will call you later. Iled and left a message for you. Brad From• Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 10:47 AM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: DOCS Hi Brad, Elope you're feeling better this morning. Just a reminder please not to forget to send me the does, thank you Don't sit down too long and try to lie down as much as possible. even if its on the floor! place towel underneath you and lie down! :) 07679 EFTA01099742 From: To: Subject: Re: RE: RE: RE: ROCS Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 3:25:34 PM Brad please can u tell me the date of his conviction important thanks Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile From: "Bradley J. Edwards" Date: Tue 08 Se 2009 14:42:51 -0400 To Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: DOCS I'll call you in 10 mins — answer your phone. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre From: Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 2:36 PM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: RE: RE: RE: DOCS brad, where's the information? don't understand... do you have the criminal complaint of his first conviction? Sep 8, 2009 02:05:01 PM, wrote: June 30, 2008 Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adlerf Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre From: Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 1:59 PM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: RE: RE: DOCS Brad, 07680 EFTA01099743 when was epstein convicted, need day ,month and year (07)? Sep 8, 2009 11:53:24 ANI . wrote: Wow, they seem dissimilar to me. That surprises me. I will call you to speak today. I think knows where was sent. I can try to find out too. Ill talk to you later. From Sent Tuesday, September 08, 2009 11:50 AM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: RE: DOCS Brad, Yes you had given me s tele last week, thank you. I already spoke with her. Unlike you I feel she is more fear based than Ma especially because she has more to loose at this point... by the way they speak to each other everyda .!! nd she spoke at least twice when I was interviewing that day, MR is son godmother! blood runs deep between the two. Can you tell me where in South Africa she is and I will find her. Just rang you back, call me when you can, thanks. What can you tell me from the sealed does? and other does? pertaining to JE and trafficked girls? , Sep 8, 2009 11:43:57 AM, wrote: I haven't forgotten about anything. I'm feeling a little better, which you know can also be a problem because you then think you can do more, and of course I busted a suture out this morning. That delayed me going into work personally, but I will get you things ASAP. I found s number, the other lady that worked for MC2 in NY. I think she will be very helpful. She knows everything knows but is much less sketchy. Also, if I that already told you this and that, then she will give you more. Her number is Also. Epstein sent his main personal assistant to South Africa to live for good, and I heard it was because he couldn't risk her getting deposed on the trafficking stuff. Her name is I don't know how to go about getting her, but I would like to find her. I will call you later. In fact, I just called and left a message for you. Brad -------- From: Sent: ues y, p em r , 10:47 AM To: Bradley 1. Edwards Subject: DOCS Hi Brad, Hope you're feeling better this morning. Just a reminder please not to forget to send me the dots, thank you Don't sit down too long and try to lie down as much as possible. even if its on the floor! place towel underneath you and lie down! 07681 EFTA01099744 From: Wadley J. Edwards To: Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: DOCS Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2039 2:42:03 PM I'll call you in 10 mins - answer your phone. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre From: Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 2:36 PM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: RE: RE: RE: DOCS brad, where's the information? don't understand... do you have the criminal complaint of his first conviction? Sep 8, 2009 02:05:01 PM, wrote: June 30, 2008 Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre Sent: u y, eptem er , 1:59 PM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: RE: RE: DOCS Brad, when was epstein convicted, need day ,month and year (07)? Sep 8, 2009 I I :53:24 AM, wrote: Wow, they seem so dissimilar to me. That surprises me. I will call you to speak today. I think knows where Sivas sent. I can try to find out too. I'll talk to you later. From: Sent Tuesday, September 08, 2009 11:50 AM To: Bradley J. Edwards 07682 EFTA01099745 Subject: Re: RE: DOCS Brad, Yes you had given me s tele last week, thank you. I already spoke with her. Unlike you I feel she is more fear based than INIMa especially because she has more to loose at this point... by the way they speak to each other everyda lla and she spoke at least twice when I was interviewing that day, MD is son godmother! blood runs deep between the two. Can you tell me where in South Africa she is and I will find her. Just rang you back, call me when you can, thanks. What can you tell me from the sealed docs? and other docs? pertaining to JE and trafficked girls? Thank you , MINS Sep 8, 2009 11:43:57 AM, a wrote: I haven't forgotten about anything. I'm feeling a little better, which you know can also be a problem because you then think you can do more, and of course I busted a suture out this morning. That delayed me going into work personally, but I will get you things ASAP. I found number, the other lady that worked for MC2 In NY. I think she will be very helpful. She knows everything knows but is much less sketchy. Also • atMl already told you this and that, then she will give you more. Her number i Also, Epstein sent his main personal assis an o u h Africa to live for good, and I heard it was because he couldn't risk her getting deposed on the trafficking stuff. Her name is I don't know how to go about getting her, but I would like to find her. I will call you later. n I called and left a message for you. Brad From Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 10:47 AM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: DOCS Hi Brad, Hope you're feeling better this morning. Just a reminder please not to forget to send me the docs, thank you Don't sit down too long and try to lie down as much as possible. even if its on the floor! place towel underneath you and lie down! :) 07683 EFTA01099746 From: To: Subject Re: RE: RE: RE: DOCS Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 2:36:46 PM brad, where's the information? don't understand... do you have the criminal complaint of his first conviction? Sep 8, 2009 02:05:01 PM wrote: une 30, 2008 radley J. Edwards antler Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adiert Attorneys at Law s Olas City Centre From: ent: ue y, o: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: RE: RE: DOES Brad, when was epstein convicted, need day ,month and year (07)? cp 8, 2009 11:53:24 AM, au wrote: owi the so dissimilar to me. That surprises me. 1 will call you to speak today. I think knows where was sent. I can try to find out too. I II talk to you later. From: nt: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 11:50 AM o: Bradley J. Edwards ubject: Re: RE: DOCS Brad, Yes you had given me tele last week, thank you. I already spoke with 07684 EFTA01099747 her. Unlike you I feel she is more fear based than MEL especially because she las more to loose at this point... by the way they speak to each other everyday!!! and she spoke at least twice when I was interviewing martiza that day, is minElls son godmother! blood runs deep between the two. an you tell me where in South Africa she is and I will find her. Just rang you ack, call me when you can, thanks. What can you tell me from the sealed dots? nd other does? pertaining to JE, and trafficked girls? ank you , ep 8, 2009 11:43:57 AM, wrote: haven t forgotten about anything. I m feeling a little better, which you know can also be problem because you then think you can do more, and of course I busted a suture out his morning. That delayed me going into work personally, but I will get you things SAP. I found i s number, the other lady that worked for MC2 in NY. I think she ill be very helpful. She knows everything knows but is much less sketchy. Also, f you lead on tar dy told you this and that, then she will give you more. -ter number is Iso, Epstein sent his main personal assistant to South Africa to live for good, and I eard it he couldn t risk her getting deposed on the trafficking stuff. Her ame is I don t know how to go about getting her, but I would like to find er. I will call you later. In fact, I Just called and left a message for you. rad From o: Bradley J. Edwards object: DOCS li Brad, Hope you're feeling better this morning. Just a reminder please not to forget to end me the dots, thank you n't sit down too long and try to lie down as much as possible. even if its on he floor! place towel underneath you and lie down! :) 07685 EFTA01099748 From: Wadley Fdwardt To: RE: RE: RE: RE: DOCS Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 7:51:00 FM Sorry, I wanted to call you and still intend to do so tonight. His date of conviction was June 30, 2008. As soon as my son goes to bed I will call you. From: Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 3:24 PM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: RE: RE: RE: DOCS Brad please can u tell me the date of his conviction important thanks Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile From: "Bradley J. Edwards" Date: Tue, 08 Se 2009 14:42:51 -0400 To: Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: DOCS I'll call you in 10 mins — answer your phone. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler) Attorneys at Law Las Olas Clly Centre From: Sent: I To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: RE: RE: RE: DOGS brad, where's the information? don't understand... do you have the criminal complaint of his first conviction? Sep 8, 2009 02:05:01 PM, I IIMcaut wrote: June 30, 2008 Bradley J Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre 07686 EFTA01099749 From: Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 1:59 PM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: RE: RE: DOCS Brad, when was epstein convicted, need day ,month and year (07)? Sep 8, 2009 1 1:53:24 AM wrote: Wow, they seem so dissimilar to me. That surprises me. I will call you to speak today. I think knows where Maas sent. I can try to find out too. I'll talk to you later. Sent: • To: Bradley1 Edwards Subject: Re: RE: DOCS Brad, Yes you had given me s tele last week, thank you. I already spoke with her. Unlike you I feel she is more fear based than a especially because she has more to loose at this point... by the way they speak to each othcr everyday!!! end she spoke at least twice when I was interviewing that day, MOism son godmother! blood runs deep between the two. Can you tell me where in South Africa she is and I will find her. Just rang you back, call me when you can, thanks. What can you tell me from the sealed does? and other does? pertaining to JE and trafficked girls? Sep 8, 2009 11:43:57 AM, MIES -Jrn wrote: I haven't forgotten about anything. I'm feeling a little better, which you know can also be a problem because you then think you can do more, and of course I busted a suture out this morning. That delayed me going into work personally, but I will get you things ASAP. I found =Ns number, the other lady that worked for MC2 in NY. I think she will be very helpful. She knows everything knows but is much less sketchy. Also, if ou lead on that already told you this and Mil. she will give you more. Her number is Also, Epstein sent his main personal assistant to South Africa to live for good, and I heard it was because he couldn't risk her getting deposed on the trafficking stuff. Her name is I don't know how to go about getting her, but I would like to find her. I will call you later. In and left a message for you. Brad From: Sent: u y, tern r , 2009 10:47 AM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: DOCS Hi. Brad, Hope you're feeling better this morning. Just a reminder please not to forget to send me the 07687 EFTA01099750 docs, thank you Don't sit down too long and try to lie down as much as possible. even if its on the floor! place towel underneath you and lie down! :) 07688 EFTA01099751 From: To: forliFy 3 Edwards Subject: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: D0CS Date: Tuesday, Septanber 08, 2009 7:53:01 PM Brad, please can you ring me simply need to have day of je conviction i know it was 07. also that court report which is not sealed, many thanks. Sep 8, 2009 02:42:54 PM wrote: ll call you in 10 mins answer your phone. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre From: Sent: Le .1.I y, epwr 08, 2009 2:36 M To: Bradley 3. Edwards Subject: Re: RE: RE: RE: DOCS brad, where's the information? don't understand... do you have the criminal complaint of his first conviction? Sep 8, 2009 02:05:01 PM, wrote: June 30, 2008 Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Aciled Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre 07689 EFTA01099752 From Sent: To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: RE: RE: DOGS Brad, when was epstein convicted, need day ,month and year (07)? Sep 8, 2009 I I :53:24 AM, a wrote: Wow, they seem so dissimilar to me. That surprises me. I will call you to speak today. I think knows where was sent. I can try to find out too. I II talk to you later. Sent: , m r To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: RE: DOGS Brad, Yes you had given me =Ins tele last week, thank you. I already spoke with her. Unlike you I feel she is more fear based than especially because she has more to loose at this point... by the way they speak to each other everyday!!! Ma and she s ke at least twice when I was interviewing that day, Mt is son godmother! blood runs deep between t e two. Can you tell me where in South Africa she is and I will find her. Just rang you back, call me when you can, thanks. What can you tell me from the sealed docs? and other does? pertaining to JE and trafficked girls? Thank you , Sep 8, 2009 I I :43:57 AM, l=l=crun wrote: a. haven t forgotten about anything. I m feeling a little better, which you know can also be a problem because you then think you can do more, and of course I busted a suture out this morning. That delayed me going into work personally, but I will get you things ASAP. I found Mill s number, the other lady that worked for MC2 in NY. I think she will be very helpful. She knows everything knows but Is much less sketchy. Also, if you lead on that already told yot.Md that, then she will give you more. Her number is 07690 EFTA01099753 SO. Epstein sent his main personal assistant to South Africa to live for good, and I eard it he couldn t risk her getting deposed on the trafficking stuff. Her ame is I don t know how to go about getting her, but I would like to find er. I will call you later. In fact. I just called and left a message for you. d From: nt: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 10:47 AM o: Bradley 1 Edwards ubject: DOGS Hi Brad, Hope you're feeling better this morning. Just a reminder please not to forget to end me the does, thank you Don't sit down too long and try to lie down as much as possible. even if its on the floor! place towel underneath you and lie down! i) 07691 EFTA01099754 From: To: OtadisrSias Subject Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: DM Data: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 7:53:47 PM thanks Brad but that's impossible since he went to jail in 07 Sep 8 2009 07:51:25 PM, wrote: Orly. wanted to call you and still intend to do so tonight. His date of conviction was June 30, 008. As soon as my son goes to bed I will call you. rom: ent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 3:24 PM o: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: RE: RE: RE: DOES rad please can u tell me the date of his conviction important thanks ent via BlacicBeny from T-Mobile rom: "Bradley 1 Edwards" Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 14:42:51 -0400 o: ubje II call you in 10 mins answer your phone. radley J. Edwards artner Rothstein Rosenfeld) Adler' Attorneys at Law as Olas City Centre rom: ent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 2:36 PM o: Bradley ). Edwards 07692 EFTA01099755 Subject Re: RE: RE: RE: DOCS brad, where's the information? don't understand... do you have the criminal complaint of his first conviction? Sep 8, 2009 02:05:01 PM, wrote: June 30, 2008 Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre From: Sent: To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: RE: RE: DOCS Brad, when was epstein convicted, need day ,month and year (07)? Sep 8, 2009 11:53:24 AM wrote: Wow, they seem so dissimilar to me. That surprises me. I will call you to speak today. I thinkM IOWS where was sent. I can try to find out too. I II talk to you later. From: Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 11:50 AM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: RE: DOCS Brad, Yes you had given me tele last week, thank you. I already spoke with her. Unlike you I feel she is more fear based than especially because she has more to loose at this point... by the way they speak to each other everyday!!! and she spoke at least twice when I was interviewing =that day, 07693 EFTA01099756 is MEM son godmother! blood runs deep between the two. Can you tell me where in South Africa she is and I will find her. Just rang you back, call me when you can, thanks. What can you tell me from the sealed does? nd other dots? pertaining to JE and trafficked girls? hank you , ep 8, 2009 11:43:57 AM, Motu wrote: I haven t forgotten about anything. I m feeling a little better, which you know can also be problem because you then think you can do more, and of course I busted a suture out his morning. That delayed me going into work personally, but I will get you things SAP. I found IMIln s number, the other lady that worked for MC2 In NY. I think she ill be very helpful. She knows everythin knows but is much less sketchy. Also, f you lead on that EM already told you this and that, then she will give you more. er number is 'so, Epstein sent his main personal assistant to South Africa to live for good, and I card it was because he couldn t risk her getting deposed on the trafficking stuff. Her ame is I don t know how to go about getting her, but I would like to find er. I will call you later. In fact, I just called and left a message for you. rad From: ent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 10:47 AM o: Bradley J. Edwards ubject: DOCS Eli Brad, Hope you're feeling better this morning. Just a reminder please not to forget to end me the does, thank you Don't sit down too long and try to lie down as much as possible. even if its on he floor! place towel underneath you and lie down! :) 07694 EFTA01099757 From: To: 'Wan 3 F8,ard Subject: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: DOCS Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 2:49:39 PM ok Sep 8, 2009 02:42:54 PM, wrote: ll call you in 10 mins answer your phone. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre From: Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 2:36 PM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: RE: RE: RE: DOCS brad, where's the information? don't understand... do you have the criminal complaint of his first conviction? Sep 8, 2009 02:05:01 PM rote: June 30, 2008 radley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre 07695 EFTA01099758 From: Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 1:59 PM To: Bradley A Edwards Subject: Re: RE: RE: DOCS Brad, when was epstein convicted, need day ,month and year (07)? Sep 8, 2009 11:53:24 AM, em wrote: Wow,eht ieem so dissimilar to me. That surprises me. I will call you to speak today. I think knows where was sent. I can try to find out too. I II talk to you later. From: Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 11:50 AM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: RE: DOCS Brad, Yes you had given me !M.'s tele last week, thank you. I already spoke with ter. Unlike you I feel she is more fear based than lat especially because she has more to loose at this point... by the way they speak to each other everyday!!! ndslilenoke at least twice when I was interviewing—that day, MI is son godmother! blood runs deep between the two. Can you tell me where in South Africa she is and I will find her. Just rang you back, call me when you can, thanks. What can you tell me from the sealed does? and other does? pertaining to JE and trafficked girls? Thank ou Sep 8, 2009 I I:43:57 AM, wrote: I haven t forgotten about anything. I m feeling a little better, which you know can also be a problem because you then think you can do more, and of course I busted a suture out this morning. That delayed me going into work personally, but I will get you things ASAP. I found Min s number, the other lady that worked for MC2 in NY. I think she will be very helpful, She knows everything knows but is much less sketchy. Also, if you lead on that already told you this and that, then she will give you more. Her number is 07696 EFTA01099759 so, Epstein sent his main personal assistant to South Africa to live for good, and I eard it was because he couldn t risk her getting deposed on the trafficking stuff. Her ame is I don t know how to go about getting her, but I would like to find er. I will call you later. In fact, I Just called and left a message for you. rad rom: rib ues ay, Septem er , : o: Bradley ). Edwards ubject: DOCS Fli Brad, Hope you're feeling bcttcr this morning. Just a reminder please not to forget to end me the does, thank you Don't sit down too long and try to lie down as much as possible. even if its on he floor! place towel underneath you and lie down! 07697 EFTA01099760 From: To: flodltaidattls Subject T Visas Date: Thursday, September 24, 2009 8:45:47 PM Please read this important. I think you can offer a trafficked victim protection, asylum and an incentive for coming forward on the case. Ask your clients if they know of any victims who were foreign so they can tell them about this and assuage their fears! This is a break through for some of the girls, because they'll be able to bring their families into the US on these visas. According to Acosta some 7000 visas are issued annually and the last time he checked only 1500 -2000 apply annually. That means that the word is NOT out about the visas (on purpose may I add and furthermore, that there is ZERO effort on the part of law enforcement to get it out, fear of having visa abused!!!! More importantly,How are you feeling? Hope you're healing quickly!!! Congress passes Violence Against Women Act of 2000 Immigrants' Rights Update, Vol. 14, No. 6, October 19, 2000 Passed by Congress on Oct. 11, 2000, the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000 (H.R. 3244) includes the Violence Against Women Act of 2000 (VAWA 2000), which expands and improves on the protections for battered spouses and children that were originally enacted in the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 (VAWA 1994). Most notably, VAWA 2000 eliminates the "extreme hardship" requirement for self- petitioners and allows all self-petitioners to adjust their status in the United States. The act also creates two new nonimmigrant visas for victims of trafficking and for victims of certain serious crimes, including victims of crimes against women (see "Congress Creates New "T' and "U" Visas for Victims of Fxoloitation"). Individuals granted these visas may subsequently adjust to permanent resident status. The bill passed both houses by enormous margins (371-1 in the House and 95-0 in the Senate), and President Bill Clinton has promised to swiftly sign it. vim% 1994. The original VAWA included provisions to address the particular problems faced by battered immigrant women and children. Under pre-VAWA immigration law, immigrant spouses and children of U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents (LPRs) were dependent on the citizen or LPR to petition to immigrate them, and this dependency left them particularly subject to abuse on the part of that relative. The VAWA created a procedure whereby abused spouses and their children or abused children and their parents can "self-petition" to obtain LPR status without the cooperation of the abusing relative. The VAWA also enabled battered spouses and children to obtain suspension of deportation or cancellation of removal If they were present in the U.S. for at least three years rather than the seven years normally required for suspension or ten years for cancellation. Obstacles based on family/marital status removed. VAWA 2000 removes a number of obstacles that battered spouses and children have encountered in attempting to use provisions of the VAWA intended to help them. For example, a battered spouse whose marriage is defective because her husband failed to tell her that he was already married is not eligible to immigrate under VAWA 1994. VAWA 2000 corrects this problem by allowing individuals who believed that they were married to a U.S. O8427 EFTA01099761 citizen or LPR to self-petition. VAWA 2000 also allows individuals to self-petition even though they have been divorced from the citizen or LPR, provided that the marriage terminated within the past two years and a connection between the termination of the marriage and the abuse of the immigrant can be shown. These changes also apply to VAWA suspension of deportation and cancellation of removal. Moreover, individuals may self-petition even if the citizen relative has died, provided they petition within two years of the death. No need to leave U.S. to apply for VAWA visa. The new law allows all VAWA self- petitioners to apply for adjustment of status in the United States, regardless of whether they were inspected when they entered the country or whether they subsequently maintained lawful status. The act also "Extreme Hardship" and other requirements for VAWA self-petitioners. eliminates the disparate treatment of self-petitioners who, under prior law, had to meet certain requirements not applied to regular family immigrant visa applicants. Most significantly, self-petitioners no longer need to show that their deportation would cause "extreme hardship." This eliminates an enormous evidentiary hurdle from the self-petition procedure. The law also allows abused spouses and children of U.S. employees and military personnel living abroad to self-petition. Under the new law, if the U.S. citizen or LPR parent or spouse subsequently loses that status for reasons related to their abusive conduct, the loss does not affect the abused immigrant's eligibility to immigrate if they petition within two years. Moreover, abused immigrants with approved self-petitions may remarry without causing the petition to be revoked. Good moral character. Self-petitioners under the new law still must show that they have "good moral character." However, the new law partially exempts them from the bar on establishing good moral character outlined in INA section 101(0. Under that provision, immigrants cannot establish good moral character if they have committed or been convicted of certain criminal acts. The new law removes the bar if the act constitutes a ground of admissibility or deportability that is waivable, and the act was connected to the abuse the applicant suffered. This rule also applies to applicants for VAWA suspension or cancellation. Children who "age out." Under the act, children who have filed a self-petition or are derivative beneficiaries of a parent's petition no longer "age out," or become subject to normal family visa rules, when they become 21 years old. Instead, they are treated as self-petitioners under the appropriate category (as unmarried sons or daughters of U.S. citizens or LPRs, or married sons or daughters of citizens), with the parent's priority date. Relaxed continuous physical presence requirement The act allows applicants for VAWA cancellation of removal to show that they have three years' continuous physical presence in the U.S., despite a single absence longer than 90 days or cumulative absences exceeding 180 days, if there is a connection between the absence and the abuse perpetrated against the applicant. The act also eliminates application of the "stop-time rule" (under which service of a Notice to Appear stops the accrual of continuous physical presence) in VAWA cancellation and suspension cases. And it requires the attorney general to parole the children or parents of individuals who are granted VAWA suspension or cancellation. 