EFTA01207766Set 9
2014-12-0127p20,908w
intrusiveness is to be defined in
Asbury, 586 F.2d 973, 975-76 (2d Cir.1978) (a strip terms of whether one search will
search is "such an extensive invasion of privacy ... F.2d 721, Accordingly, even if a search is not destructive or
723 (9th Cir.1978). But in each of these cases, the search damaging, if it is sufficiently invasive or intrusive
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01207766.pdf
Cir.1979); ("14] Alabama v. Blue Bird Body Co., Inc., 573
F.2d 309, 317 (5th Cir.1978); Terrell v. Household Goods Carriers' Bureau, 494 F.2d 16,
20 (5th Cir.), cert. dismissed
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01363303.pdf
EFTA00186748Set 9
2006-08-1820p9,233w
terms, section 1292(b) applies only to orders Subpoenas, 584 P.2d 1366, 1369 (6th Cir.1978)
in civil actions, and has no application to appeals in ("[Section 1292(b) limits interim
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00186748.pdf
EFTA01207793Set 9
22p17,194w
Fogelman,
the physical boundary itself to the "functional equivalent" 586 F.2d 337, 350 (5th Cir.1978) (Brown, C.J.,
of the border, which may include "an established station concurring).
near the border
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01207793.pdf
EFTA00186707Set 9
2006-09-0520p9,610w
terms, section 1292(b) applies only to orders Subpoenas, 584 F.2d 1366, 1369 (6th Cir.1978)
in civil actions, and has no application to appeals in ("[Section 1292(b) ] limits interim
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00186707.pdf
EFTA01363306Set 10
2014-04-171p246w
Unit B 1981);
Prop-Jets, Inc. v. Chandler, 575 F.2d 1322, 1324 (10th Cir.1978); Fontana v. United
Bonding Insurance Co., 468 F.2d 168, 170 (3d Cir.1972). In this case
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01363306.pdf
11th Cir.1984); Aviation Specialties Inc. v.
United Technologies Corp., 568 F.2d 1186, 1189 (5th Cir.1978).
A.
On September 10, 1982 SAFFCO's counsel, in Atlanta, received the defendants' notice
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01363304.pdf
Cir.1980); Froning's, Inc. v.
Johnston Feed Service, Inc., 568 F.2d 108, 110 (8th Cir.1978). When Patterson moved to
substitute himself for his dissolved corporation, the question became whether
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01363305.pdf
EFTA00028968Set 8
2021-03-156p1,103w
F.2d 3, 7 (2d Cir.1963); United States v. Carter, 576
F.2d 1061, 1064 (3d Cir.1978); and United States v. Langford, 946 F.2d 798, 802 (11th Cir.1991).
2 See also United
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00028968.pdf