EFTA00607113Set 9
2015-04-0646p12,645w
whether Congress referenced a generic crime or a defendant's specific conduct: the
categorical approach and the circumstance-specific approach.
If a statute refers to the generic crime, courts apply ... what has become known as
the `categorical approach': They compare the elements of the statute forming the basis of
the defendant's conviction with the elements of the [predicate] crime ... United States v. Dennis, 551 F.3d 986,
991 (10th Cir. 2008) (applying the categorical approach to determine whether an indecent
liberties-with-a-minor conviction was a crime of violence
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00607113.pdf
EFTA00295614Set 9
2012-12-3152p16,979w
INVESTMENTS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2012
(Expressed in United States dollars)
The following table categorizes the aggregate fair value of investment and derivative assets, in which the
underlying ... Total derivative assets 299,769 0.34 %
Total $ 132.449.421 S 83.058.409 93.68 %
The following table categorizes the aggregate fair value of investment liabilities by type:
Proceeds Fair Value % Net Assets
Investment ... INVESTMENTS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2012
(Expressed in United States dollars)
The following table categorizes the aggregate fair value of investment and derivative assets, in which the
underlying
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00295614.pdf
EFTA00015219Set 8
2020-05-2658p17,292w
through the FOIA. In addition to the 11,571 processed pages, the FBI
also categorically withheld additional records pursuant to Exemption 7(A). See infra FN 7.
(4) In accordance ... procedures for reviewing records that were categorically exempt pursuant to
Exemption (7)(A).
BACKGROUND INFORMATION CONCERNING JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN
(5) In June 2008, Jeffrey Epstein pled guilty to a criminal ... exempt
from disclosure pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(7)(A).4 The FBI categorically reviewed5 the
remaining responsive documents, at a rate of no less than 500 per month
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00015219.pdf
EFTA00069312Set 9
2019-07-0227p8,046w
exemption, and the FBI has withheld them individually, prior to
Esptein's arrest, and categorically, after Esptein's arrest.
Other FOIA exemptions also justify the FBI's withholding of records ... Seidel Decl. ¶y 49-_. During this
time, it did not categorically assert Exemption 7(A), but it did assert this exemption on
applicable records or parts of records that were ... pages a month, and during this time period, the FBI
asserted Exemption 7(A) categorically and released 46 documents. Seidel Decl. ¶¶ 67-79.
Seidel Decl
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00069312.pdf
EFTA00090494Set 9
2021-07-1234p11,087w
argument for the enticement and related
conspiracy charges.
This approach is analogous to the "categorical approach" employed by courts to evaluate
prior convictions for immigration and sentencing purposes. See Taylor ... United States, 495
U.S. 575, 602 (1990). Generally speaking, the "categorical approach" requires that courts "look
only to the statutory definitions—i.e., the elements" of the relevant offense to determine ... internal quotation marks omitted). Whether a statute
requires a categorical or case-specific approach is a question of statutory interpretation. To
determine whether Congress used the word "offense
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00090494.pdf
EFTA00154640Set 9
2021-07-1234p11,087w
argument for the enticement and related
conspiracy charges.
This approach is analogous to the "categorical approach" employed by courts to evaluate
prior convictions for immigration and sentencing purposes. See Taylor ... United States, 495
U.S. 575, 602 (1990). Generally speaking, the "categorical approach" requires that courts "look
only to the statutory definitions—i.e., the elements" of the relevant offense to determine ... internal quotation marks omitted). Whether a statute
requires a categorical or case-specific approach is a question of statutory interpretation. To
determine whether Congress used the word "offense
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00154640.pdf
EFTA00105663Set 9
2021-07-1234p11,087w
argument for the enticement and related
conspiracy charges.
This approach is analogous to the "categorical approach" employed by courts to evaluate
prior convictions for immigration and sentencing purposes. See Taylor ... United States, 495
U.S. 575, 602 (1990). Generally speaking, the "categorical approach" requires that courts "look
only to the statutory definitions—i.e., the elements" of the relevant offense to determine ... internal quotation marks omitted). Whether a statute
requires a categorical or case-specific approach is a question of statutory interpretation. To
determine whether Congress used the word "offense
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00105663.pdf
EFTA00103308Set 9
2021-07-1234p11,087w
argument for the enticement and related
conspiracy charges.
This approach is analogous to the "categorical approach" employed by courts to evaluate
prior convictions for immigration and sentencing purposes. See Taylor ... United States, 495
U.S. 575, 602 (1990). Generally speaking, the "categorical approach" requires that courts "look
only to the statutory definitions—i.e., the elements" of the relevant offense to determine ... internal quotation marks omitted). Whether a statute
requires a categorical or case-specific approach is a question of statutory interpretation. To
determine whether Congress used the word "offense
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00103308.pdf
EFTA00103273Set 9
2021-07-1234p11,087w
argument for the enticement and related
conspiracy charges.
