From: Kathy Ruemmler
Sent: Saturday, September 5, 2015 9:11 PM
To: Jeffrey E.
Subject: Re:
This was always what Rahm advised too.= I think there may be some Latham restrictions because of conflicts, e=c.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 5, 2015, at 5:09 P=, Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail=com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com» wrote:
female competent board members are few and far , it would b= a great learing exp
On Sat, Se 5, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Kathy Ruemmler impppeamigia
> wrote:
Meant t= mention that you don't get any credit on the "token" scale for being a sin=le woman. Being a
woman, yes, but not being a single woman. I t=ink you get token demerits for that.
Sent from my iPhone
&nbs=; please note
The information contained in this communication=is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute in=ide information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It i= the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of thisar>communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be un=awful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify u= immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacat=on@gmail.com> , and
destroy t=is communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copy=ight -all rights reserved
EFTA_R1_01607643
EFTA02487855