""Appellate Brief"" — Epstein Files Search

Search Entities About Settings

/to search

Dataset

Sort

Status

DOJ Status

Date Range

–

Page Count

–

results for “"Appellate Brief"”

Keyboard Shortcuts

/

Focus search

Esc

Blur input

O

Open PDF

←→

Paginate

Corpus: 1990-03-17 – 2025-12-01

July 2011

Mo

Tu

We

Th

Fr

Sa

Su

None

Light

Medium

Heavy

EFTA00312716Set 9

2011-07-1421p3,549w

appellate filing mechanics and brief format. 2/04/11 Sandra L Musumeci 2.75 Draft and revise appellate brief: conduct legal research for appellate brief. 2/04/11 Maura Klugman 4.50 Pull material re possible ... libel issues per J. Epstein. 2/05/11 Sandra L Musumeci 4.00 Draft and revise appellate brief: conduct legal research for appellate brief. 2/06/11 Sandra L Musumeci 9.50 Draft and revise appellate ... brief: conduct legal research for appellate brief. 2/07/11 Brian Howe 2.00 Prepare. organize and review Jeffrey Epstein background materials binder at the request of M. Denny. 2/07/11 Sandra L Musumeci

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00312716.pdf

EFTA00805348Set 9

2018-11-2819p5,376w

EPSTEIN, Defendant-Appellant. : x MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO UNSEAL APPELLATE BRIEFS DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LIP Robert D. Balin John M. Browning 1251 Avenue of the Americas ... Handling of Epstein's Case 5 C. The Post's Efforts to Obtain the Appellate Briefing Filed with the First Department 8 ARGUMENT 9 I. THE POST HAS THE RIGHT ... MOVE THIS COURT FOR AN ORDER UNSEALING THE APPELLATE BRIEFING 9 II. GOOD CAUSE EXISTS TO UNSEAL THE APPELLATE BRIEFS 10 CONCLUSION 14 4811-3721-9459v.2 3930033-000039 EFTA00805349

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00805348.pdf

EFTA00798121Set 9

constitutional rights. 4 EFTA00798124 Finally, the People improperly attempt to introduce in their appellate brief new factually erroneous contentions concerning the circumstances by which Appellant was only ever charged with ... A.D.2d 245, 254 (1st Dep't 1998) (noting "the basic precept that arguments in appellate briefs are to be based and appeals decided solely upon factual material before the court ... propensity for underage girls. Indeed, the Probable Cause Affidavit and the People's appellate brief both underscore the extremely damaging claim that Appellant allegedly relayed to H.R. that his preference

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00798121.pdf

EFTA01085713Set 9

statutory and constitutional rights. Finally, the People improperly attempt to introduce in their appellate brief new factually erroneous contentions concerning the circumstances by which Appellant was only ever charged with ... A.D.2d 245, 254 (1st Dep't 1998) (noting "the basic precept that arguments in appellate briefs are to be based and appeals decided solely upon factual material before the court ... propensity for underage girls. Indeed, the Probable Cause Affidavit and the People's appellate brief both underscore the extremely damaging claim that Appellant allegedly relayed to H.R. that his preference

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01085713.pdf

EFTA00792569Set 9

A.D.2d 245, 254 (1st Dep't 1998) (noting "the basic precept that arguments in appellate briefs are to be based and appeals decided solely upon factual material before the court

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00792569.pdf

EFTA01168858Set 9

A.D.2d 245, 254 (1st Dep't 1998) (noting "the basic precept that arguments in appellate briefs are to be based and appeals decided solely upon factual material before the court

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01168858.pdf

EFTA01085764Set 9

level of registration under SORA. Additionally, the People improperly attempt to introduce in their appellate brief new factually erroneous and immaterial contentions concerning the circumstances by which Appellant was only ... A.D.2d 245, 254 (1st Dep't 1998) (noting "the basic precept that arguments in appellate briefs are to be based and appeals decided solely upon factual material before the court

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01085764.pdf

EFTA00584101Set 9

level of registration under SORA. Additionally, the People improperly attempt to introduce in their appellate brief new factually erroneous and immaterial contentions concerning the circumstances by which Appellant was only ... noting "the basic precept that arguments in appellate briefs are to be based and appeals decided solely upon factual material before the court at nisi Arius" and that "references

