EFTA00591577Set 9
2015-12-2813p3,821w
F.Supp.2d 584, 601 (E.D.N.Y. 2011)
("[G]eneral denials aren't actionable."); Davis v. Boeheim, 24 N.Y.3d 262, 271-72 (N.Y. 2014).
Plaintiff unsuccessfully attempts to analogize the subject Statement ... those in Boeheim
and Clemens. Yet in both cases those statements clearly crossed the line from "general denial to
specific accusations reasonably susceptible of a defamatory meaning." Clemens, 762 F.Supp ... Maxwell's statement does not. First, in Boeheim, the defendant coupled statements
regarding plaintiff's accusations as "false allegations" and "a lie" with detailed claims regarding
the accusers as "liars
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00591577.pdf
EFTA00593727Set 9
2015-09-2120p4,228w
could have concluded that the statements were conveying facts
about the plaintiff." Davis v. Boeheim, 24 N.Y.3d 262, 22 N.E.3d
999 (2014) (internal citations, ellipses, and brackets omitted).
The distinction
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00593727.pdf
EFTA01069530Set 9
2015-09-2120p4,220w
could have concluded that the statements were conveying facts
about the plaintiff." Davis v. Boeheim, 24 N.Y.3d 262, 22 N.E.3d
999 (2014) (internal citations, ellipses, and brackets omitted).
The distinction
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01069530.pdf
EFTA01105784Set 9
2015-09-2120p4,228w
could have concluded that the statements were conveying facts
about the plaintiff." Davis v. Boeheim, 24 N.Y.3d 262, 22 N.E.3d
999 (2014) (internal citations, ellipses, and brackets omitted).
The distinction
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01105784.pdf