""CPLR 3101"" — Epstein Files Search

Search Entities About Settings

/to search

Dataset

Sort

Status

DOJ Status

Date Range

–

Page Count

–

2 results for “"CPLR 3101"”

EFTA00596449Set 9

2008-08-0836p11,867w

EDWARDS FAILS TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR DISCOVERY OF A NON-PARTY UNDER CPLR 3101(a) 14 A. The Epstein Interview Does Not Have Heightened Relevance to the Issues ... Yoder v. Adriatic°, 459 So.2d 449 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984) 18 STATUTES

Keyboard Shortcuts

/

Focus search

Esc

Blur input

O

Open PDF

←→

Paginate

CPLR

3101

(a)(4) passim

CPLR

3102(e) 11, 1 2 MI Civil Rights ... privilege since Edwards does not satisfy the minimum standards for non-party disclosure under

CPLR

3101

(aX4) — which requires that even non-privileged evidence must have heightened relevance

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00596449.pdf

EFTA00595559Set 9

2011-04-126p1,296w

matter material and necessary in the prosecution or defense of an action" (CPLR 3101). Non-party discovery involves a showing of more than mere relevance, as non-parties should

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00595559.pdf

August 2008

Mo

Tu

We

Th

Fr

Sa

Su

None

Light

Medium

Heavy

Results by Dataset2 total

Set 9

2