EFTA01077101Set 9
61p12,214w
LEFKOWITZ
New York County Clerk's Index No. 30129/2010
Nein 'Nark $upnme Gantt
APPELLATE DIVISION-FIRST DEPARTMENT
she
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,
Respondent,
—against—
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN ... Defendant-Appellant.
BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
JAY P. LEFKOWITZ
SANDRA LYNN MUSUMECI
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
601 Lexington Avenue
New York, New York 10022
jay.lefkowitz@kirkland.corn
sandra.musumeci@kirkland.com
Attorneys for Defendant-Appellant
REPRODUCED ... Facts Cited Therein Were Disputed and No Further
Evidence Was Presented. 25
C. Determining Appellant To Be a Level 3 Offender Based on
Factors That Were Not Proven by Clear
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01077101.pdf
EFTA00181023Set 9
124p12,224w
LEPKOWITZ
New York County Clerk's Index No. 30129/2010
'.ex 'Dark Sul:mettle Tourt
APPELLATE DIVISION-FIRST DEPARTMENT
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OP NEW YORK,
Respondent,
—against—
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN ... Defendant-Appellant.
BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
JAY P. LEFKOWITZ
SANDRA LYNN MUSUMECI
rI
KnAND & ELLIS LLP
601 Lexington Avenue
New York, New York 10022
Attorneys for Defendant-Appellant
REPRODUCED ... Facts Cited Therein Were Disputed and No Further
Evidence Was Presented. 25
C. Determining Appellant To Be a Level 3 Offender Based on
Factors That Were Not Proven by Clear
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00181023.pdf
EFTA00603264Set 9
2010-08-1657p11,344w
Mark auprente Court
Appellate Elittisian, 'first £firpttrtutrut
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,
Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,
Defendant-Appellant.
On Appeal from
Case ... APPELLANT'S BRIEF
Jay P. Lefkowitz, P.C.
jay.lefkowitz@kirkland.com
Sandra Lynn Musumeci
sandra.musumeci@kirkland.com
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
601 Lexington Avenue
New York, New York 10022
Telephone: (212) 446-4800
Facsimile ... EFTA00603264
Counsel for Defendant-Appellant
Jeffrey E. Epstein
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
K&E 443684444182681124
EFTA00603265
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
K&E 4/46844441,8268112,11
EFTA00603266
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
Appellant Jeffrey
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00603264.pdf
EFTA00792343Set 9
57p11,385w
LEFKOWITZ
New York County Clerk's Index No. 30129/2010
e€u laurk Supreme Trani
APPELLATE DIVISION-FIRST DEPARTMENT
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,
Respondent,
—against—
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN ... Defendant-Appellant.
BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
JAY P. LE•FKOWITZ
SANDRA LYNN MUSUMECI
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
601 Lexington Avenue
New York, New York 10022
Attorneys for Defendant-Appellant
REPRODUCED ... Facts Cited Therein Were Disputed and No Further
Evidence Was Presented. 25
C. Determining Appellant To Be a Level 3 Offender Based on
Factors That Were Not Proven by Clear
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00792343.pdf
EFTA00792569Set 9
39p7,774w
LEFKOWITZ
New York County Clerk's Index No. 30129/2010
.ettr 'lark $upreme Court
APPELLATE DIVISION-FIRST DEPARTMENT
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,
Respondent,
—against—
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,
Defendant ... Appellant.
REPLY BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
JAY P. LEFKOWITZ
SANDRA LYNN Musumea
KIRKLAND & Eats LLP
601 Lexington Avenue
New York, New York 10022
(212)446-4800
Attorneys for Defendant-Appellant ... Governing Legal Standard, As Set Forth by SORA and Its
Guidelines, For Assessing Appellant's Risk Level Based on
Uncharged Allegations. 16
C. By Their Improper Attempt to Introduce
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00792569.pdf
EFTA01168858Set 9
39p7,780w
LEFKOWITZ
New York County Clerk's Index No. 30129/2010
'lark $upreme Court
APPELLATE DIVISION-FIRST DEPARTMENT
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,
Respondent,
—against—
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,
Defendant-Appellant ... REPLY BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
JAY P. LEFKOWITZ
SANDRA LYNN MUSUMECI
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
601 Lexington Avenue
New York, New York 10022
(212) 446-4800
jay.lefkowitz@kirkland.com
sandra.musumeci@kirkland.com
Attorneys for Defendant ... Appellant
REPRODUCED ON RECYCLED PAPER
COPY OF ORIGINAL
WITH PROOF OF SERVICE
EFTA01168858
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ato
INTRODUCTION 1
ARGUMENT 4
I. THE PEOPLE SHOULD BE ESTOPPED FROM REVERSING
THEIR
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01168858.pdf
EFTA01074989Set 9
2008-06-3043p8,195w
York Supreme Court
Appellate Division, First Department
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,
Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,
Defendant-Appellant.
On Appeal from
Case ... APPELLANT'S BRIEF
Jay P. Lefkowitz, P.C.
jay.lefkowitz@kirkland.com
Sandra Lynn Musumeci
sandra.musumeci®kirkland.com
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
601 Lexington Avenue
New York, New York 10022
Telephone:
Facsimile:
K&E 18368113.3
EFTA01074989 ... Counsel for Defendant-Appellant
Jeffrey E. Epstein
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
K&E 18368113.3
EFTA01074990
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
i
K&E 18368113.3
EFTA01074991
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
Appellant Jeffrey E. Epstein seeks
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01074989.pdf
EFTA00797972Set 9
2018-11-1510p5,667w
Weekly D 1792
registration statute, in violation of § 943.0435(14), Fla.
