To: Melanie Spinella[
From: Jeffrey Epstein
Sent Tue 9/24/2013 2:58:38 PM
Subject: Re: Petition for Advisory Opinion
we will have to discuss tomorrw , leon can hear their arguments and choose. it is
s000000000000 silly
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Melanie Spinella wrote:
Jeffrey —he is in back to back meetings most of the day — I will give him the message.
From: Jeffrey Epstein [mailto:jeevacationOgmailS0ffil
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 10:41 AM
To: Melanie Spinella
Subject: Fwd: Petition for Advisory Opinion
please call me
Forwarded message
From: Alan S Halperin
Date: Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:40 AM
Subject: Re: Pet* • on
To: Ada Clapp Jeffre Epstein <cevacation
Sorry guys. I thought we were done. I am out of the office for much of the day. I will give final
review tonight.
IRS Circular 230 disclosure:
To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S.
federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended
or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the
Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any
transaction or matter addressed herein.
EFTA_R1_00428882
EFTA01956151
From: "Ada Clapp"
Sent: 09/24/2013 101IIII IMI
To: "Jeffrey Epstein" <jeevacation@gmail.com>; Alan Halperin
Cc: "Eileen Alexanderson" e Jessica Soojian
Subject: Re: Petition for Advisory Opinion
Jeffrey,
I revised the draft Petition to include the language you asked for--all noted in bold black font
and enclosed in brackets, namely: (i) language referencing the trust's grantor trust status for
Federal income tax purposes, (ii) a statement that sales tax was paid upon initial purchase of
the TPP and (iii) references to the Substitution Power constituting a non-fiduciary
administrative power.
As you know, Alan and I would prefer not to include the foregoing references. References (i)
and (iii) do not add to the lack of consideration argument and may inadvertently trigger a
second look at the Rothstein case and the State's willingness to follow Rev. Rule 85-13 instead
of Rothstein (which is still good Federal law for NY State tax purposes). If that happens, it
could mean that transactions between a grantor and his grantor trust would constitute sales for
New York State income tax purposes. Needless to say, that would be a disastrous result.
Even if this is a very remote scenario, there is no reason to wave a red flag (even a tiny one)
in front of a very big bull if we gain nothing from it. I would therefore exclude references to
the IRC and the grantor trust provisions.
The reason for excluding reference (ii) is noted below.
The bracketed and bold language in Red is language I included to address the use tax issue but
which I believe Alan was not completely comfortable with. Alan--have you thought more
about this?
EFTA_R1_00420863
EFTA01956152
Please let me know if you need any further revisions.
Best regards,
Ada Clapp
Black Family Partners
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure:
Pursuant to IRS regulations, I inform you that any tax advice contained in this
communication (including attachments) is not intended or written to be
used, and cannot be used by any person or entity for the purpose of (i)
avoiding tax related penalties imposed by any governmental tax authority,
or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any
transaction or matter discussed herein. I advise you to consult with an
independent tax advisor on your particular tax circumstances.
This communication, and any attachment, is for the intended recipient(s) only
and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or
proprietary If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that further dissemination of this communication and its attachments is
prohibited. Please delete all copies of this communication and its
attachments and notify me immediately that you have received them in
error.
EFTA_R1_00426864
EFTA01956153
On Sep 24, 2013, at 9:36 AM, Ada Clapp <ada.clapp@smail.com> wrote:
Good morning Jeffrey,
I addressed your two points in my email yesterday. Perhaps you missed it (or I missed your
response). I will reiterate below:
I do not think we should mention that sales tax was paid by the grantor for the
reasons we discussed relating to our not applying for the opinion in the first place.
I don't think we want that to be a determinative factor in the ruling. I worry that it
opens the door for a fishing expedition if NY ever looks into such a reacquisition.
If still want it included in the Petition and it does become a determinative factor
to issuing the opinion, it means that a grantor will only be able to substitute art for
which he or she can prove sales tax was paid. I would rather not have that
limitation. Alan agrees with this view Do you want this included nonetheless?
