From: Jeevacation <jeevacation@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 6:22 PM
To: Marc Hauser
Subject: Re: a few things
Phone fri
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 14, 2010, at 2:14 PM, Marc Hauser c: a. > wrote:
hmmm...interesting. can you say more?
-marc
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Jeevacation «mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com> jeevacation@gmail.com
<mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com» wrote:
I went to Cambridge Sunday,just stay quiet
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 14, 2010, at 1:01 PM, Marc Hauser «mailto:
<mailto > wrote:
jeffrey
i spoke with david baltimore's attorney, who has handled other cases like mine, and is involved
in one now. he had a very different take: i should go straight to ORI (feds), give them a 2-3 page summary of why my
case is not misconduct, and work with them to show them that harvard provided the wrong analysis, and there were
dreadful procedural mistakes, including confidentiality breaches, failure to provide evidence in time, etc. He was much
more proactive. Dersh and Schneider are very defensive and reactive. He said that ORI hates harvard, and is aware of
procedural problems. In any case, i sent him some materials to review. such different opinions, and hard to know what
to do. also, major start up costs with a new lawyer, though schneider will talk with him. what do your instincts say?
any thoughts on the negotiation issue with harvard, retirement, etc?
-marc
--- Marc
EFTA_R1_00140111
EFTA01800496
--- Marc
2
EFTA_R1_00140112
EFTA01800497