From: jeffrey epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2011 1:20 AM
To: Warwick Wicksman
Subject: Re: LS1 design sketches
On plane
Sorry for all the typos=.Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 21, 2011, at 6:23 PM, Warwick Wic=sman <
<mailto: > wrote:
=div>
We need to review that. =Perhaps after between the entry gallery and the living room. See attached.<=:p>
&n=sp; &n=sp; =nbsp;
Warwick Wicksman, AIA
Principal
310.449.5790
=nbsp; &nbs=; &n=sp;
Gensler
2500 Broadway
Suite 300
Santa Monica, California 90404
USA
<http://www.gensler.=omi> http://www.Gensler.com=/o:p>
Click here to view Gensler's 2=10 Annual Report.
<http://www.gensler.=om/uploads/documents/AR_2010_10_22_2010.pdf>
From: jeffrey eps=ein [mailtojeevacation@gmail.comj
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 3:16 PM
To: Warwick Wicksman
Subject: Re: LSJ design sketches
You could lower pool 2 ft bit if we lower living belo= 59 . How and where do we make the transition ?
Sorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone
EFTA_R1_00143974
EFTA01802247
On Jan 21, 2011, at 6:10 PM, Warwick Wicksman «mailt
<mailt > wro e:
Ok. We can raise the ceiling height in=the living room. A couple of questions:
=span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:black">. &=bsp; How low can we drop the
floor elevation of th= living room below +59'?
=span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:black">. &=bsp; Do you have a preferred
elevation from what w= sent?
=span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:black">• &=bsp; We can't lower the pool
ceiling heigh= too much and fit in the mezzanine access, but we could lower the whole thi=g.
Please send us comments on this, and we can u=date the layout to reflect it.
Thanks,
Warwick
= &=bsp; &nb=p;
Warwick Wicksman, AIA
Principal
=nbsp; Sinbs=, &nrsp;
Gensler
2500 Broadway
Suite 300
Santa Monica, California 90404
USA
<http://www.Gensler.com>
t 5:39 PM Warwick Wicksman «
<mailto > wrote:
Jeffrey,
Attached please find some sketches based on w=at you and Tom reviewed at the Island last
week.
Plans ("65 main level", 40=80.G5 lower level", and "G5 mezzanine level", 40=804065 roof"):
Please confirm if we are approved to proceed=with this building layout. We need to get the
main building going ASAP , and want to release the structural engineer and pool engineer t= move ahead. Tom is still
studying the stairs and the exterior elevat=ons; that can continue to develop. But we need to know if the main
40=804,boxes" are set.
2
EFTA_R1_00143975
EFTA01802248
Exterior Elevations ("elevation s=udy A..." and "elevation study b..."):<=span>
These sketches are based on what was discuss=d last week.
="A" includes sloped-roof and f=at-roof version that matches the design of the existing
buildings.
* ="B" includes a flat-roof miss=on-style concept for the living room, with the two options
for the entry bu=lding (one mission, one matching existing).
" =Our initial preference is leaning towards the=sloped-roof version of A, but we want to
each scheme with you in more detai=.
Sections:
These show the basic heights, based on the s=oped-roof version of elevation "A".
Please review and comment, and let us know i= the floor plans are approved!
Thanks,
Warwick
= &=bsp; &nb=p;
Warwick Wicksman, AIA
Principal
=nbsp; &nbs=; &n=sp;
Gensler
2500 Broadway
Suite 300
Santa Monica, California 90404
USA
http://www.Gensler.co= <http://www.gensler.com/>
Click here to view Gensler's 2010 Annual Report.
<http://www.gensler.com/uploads/documents/AR_2010_10_22_20=0.pdf>
<Elevation Study A 1.21-11.PDF>
<Elevation Study B 1-21-11.PDF>
3
EFTA_R1_00143976
EFTA01802249
<Option 65 -lower plan.pdf>
<Option 65 -mezzanine level.pdf>
<Option 65 main level.pdf>
<Option 65 -roof plan.pdf>
<Option 65 -Section A and B.PDF>
<Option 65 main level.p=f>
4
EFTA_R1_00143977
EFTA01802250