EFTA00801275Set 9
90p17,710w
that simply creates extraordinary
9 prejudice to my client. It creates
10 confusion on the part of the jury, and it is
11 absolutely unnecessary; and, indeed, under
12 these ... denied because of -- I
15 wrote down here before Mr. Scarola mentioned
16 it -- confusion of issues before the jury
17 and the potential, the real potential of
18 prejudice ... these two matters to be
16 tried together.
17 And the fact that substantial confusion
18 could be operable here -- as argued by
19 counsel and as written down
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00801275.pdf
EFTA00808738Set 9
2011-02-2514p3,802w
raised relevance. We raised probative value substantially
outweighed by the danger or unfair prejudice, confusion, misleading
the July, as well as hearsay and authenticity.
This is a very good example ... malicious prosecution issues, and can only result in unfair
prejudice to Epstein, confusion of the jury, and unfortunately, a second trial of this case.
ARGUMENT
Edwards argues that Exhibit ... inadmissible if its probative value is
substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, [or] misleading
the jury." § 90.403, Fla. Stat. (2017). Whatever probative value the article
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00808738.pdf
EFTA00091875Set 9
2008-01-1619p4,850w
will lengthen and complicate
1
EFTA00091879
the trial, raise a substantial risk of juror confusion, and may operate to deprive Ms. Maxwell of
her counsel of choice. Accordingly, the Court ... because the statements at issue are not perjurious, the
questions asked were confusing, ambiguous, and improperly formed. None of the questions, or
any answers, were material to any issue ... criminal
propensity. Similarly, it would create a substantial risk that the jury will confuse the legal and
factual issues pertinent to the Perjury Counts and convict Ms. Maxwell without independently
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00091875.pdf
EFTA01122224Set 9
2008-06-3018p5,122w
physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress,
psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment,
loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion ... physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress,
psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment,
loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion ... physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress,
psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment,
loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01122224.pdf
EFTA00182476Set 9removed from DOJ
2009-10-20180p31,379w
testified to,
22 right?
23 MR. CRITTON: Form.
24 THE WITNESS: I get confused, because there
25 are some visitors come or female come, and
• Toll Free: 866.709.8777
Facsimile ... vAvw.esduiresolutIons.com
EFTA00182514
- Volume II October 20, 2009
168
1 then -- so I get confused, so I can't remember
2 this, and I'm telling you that ... wenv.esquiresolutions.com
EFTA00182544
- Volume II October 20, 2009
198
understood --
2 A I get confused, because during that time my
3 schedule was like sometimes eight -- I go nine,
sometimes
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00182476.pdf
EFTA00729603Set 9
2010-11-1084p19,772w
suffering, emotional distress, psychological and psychiatric trauma, mental anguish,
humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, loss of enjoyment of
life, invasion of her privacy and other ... suffer injury, pain
and suffering, emotional distress, psychological and psychiatric trauma, mental anguish,
humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, loss of enjoyment of
life, invasion ... suffer
injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological and psychiatric trauma, mental
anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, loss of
enjoyment of life, invasion
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00729603.pdf
EFTA00089904Set 9
2021-11-0117p4,502w
probative, the Court further finds that Rule 403 prejudice
outweighs. First, the testimony may confuse jurors with old diagnoses that have little connection
to the conduct at issue or Alleged ... Victim 4's credibility today. See id. Confusion is particularly
likely here given that Dr. Hall's report is at times unclear and even contradictory, as with the
confusion oveOM ... substantiate
the accuracy of Dr. Hall's conclusions, would result in significant prejudice, including confusing
the jury and delaying the trial with a large volume of unnecessary details. The Court
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00089904.pdf
EFTA00601154Set 9
2015-10-15179p36,459w
fibrillation you are now
14 describing as an atrial flutter?
15 A. You're confused, sir. Please listen to my 09:54:42
16 answers. What I've said ... there must have been a mistake or
19 something. And clearly she had confused me with
20 someone else.
21 And as I understand it, Nancy Gertner made ... number. Yes, I have her phone number.
4 Q. I'm a little bit confused. 10:22:10
5 A. There's no reason
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00601154.pdf
EFTA00793693Set 9
2018-03-0824p4,964w
years of litigation, Edwards
argued that separate trials are necessary to avoid prejudice, confusion and
inconvenience to Edwards. The next day, apparently just realizing that the matter ... limit the issue in this
way as to Rothstein has the potential of confusing the
jury in determining whether Epstein had any probable
cause to claim damages against Edwards arising ... Prejudice Edwards
Edwards argues separate trials are necessary, or the jury will be confused by
the default liability judgment against Rothstein, and Edwards will have to object to
evidence
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00793693.pdf
EFTA00801498Set 9
2017-11-109p2,492w
Statutes, because any probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair
prejudice, confusion of the issues, and misleading the jury.
"[E]ven if relevant, a trial court ... remote or minimal probative value is clearly outweighed by the danger of unfair
prejudice, confusion of issues, and the risks of misleading the jury. See Fla. Stat. § 90.403. "In
weighing ... bagel."). "If the
introduction of the evidence tends in actual operation to produce a confusion in the minds of the
jurors in excess of the legitimate probative effect of such
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00801498.pdf