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00584101.pdf

EFTA00936499Set 9

2012-06-062p562w

Attachments: 12126002277-0606-161656-297.pdf; 2010_30129_Epsteinieffrey_respbrielpdf I have sent Erika our initial Appellate Brief and our Reply Appellate Brief in connection with the appeal of the Level 3 designation ... resulted in the DA agreeing to a lower designation. The appellate briefs that I sent to Erika recite the fact that the DA agreed to the lower designation ... level of detail. Your call. I also did not send Erika the DA's Appellate Brief as the DA's brief contains numerous detailed allegations of a sexual nature from

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00936499.pdf

EFTA01165659Set 9

SUPPORT OF EDWARDS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Counter-Plaintiff; Bradley Edwards, hereby submits the attached appellate brief in further support of his pending motion for reconsideration of the Court's announced ... Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein. Counter-Plaintiff adopts all legal arguments contained within the attached appellate brief, which brief relates directly to the issue of whether the litigation privilege may properly

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01165659.pdf

EFTA01085680Set 9

A.D.2d 245, 254 (1st Dep't 1998) (noting "the basic precept that arguments in appellate briefs are to be based and appeals decided solely upon factual material before the court

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01085680.pdf

EFTA01115564Set 9

Florida Supreme Court has repeatedly stated, trying to incorporate by reference in an appellate brief arguments from trial court filings is improper and causes those issues to be waived ... purpose of an appellate brief is to present arguments in support of the points on appeal. Merely making reference to arguments below without further elucidation does not suffice to preserve

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01115564.pdf

EFTA00616958Set 9

Florida Supreme Court has repeatedly stated, trying to incorporate by reference in an appellate brief arguments from trial court filings is improper and causes those issues to be waived ... purpose of an appellate brief is to present arguments in support of the points on appeal. Merely making reference to arguments below without further elucidation does not suffice to preserve

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00616958.pdf

EFTA00800328Set 9

legal issue of whether there is any principled justification for the continued sealing of appellate briefs to this Court. Mr. Epstein, however, does want to provide the facts that demonstrate ... merits of the Motion to Unseal. The Post claims that the unsealing of the appellate briefs is essential to its ability to I EFTA00800328 explore whether the District Attorney ... motivated by favoritism toward a wealthy individual with prominent connections. The content of the appellate briefs may provide further grist for the Post's titillation of its readers

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00800328.pdf

EFTA00714920Set 9

2015-02-2529p6,248w

Summary Judgment, and in that submission adopted "all legal arguments contained within the attached appellate brief." (R. 798). Thus Edwards made the Steinberg argument a part of this case. Further

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00714920.pdf

EFTA01194977Set 9

2015-02-1830p6,220w

Judgment, and in that submission adopted -adapting-"all legal arguments contained within the attached appellate brief." (R. 798). Thus Edwards made the Steinberg argument a part of this case. Further

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01194977.pdf

EFTA00589617Set 9

2015-02-1830p6,231w

Judgment, and in that submission adopted -adapting-"all legal arguments contained within the attached appellate brief." (R. 798). Thus Edwards made the Steinberg argument a part of this case. Further

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00589617.pdf

EFTA00725201Set 9

2010-03-198p2,226w

Action. The Daily News Parties shall submit with their motion their Appellants' Brief and the Appendix. In their motion for expedited consideration and determination of the Appeal, the Daily News ... Contempt Appeal. The Daily News Parties shall submit with their motion their Appellants' Brief and the Appendix. In their motion for expedited consideration and determination of the Contempt Appeal ... Apellee's Brief be filed and served within four business days after the Appellants' Brief; (ii) that the Daily News Parties' Reply Brief be filed and served within two business

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00725201.pdf

EFTA01197850Set 9

2014-10-0811p5,001w

Appellant, v. Richard DEBRINCAT and..., 2014 WL 7201931... 2014 WL 7201931(FlaApp. 4 Dist.) (Appellate Brief) District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. Stephen FISCHER, Appellant, v. Richard DEBRINCAT ... Steven H. MEYER, et..., 2014 WL 7201870... 2014 WL 7201870 (Fla.App. 4 Dist.) (Appellate Brief) District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. Theresa RIVERNIDER, Plaintiff(s), v. Steven

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01197850.pdf

EFTA00801681Set 9

2019-01-061p138w

YORK, Respondent, App. Div. No. 6081 - against - RESPONSE TO MOTION TO UNSEAL APPELLATE BRIEFS JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN Defendant-Appellant Defendant-Appellant Jeffrey E. Epstein, by and through undersigned counsel, does ... oppose NYP Holding, Inc's request to unseal the appellate briefs in the above-captioned matter subject to the proposed redactions of any alleged victim identities, see Post Memorandum

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00801681.pdf

Page 1

Results by Dataset54 total

Set 9

53

Set 11

1