08428 EFTA01099762 Motions to reopen. The act allows individuals who become eligible for VAWA suspension or cancellation because of the changes made by the new law to move to reopen their proceedings. It also amends the INA's time limitations on motions to reopen, allowing individuals to file a motion to reopen to apply for VAWA cancellation within one year of the entry of a final order. The attorney general may also waive the one-year limitation in cases of extraordinary circumstances or extreme hardship to a child. Now waivers of grounds of inadmissibility and deportability. The act establishes waivers of certain grounds of inadmissibility for abused immigrants. There is a waiver of the ground of inadmissibility for reentering the U.S. without inspection following a one- year period of unlawful presence or after having been ordered removed. This waiver is available to individuals who can establish a connection between the abuse they suffered and their departure or reentry. There is also a waiver of the ground of deportability for having a conviction for a crime of domestic violence or for violation of a protective order, if the abused immigrant can show that she was not the primary perpetrator of violence in the relationship. She must also show that she was acting in self-defense or that the crime did not result in serious bodily injury and was connected to the abuse that the immigrant suffered. The act makes available to abused immigrants the INA's waivers for certain criminal grounds ( 212(h)), fraud or misrepresentation ( 212(i)), and health grounds ( 212(g)). Expanding the availability of these waivers was considered necessary because they had been limited to spouses of U.S. citizens or LPRs. Abused immigrants may no longer have such a relationship. Public charge. The act amends the public charge ground of exclusion to provide that cash or other benefits received pursuant to 8 U.S.C. section 1641(c) (which permits VAWA beneficiaries to obtain cash and other government assistance in connection with their escape from domestic violence) may not be considered in public charge determinations. Changes to Cuban Adjustment Act, NACARA, and HRIFA. The act also amends the Cuban Adjustment Act, the adjustment of status provisions of the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act (NACARA), and the Haitian Refugee Immigration Fairness Act (HRIFA). These amendments allow abused spouses or children who are dependents of individuals eligible for relief under these laws to adjust their status, without having to reside with the principal or maintain the relationship. Under the act, persons who become LPRs through VAWA may also apply for naturalization after they have resided in the U.S. in LPR status for three years. Sep 24, 2009 08:34:02 PM wrote: 'Long day. I will call you tomorrow. Client went through hell today. 08429 EFTA01099763 :----Ori inal Message Fro nt: urs ay, September 24, 2009 10:39 AM o: Bradley 3. Edwards ubject: Not a mention of the name after a 2 1/2 hour interview nt via BlackBerry from T-Mobile 08430 EFTA01099764 From: To: Subject Epstein Date: Monday, August 24, 2009 7:38:00 PM Sony it took me a couple days. I actually forgot about it. If the link still does not allow you to open it, then I am also giving you all the information so that you can get it from Pacer. It is Jane Doe 102 v. Epstein, case number 09.80656. Let me know if you need anything else from me and also if you hear of anything that would be helpful. I am still working on some things for you. httosliecf flsd uncurls goy/clod/05116541941 Sincerely, Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre 01506 EFTA01099765 From: aradlev J. Edwards To: MgtOSMIUM Subject: Epstein Date: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 9:28:00 AM Hi Michele, I was wondering if you were able to get a members list at the Mara[ago, and even more importantly if you were able to get a list of banned members from the Maralago? Rumor has it that he was banned for having sex with and attempting to have sex with minors at the club, and we already know of certain minors that he took from the dub to his house. I will take a deposition of someone there if we need to do that to get the true information on this, but there are so many depositions to take in this case (and we are setting them right now around the country) that I would like to avoid this one if we could get the info another way. Thanks Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler( Attorneys at Law 01486 EFTA01099766 From: arafgea.T±10/1 To: Subject: Epstein Date: Tuesday, My 28, 2009 8:59:00 AM Hi Susan, I read the article you did recently on Dadurian suing Maralago for failing to return her membership deposit. By any chance do you have a list of the members? Or even more importantly, do you happen to have a list of the members that have been banned? I think you know where this is going... Also, were you one of the reporters at Epstein's house these past few days? Just curious what was going on over there....whether he was still finding some way to get his hands on little kids. Anyway, let me know if you have anything. I will keep you in the loop as things develop. Sincerely, Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adlerl Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre 01483 EFTA01099767 From: fradkv9 Fdunivis To: tin Subject: Epstein Date: Wednesday, hey 22, 2009 11:22:00 AM HI Michele. I am sure you heard that Epstein was released this morning (assuming he wasn't released last week). We are hearing that his probation is being transferred so that he can actually spend his house arrest nn his isl nd in the Vir in Islands. Anyway, this is the name of Epstein's probation officer. Just passing it on in case you wanted to Interrogate him and see if he will tell you something, I will have more news for you soon as there are a lot of things starting to happen now. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosonfoldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre 01479 EFTA01099768 From: To: Subject: Date: Erlday F neienMay 22, 2009 12:13:00 PM The case in which the Non-prosecution agreement was released to the victims and victim's attorneys is Jane Doe v. United States of America, 08-80736. It was released pursuant to protective order which is why I cannot discuss the contents of the Non-Prosecution agreement. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre 01449 EFTA01099769 From: Rush Cimme To: fradlov I Fdward• Subject Epstein updates Date: Tuesday, October 20, 2009 1:01:25 FM R60ActE ‘t19°°‘ vjos& This transmission is intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is confidential, privileged and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of the information contained herein is strictly unauthorized and prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this message. Thank you. This transmission is intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is confidential, privileged and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of the information contained herein is strictly unauthorized and prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this message. Thank you. 01433 EFTA01099770 From: Wadley J Edeordi To: Subject: 1W: Epstein Oate: Wednesday, August 26, 2039 9:S6:00 PH Here it is again. I am waiting for your call. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law From: Bradley ). Edwards 7:39 PM To: Subject: Epstein Sorry it took me a couple days. I actually forgot about it. If the link still does not allow you to open it, then I am also giving you all the information so that you can get it from Pacer. It is Jane Doe 102 v. Epstein, case number 09-80656. Let me know if you need anything else from me and also if you hear of anything that would be helpful. I am still working on some things for you. htlgs://ecf flsd.uscourts aoWdocir05116541941 Sincerely, Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfoldt Adled Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre 02269 EFTA01099771 From: To: Subject Fyr: Please can u email the docs Date: Monday, Septonba. 07, 2009 6:92:46 PM Second attempt Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile ' Inal Messa From Date: Man, 7 Sep To: Brad Edwards Subject: Re: Please can u email the docs Oh that's too bad Brad! What can u tell me on the record from those docs now? Can u send an email with info? When will u be able to send them ? Yes, I need OEMs criminal file and whatever other on the record Me pertaining to epstein's trafficking/prostitution crimes Many thanks -Original Message From: Brad Edwards To: Inaa Sent: Sep 7, 2009 13:08 Subject: RE: Please can u email the dots I Just found out that we cannot release the docs that were under seal yet (the Non-Prosecution Agreement), until the Judge si ns off on it. I will call you later and we will deal with this issue. Don't worry. I am trying to get you criminal record today. Anything else you need from me right now. From: Sent: Monday, September 07, 2009 1:03 PM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: Please can u email the docs Hi Brad, I'm delighted you're feeling better. M you can imagine I have to meet certain deadlines with my editor. This particular chapter Is due pretty soon and I have a lot to write. Please can you see that I have the docs soonest, thank you so much. Wishing you a Godspeed recovery, a Original Message From: Brad Edwards To: MON Sent: Sep 7, 2009 13:01 Subject: RE: Please can u email the docs I asked my Investigator to send it to you, and he apparently didn't. I am going into the office tomorrow for a few hours and will send it personally If you don't get It before then. I am getting better. Thanks. Brad ----Original Message From: Sent: Monday, September 07, 2009 12:39 PM 02595 EFTA01099772 To: Bradley 3. Edwards Subject: Please can u email the does Hi Brad, Hope you're feeling better and enjoying the weekend. Please can you email the does we discussed. Including all unsealed dots Many thanks, Mit Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile 02596 EFTA01099773 From: To: War) Fgeargg Subject GOO SPEED REINERT!!! Data: Monday, August 31, 2009 10:93:33 MI Hi Brad, Hope you are well on your way to a Godspeed recovery! Please could you forward the names of the girls in NY, I somehow deleted those emails!!!! Many thanks, Aug 24, 2009 07:38:41 PM, wrote: a, orry it took me a couple days. I actually forgot about it. If the link still does not allow ou to open it, then I am also giving you all the information so that you can get it from acer. It is Jane Doe 102 v. Epstein, case number 09.80656. Let me know if you need nything else from me and also If you hear of anything that would be helpful. I am still orking on some things for you. ttos flsd uscourts.ctoWdoc1/05116541941 incerely, redley J. Edwards after othstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law as Olas City Centre 02895 EFTA01099774 From: Srtnrn WondnI SUSTI1 I'M -Palm &mill To: Bradley). Edwards Subject: Out of Office AutoRepir Epstein Date: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 8:59:44 MI I am currently out of the office, returning Wednesday, July 29. 11you need to speak to someone in my absence, please contact my editor, Mary Hladky, at Or if it is 100% urgent you can call me on my cell. I am in a time zone six hours behind F Thank you. 03070 EFTA01099775 From: To: EicasaraEtta& Subject: PRIVATE Si CONFIDENTIAL Date: Monday, September 21, 20091:37:44 PM Hi Brad, Hope all is going according to plans. Just spoke with Mike. Found a few pieces of info that might help you. foundation under parent's name is registered at Clinton Global Initiative Elissa and Herbert Epstein Philanthropic Fund working for that foundation are a couple of family members including Mark Epstein Jill Epstein White (research) Debra Epstein (Dir of Finance) Bon voyage 03081 EFTA01099776 From: To: Dradley J. Fdretc Subject: Re: ? Date: Wednesday, October 19, 2009 9:02:09 AM Thanks Brad, goad luck!!! Original Message From: Esq Brad Edwards To: SM011ka Mei Sent: 14 Oct 2009 07:39 Subject: RE: ? The last email I received from you was weeks ago, so I assume I did not get it. I have a bunch of Epstein things today up in west palm beach. I'll call you on my way home. Take care. From: 11. 