From: jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 1, 2015 4:51 PM
To: Jeremy Rubin
Subject: Re: New Yorker article on insider trading:
very good, we have to be careful that the info is no= stolen info. , ie belongs to the co. etc. o=herwise patents etc
could be traded .
=br>
On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Jeremy Rubi= > wrote:
http:/=www.newyorker.com/business/currency/making-insider-trading-legal
<http://www.newyorker.c=m/business/currency/making-insider-trading-legal>
Of course you're probably much more up to date on such pieces than my=elf, but this seems like an interesting
kernel to framework a cryptosystem=around. If the item being passed is informations which you always forward
=hrough at least a few other people before unlocking the information, and t=en are able to use that information to trade
well (eg, with some probabili=y p of having success based on quality of information), it operates as a p=obabilistic
payment system where you can exchange out of the system by tra=ing stocks in traditional systems (so you "get" a
payment some p=percent of the time).
Thoughts?
adiv>
please =ote
The information contained in this communication is confiden=ial, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute
inside informati=n, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the propert= of JEE Unauthorized use,
disclosure or copying of this communica=ion or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If =ou have
received this communication in error, please notify us immediat=ly by return e-mail or by e-mail to
jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail=com> , and destroy this comm=nication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -=11 rights reserved
EFTA_R1_01597729
EFTA02481342