EFTA00222162Set 9
2009-05-069p1,992w
disregarded
in discovery disputes has been routinely rejected in federal courts. See, gj,„ Barta I. City and
County of Honolulu, 169 F.R.D. 132 (D. Haw. 1996) (granting protective order pursuant ... will clearly fail to satisfy the balancing test" set forth in Rule 412.
See Barta I. City and County of Honolulu, 169 F.R.D. at 135.
In Barta, the Court confronted
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00222162.pdf
EFTA00222171Set 9
1999-02-1910p2,165w
only the admissibility of evidence at trial, but must also "inform the
discovery process." Barta I. City and County of Honolulu, 169 F.R.D. 132 (D. Haw. 1996). The
3
EFTA00222173 ... disregarded in discovery disputes has been routinely rejected in federal courts. See ea,, Barta
City and County of Honolulu 169 F.R.D. 132 (D. Haw. 1996) (granting protective order
pursuant ... Document 94 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/06/2009 Page 6 of 10
In Barta the Court confronted this issue in the context of a discovery motion in a civil
case
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00222171.pdf