1 Sent: Wednesday, Octbber 14, 2009 5:50 AM To: Bradley 3. Edwards Subject: ? Hi Brad, Hope you're feeling better. Did you not receive my previous email ? Best, Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile 03189 EFTA01099777 From: likieleslagrarria To: Subject: RE: ? Date: Wednesday, October 19, 2009 7:39:00 AM The last email I received from you was weeks ago, so I assume I did not get it. I have a bunch of Epstein things today up in west palm beach. I'll call you on my way home. Take care. Ori inal Messa From: Sent: , , . To: Bradley 3. Edwards Subject: ? Hi Brad, Hope you're feeling better. Did you not receive my previous email ? Best, NMI& Sent via BlackBerry from T-Moblle 03190 EFTA01099778 From: Wadley 7. Felwards T, • RE: DOCS Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 11:43:00 AM I haven't forgotten about anything. I'm feeling a little better, which you know can also be a problem because you then think you can do more, and of course I busted a suture out this morning. That delayed me going into work personally, but I will get you things ASAP. I found s number the other lady that worked for MC2 in NY. I think she will be very helpful. She knows everything knows but is much less sketchy. Also, if ou lead on that already told you this and that, then she will give you more. Her number i Also, Epstein sent his main personal assistant to South Africa to live for good, and I heard it was because he couldn't risk her getting deposed on the trafficking stuff. Her name is I don't know how to go about getting her, but I would like to find her. I will call you later. In fact, I just called and left a message for you. Brad From: Sent my, To: Bradley 3. Edwards Subject: DOGS Hi Brad, Hope you're feeling better this morning. Just a reminder please not to forget to send me the does, thank you Don't sit down too long and try to lie down as much as possible. even if its on the floor! place towel underneath you and lie down! :) 04015 EFTA01099779 From: To: U MW Cc: Bente/Cenne Mom929 Subject: IMPORTANT POTENTIAL MEDIA TACTIC Raman polansld and lE Date: Monday, September 28, 2009 8:09:09 AM Hi Brad, The media bun surrounding polansles arrest in Zurich based on a 70s warrant for his arrest on charges that he had sex with 13 year old shld be leveraged In epstein's case now!!!! Maybe mothers in palm beach can create a stir and a vigil against men in power who abuse children? What are your thoughts? Warmly, a Sent via BladcBerry from T-Mobile 02913 EFTA01099780 From: trallaSkitaldd To: Glasser Eric (WPTVI Subject: RE: hey &ad! Date: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 3:10:00 P11 Attachments: Imaaeft02Jrc FYI — The motion to unseal the noaosecution agreement (agreement between Epstein and the government) is in front of Judge tomorrow morning at 10:30 in courtroom 11F. I know that Tim wanted to have you guys there and we would love that too. Thanks Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein RosonfeIdt Adlerl Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre From: Glasser, Eric (WPTV) Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 10:2 To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: hey Brad! I am working on getting you a copy. Peter OK'd it — so I'll keep you posted. Email me the address you want it sent to, OK? Talk soon, Eric 06655 EFTA01099781 p.m.c j .isten002138"chiholeoniimi him From: Mike Fisten Scat: Sep 28, 2009 23:45:22 To: Cc: Bcc: Subject: Note Hi Just stopping by to say Hi, hope you had a pleasant trip back North. I'll keep you posted as issues develop. Also I had a long talk with my agent about you and your project this weekend. He seemed very interested. I have been reading a lot lately about trafficking of children. The more I read the more I believe JE has been doing this for some time. Bringing dozens of girls on false immigration documents from Eastern Europe, and Brazil to the US through the modeling agency. Where arc all these girls now? Did they sell them? Someone in the news show 60 minutes caught on to this scheme 10 years ago and no one stepped in to stop it ""Karin Models founder Bnmel, who's currently a partner in MC2, denied allegations in a 1997 ""60 Minutes"" segment that he took advantage of young models who were high on drugs. Brunel also reportedly left his Trump Tower digs in 1999 after complaints of night carousing, which he also denied. Disgraced former Elite models exec Gerald Marie is also involved with MC2, says our source. Marie was accused of having sex with underage models in a 1999 BBC documentary where he was filmed saying he hoped to seduce contestants in a modeling contest in which the average age of participants was 15. He also dated Linda Evangelista when she was a teen. "" Hope all is good, Mike Mike Fisten, Senior Intelligence Agent Rothstein Rosenfeld( Adler 1 Attorneys at Law IlleVQ/Documatis%20and%20Staingstreialasktop/E. tictionieDom/eMail/Mike_Fisien002338^eMailConteni him (I of 2) I (/620101028:08 PMl 19986 EFTA01099782 Mit.ttristuAl2338^eMailConitaltm I www.rra-law.com IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: Please note that the views expressed herein or in any attachments hereto are not intended to constitute a ""reliance opinion"" under applicable Treasury Regulations, and accordingly are not intended or written to be used, and may not be used or relied upon, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related penalties that may be imposed by the Internal Revenue Service, or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another patty any tax-related matters addressed herein. NOTICE: THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS TRANSMISSION IS ATTORNEY PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL. IT IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ABOVE. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NO 111.1ED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPY OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONE COLLECT AND DELETE THE MATERIAL FROM ANY COMPUTER. THANK YOU. iltelfieliDocuonme)420und%20SettowiTrialiummowE...occion/cDocskMael/M!Ref istera)233treMuilContolthtm (2 of 2) (I I/&201010:29.08 PM) 19987 EFTA01099783 From: Michele Damn To: Bradley 3. Edwards Subject: Re: Epstein tiling Date: Wednesday, July 15, 20031:22:54 PM No problem Brad. I totally understand being short staffed. No worries. I Just want to be the story as complete as possible and, of course, to have your voice in it since you propelled this whole process. Michele On 7/15/09 1:17 PM, "Bradley J. Edwards". wrote: I'm sorry Michele. My secretary is out, so I forwarded the instruction to another lawyer in the firm and it was delegated to another secretary. I hope you get it today, but like I said we are a person down right now staff-wise, so I will do my best to follow up and get you the response. Bradley. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adlerl Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre From: Michele Dargan Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 12:59 PM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Epstein filing Hi Brad, I hate to be a pain, but I'm bumping up on deadline for tomorrow's paper and haven't received your e-mall filing yet and I definitely want to Include your position In my story. If you can e-mall me that pleading soon, I will be able to Include your position in my story. Thanks In advance, Michele Michele Dargan, staff writer Palm Beach Daily News 04905 EFTA01099784 From: flradlev Edwards To: lthelelernan Subject: RE: Epstbn tiling Date: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 1:17:00 PM I'm sorry Michele. My secretary is out, so I forwarded the Instruction to another lawyer in the firm and it was delegated to another secretary. I hope you get it today, but like I said we are a person down right now staff-wise, so I will do my best to follow up and get you the response. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosonfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law From: Michele Dargan imailtommlmjnippinuilgamma. Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 12:59 PM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Epstein filing Hi Brad, I hate to be a pain, but I'm bumping up on deadline for tomorrow's paper and haven't received your e-mail filing yet and I definitely want to Include your position In my story. If you can e-mall me that pleading soon, I will be able to include your position in my story. Thanks In advance, Michele Michele Dargan, staff writer Palm Beach Daily News e 04906 EFTA01099785 From: Snenerr Wendel Sown (CN1-Palm Death), To: Bradley ). Edwards Subject: RE: Epstdn Date: Friday, May 22, 2009 12:21:43 PM 10-4. Thank you. Susan Spencer-Wendel Courts Reporter NIS Original Message From: Bradley J. Edwards a Sent: Frl 5/22/2009 12:13 PM To: Spencer Wendel, Susan (CM-Palm Beach) Subject: Epstein The case in which the Non-prosecution agreement was released to the victims and victim's attorneys Is Jane Doe v. United States of America, 08-80736. It was released pursuant to protective order which is why I cannot discuss the contents of the Non-Prosecution agreement. Bradley 3. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler Attorneys at Law Las alas City Centre 05148 EFTA01099786 From: lialau...breatIndbf720 To: Bradley ). Edwards Subject• RE: Epstdn Date: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 5:33:30 PM Have called your otfice,we're good tomorrow if you are Ti From: Bradley J. Edwards Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 4:5 To: Malloy, Timothy (WP1V) Subject: Epstein HI Tim, I was able to reach my client, and we would be able to arrange for an interview tomorrow. Please contact me at your earliest chance. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre 05151 EFTA01099787 From: Gnawer Wendel Susan (CM-Palm Bea) To: Bradley Edwards Subject RE: Epstein Date: Thwsday, May 28, 2009 2:13:21 PM Dear Mr. Edwards: to give me a call? Was the young woman you represent interviewed by Channel 5? And did she/you touch on the sealing issues with 5? Please advise .. as we at the Post do not want to be beat to the punch. Many thanks, Susan Spencer-Wendel Courts Reporter Palm Beach Post Original Message From: Bradley). Edwards [a Sent: Fri 5/22/2009 12:13 PM To: Spencer Wendel, Susan (CNI-Palm Beach) Subject: Epstein The case in which the Non-prosecution agreement was released to the victims and victim's attorneys is Jane Doe v. United States of America, 08-80736. It was released pursuant to protective order which is why I cannot discuss the contents of the Non-Prosecution agreement. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre 05161 EFTA01099788 From: ptadlev 1. Fdward< To: Clicheir—Qamao Subject: RE: epsteln Date: Tuesday, lune 23, 20091:16:00 FI4 I sent the request to my secretary and she will send you those dots today. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adlerl Attorneys at Law From: Michele Dargan [mallto: Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 1:11 PM To: Bradley 3. Edwards Subject: Re: epstein • Brad, Thanks for the link. I appreciate It! Also, would you e-mall those documents that we talked about - your motion to unseal - and the Posts' atty if she has a separate one and also the Epstein attorney document that was filed on Friday. Thanks so much! Michele On 6/23/09 12:52 PM, "Bradley J. Edwards' <bedwards(Orra-law.com> wrote: httol/www radaronline com/exclusivasanOn/06/oxcluslye-leffray-ertein-be-ml•acednorison-early Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre Michele Dargan, staff writer Palm Beach Dal 05203 EFTA01099789 From: &00110afataDil To: tialf&DAM0 Subject RE: easter, Date: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 2:31:00 PM I have not seen anyone else report anything similar to the Radar report anywhere. Does that media channel not share with others? I am pretty curious how Radar got the Info... Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeld) Adlerl Attorneys at Law From: Michele Dargan [mailto Sent Tuesday, June 23, 2009 1:27 PM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: epstein Thanks! On 6/23/09 1:16 PM, "Bradley J. Edwards' > wrote: I sent the request to my secretary and she will send you those dots today. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler! Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre From: Michele Dargan Sent: Tuesday, June To: Bradley 3. Edwards Subject: Re: epstein Brad, Thanks for the link. I appreciate it! Also, would you e-mall those documents that we talked about - your motion to unseal - and the Posts' atty if she has a separate one and also the Epstein attorney document that was nled on Friday. Thanks so much! Michele On 6/23/09 12:52 PM, "Bradley J. Edwards' wrote: littpfAvww radaronlinesomiexclusivesPOn9/06/0xclusiyedeffrey-eostein-be-released-orison-early 05207 EFTA01099790 Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfoldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre Michele Dargan, staff writer own 05208 EFTA01099791 From: Wadley J. Fc To: thataikellel Subject RE: epstem Date: Tuesday, hoe 23, 2009 5:22:00 PM Unfortunately she has not had time to send the dots. I hope she gets them out today, but it may not happen. There is nothing to really comment on. It doesn't surprise me at all that he, despite being a registered sex offender, is being released early, and it also won't be a surprise when he is released without the victims being notified. Par for the course with this case. I will try to get you the does you want. See you Thursday. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adlorj Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre From: Michele Dargan Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 4:37 PM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject Re: epstein Brad, I haven't received those documents yet. Will she be able to forward them to me today? Also, I am filing a story to the web about his release date. Found out It's July 22 and I am citing Radaronline about his involvment In the Bear Stearns case. Do you want to comment on the fact that he's getting released on July 22? M On 6/23/09 1:16 PM, "Bradley J. Edwards" wrote: I sent the request to my secretary and she will send you those does today. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Dias City Centre From: Michele Dargan Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 1:11 PM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: epstein Brad, 05220 EFTA01099792 Thanks for the link. I appreciate It! Also, would you e-mall those documents that we talked about - your motion to unseal - and the Posts' atty if she has a separate one and also the Epstein attorney document that was filed on Friday. Thanks so much! Michele On 6/23/09 12:52 PM, "Bradley J. Edwards" wrote: nttn://www radaronline rarnawnlusivest2009/06/prchiliveieffrev-enstein-he-released-orison-earkt Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosonfeldt Adlert Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre Michele Dargan, staff writer 11111110 05221 EFTA01099793 From: firkin] Fdwardc To: efidlelableactil Subject RE: PSIS Date: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 9:39:00 WI httol/www businessweek comnowdaiividnflash/crintenl/O2007/db20070710 434383 hint This was a story from 2007 already naming Epstein as the mysterious Investor from a source other than Radar. Just thought I'd share. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adlerl Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre From: Michele Dargan [manta Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 4:37 PM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: epstein Brad, I haven't received those documents yet. Will she be able to forward them to me today? Also, I am filing a story to the web about his release date. Found out It's July 22 and 1 am citing Radaronline about his Involvment in the Bear Stearns case. Do you want to comment on the fact that he's getting released on July 22? On 6/23/09 1:16 PM, "Bradley J. Edwards" <bedwards@rra-law.com> wrote: I sent the request to my secretary and she will send you those dots today. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attornoys at Law Las Olas City Centre From: Michele Dargan (maja Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 1:11 PM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: epstein Brad, Thanks for the link. I appreciate it! 05224 EFTA01099794 Also, would you e-mall those documents that we talked about - your motion to unseal - and the Posts' atty if she has a separate one and also the Epstein attorney document that was flied on Friday. Thanks so much! Michele On 6/23/09 12:52 PM, 'Bradley Edwards" ‹ > wrote: Jitto/Annvw radaronline com/exclusiyesPnn9/06/exclusivia-ieffnuy-eociteln-be-released-orison-early Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre Michele Dargan, staff writer Palm Beach Daily News 05225 EFTA01099795 From: [ ,pip To: Bradley 1. Owenle Subject: Re: epstS Date: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 1:13:17 PM Brad, Thanks for the link. I appreciate it! Also, would you e-mail those documents that we talked about - your motion to unseal - and the Posts' atty if she has a separate one and also the Epstein attorney document that was filed on Friday. Thanks so much! Michele On 6/23/09 12:52 PM, 'Bradley J. Edwards' wrote: Ittgy.//www radaronline.corniexclusiyes/2009/06/exdusive-jeffrey-eostein-be-released- prison-early Bradley .1. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre Michele Dargan, staff writer Palm Beach Daily News 05239 EFTA01099796 Ruin: SeekDIL910 To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject Re: epstein Date: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 1:29:20 PM Thanks! On 6/23/09 1:16 PM, "Bradley J. Edwards" < > wrote: I sent the request to my secretary and she will send you those dots today. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre ISM From: Michele Dargan (ORROAPPMPIMPliiliall Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 1:11 PM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: epstein Brad, Thanks for the link. I appreciate it! Also, would you e-mall those documents that we talked about - your motion to unseal - and the Posts' atty if she has a separate one and also the Epstein attorney document that was filed on Friday. Thanks so much! Michele On 6/23/09 12:52 PM, "Bradley 1. Edwards" > wrote: htto.//wyny radaronline cronVexclusiyeat2009/06/pxclusiye-ieffrey-eostein-be-released- prison-early Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attornoys at Law 05277 EFTA01099797 Michele Dargan, staff writer Palm Beach Daily News IS 05278 EFTA01099798 From: MkIMk Daman To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: epstein Date: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 2:41:42 PM I also noticed that Radar is the only one to report that info. Newspapers have a higher standard than online publications and bloggers etc. and newspapers, generally, have to confirm that the info Is In fact true. However, we may be able to cite Radar as a source....Believe me, I've been making umpteen calls trying to verify the Info. On 6/23/09 2:31 PM, "Bradley J. Edwards" < wrote: I have not seen anyone else report anything similar to the Radar report anywhere. Does that media channel not share with others? I am pretty curious how Radar got the info... Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre From: Michele Dargan Sent: Tuesday, June 23, To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: epstein Thanks! On 6/23/09 1:16 PM, "Bradley J. Edwards" a wrote: I sent the request to my secretary and she will send you those does today. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre From: Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 1:11 PM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: epstein 05324 EFTA01099799 Brad, Thanks for the link. 1 appredate It! Also, would you e-mail those documents that we talked about - your motion to unseal - and the Posts' atty If she has a separate one and also the Epstein attorney document that was filed on Friday. Thanks so much! Michele On 6/23/09 12:52 PM, "Bradley J. Edwards" a wrote: ►dplAvww radaronline com/exclusives/2009/0Wexdusive-ieffreli-nostein-be-released- prison-early Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre Michele Dargan, staff writer 05325 EFTA01099800 From: kittid200110 To: Braley 3. Edwards Subject: Re: epsteln Date: Tuesday, lune 23, 2009 4:39:33 PM Brad, I haven't received those documents yet. Will she be able to forward them to me today? Also, I am filing a story to the web about his release date. Found out it's July 22 and I am citing Radaronline about his involvment in the Bear Stearns case. Do you want to comment on the fact that he's getting released on July 22? On 6/23/09 1:16 PM, "Bradley J. Edwards" wrote: I sent the request to my secretary and she will send you those docs today. Bradley J Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre From: Michele Dargan Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 1:11 PM To: Bradley 3. Edwards Subject: Re: epstein Brad, Thanks for the link. I appreciate it! Also, would you e-mall those documents that we talked about - your motion to unseal - and the Posts' atty if she has a separate one and also the Epstein attorney document that was filed on Friday. Thanks so much! Michele On 6/23/09 12:52 PM, "Bradley 1. Edwards" wrote: rdaf/www radaronline com/exchicivne.P009/06/exclusive-leffrev-aostein-be-released- prison-early Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adlorl Attorneys at Law 05368 EFTA01099801 Sm Michele Dargan, staff writer Irn 05369 EFTA01099802 From: tiltbelaDeboa To: sratley J. Edwards Subject Re: epstein Date: Tuesday, lune 23, 2009 5:28:53 PM Thanks so much. I am going to continue to pursue the Bear Stearns angle tomorrow. But, as for now, I will run two graphs citing Radar as the source. It should be up on the web within the hour at www.palmbeachdallynews.com On 6/23/09 5:22 PM, "Bradley J. Edwards' wrote: Unfortunately she has not had time to send the docs. I hope she gets them out today, but it may not happen. There is nothing to really comment on. It doesn't surprise me at all that he, despite being a registered sex offender, is being released early, and it also won't be a surprise when he is released without the victims being notified. Par for the course with this case. I will try to get you the docs you want. See you Thursday. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre From: Michele Dargan Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 4:37 PM To: Bradley 1 Edwards Subject: Re: epstein Brad, I haven't received those documents yet. Will she be able to forward them to me today? Also, I am tiling a story to the web about his release date. Found out it's July 22 and I am citing Radaronline about his involvment in the Bear Stearns case. Do you want to comment on the fact that he's getting released on July 22? M On 6/23/09 1:16 PM, 'Bradley J. Edwards" wrote: I sent the request to my secretary and she will send you those docs today. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adlerl Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre 05387 EFTA01099803 From: Michele Da an • To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: epstein Brad, Thanks for the Ilnk. I appreciate It! Also, would you e-mail those documents that we talked about - your motion to unseal - and the Posts' atty If she has a separate one and also the Epstein attorney document that was filed on Friday. Thanks so much! Michele On 6/23/09 12:52 PM, *Bradley J. Edwards" wrote: httolfwww radaronline rnm/exclucive‘f2009/116/excluahm-ieffrey-ecistein-bre-released- prison-eady. Bradley .1 Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler! Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre Michele Dargan, staff writer Palm Beach Daily News 05388 EFTA01099804 From: Wart/Slidols To: dcheitithaion Subject: Epstein applicable statutes Date: Friday, September 18, 2009 2:55:00 PM Attachments: iinkze011at laaaP102.4 I did not pull the conspiracy version, and convictions of conspiracy would add some amount of time. how much I don't know. I hope this helps. I cut the statutes straight from VVestlaw: 18 U.S.C.A. § 2422 United States Code Annotated currentness Title 18. Crimes and Criminal Procedure filets & Annosi Part j. Crimes (Refs & Annos1 chanter 117. Transportation for Illegal Sexual Activity and Related Crimes (Refs Pc Annos) § 2422. Coercion and enticement (a) Whoever knowingly persuades, induces, entices, or coerces any Individual to travel In interstate or foreign commerce, or in any Territory or Possession of the United States,9to engage in prostitution, or In any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both. (b) Whoever, using the mail or any facility or means of Interstate or foreign commerce, or within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States knowingly Persuades, Induces, entices, or coerces any individual who has not attained the age of 18 years, to engage in prostitution or any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title and imprisoned not less than JCI years or for life. 18 U.S.C.A. § 2423 United States Code Annotated Currentness Title 18. Crimes and Criminal Procedure (Refs & Annos.1 Part 1. Crimes (Refs & Annos1 Chapter 117. Transportation for Illegal Sexual Activity and Related Crimes filets & Anne's) § 2423. Transportation of minors (a) Transportation with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity.--A person who knowingly transports an individual who has not attained the age of 18 years in interstate or foreign commerce, or in any commonwealth, territory or possession of the United States, with Intent that the individual engage In prostitution, or in any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, shall be fined under this title and jmnrisoned not legs than 10 years or fnr life. (b) Travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct.--A person who travels in interstate commerce or travels into the United States, or a United States citizen or an 01280 EFTA01099805 alien admitted for permanent residence in the United States who travels In foreign commerce, for the purpose of engaging In any illicit sexual conduct with another person shall be fined under this title or knorisoned not mnre than 30 years, or both. (c) Engaging in illicit sexual conduct in foreign places.--Any United States citizen or alien admitted for permanent residence who travels in foreign commerce, and engages in any illicit sexual conduct with another person shall be fined under this title or Imprisoned not more than 30 years, or both. (d) Ancillary offenses.--Whoever, for the purpose of commercial advantage or private financial gain, arranges, induces, procures, or facilitates the travel of a person knowing that such a person is traveling in interstate commerce or foreign commerce for the purpose of engaging in illicit sexual conduct shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 30 years, or both. (e) Attempt and conspiracy.--Whoever attempts or rnnsoires to violate subsection fa) fb). (c). or (di shall be nimishahle in the same manner as a rnmoleted violation of that subsection, (1) Definition.--As used in this section, the term "Illicit sexual conduct" means (1) a sexual act (as defined in section 2246) with a person under 18 years of age that would be in violation of chapter 109A if the sexual act occurred in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States; or (2) any commercial sex act (as defined In section 1591) with a person under 18 years of age. (g) Defense.--In a prosecution under this section based on illicit sexual conduct as defined In subsection (f)(2), It Is a defense, which the defendant must establish by a preponderance of the evidence, that the defendant reasonably believed that the person with whom the defendant engaged in the commercial sex act had attained the age of 18 years. 18 U.S.C.A. § 1591 United States Code Annotated furrentness. Title 18. Crimes and Criminal Procedure (Refs & Annos1 Part 1. Crimes f Refs & Annos1 Chapter 77 Peonage, Slavery, and Trafficking In Persons (Refs & Annos1 § 1591. Sex trafficking of children or by force, fraud, or coercion (a) Whoever knowingly-- (1) in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, or within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, recruits, entices, harbors, transports, provides, obtains, or maintains by any means a person; or (2) benefits, financially or by receiving anything of value, from participation in a venture which has engaged In an act described in violation of paragraph (1), knowing, or in reckless disregard of the fact, that means of force, threats of force, fraud, coercion described in subsection (e)(2), or any combination of such means will be used to cause the person to engage In a commercial sex act, or that the person has not attained the age of 18 years and will be caused to engage in a commercial sex act, shall be punished as provided in subsection (b). 