EFTA00176706Set 9
2005-04-2751p8,853w
Plaintiff, )
) NOTICE TO COURT OF
vs. ) RESTITUTION PLAN AND
) APPROVAL OF TRUST
JOSEF F. BOEHM, ) DOCUMENT
a/k/a "Joe Millionaire", )
)
Defendant. )
EFTA00176707
COMES NOW the United States of America ... within the restitution
statute. Because any restitution is deducted from the agreed $1.2 million,
Boehm, through his attorney Kevin Fitzgerald, has waived notice of such motion,
which may be filed ... STATES OF AMERICA, ) No. A04-003-01 CR (JWS)
)
Plaintiff, )
)
vs. ) ORDER
)
JOSEF. F. BOEHM, )
)
Defendant. )
)
Having duly considered the government's motion setting forth the
restitution plan
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00176706.pdf
EFTA00233878Set 9
2007-10-25120p23,156w
Plaintiff, )
) NOTICE TO COURT OF
vs. ) RESTITUTION PLAN AND
) APPROVAL OF TRUST
JOSEF F. BOEHM, ) DOCUMENT
a/k/a "Joe Millionaire", )
)
Defendant. )
EFTA00233946
counsel, and
COMES NOW the United States of America ... million,
statute. Because any restitution is deducted from the agree
notice of such motion,
Boehm, through his attorney Kevin Fitzgerald, has waived
r 30 days from
which may be filed ... STATES OF AMERICA, ) No. A04-003-01 CR (JWS)
)
Plaintiff, )
)
vs. ) ORDER
)
JOSEF. F. BOEHM, )
)
Defendant. )
)
the
Having duly considered the government's motion setting forth
y APPROVES such
restitution
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00233878.pdf
EFTA00233209Set 9
2007-10-25120p23,398w
Plaintiff, )
) NOTICE TO COURT OF
vs. ) RESTITUTION PLAN AND
) APPROVAL OF TRUST
JOSEF F. BOEHM, ) DOCUMENT
a/k/a "Joe Millionaire", )
)
Defendant. )
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 000618
EFTA00233277
counsel ... million,
statute. Because any restitution is deducted from the
ed notice of such motion,
Boehm, through his attorney Kevin Fitzgerald, has waiv
r 30 days from
which may be filed ... STATES OF AMERICA, ) No. A04-003-01 CR (JWS)
)
Plaintiff, )
)
vs. ) ORDER
)
JOSEF. F. BOEHM, )
)
Defendant. )
)
g forth the
Having duly considered the government's motion settin
y APPROVES such
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00233209.pdf
EFTA00210074Set 9
2005-06-2017p8,642w
here. When asked, the closest case suggested by
the prosecutors was United States v. Boehm—and it hardly could differ more from Mr. Epstein's
case. In Boehm, the defendant ... trafficking of children in
violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 1591. United States v. Boehm, Case No. 3:04CR00003 (11
Alaska 2004). Boehm's actions, unlike Mr. Epstein's, also ... strong interstate nexus: Boehm
purchased and distributed large quantities of crack cocaine and cocaine that traveled in interstate
commerce, and he used his home and hotels (which were used
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00210074.pdf
EFTA00013811Set 8
2005-06-2017p8,641w
here. When asked, the closest case suggested by
the prosecutors was United States v. Boehm—and it hardly could differ more from Mr. Epstein's
case. In Boehm, the defendant ... trafficking of children in
violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 1591. United States v. Boehm, Case No. 3:04CR00003 (11
Alaska 2004). Boehm's actions, unlike Mr. Epstein's, also ... strong interstate nexus: Boehm
purchased and distributed large quantities of crack cocaine and cocaine that traveled in interstate
commerce, and he used his home and hotels (which were used
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00013811.pdf
EFTA00176157Set 9
21p8,891w
federal court in the Southern District of Florida;
2 Your letter references U.S. I Boehm, No. 3:04CR00003 (D. Ala 2004) as a model for a restitution fund
settlement ... that this Office should not act as intermediary. Finally, I would note that in Boehm as well, the victims'
identities were not initially disclosed. As the AUSA wrote in that ... case: "This filing is made ex parte
because Boehm, in his plea agreement, waived any rights he had pertaining to the selection of beneficiaries
and the disbursement of funds
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00176157.pdf
EFTA00223211Set 9
21p8,816w
federal court in the Southern District of Florida;
Your letter references U.S. I Boehm, No. 3:04CR00003 (D. Ala 2004) as a model for a restitution fund
settlement. I asked ... that this Office should not act as intermediary. Finally, I would note that in Boehm as well, the victims'
identities were not initially disclosed. As the AUSA wrote in that ... case: "This filing is made exparte
because Boehm, in his plea agreement, waived any rights he had pertaining to the selection of beneficiaries
and the disbursement of funds to such
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00223211.pdf