Regarding the administrative powers language, the Petition quotes the entire trust
language which states that the grantor is exercising the power in a non-fiduciary
capacity. I don't see what traction is gained by simply repeating this as part of
the argument for a favorable opinion. What is your reasoning for why this bolster
the lack of consideration argument? Please explain so I know what argument you
are trying to make and can include it in the Petition.
Thanks.
Ada Clapp
1 Partners
Black Famil
EFTA_R1_00428805
EFTA01956154
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure:
Pursuant to IRS regulations, I inform you that any tax advice contained in this
communication (including attachments) is not intended or written to be
used, and cannot be used by any person or entity for the purpose of (i)
avoiding tax related penalties imposed by any governmental tax authority,
or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any
transaction or matter discussed herein. I advise you to consult with an
independent tax advisor on your particular tax circumstances.
This communication, and any attachment, is for the intended recipient(s) only
and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or
proprietary If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that further dissemination of this communication and its attachments is
prohibited. Please delete all copies of this communication and its
attachments and notify me immediately that you have received them in
error.
On Sep 24, 2013, at 9:27 AM, Jeffrey Epstein <jecvacationfa uniail.com> wrote:
you did not include the fact that sales tax has been paid, already on the ites, and that he is
actingin a non fireualrty capacity please re do
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:
this didn't incoudc the last changes non fidiciary , sales tax already paid.etc
EFTA_R1_00426866
EFTA01956155
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Ada Clapp wrote:
Jeffrey,
The form is set up so that you cannot save it as a document in editable format. Whomever is
representing your client and submitting the Petition on his, her or its behalf will either need to
(i) print out the form and type in the information (using an Attachment), or (ii) type most of
the information into the form online and save it as a PDF document (the form is not flexible
enough to include the lengthly response to item 4, so your representative will need to use an
Attachment). The PDF document can be printed and submitted with the Attachment.
I have attached what your client's representative may wish to use as responses to items 1-4.
Item 5 addresses additional redacting you may wish for your client if you include any
information other than what is on the attached draft Petition.
Item 6 relates to reserving your client's right to participate in New York's Voluntary Disclosure
and Compliance program with respect to the subject of the advisory opinion. As you may
know, this program is designed to encourage taxpayers to come forward and declare unpaid
taxes in exchange for NY not imposing penalties or bringing criminal charges. I do not know
if there is any downside to reserving the ability to participate in the VDC program-- but it
would only apply to sales and use tax relating to your client's having substituted tangible
personal property into a grantor trust in exchange for other property. If your client has not
done this, perhaps it makes no sense to reserve this right. I am not sure if it "looks suspicious"
to check this box. Perhaps Alan has a better feel for this?
Your representative will also need to fill out page 3 of the Petition which is the Power of
Attorney and make the required declaration.
EFTA_R1_00428867
EFTA01956156
Ada Clapp
Black Family Partners
Uo Apollo Management
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure:
Pursuant to IRS regulations, I inform you that any tax advice contained in this
communication (including attachments) is not intended or written to be
used, and cannot be used by any person or entity for the purpose of (i)
avoiding tax related penalties imposed by any governmental tax authority,
or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any
transaction or matter discussed herein. I advise you to consult with an
independent tax advisor on your particular tax circumstances.
This communication, and any attachment, is for the intended recipient(s) only
and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or
proprietary If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that further dissemination of this communication and its attachments is
prohibited. Please delete all copies of this communication and its
attachments and notify me immediately that you have received them in
error.
On Sep 23, 2013, at 6:53 AM, Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacat uniail.com> wrote:
EFTA_R1_00426868
EFTA01956157
please fill out the advisory oinion form. I suggest using the concept that the setllor is excercising
administravitce powers
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return c-mail or by c-mail to jecvaeation@gmail cam, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by c-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments copyright -all rights reserved
***********************************************************
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
EFTA_R1_00426869
EFTA01956158
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jecvacation@gmail.com and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to ic_c‘ acationegmail,com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and intended solely for the person or entity to whom they are
addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or
other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this
information by persons or entities other than the intended
recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email in
error please contact the sender and delete the material from
any computer.
Apollo Global Management, LLC
EFTA_R1_00426870
EFTA01956159
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@smail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA_R1_00426871
EFTA01956160