01281 EFTA01099806 (b) The punishment for an offense under subsection (a) is-- (1) if the offense was effected by means of force, threats of force, fraud, or coercion described in subsection (e)(2), or by any combination of such means, or if the person recruited, enticed, harbored, transported, provided, or obtained had not attained the ape of 14 years at the time of such offense, by a fine under this title and imprisonment for any term of years not less than 15 or for life; or (2) if the offense was not so effected, and the person recruited, enticed, harbored, transported, provided, or obtained had attained the age of 14 years hut had not attained the aae of 18 years at the time of such offense. by a fine under this title and imprisonment for not less than in years or for life. (c) In a prosecution under subsection (a)(1) in which the defendant had a reasonable opportunity to observe the person so recruited, enticed, harbored, transported, provided, obtained or maintained, the Government need not nmve that the defendant knew that the person had not attained the age of 19 years. (d) Whoever obstructs, attempts to obstruct, or in any way Interferes with or prevents the enforcement of this section, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned for a term not to exceed 20 years, or both. (e) In this section: (1) The term "abuse or threatened abuse of law or legal process" means the use or threatened use of a law or legal process, whether administrative, civil, or criminal, In any manner or for any purpose for which the law was not designed, in order to exert pressure on another person to cause that person to take some action or refrain from taking some action. (2) The term "coercion" means-- (A) threats of serious harm to or physical restraint against any person; (B) any scheme, plan, or pattern intended to cause a person to believe that failure to perform an act would result in serious harm to or physical restraint against any person; or (C) the abuse or threatened abuse of law or the legal process. (3) The term "commercial sex act" means any sex act, on account of which anything of value is given to or received by any person. (4) The term "serious harm" means any harm, whether physical or nonphysical, including psychological, financial, or reputational harm, that is sufficiently serious, under all the surrounding circumstances, to compel a reasonable person of the same background and in the same circumstances to perform or to continue performing commercial sexual activity in order to avoid Incurring that harm. (5) The term "venture" means any group of two or more individuals associated in fact, whether or not a legal entity. Twelfth, Section 206 of the Adam Walsh Act added 18 11.5 C. 15%1 to the list of offenses for which a defendant is to be sentenced to life under 18 II.S C. 155.9(el(7)(A). The amendment adds .18 U.S C. 1591 to the list of instant offenses of convictions that are 01282 EFTA01099807 covered sex crimes under § 4B1.5. USSG, Ch. TWO, Pt. A, Refs & Annos, 18 U.S.C.A. United States Code Annotated Currentness. Federal Sentencing Guidelines Chapter Two. Offense Conduct Part A. Offenses Against the Person 3. Criminal Sexual Abuse and Offenses Related to Registration as a Sex Offender HISTORICAL NOTES 2007 Amendments Chapter Two, Part A, Subpart Three, is amended In the heading by adding at the end "AND OFFENSES RELATED TO REGISTRATION AS A SEX OFFENDER". Reason for Amendment: This amendment responds to the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 (the "Adam Walsh Act"), Pub.L. 109-248, which contained a directive to the Commission, created new sexual offenses, and enhanced penalties for existing sexual offenses. The amendment implements the directive by creating two new guidelines, §§ 2A3.5 (Criminal Sexual Abuse and Offenses Related to Registration as a Sex Offender) and 2A3.6 (Aggravated Offenses Relating to Registration as a Sex Offender). It further addresses relevant provisions in the Adam Walsh Act by making changes to Chapter Two, Part A, Subpart 3 (Criminal Sexual Abuse) and Part G (Offenses Involving Commercial Sex Acts, Sexual Exploitation of Minors, and Obscenity), § 211.2 (Obstruction of Justice), § 3D1.2 (Groups of Closely Related Counts), § 481.5 (Repeat and Dangerous Sex Offender Against Minors), § 5B1.3 (Conditions of Probation), § 5D1.2 (Term of Supervised Release), § 5D1.3 (Conditions of Supervised Release) and Appendix A (Statutory Index). First, section 206 of the Adam Walsh Act amended 18 ILS.C. 7741(r) to add a new mandatory minimum term of imprisonment of 30 years for offenses related to the aggravated sexual abuse of a child under 12 years old, or of a child between 12 and 16 years old if force, threat, or other means was used. In response to the new mandatory minimum for these offenses, the amendment increases the base offense level at § 2A3.1 (Criminal Sexual Abuse; Attempt to Commit Criminal Sexual Abuse) from level 30 to level 38. The base offense level of 30 has been retained for all other offenses. At least one specific offense characteristic applied to every conviction under 18 II S.C. 7741(c) sentenced under § 2A3.1 in fiscal year 2006. Accordingly, the mandatory minimum 360 months' imprisonment is expected to be reached or exceeded In every case with a base offense level of 38. The amendment provides a new application note that precludes application of the specific offense characteristic at § 2A3.1(b)(1) regarding conduct described in 1R U S C 7241(al or al if the conduct that forms the basis for a conviction under 18 LI S C 7241(r) is that the defendant engaged in conduct described In J8 U S.C. 2241(al or al (force, threat, or other means). The amendment also precludes application of the specific offense characteristic for the age of a victim at § 2A3.1(b)(2) if the defendant was convicted under section 2241(c). The heightened base offense level of 38 takes into account the age of the victim. These instructions, therefore, avoid unwarranted double counting. Second, section 207 of the Adam Walsh Act Increased the statutory maximum term of imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. 2243(b1 from 5 years to 15 years for the sexual abuse of a person in official detention or under custodial authority. In response to Increased penalty, 01283 EFTA01099808 the amendment increases the base offense level from 12 to 14 in § 2A3.3 (Criminal Sexual Abuse of a Ward or Attempt to Commit Such Acts). The amendment also adds a new definition of "minor" consistent with how this term is defined elsewhere in the guidelines manual. In addition, the amendment includes an application note precluding application of § 381.3 (Abuse of Position of Trust or Use of Special Skill) for these offenses because an abuse of position of trust is assumed in all such cases and, therefore, is built into the base offense level. Third, section 206 of the Adam Walsh Act created a new subsection at 18 U S.C. 7244. Section 2244(a)(5) provides a penalty of any term of years If the sexual conduct would have violated 18 U.S.C. 2241(c) had the contact been a sexual act. Section 2241(c) conduct involves the aggravated sexual abuse of a child under 12 years old or of a child between 12 and 16 years old if force, threat, or other means was used, as defined in la )i.S C. 2241(al and (U. Prior to the Adam Walsh Act, the penalty for offenses involving children under 12 years old was "twice that otherwise provided," and the penalty for sexual contact involving behavior described in 18 U S.C. 2241 was a statutory maximum term of imprisonment of 10 years. The amendment addresses this new offense by increasing the minimum offense level in the age enhancement in subsection (b)(1) of § 2A3.4 (Abusive Sexual Contact or Attempt to Commit Abusive Sexual Contact) from level 20 to level 22. Fourth, section 141 of the Adam Walsh Act created a new offense under 18 U.S.C. 2250(81 for the failure to register as a sex offender. The basic offense carries a statutory maximum term of imprisonment of 10 years. Section 141 also included a directive to the Commission that when promulgating guidelines for the offense, to consider, among other factors, the seriousness of the sex offender's conviction that gave rise to the requirement to register; relevant further offense conduct during the period for which the defendant failed to register; and the offender's criminal history. The amendment creates a new guideline, § 2A3.5 (Failure to Register as a Sex Offender), to address the directive. The new guideline provides three alternative base offense levels based on the tiered category of the sex offender: level 16 If the defendant was required to register as a Tier III offender; level 14 If the defendant was required to register as a Tier II offender; and level 12 if the defendant was required to register as a Tier I offender. The amendment also provides two specific offense characteristics. First, subsection (b)(1) provides a tiered enhancement to address criminal conduct committed while the defendant is in a failure to register status. Specifically, § 2A3.5(b)(1) provides a six-level increase if, while in a failure to register status, the defendant committed a sex offense against an adult, a six-level increase if the defendant committed a felony offense against a minor, and an eight-level increase if the defendant committed a sex offense against a minor. Second, § 2A3.5(b)(2) provides a three-level decrease if the defendant voluntarily corrected the failure to register or voluntarily attempted to register but was prevented from registering by uncontrollable circumstances, and the defendant did not contribute to the creation of those circumstances. The reduction covers cases in which (1) the defendant either does not attempt to register until after the relevant registration period has expired but subsequently successfully registers, thereby correcting the failure to register status, or (2) the defendant, either before or after the registration period has expired, attempted to register but circumstances beyond the defendant's control prevented the defendant from successfully registering. An application note specifies that the voluntary attempt to register or to correct the failure to register must have occurred prior to the time the defendant knew or reasonably should have known a jurisdiction had detected the failure to register. The application note also provides that the reduction does not apply if the enhancement for committing one of the enumerated offenses in § 2A3.5(b)(1) applies. 01284 EFTA01099809 Additionally, the amendment adds § 2A3.5 to the list of offenses that are considered groupable under § 3D1.2(d) because the failure to register offense is an ongoing and continuous offense. Fifth, section 141 of the Adam Walsh Act created two new aggravated offenses relating to the registration as a sex offender. Section 141 of the Act created 1RU.S.C. 2250(cl, which carries a mandatory minimum term of imprisonment of 5 years and a statutory maximum term of imprisonment of 30 years if a defendant commits a crime of violence while in a failure to register status, with the sentence to be consecutive to the punishment provided for the failure to register. Section 702 of the Adam Walsh Act created a new offense at 1$ 11.5 (' 2260A that prohibits the commission of various enumerated offenses while in a failure to register status. The penalty for this offense is a mandatory term of imprisonment of 10 years to be imposed consecutively to the underlying offense. The amendment creates a new guideline at § 2A3.6 (Aggravated Offenses Relating to Registration as a Sex Offender) to address these new offenses. The new guideline provides that for offenses under section 2250(c), the guideline sentence is the minimum term of imprisonment required by statute, and for offenses under section 2260A, the guideline sentence is the term of imprisonment required by statute. Chapters Three and Four are not to apply. This is consistent with how the guidelines treat other offenses that carry both a specified term of imprisonment and a requirement that such term be imposed consecutively. See §§ 3D1.1 (Procedure for Determining Offense Level on Multiple Counts) and 5G1.2 (Sentencing on Multiple Counts of Conviction). The guideline includes an application note that provides an upward departure stating that a sentence above the minimum term required by section 2250(c) is an upward departure from the guideline sentence. An upward departure may be warranted, for example, In a case involving a sex offense committed against a minor or if the offense resulted in serious bodily injury to a minor. Sixth, section 208 of the Adam Walsh Act added a new mandatory minimum term of imprisonment of 15 years under 18 U S C 1591(b)(1) for sex trafficking of an adult by force, fraud, or coercion. In response, the amendment provides a new base offense level of 34 in § 2G1.1 (Promoting a Commercial Sex Act or Prohibited Sexual Conduct with an Individual Other than a Minor) if the offense of conviction is 18 U.S.C. 1591O1)(1'1 but retains a base offense level of 14 for all other offenses. In addition, the amendment limits application of the specific offense characteristic at § 2G1.1(b)(1) that applies if the offense involved fraud or coercion only to those offenses receiving a base offense level of 14. Offenses under 18 U S C. 1561(61(1) necessarily involve fraud and coercion and, therefore, such conduct is built into the heightened base offense level of 34. This limitation thus avoids unwarranted double counting. Seventh, section 208 of the Adam Walsh Act added a new mandatory minimum term of imprisonment of 15 years under 18 U.S.C. 1591(b)(1) for sex trafficking of children under 14 years of age and added a new mandatory minimum term of imprisonment of 10 years and increased the statutory maximum term of imprisonment from 40 years to life under 18 U.S.C. 1591(b1(2) for sex trafficking of children who had attained the age of 14 years but had not attained the age of 18 years. Further, the Adam Walsh Act increased the mandatory minimum term of imprisonment from 5 years to 10 years and increased the statutory maximum term of imprisonment from 30 years to life under both 18 U.S.C. 242201, for persuading or enticing any person who has not attained the age of 18 years to engage in prostitution or any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, and 18 U S.0 2423(a), for transporting a person who has not attained the age of 18 years in interstate or foreign commerce, with the intent that the person engage in prostitution, or in any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with 01285 EFTA01099810 a criminal offense. In response, the amendment provides alternative base offense levels in § 2G1.3 (Promoting a Commercial Sex Act or Prohibited Sexual Conduct with a Minor; Transportation of Minors to Engage in a Commercial Sex Act or Prohibited Sexual Conduct; Travel to Engage in Commercial Sex Act or Prohibited Sexual Conduct with a Minor; Sex Trafficking of Children; Use of Interstate Facilities to Transport Information about a Minor) based on the statute of conviction and the conduct described in that conviction. For convictions under 18 U S.C. 1591(b)(1) the base offense level is 34. For convictions under 18 U.S.0 1591(h)(7)., the base offense level is 30. The amendment further provides a base offense level of 28 for convictions under a U.S.C. 2422(bl and 2473(a) The two-level enhancement for the use of a computer at § 2G1.3(b)(3) applied to 9S percent of offenders convicted under 18 U.S.C. 7477(b1 and sentenced under § 2G1.3 in fiscal year 2006. In addition, the two-level enhancement for the offense involving a sexual act or sexual contact at § 2G1.3(b)(4) applied to 95 percent of offenders convicted under .18 U.S.C. 2423(al and sentenced under this guideline in fiscal year 2006. With application of either enhancement, the mandatory minimum term of imprisonment of 120 months will be