MEGALETO ANDREWS, Appellant, v. STATE OF
Stat. (2007). The trial court imposed an enhanced
FLORIDA, Appellee.
sentence ... apartment complex often to see his girlfriend
but did not live there. The appellate court found,
Post-conviction relief denied at Andrews v. State ... witnesses,
Outcome
harmless, lived, failure to report. non-violent, reside,
The judgment was affirmed.
appellate court, incarceration, requirements. Statutes,
violent, fail to register, career criminal, girlfriend,
apartment, temporary, asserts, truck
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00797972.pdf
EFTA01295845Set 10
2016-10-1252p21,251w
RESULTS:
Court Cases:
IN RE: JEFFREY J. PROSSER, Debtor. NORTH SHORE REAL
ESTATE CORPORATION, Appellant, v. JAMES P. CARROLL,
CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE, Appellee.
Chapter 7, Case ... Prosser), 2010 Bankr.
LEXIS 1566 (Bankr. D.V.I., May 26, 2010)
CASE SUMMARY:
OVERVIEW: Appellant filed a notice of appeal from a decision of the bankruptcy court.
Appellee trustee moved ... dismissal and one weighed
against dismissal. The court took into account the possibility that appellants counsel had
some of the responsibility for its failure to follow the court's scheduling
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01295845.pdf
EFTA01407189Set 10
2016-10-12100p20,728w
RESULTS:
Court Cases:
IN RE: JEFFREY J. PROSSER, Debtor. NORTH SHORE REAL
ESTATE CORPORATION, Appellant, v. JAMES P. CARROLL,
CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE, Appellee.
Chapter 7, Case ... Prosser), 2010
Bankr.
LEXIS 1566 (Bankr. D.V.I., May 26, 2010)
CASE SUMMARY:
OVERVIEW: Appellant filed a notice of appeal from a decision of the
bankruptcy court.
Appellee trustee moved ... dismissal
and one weighed
against dismissal. The court took into account the possibility that
appellant's counsel had
some of the responsibility for its failure to follow the court
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01407189.pdf
EFTA00714920Set 9
2015-02-2529p6,248w
STATE OF FLORIDA
BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, CASE NO.: 4D14-2282
L.T. Case No.: 502009CA040800
Appellant,
v.
RECEIVED, 2/25/2015 3:10 PM, Clerk, Fourth District Court of Appeal
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Appellee ... TRIAL COURT CORRECTLY GRANTED SUMMARY
JUDGMENT, AS THE LITIGATION PRIVILEGE IS A BAR TO
APPELLANT'S CLAIM BASED ON MALICIOUS
PROSECUTION 7
CONCLUSION 24
CERTIFICATE OF TYPE SIZE AND STYLE ... EFTA00714923
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
This matter arises from the Appellant, Bradley Edwards's appeal of the trial
court's final Order granting Appellee's Motion for Summary Judgment. In this
brief
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00714920.pdf
EFTA00589617Set 9
2015-02-1830p6,231w
STATE OF FLORIDA
BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, CASE NO.: 4D14-2282
L.T. Case No.: 502009CA040800
Appellant,
v.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Appellee.
I
ANSWER BRIEF OF APPELLEE JEFFREY EPSTEIN
TONJA HADDAD COLEMAN ... TRIAL COURT CORRECTLY GRANTED SUMMARY
JUDGMENT, AS THE LITIGATION PRIVILEGE IS A BAR TO
APPELLANT'S CLAIM BASED ON MALICIOUS
PROSECUTION. 7
CONCLUSION 24
CERTIFICATE OF TYPE SIZE AND STYLE ... EFTA00589620
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
This matter arises from the Appellant, Bradley Edwards's appeal of the trial
court's final Order granting Appellee's Motion for Summary Judgment. In this
brief
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00589617.pdf
EFTA01194977Set 9
2015-02-1830p6,220w
STATE OF FLORIDA
BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, CASE NO.: 4D14-2282
L.T. Case No.: 502009CA040800
Appellant,
v.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Appellee.
I
ANSWER BRIEF OF APPELLEE JEFFREY EPSTEIN
TONJA HADDAD COLEMAN ... TRIAL COURT CORRECTLY GRANTED SUMMARY
JUDGMENT, AS THE LITIGATION PRIVILEGE IS A BAR TO
APPELLANT'S CLAIM BASED ON MALICIOUS
PROSECUTION. 7
CONCLUSION 24
CERTIFICATE OF TYPE SIZE AND STYLE ... EFTA01194980
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
This matter arises from the Appellant, Bradley Edwards's appeal of the trial
court's final Order granting Appellee's Motion for Summary Judgment. In this
brief
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01194977.pdf
EFTA00186748Set 9
2006-08-1820p9,233w
F.2d 554)
H
United States Court of Appeals, the case is not ripe for appellate review until the
Eleventh Circuit. subpoenaed party has actually been asked to reveal ... McQuaig, Jake [4] Grand Jury C36.9(2)
Godbold, Don McClure, Intervenors- 193k36.9(2)
Appellants. Federal common-law presumption of grand jury ... Appeals, Tjoflat, Circuit Judge, held that: (1) privilege. West's F.S.A. § 905.27: Fed.Rules
appellants could appeal denial of the motions to the Evid.Rule 501, 28 U.S.C.A.
extent that they asserted
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00186748.pdf