EFTA00221305Set 9
7p3,096w
federal court in the Southern District of Florida;
2 Your letter references US. I Boehm, No. 3:04CR00003 (D. Ala 2004) as a model for a restitution fund
settlement ... that this Office should not act as intermediary. Finally, I would note that in Boehm as well, the victims'
identities were not initially disclosed. As the AUSA wrote in that ... ease• "This filing is made ex pane
because Boehm, in his plea agreement, waived any rights he had pertaining to the selection of beneficiaries
and the disbursement of hinds
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00221305.pdf
EFTA00214355Set 9
7p3,061w
federal court in the Southern District of Florida;
2 Your letter references US v Boehm, No. 3:04CR00003 (D. Ala 2004) as a model for a restitution fund
settlement ... that this Office should not act as intermediary. Finally, I would note that in Boehm as well, the victims'
identities were not initially disclosed. As the AUSA wrote in that ... ease• "This filing is made ex pane
because Boehm, in his plea agreement, waived any rights he had pertaining to the selection of beneficiaries
and the disbursement of hinds
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00214355.pdf
EFTA01659888Set 10
7p3,071w
federal court in the Southern District of Florida;
2 Your letter references US v Boehm, No. 3:04CR00003 (D. Ala 2004) as a model for a restitution fund
settlement ... that this Office should not act as intermediary. Finally, I would note that in Boehm as well, the victims'
identities were not initially disclosed. As the AUSA wrote in that ... ease• "This filing is made ex pane
because Boehm, in his plea agreement, waived any rights he had pertaining to the selection of beneficiaries
and the disbursement of hinds
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01659888.pdf
EFTA00214771Set 9
7p3,066w
federal court in the Southern District of Florida;
2 Your letter references US v Boehm, No. 3:04CR00003 (D. Ala 2004) as a model for a restitution fund
settlement ... that this Office should not act as intermediary. Finally, I would note that in Boehm as well, the victims'
identities were not initially disclosed. As the AUSA wrote in that ... ease• "This filing is made ex pane
because Boehm, in his plea agreement, waived any rights he had pertaining to the selection of beneficiaries
and the disbursement of hinds
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00214771.pdf
EFTA00731642Set 9
2007-12-047p3,193w
federal court in the Southern District of Florida;
' Your letter references U.S v Boehm, No. 3:04CR00003 Ala 2004) as a model for a restitution fund
settlement. I asked ... AUSA wrote in that case: "This filing is made cx pane
because Boehm, in his plea agreement, waived any rights he had pertaining to the selection of beneficiaries
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00731642.pdf
EFTA00207603Set 9
2007-11-0419p6,689w
federal court in the Southern District of Florida;
' Your letter refaitinces U.S. v Boehm, No. 3:04CR00003 (D. Ala 2004) as a model for a restitution fund
sealement I asked ... disclosed. As theAUSA wrote in that case; "This filing is made ere parte
become* Boehm, in hia plea sgreernem, waived any skits he had pertaining to the selection of /acne
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00207603.pdf
EFTA00289808Set 9
2007-09-2453p18,621w
that this Office should not act as intermediary. Finally, I would note that in Boehm is well, the victims'
identities were net Initially disclosed. At the AUSA wrote In dint ... This filing is made cx ante
because Boehm in hit plea agreement, waived any rights he Tad penalning to the material of beneficiaries
and the disbursement of Ponds to such
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00289808.pdf
EFTA00190007Set 9
6p2,997w
choose to sue. It should be the
victims' choice.-
2 Your letter references U.S. 'Boehm, No. 3:04CR00003 (D. Ala 2004) as a model for a restitution fund settlement ... that AUSA wrote in that case: "This filing is made ex pane because Boehm, in his plea agreement, waived any
rights he had pertaining to the selection of beneficiaries
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00190007.pdf
EFTA00213810Set 9
2007-09-2519p6,870w
federal court in the Southern District of Florida;
' Your letter refaitinces U.S. v Boehm, No. 3:04CR00003 (D. Ala 2004) as a model for a restitution fund
sealement I asked ... disclosed. As theAUSA wrote in that case; "This filing is made ere parte
become* Boehm, in hia plea sgreernem, waived any skits he had pertaining to the selection of /acne
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00213810.pdf