reached in the majority of convictions under la II.S.C- 7472(bl and 2473(4 before application of other guidelines adjustments. Further, the amendment addresses the interaction of two specific offense characteristics with the alternative base offense levels. First, every conviction under 18 U.S.0 1591 necessarily Involves a commercial sex act. With the base offense levels being determined based on the statute of conviction, the amendment clarifies that § 2G1.3(b)(4)(B), which provides a two-level enhancement if the offense involved a commercial sex act, does not apply if the defendant is convicted under 18 U.S.C. 1591. Second, the amendment precludes application of the age enhancement in § 2G1.3(b)(5) if the base offense level is determined under subsection (a)(1) of § 2G1.3 for a conviction under 18 U S C 1591(h)(11 The base offense level provided by subsection (a)(1) of § 2G1.3 takes Into account the age of the victim and, therefore, limitations on application of subsections (b)(4)(8) and (b)(5) of § 2G1.3 avoid unwarranted double counting. Eighth, section 503 of the Adam Walsh Act created a new section, 18 li 5J- 2757A, adopting new recordkeeping obligations for the production of any book, magazine, periodical, film, videotape, or digital Image that contains a visual depiction of simulated sexually explicit conduct. Section 2257A has a statutory maximum of one year imprisonment for the failure to comply with the recordkeeping requirements and a statutory maximum term of imprisonment of five years if the violation was to conceal a substantive offense that involves either causing a minor to engage in sexually explicit conduct for the purpose of producing a visual depiction or trafficking in material involving the sexual exploitation of a minor. The new offense is similar to 18 11.5 C 2257, which Is referenced to § 2G2.5 (Recordkeeping Offenses Involving the Production of Sexually Explicit Materials; Failure to Provide Required Marks in Commercial Electronic Mail). Accordingly, the amendment refers the new offense to § 2G2.5. Ninth, section 701 of the Adam Walsh Act created a new offense in 18 U.S.C. 2257A(ol that prohibits engaging in child exploitation enterprises, defined as violating 18 U.S.0 tau, 1201 (if the victim is a minor), chapter 109A (involving a minor victim), chapter 110 (except for 18 U.S.0 2257 and 2257A), or chapter 117 (Involving a minor victim), as part of a series of felony violations constituting three or more separate incidents and involving more than one victim, and committing those offenses in concert with three or more other people. The statute provides a mandatory minimum term of imprisonment of 20 years. The amendment creates a new guideline at § 2G2.6 (Child Exploitation Enterprises) to cover this new offense. The guideline provides a base offense level of 35 and four specific 01286 EFTA01099811 offense characteristics. The Commission anticipates these offenses typically will involve conduct encompassing at least one of the specific offense characteristics, resulting in an offense level of at least level 37. Thus, the mandatory minimum term of imprisonment of 240 months typically is expected to be reached or exceeded, before application of other guideline adjustments. Tenth, section 206 of the Adam Walsh Act Increased the statutory maximum term of imprisonment from 4 years to 10 years under 18 ll S.C. 7752.8(b1 for knowingly using a misleading domain name with the Intent to deceive a minor into viewing material harmful to minors on the Internet. In addition, section 703 of the Act created a new section, la U.S C 27570 that carries a statutory maximum term of imprisonment of 10 years for knowingly embedding words or digital images into the source code of a Web site with the Intent to deceive a person into viewing material constituting obscenity. Section 2252C(b) carries a statutory maximum term of imprisonment of 20 years for knowingly embedding words or digital Images into the source code of a Web site with the intent to deceive a minor Into viewing material harmful to minors on the Internet. In response to the new offense, the amendment expands the scope of subsection (b)(2) of § 2G3.1 (Importing, Mailing, or Transporting Obscene Matter; Transferring Obscene Matter to a Minor; Misleading Domain Names) by adding to this enhancement "embedded words or digital images into the source code on a Web site." Eleventh, section 141 of the Adam Walsh Act added a new provision in 28 U S.C. 1001 that carries a statutory maximum term of imprisonment of 8 years for falsifying or covering up by any scheme or making materially false or fraudulent statements or making or using any false writings or documents that relate to offenses under chapters 109A, 1098, 110, and 117, and under section 1591 of chapter 77. The amendment adds a new specific offense characteristic at subsection (b)(1)(A) of § 2J1.2 (Obstruction of Justice) enhancing the offense level by four levels if the defendant was convicted under 18 U.S C 1001 and the statutory maximum term of 8 years' imprisonment applies because the matter relates to sex offenses. The amendment also added language to Application Note 4 stating an upward departure may be warranted under the guideline in a case involving a particularly serious sex offense. Twelfth. section 706 of the Adam Walsh Art added 18 U.S.C.. 1991 to the list of offenses for whirh a defendant is to he sentenred to life under 18 11.S.0 3559(e)(7)(A) The amendment adds 18 U.S.C. 1591 to the list of instant offenses of convictions that are covered sex rrimes under 6 481.5. Thirteenth, section 141 of the Adam Walsh Act amended 28 U.S.C. 3563 and 3583. The amendment adds a new subdivision to (a)(9) of § 561.3 and to (a)(7) of § 5D1.3 to require a defendant to comply with the new registration requirements provided by the Adam Walsh Act. The amendment also modifies the language in §§ 581.3(.3)(9) and 501.3(a)(7) relating to defendants convicted of a sexual offense described in 18 U.S.0 4047(c)(41• Not all states have implemented the new requirements, continuing to register sex offenders pursuant to the sex offender registry in place prior to July 27, 2006, the date of enactment of the Adam Walsh Act. Thus, It is necessary to maintain the language in the guidelines providing for conditions of probation and supervised release for those offenders. Fourteenth, section 141 of the Act amended 18 U.S.C. 3583(k)., which provides that the authorized term of supervised release for any offense under enumerated sex offenses is any term of years or life. In response, the amendment adds offenses under chanter 11198 and sections 1201 and 1591 of title 18 United States Code or 28 U.S.C-1201 and 1591 to the definition of sex offense under § 501.2(b)(2) for which the length of the term of supervised release shall be not less than the minimum term of years specified for the offense and may be up to life. 01287 EFTA01099812 Finally, the amendment provides a definition of "minor in relevant guidelines that is consistent with how this term is defined elsewhere in the guidelines. Outdated background commentary also is deleted by this amendment. The effective date of this amendment is November 1, 2007. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Oias CIN Centre 50 01288 EFTA01099813 Ilizillty_Edwords009065^eMailContcnt Min From Sent: Sep 24, 2009 20:45:34 To: Bradley J. Edwards Cc: Bcc: Subject: T Visas Please read this important. I think you can offer a trafficked victim protection, asylum and an incentive for coming forward on the case. Ask your clients if they know of any victims who were foreign so they can tell them about this and assuage their fears! This is a break through for some of the girls, because they'll be able to bring their families into the US on these visas. According to Acosta some 7000 visas are issued annually and the last time he checked only 1500 -2000 apply annually. That means that the word is NOT out about the visas (on purpose may I add and furthermore, that there is ZERO effort on the part of law enforcement to get it out, fear of having visa abused!!!! More importantly,How are you feeling? Hope you're healing quickly!!! Congress passes Violence Against Women Act of 2000 Immigrants' Rights Update, Vol. 14, No. 6, October 19, 2000 Passed by Congress on Oct. 11, 2000, the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000 (H.R. 3244) includes the Violence Against Women Act of 2000 (VAWA 2000), which expands and improves on the protections for battered spouses and children that were originally enacted in the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 (VAWA 1994). Most notably, VAWA 2000 eliminates the ""extreme hardship"" requirement for self-petitioners and allows all self-petitioners to adjust their status in the United States. The act also creates two new nonimmigrant visas for victims of trafficking and for victims of certain serious crimes, including victims of crimes against women (see ""Congress Creates New "HT"" and ""U"" Visas for Victims of Exploitation ""). Individuals granted these visas may subsequently adjust to permanent resident status. The bill passed both houses by enormous margins (371-1 in the House and 95-0 in the Senate), and President Bill Clinton has promised to swiftly sign it. VAWA 1994. The original VAWA included provisions to address the particular problems faced by battered immigrant women and children. Under pre-VAWA immigration law, immigrant spouses and children of U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents (LPRs) were dependent on the citizen or LPR to petition to immigrate them, and this dependency left them particularly subject to abuse on the part of that relative. The VAWA created a procedure whereby abused spouses and their children or abused children and their parents can ""self-petition"" to obtain LPR status without the cooperation of the abusing relative. The VAWA also enabled battered spouses and children to obtain suspension of deportation or cancellation of removal if they were present in the U.S. for at least three years rather than file ffiCypecumentsiQOand1420Senings/Tnal/DoktopHE cateDocskMail/Bradley_Edwartli009065"eMailContent.him (I of 4) 111/6/2010 10 10 01 PM) 10586 EFTA01099814 Orudley_Edwards009065^eMailConienLktm the seven years normally required for suspension or ten years for cancellation. Obstacles based on family/marital status removed. VAWA 2000 removes a number of obstacles that battered spouses and children have encountered in attempting to use provisions of the VAWA intended to help them. For example, a battered spouse whose marriage is defective because her husband failed to tell her that he was already married is not eligible to immigrate under VAWA 1994. VAWA 2000 corrects this problem by allowing individuals who believed that they were married to a U.S. citizen or 1 PR to self-petition. VAWA 2000 also allows individuals to self-petition even though they have been divorced front the citizen or LPR, provided that the marriage terminated within the past two years and a connection between the termination of the marriage and the abuse of the immigrant can be shown. These changes also apply to VAWA suspension of deportation and cancellation of removal. Moreover, individuals may self-petition even if the citizen relative has died, provided they petition within two years of the death. No need to leave U.S. to apply for VAWA visa. The new law allows all VAWA self-petitioners to apply for adjustment of status in the United States, regardless of whether they were inspected when they entered the country or whether they subsequently maintained lawful status. ""Extreme Hardship"" and other requirements for VAWA self-petitioners. The act also eliminates the disparate treatment of self-petitioners who, under prior law, had to meet certain requirements not applied to regular family immigrant visa applicants. Most significantly, self-petitioners no longer need to show that their deportation would cause ""extreme hardship."" This eliminates an enormous evidentiary hurdle from the self-petition procedure. The law also allows abused spouses and children ofU.S. employees and military personnel living abroad to self-petition. Under the new law, if the U.S. citizen or LPR parent or spouse subsequently loses that status for reasons related to their abusive conduct, the loss does not affect the abused immigrant's eligibility to immigrate if they petition within two years. Moreover, abused immigrants with approved self-petitions may remany without causing the petition to be revoked. Good moral character. Self-petitioners under the new law still must show that they have ""good moral character."" However, the new law partially exempts them from the bar on establishing good moral character outlined in INA section 101(f). Under that provision, immigrants cannot establish good moral character if they have committed or been convicted of certain criminal acts. The new law removes the bar if the act constitutes a ground of admissibility or deportability that is waivable, and the act was connected to the abuse the applicant suffered. This rule also applies to applicants for VAWA suspension or cancellation. Children who ""age out."" Under the act, children who have filed a self-petition or are derivative beneficiaries of a parent's petition no longer ""age out,"" or become subject to normal family visa rules, when they become 21 years old. Instead, they are treated as self-petitioners under the appropriate category (as unmarried sons or daughters of U.S. citizens or LPRs, or married sons or daughters of citizens), with the parent's priority date. faci/CP13ocunsents%20and%20ScItingsarialiDeskloit/E onlerloeshAlailifirodtty_Edwants009065'IcMaitCotitatt.htm (2 of 4)(I (/4202010:10.01 PM) 10587 EFTA01099815 Brallcy_Edwouls009065MMaileomenathn Relaxed continuous physical presence requirement. The act allows applicants for VAWA cancellation of removal to show that they have three years' continuous physical presence in the U.S., despite a single absence longer than 90 days or cumulative absences exceeding 180 days, if there is a connection between the absence and the abuse perpetrated against the applicant. The act also eliminates application of the ""stop-time rule"" (under which service of a Notice to Appear stops the accrual of continuous physical presence) in VAWA cancellation and suspension cases. And