EFTA01784411

From: David Sauvage < Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 3:57 PM To: Jeffrey E. Subject: Re: I don't mind anything you're saying - l=am definitely not a scientist, don't claim to be, and don't know much about=experiments and design. I feel like it'd be good to talk it out? I s=y what I can do, and somebody who knows science tells me how we can test th=t, until we arrive at a solution that works both ways? Sent fr=m my mobile device On Aug 16, 2016, at 11:44 AM, jeffrey E. &=t;jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com> wr=te: I like you= I am trying to be kind, that is not science. . if y=u make people feel better and no one is injured , all the best to you. = how about being blindfolded and guessing their nam=. the outcome must be verifiable, not you are shy ,=sometimes. angry other times . the trick of mentalists th=t do much better than that. they could take a strength finder t=st, and then you could take it with empathy for them, the=e are 100 questions see if you got the more than 80 percent rig=t. On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 9:24 AM, David Sauvage < <nlailtc » wrote: Jeffrey, Just an additional thought. A vi=ion, actually-- What if I did readings blindfolded? So I held=someone's hand and felt into them. With such limited visual/tactile informa=ion, it would be a real test of my empathic abilities. It would almost vali=ate "the sixth sense." Then maybe we could compare=my ability to read people with an average person's ability to read people?&=bsp; Just brainstorming here... Very best, David =div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 9:28 AM, David Sauvage > wrote: I would love to do that. Definitely has highe= probability of success. EFTA_R1_00105725 EFTA01784411 Sent from my mobile device On Aug 15, 2016, at 8:52 AM, jeffrey E. leevacation@gmail.com<=a» wrote: = greatly appreciatei the honesty, I dont think will work w=th pictures. but might work face to face. if it will work at all.&nbs=; if so I would try 10 women, and ten names. =. you willl need to touch each one. . On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 10:=2 PM, David Sauvage <mailto > wrote: Hi Jeffrey and Gino, Earlier today, I sat down with 15 pictures and 15 names and trie= to match them. It turned out to be quite a struggle -- primarily because p=ople were very similar. For instance, I'd have descriptions like this: Shy but relatively happy on the outside Fille= with frustration and anxiety Burning with rage deep down But out of the 15 people, that could vaguely describe 3 or=4 them. So my matching ending up looking like a convoluted chart. What I concluded was that I need a bit more help desig=ing this experiment. Ideally, rather than matching 15 names to pictures, I h=ve a bunch of binary decisions (A or B). One would expect me to get 50% rig=t. IF the people are emotionally different enough (happy v. sad, for instan=e) I hypothesize I will do considerably better than chance. Does that make s=nse? I have started to go down this road with my f=iend at NYU. Happy to discuss with Gino as well. =div>And of course, happy to submit to MRI machines and the like to figure w=at's happening on that end. Open to any and all th=ughts. Science, clearly, is not my gift. Very best= David On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 1:49 PM, David Sauvage & > wrote: cmailt° This weekend, when I have space and time, I'll ask a frie=d to lay out some pictures and names and see how I do. And I'll report back=what I learn. 2 EFTA_R1_00105726 EFTA01784412 I've been thinking about this for a while -- and I d= feel we ultimately need a more rigorous experiment. But I like your idea, a= least to start, of just giving it a good and seeing. Great meeting you.=/div> David Sent from my mobile devic= On Aug 7, 2016, at 6:22 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com da=id, if you can do the name to photo test. in a 25 p=cture test. it could be an interesting begining, &nb=p; , I suggst you take twenty women all availbel on googl= or facebook and try. , =nbsp; please note The information contained=in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged= may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use o= the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosur= or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohib=ted and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in e=ror, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com<=a>, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including a=I attachments. copyright -all rights reserved p=ease note The information contained in this communication is con=idential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside infor=ation, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the prop=rty of 3 EFTA_R1_00105727 EFTA01784413 JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communisation or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If=you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediat=ly by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.=om> and destroy this commun=cation and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all=rights reserved = please note The information contained in t=is communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may=br>constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of th= addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or=copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited=br>and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error= please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, a=d destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all at=achments. copyright -all rights reserved 4 EFTA_R1_00105728 EFTA01784414