From: The Modem World Global History since 1760 Course Team
To: jeeproject@yahoo.com
Subject: Starting Week 11
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 03:26:09 +0000
Dear jeffrey epstein,
Many of you are still working through Week 10 and earlier, but for those who are ready we offer Week Il,
covering the period between 1940 and 1950.
No week in the course covers less time than this one. No week in the course has more material for you to cover.
But I think all of you will understand why.
From a world historical point of view, the week begins with extension of the regional wars into a total, global
war and then continues with the aftermath of that war. I spend two long presentations on the vital questions of
why the war became global, and the strategies chosen by the principal warring powers. I do not spend much time
recounting the individual campaigns or battles, although I have done that in other courses. Here the emphasis, as
usual, is on the biggest 'why' questions. I do allude, though not in much detail, to the significance of
unglamorous but vital choices and institutions about technology, production, and management. For those
interested in learning more about the dry essence of "history from the middle," it is hard to better the recent
synthesis by the historian Paul Kennedy on "Engineers of Victory."
The week extends to early 1950 as I tend to see the division of Europe immediately after the war, and the
continued civil warfare in much of Asia, as substantially inevitable byproducts of this global war — part of its
aftermath. Although with hindsight we see the emergence of the so-called "cold war" after World War II (George
Orwell may have been the first to circulate the expression, in his 1945 essay on "You and the Atom Bomb"), this
was the renewal under new circumstances of a familiar conflict, one that had already been dividing world
opinion since 1919.
Although I regard a division of Europe and continued conflict in Asia as inevitable products of the global war, I
do not regard the postwar choices as also being inevitable. Among the more consequential of those, surprising to
many at the time, may have been the choices made by the United States of America in its intense engagement
with the fate of Western Europe and comparative disengagement with the fate of China and much of East Asia,
except for Japan. The future of Western Europe was very much uncertain to those experiencing it at the time.
And as you will see, following the views of historians of this war like Odd Arne Westad, I also do not regard the
outcome of the Chinese civil war as inevitable. The American government's judgments, for example, were highly
attuned to its assessments of available leadership and opportunities in Western Europe and in places like China.
This course emphasizes the year 1950 as a breakpoint because of the way the Korean War would change the
character of the 'cold war' into intense, mobilized preparations for World War III, with spillover effects of every
kind in every part of the world. We stop this week before coming to that new precipice.
For this week, Week 11 of the course, the focus is on global war and its aftermath. Although the presentations
spend little time in the mud and terrors of combat and massacres, they do reflect on the extent to which Henry
Adams' earlier nightmarish visions, mentioned in Week 7, were becoming real. They notice how recently devised
powers of destruction reached and exceeded the known limits of whatever qualities we associate with the term
"humanity."
Best wishes,
Philip Zelikow
EFTA01144229
The Modem World: Global History since 1760 Course Team
Go To Class
You are mteiving this email becausejeeproject@yahoo.com is enrolled in The Modem World: Global !Jimmy since 1760. To stop receiving similar future emails from this class.
please click here. Please do not reply directly to this email. If you have any questions or feedback, please post on the class discussion forums. For general questions. please visit ow
supoon site.
EFTA01144230