it requires the attorney general to parole the children or parents of individuals who are granted VAWA suspension or cancellation. Motions to reopen. The act allows individuals who become eligible for VAWA suspension or cancellation because of the changes made by the new law to move to reopen their proceedings. It also amends the INA's time limitations on motions to reopen, allowing individuals to file a motion to reopen to apply for VAWA cancellation within one year of the entry of a final order. The attorney general may also waive the one-year limitation in cases of extraordinary circumstances or extreme hardship to a child. New waivers of grounds of inadmissibility and deportability. The act establishes waivers of certain grounds of inadmissibility for abused immigrants. There is a waiver of the ground of inadmissibility for reentering the U.S. without inspection following a one-year period of unlawful presence or after having been ordered removed. This waiver is available to individuals who can establish a connection between the abuse they suffered and their departure or reentry. There is also a waiver of the ground of deportability for having a conviction for a crime of domestic violence or for violation of a protective order, if the abused immigrant can show that she was not the primary perpetrator of violence in the relationship. She must also show that she was acting in self- defense or that the crime did not result in serious bodily injury and was connected to the abuse that the immigrant suffered. The act makes available to abused immigrants the INA's waivers for certain criminal grounds (§ 212(h)), fraud or misrepresentation (§ 212(i)), and health grounds (§ 212(g)). Expanding the availability of these waivers was considered necessary because they had been limited to spouses of U.S. citizens or LPRs. Abused immigrants may no longer have such a relationship. Public charge. The act amends the public charge ground of exclusion to provide that cash or other benefits received pursuant to 8 U.S.C. section 1641(c) (which permits VAWA beneficiaries to obtain cash and other government assistance in connection with their escape from domestic violence) may not be considered in public charge determinations. Changes to Cuban Adjustment Act, NACARA, and HRIFA. The act also amends the Cuban Adjustment Act, the adjustment of status provisions of the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act (NACARA), and the Haitian Refugee Immigration Fairness Act (HRIFA). These amendments allow abused spouses or children who are dependents of individuals eligible for relief under these laws to adjust their status, without having to reside with the principal or maintain the relationship. Under the act, persons who become LPRs through VAWA may also apply for naturalization after they have resided in the U.S. in LPR status for three years. lacifig/t)ocumems1420ant420SetiingsatialAksktop/E...onleDoSeMail/Brailley_Edwards009045^eMaileonteni Wm (3 ON) tI I/6/20I0 la01 PM) 10588 EFTA01099816 Bialley_Edwattis0090651:1,4011Conienikim Sep 24, 2009 08:34:02 PM, i wrote: Long day. I will call you tomorrow. Client went though hell today. Original Message From Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 10:39 AM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Not a mention of the name after a 2 1/2 hour interview Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile file:///CVDocuments%2Ound%20Seitingilfrial/Daloopit..onkOodeMoil/Bradley_E4wanIs009065^0440Converthtm (4 of 4) [11/6/2010 10:10:01 PMJ 10589 EFTA01099817 Bmdley_Edwards0170324tMailConiont Mai From: Michele Dargan Sent: Jul 29, 2009 13:47:51 To: Bradley J. Edwards Cc: Bee: Subject: Re: Epstein Brad, We have no way of getting the members or the banned members lists. However, I spoke to Donald Trump today — nothing like getting it from the horse's mouth! Anyway, he said Epstein is not a member and would not confirm or deny that he ever was a member. He would not comment at all (which is very rare for him) on whether or not Epstein got booted from the club or if he had recruited girls from Mar-A-Lago. Sorry I couldn't be more help. I really thought that he would say something. He usually does comment for all of our stories. That's why this was quite unusual. If you get any info, please pass it on....like if any info comes out during depos of anything related to Epstein getting booted from the club or about him recruiting girls from there. You know I will run with it! Michele On 7/28/09 9:28 AM, ""Bradley J. Edwards"" wrote: Hi Michele, I was wondering if you were able to get a members list at the Maralago, and even more importantly if you were able to get a list of banned members from the Maralago? Rumor has it that he was banned for having sex with and attempting to have sex with minors at the club, and we already know of certain minors that he took from the club to his house. I will take a deposition of someone there if we need to do that to get the true information on this, but there are so many depositions to take in this case (and we are setting them right now around the country) that I would like to avoid this one if we could get the info another way. Thanks Bradley J. Edwards Partner file:///q/DocumatS420ond14201ituingstfrial/Desklope..on/cDoceeMaiVEPodlcy_Edwards0170320tMoilConlont.lum (I of 2)01/612010 10:10:54 PM) 11075 EFTA01099818 Itrodlcy_Edwords017032^4MnilConlenthtm Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre Michele Dargan, staff writer liltMCl/Docunicnts%200nd%205ellinoiltrial/Desklop(0..onknonteMailillrndley_EdwardsOI7032"eMoilConient him (2 or 2)111/62010 10:10.54 PM! 11076 EFTA01099819 Brodky_041wards017120^041:01Conienthim From: Michele Dargan Sent: Jul 31, 2009 11:20:03 To: Bradley J. Edwards Cc: Bcc: Subject: Re: Epstein Brad, I didn't get your e-mail until I got in this morning (Friday) so it was too late....you did mean it took place this morning, right? Anything interesting? On 7/30/09 6:06 PM, ""Bradley J. Edwards"" wrote: Michele, I forgot to tell you that I have a hearing in= courtroom (11B I think) at 8:30 on our motion to add punitive damages. Should be some interesting things said for you. Things that have not been said before. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law From: Michele Dargan [mailtt, ' ' Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 1:48 PM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: Epstein Brad, We have no way of getting the members or the banned members lists. IlielliCynocument4$3204nd1/4 20.SalingsfirialinclJdop/E ..04/c0otsichfail/Bradley_Edwards017125P`cMailConleni hum (1 of 3)111/62010 10110:54 PMl 11080 EFTA01099820 Boolley_EtIvrads017129^eMaileonieio him However, I spoke to Donald Trump today — nothing like getting it from the horse's mouth! Anyway, he said Epstein is not a member and would not confirm or deny that he ever was a member. He would not comment at all (which is very rare for him) on whether or not Epstein got booted from the club or if he had recruited girls from Mar-A-Lago. Sorry I couldn't be more help. I really thought that he would say something. He usually does comment for all of our storics. That's why this was quite unusual. If you get any info, please pass it on....like if any info comes out during depos of anything related to Epstein getting booted from the club or about him recruiting girls from there. You know I will run with it! Michele On 7/28/09 9:28 AM, ""Bradley J. Edwards"" wrote: Hi Michele, 1 was wondering if you were able to get a members list at the Maralago, and even more importantly if you were able to get a list of banned members from the Maralago? Rumor has it that he was banned for having sex with and attempting to have sex with minors at the club, and we already know of certain minors that he took from the club to his house. I will take a deposition of someone there if we need to do that to get the true information on this, but there are so many depositions to take in this case (and we are setting them right now around the country) that I would like to avoid this one if we could get the info another way. Thanks Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre lik:///Cy(bcuments%7Oend%2OSettinyfhul/Dcddlopla...on%DocVeMeiOaradley_Edwsrds01712rvMnilContw.lum (2 of 3) ti I/62010 10:10:54 ?Ml 11081 EFTA01099821 linimicy_Edvrards017129^cMolleontentlum Michele Dargan, staff writer sob fIc:///CVDocum461O420and%206411ingsffriaVDesktoplE...on/nDoct/eMail/0mdleyEthnr4:0171294eMailConienthlin (3 or 3) [I 1/6/201010:10:54 PM) 11082 EFTA01099822 ilimlictEdwards020726(almiComent him Front: Bradley J. Edwards Sent: Jul 30, 2009 14:36:23 To: Michele Dargan Cc: Bcc: Subject: RE: Epstein Thank you. We have our answer then. All the pieces are public record - Complaint filed by Josephsberg regarding Epstein being at the club with Ghislaine Maxwell and taking a 15 year old home with him, a newspaper article that indicated he was banned for similar conduct (don't remember who published it but I read it a few months back), and a no comment from Trump. He's banned. Don't worry, we will get the official word. We are setting many depositions soon and certain people that will be set will know that information. I will keep you informed. Good work. I'll be in touch. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre From: Michele Dargan [mailto Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 1:48 PM To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: Epstein Brad, filel/K/Documeriisfir20mwriC2OSMIMgilfriel/Dakiop/E...ciikDocsiehiniM3radley_ridivards020726NMmIConierit.hicti (I or 3) [11/6/7010 PMI 11320 EFTA01099823 13radleyEdwards020726"cMaulConient.him We have no way of getting the members or the banned members lists. However, I spoke to Donald Trump today - nothing like getting it from the horse's mouth! Anyway, he said Epstein is not a member and would not confirm or deny that he ever was a member. He would not comment at all (which is very rare for him) on whether or not Epstein got booted from the club or if he had recntited girls from Mar-A-Lago. Sony I couldn't be more help. I really thought that he would say something. He usually does comment for all of our stories. That's why this was quite unusual. If you get any info, please pass it on....like if any info comes out during depos of anything related to Epstein getting booted from the club or about hint recruiting girls from there. You know I will run with it! Michele On 7/28/09 9:28 AM, ""Bradley J. Edwards"" wrote: Hi Michele, I was wondering if you were able to get a members list at the Maralago, and even more importantly if you were able to get a list of banned members front the Maralago? Rumor has it that he was banned for having sex with and attempting to have sex with minors at the club, and we already know of certain minors that he took front the club to his house. I will take a deposition of someone there if we need to do that to get the true information on this, but there are so many depositions to take in this case (and we are setting them right now around the country) that I would like to avoid this one if we could get the info another way. Thanks Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre liled//CVDocuments%20and%20Sotlingsrnial/Dosktop/E...00knoceleMailinradley_Edwords020,26"eMoilConient him (2 of 3)01/62010 10.11:30 PMJ 11321 EFTA01099824 u.i$C120726^eMoilCoolcalom Michele Dargan, staff writer Palm Beach Daily News lilt ///q(Documents%20ood%20Stllingstfrial/Ot lop& .onkDocs/c Mailitiradley_Edwards020726^eMoileomeni loot (3 of 3) I 116/2010 I 0 I 1.30 PM) 11322 EFTA01099825 U.-:2.yEdwards0207328eMoileonteithim From: Bradley J. Edwards Scut: Jul 30, 2009 18:06:49 To: Michele Dargan Cc: Bee: Subject: RE: Epstein Michele, I forgot to tell you that I have a hearing in courtroom (11B I think) at 8:30 on our motion to add punitive damages. Should be some interesting things said for you. Things that have not been said before. Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler! Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre Prom: Michele Dargan [mailto Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 20011. To: Bradley J. Edwards Subject: Re: Epstein Brad, We have no way of getting the members or the banned members lists. However, I spoke to Donald Trump today - nothing like getting it from the horse's mouth! rile:///q/Docoments9420end5420Siolingsfrrial/DcskiopE, • on/cDocskMaiUBrodley_EsivninJoI320732AeMoilConleatlilm (1 or 3)111/6/2010 10:11:30 PM) 11323 EFTA01099826 Lindky_Edwards020732^thiellConlothlei Anyway, he said Epstein is not a member and would not confirm or deny that he ever was a member. He would not comment at all (which is very rare for him) on whether or not Epstein got booted from the club or if he had recruited girls from Mar-A-forgo. Sony I couldn't be more help. I really thought that he would say something. He usually does comment for all of our stories. That's why this was quite unusual. If you get any info, please pass it on....like if any info conies out during depos of anything related to Epstein getting booted from the club or about him recruiting girls from there. You know I will run with it! Michele On 7/28/09 9:28 AM, ""Bradley J. Edwards"" wrote: Hi Michele, I was wondering if you were able to get a members list at the Maralago, and even more importantly if you were able to get a list of banned members from the Maralago? Rumor has it that he was banned for having sex with and attempting to have sex with minors at the club, and we already know of certain minors that he took from the club to his house. I will take a deposition of someone there if we need to do that to get the true information on this, but there are so many depositions to take in this case (and we are setting them right now around the country) that I would like to avoid this one if we could get the info another way. Thanks Bradley J. Edwards Partner Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law Las Olas City Centre Michele Dugan, staff writer Ale MCVDoeumeats%200e"XlSellingsariel/DesktopfE...e(VeDocilelshiliBrodley_Edwards02073reMailConlene hen (2 or 3) (11/6/2010 10:1110 PM) 11324 EFTA01099827 Lea..livfAiwaids020732".:MasContag ItUn lm Beach Dail News 3)(I116/Z310 10,11:30 PM) 0Settingilirial/DeskiopiE...onkDocaeMail/EttudleyEdwards020732"ctelailContcnthim (1of lile ///q/Documenu%20ond%2 11325 EFTA01099828