""Cognitive Modeling"" — Epstein Files Search

Search Entities About Settings

/to search

Dataset

Sort

Status

DOJ Status

Date Range

–

Page Count

–

results for “"Cognitive Modeling"”

Keyboard Shortcuts

/

Focus search

Esc

Blur input

O

Open PDF

←→

Paginate

EFTA00802274Set 9

Highly Commended Article invited for journal publication. Jansen, B.J. (2002) Towards Implementing a Cognitive Model of Searching, Proceedings of the E- Learning 2002 Conference (Web Track), Montreal, Canada

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00802274.pdf

EFTA00601577Set 9

Highly Commended Article invited for journal publication. Jansen, B.J. (2002) Towards Implementing a Cognitive Model of Searching, Proceedings of the E- Learning 2002 Conference (Web Track), Montreal, Canada

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00601577.pdf

EFTA01092999Set 9

Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures science researchers (RICA), Cognitive Systems, and Cognitive Modeling (ICCM). Among those groups, there is an emerging consensus on several paradigms: Integrated architectures

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01092999.pdf

EFTA00954495Set 9

2013-02-195p2,164w

more powerful mental simulations I remember a very livid discussion at a conference for cognitive modeling (John Anderson and a few others were on the panel), wit the cognitive differences ... think that especially motivational relevance might be key for overcoming the representation problem in cognitive model with limited power. However, I might be wrong at least in the case

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00954495.pdf

EFTA00954504Set 9

2013-02-195p2,294w

more powerful mental simulations I remember a very livid discussion at a conference for cognitive modeling (John Anderson and a few others EFTA00954504 were on the panel), wrt the cognitive ... think that especially motivational relevance might be key for overcoming the representation problem in cognitive model with limited power. However, I might be wrong at least in the case

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00954504.pdf

EFTA00953846Set 9

2013-02-155p1,794w

wrote: in case you asking about the people mentioned if john anderson is doing cognitive modeling its news to me; my colleague bob abelson used to say john ... understand it, there are at least four very similar groups now: cognitive modeling (that is where John Anderson goes), AGI (started by Ben Goertzel as an attempt to revive

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00953846.pdf

EFTA00656059Set 9

2013-02-155p1,857w

wrote: in case you asking about the people mentioned if john anderson is doing cognitive modeling its news to me; my colleague bob abelson used to say john ... understand it, there are at least four very similar groups now: cognitive modeling (that is where John Anderson goes), AGI (started by Ben Goertzel as an attempt to revive

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00656059.pdf

EFTA00652861Set 9

2013-02-154p1,630w

case you asking about the people mentioned if john anderson is doing cognitive modeling its news to me; my colleague bob abelson used to say john had 200 IQ disease ... understand it, there are at least four very similar groups now: cognitive modeling (that is where John Anderson goes), AGI (started by Ben Goertzel as an attempt to revive

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00652861.pdf

EFTA01175884Set 9

required. Of course, there arc likely to be other valuable perspectives founded on different cognitive models, and this is an area wide open for further exploration both conceptually and empirically

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01175884.pdf

EFTA01920270Set 10

Bach doesn't see the MicroPsi 2 Project as being anywhere near a valid cognitive model but rather as an evolving effort towards a unified theory of cognition. END SUBPAGE

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01920270.pdf

EFTA00584307Set 9

Bach doesn't see the MicroPsi 2 Project as being anywhere near a valid cognitive model but rather as an evolving effort towards a unified theory of cognition. END SUBPAGE

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00584307.pdf

EFTA01192367Set 9

Bach doesn't see the MicroPsi 2 Project as being anywhere near a valid cognitive model but rather as an evolving effort towards a unified theory of cognition. END SUBPAGE

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01192367.pdf

EFTA02709907Set 11

Bach doesn't see the MicroPsi 2 Project as being anywhere near a valid cognitive model but rather as an evolving effort towards a unified theory of cognition. END SUBPAGE

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02709907.pdf

EFTA01949601Set 10

does not see his new MicroPsi Project as anywhere close to being a valid cognitive model but rather as an evolving effort to provide a unified theory of cognition

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01949601.pdf

EFTA02410428Set 11

2009-11-254p3,396w

Harris and colleagues did thought about God's relationship with humans a miss the cognitive model as speculation. Yet studies somewhat similar to Bering's, asking part of the brain

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02410428.pdf

EFTA00731358Set 9

2009-11-254p3,358w

Harris and colleagues did thought about God's relationship with humans, a miss the cognitive model as speculation. Yet studies somewhat similar to Bering's, asking part of the brain

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00731358.pdf

EFTA00742459Set 9

2009-11-254p3,392w

Harris and colleagues did thought about God's relationship with humans, a miss the cognitive model as speculation. Yet studies somewhat similar to Bering's, asking part of the brain

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00742459.pdf

EFTA01128781Set 9

driven agents to move around in. Most importantly, these moving agents are not validated cognitive models, but theoretical explorations in the realm of Al architecture for generating behavior: an evolving

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01128781.pdf

EFTA01958846Set 10

driven agents to move around in. Most importantly, these moving agents arc not validated cognitive models, but theoretical explorations in the realm of AI architecture for generating behavior: an evolving

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01958846.pdf

EFTA01074376Set 9

MAVERICK group at Bar Ilan University, which conducts research in multi-robot systems, teamwork, cognitive modeling, and artificial intelligence, Prof. Kaminka is an accomplished researcher, teacher and specializes

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01074376.pdf

Page 1

Corpus: 1990-03-17 – 2025-12-01

December 2025

Mo

Tu

We

Th

Fr

Sa

Su

None

Light

Medium

Heavy

Results by Dataset26 total

Set 9

21

Set 10

3

Set 11

2