This approach is analogous to the "categorical approach" employed by courts to evaluate
prior convictions for immigration and sentencing purposes. See Taylor ... United States, 495
U.S. 575, 602 (1990). Generally speaking, the "categorical approach" requires that courts "look
only to the statutory definitions—i.e., the elements" of the relevant offense to determine ... internal quotation marks omitted). Whether a statute
requires a categorical or case-specific approach is a question of statutory interpretation. To
determine whether Congress used the word "offense
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00103273.pdf
EFTA00103343Set 9
2021-07-1234p11,087w
argument for the enticement and related
conspiracy charges.
This approach is analogous to the "categorical approach" employed by courts to evaluate
prior convictions for immigration and sentencing purposes. See Taylor ... United States, 495
U.S. 575, 602 (1990). Generally speaking, the "categorical approach" requires that courts "look
only to the statutory definitions—i.e., the elements" of the relevant offense to determine ... internal quotation marks omitted). Whether a statute
requires a categorical or case-specific approach is a question of statutory interpretation. To
determine whether Congress used the word "offense
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00103343.pdf
EFTA00092886Set 9
2021-07-1234p11,087w
argument for the enticement and related
conspiracy charges.
This approach is analogous to the "categorical approach" employed by courts to evaluate
prior convictions for immigration and sentencing purposes. See Taylor ... United States, 495
U.S. 575, 602 (1990). Generally speaking, the "categorical approach" requires that courts "look
only to the statutory definitions—i.e., the elements" of the relevant offense to determine ... internal quotation marks omitted). Whether a statute
requires a categorical or case-specific approach is a question of statutory interpretation. To
determine whether Congress used the word "offense
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00092886.pdf
EFTA00085225Set 9
2021-07-1234p11,087w
argument for the enticement and related
conspiracy charges.
This approach is analogous to the "categorical approach" employed by courts to evaluate
prior convictions for immigration and sentencing purposes. See Taylor ... United States, 495
U.S. 575, 602 (1990). Generally speaking, the "categorical approach" requires that courts "look
only to the statutory definitions—i.e., the elements" of the relevant offense to determine ... internal quotation marks omitted). Whether a statute
requires a categorical or case-specific approach is a question of statutory interpretation. To
determine whether Congress used the word "offense
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00085225.pdf
EFTA00104652Set 9
2021-07-1234p11,087w
argument for the enticement and related
conspiracy charges.
This approach is analogous to the "categorical approach" employed by courts to evaluate
prior convictions for immigration and sentencing purposes. See Taylor ... United States, 495
U.S. 575, 602 (1990). Generally speaking, the "categorical approach" requires that courts "look
only to the statutory definitions—i.e., the elements" of the relevant offense to determine ... internal quotation marks omitted). Whether a statute
requires a categorical or case-specific approach is a question of statutory interpretation. To
determine whether Congress used the word "offense
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00104652.pdf
EFTA00092755Set 9
2021-07-1234p11,087w
argument for the enticement and related
conspiracy charges.
This approach is analogous to the "categorical approach" employed by courts to evaluate
prior convictions for immigration and sentencing purposes. See Taylor ... United States, 495
U.S. 575, 602 (1990). Generally speaking, the "categorical approach" requires that courts "look
only to the statutory definitions—i.e., the elements" of the relevant offense to determine ... internal quotation marks omitted). Whether a statute
requires a categorical or case-specific approach is a question of statutory interpretation. To
determine whether Congress used the word "offense
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00092755.pdf
EFTA00029540Set 8
2021-07-1234p11,084w
argument for the enticement and related
conspiracy charges.
This approach is analogous to the "categorical approach" employed by courts to evaluate
prior convictions for immigration and sentencing purposes. See Taylor ... United States, 495
U.S. 575, 602 (1990). Generally speaking, the "categorical approach" requires that courts "look
only to the statutory definitions—i.e., the elements" of the relevant offense to determine ... internal quotation marks omitted). Whether a statute
requires a categorical or case-specific approach is a question of statutory interpretation. To
determine whether Congress used the word "offense
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00029540.pdf
EFTA01207793Set 9
22p17,194w
assessing reasonableness of search„ it was not
appropriate for court to simply categorize the laptop as
"container," of kind which may be subjected to
warrantless search at border ... appropriate for of unlimited scope, for the purpose of gathering
court to simply categorize the laptop as evidence of pre-existing export violation, was
"container," of kind which ... Special Agent Hamako "requested 4/8 Tr. at 31. It also indexes and categorizes emails:
a border search of the laptop" from Special Agent
Marshall
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01207793.pdf