To:
From: . T ax
Sent: Sat 1/1/4501 5:00:00 AM
Subject: Re:
<html>
Ew- matchmaker definitely, social not. It implies that it is only one type of
person and simply does not acknowledge the rich and textured panacea of those
whom who are beginning and shall continue to er converse with. <br>
Last night was a classic. I told you that I was best man - well it was
hysterical. I stood by the groom went to the urinal w/him - stood and peed - told
him the helicopter was waiting if he changed his mind and gave the rings at the
ceremony as I stood by his side in my pinstripe suit. The officiating minister or
whom ever it was got so confused - he kept referring to the best man and then
having to correct himself and then blushing it was a hoot<br>
<br>
Gx<br>
<br>
<br>
At 10:01 AM 4/21/2002 -0400, you wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite>By the way, the social matchmaker part is
pretty right on... I would have told them that you are my pimp but that at the
same time ou are my lover </blockquote></html>
From Sun A r 21 13:07:13 2002
To: (WJC wjc)
From: "G. Max
Subject: Re:
Cc:
Bcc:
X-Attachments:
In-Reply-To: <16180476.1877716163@imcingular.com>
References: <27e>
Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.2.20020421130624.00b02db8@mail.mindspring.com>
X-Eudora-Signature: <Standard>
EFTA_R1_01280142
EFTA02333508