EFTA01099134Set 9
2015-03-0226p11,196w
EDWARDS and PAUL G.
CASSELL,
Plaintiff(s),
vs.
ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ,
Defendant(s).
COUNTER-DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIM
Plaintiffs/Counterclaim-defendants Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell, by and
through ... limited statements are not
EFTA01099134
Edwards, Bradley vs. Dershowitz
Case No.: CACE 15-000072
Counter-Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim
defamatory and, in any event, are protected under both ... offenses committed by
2
EFTA01099135
Edwards, Bradley vs. Dershowitz
Case No.: CACE 15-000072
Counter-Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim
Jeffrey Epstein, including the offense of sex trafficking. She alleged
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01099134.pdf
EFTA01128873Set 9
2013-05-176p1,512w
CASE NO.: 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, CIVIL DIVISION "AG"
Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant,
v.
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually,
BRADLEY J. EDWARDS,
individually, and L.M., individually,
Defendant ... Counter-Plaintiff(s).
ORDER DENYING COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S
MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION/RECONSIDERATION
THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's (the
"Counter-Defendant") Motion for Clarification/Reconsideration of this ... This Court. having heard argument on the motion and having carefully
reviewed the Counter-Defendant's objections and all applicable legal authority, and being otherwise
fully advised in the premises
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01128873.pdf
EFTA00608263Set 9
2017-08-254p562w
individually,
Defendant(s).
MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES OVER THE
OBJECTIONS OF COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN
BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, by and through his undersigned attorneys, moves this
Honorable Court ... enter an order compelling Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, to answer
Interrogatories propounded by Counter-Plaintiff, Bradley J. Edwards, over the Objections of
Jeffrey Epstein, and states:
I. Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY ... Epstein
Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories Over Objections
of Counter-Defendant, Epstein
3. Movant counsel certifies that a bona fide effort to agree or to narrow
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00608263.pdf
EFTA01140721Set 9
2014-01-277p1,040w
Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs.
MOTION FOR ENTRY OF ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
COMES NOW, the Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and through his
undersigned attorney, and requests that this Court enter ... Counter-Plaintiff has objected to the proposed order and suggested
additional language to which Counter-Defendant cannot agree.
EFTA01140721
CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB
6. It therefore becomes necessary that the court ... proposed order and enter an order that the Court deems appropriate.
WHEREFORE, Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, requests that this Court enter an
order regarding its ruling on Counter-Defendant
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01140721.pdf
EFTA00621305Set 9
2014-01-277p1,043w
Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs.
MOTION FOR ENTRY OF ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
COMES NOW, the Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and through his
undersigned attorney, and requests that this Court enter ... Counter-Plaintiff has objected to the proposed order and suggested
additional language to which Counter-Defendant cannot agree.
EFTA00621305
CASE NO. 502009CA0408003OO{XMB
6. It therefore becomes necessary that ... proposed order and enter an order that the Court deems appropriate.
WHEREFORE, Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, requests that this Court enter an
order regarding its ruling on Counter-Defendant
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00621305.pdf
EFTA01107612Set 9
2013-03-1113p2,619w
cited, has reviewed the discovery
along with the objections filed on behalf of the Counter-Defendant . . .
[t]he Counter-Defendant's Objections to Discovery other than privilege
(including ... cited, has
reviewed the discovery along with the objections filed on behalf of the
Counter-Defendant. Based upon the foregoing,
and after a thorough review of same, it
is
CONSIDERED ... ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follow
s:
The Counter-Defendant's Objections to Discovery other
than privilege
(including but not limited to constitutional guarantees unde
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01107612.pdf
EFTA01111222Set 9
2013-05-1718p5,126w
Amendments,
attorney/client privilege, work product privilege)
are overruled. . . The
Counter-Defendant shall not be required to
list any documents he
contends are privileged pursuant ... cited, has
reviewed the discovery along with the objections filed on behalf of the
Counter-Defendant. Based upon the foregoing, and after a thorough revie
w of same ... CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follow
s:
The Counter-Defendant's Objections to Discovery other than privil
ege
(including but not limited to constitutional guarantees under
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01111222.pdf
EFTA01093428Set 9
2013-02-042p242w
Plaintiff(s),
vs.
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, etc., et al.,
Defendant(s).
ORDER CLARIFYING
ORDER ON COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
THIS CAUSE came before the Court on
February ... upon this Court's Order on the Counter-Defendant's Motion for
Protective Order dated January 29, 2013. The parties advised the Court that the Order
fails to set forth ... timeframe for compliance by the Counter-Defendant. Based upon
argument of counsel, and the Court being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is
hereby
CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01093428.pdf
EFTA00617978Set 9
2015-02-0326p5,268w
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR FEES AND COSTS
THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Counter-Defendant's, Jeffrey Epstein's, Motion
for Fees and Costs filed on June ... EPSTEIN,
Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,
vs.
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and
BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually,
Defendants/Countcr-Plaintiffs.
ORDER GRANTING COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
THIS CAUSE having came before the Court ... upon Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's
Motion for Summary Judgment. Having reviewed the law and case file, having heard argument
of counsel and being otherwise fully advised in the premises
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00617978.pdf
EFTA01196659Set 9
2015-02-0326p5,229w
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR FEES AND COSTS
THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Counter-Defendant's, Jeffrey Epstein's, Motion
for Fees and Costs filed on June ... EPSTEIN,
Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,
vs.
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and
BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually,
Defendants/Countcr-Plaintiffs.
ORDER GRANTING COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
THIS CAUSE having came before the Court ... upon Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's
Motion for Summary Judgment. Having reviewed the law and case file, having heard argument
of counsel and being otherwise fully advised in the premises
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01196659.pdf
EFTA01112365Set 9
2013-05-179p2,220w
cited, has reviewed the discovery
along with the objections filed on behalf of the Counter-Defendant . . .
[t]he Counter-Defendant's Objections to Discovery other than privilege
(including ... Amendments, attorney/client privilege, work product privilege)
are overruled. . . The Counter-Defendant shall not be required to list
any documents he contends are privileged pursuant
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01112365.pdf
EFTA00792811Set 9
187p36,662w
pejorative, unnecessary comments as it
15 relates, in particular, to the
16 counter-defendant.
17 I will remind you that the Court order
18 that I executed relative ... matters that surround the instant
14 action. Let's start with the
15 counter-defendant's revised omnibus motion
16 in limine.
17 MR. LINK: May it please the Court ... this case.
17 Element two. Was it filed by the
18 present defendant -- the counter-defendant.
19 Not an issue in this case.
20 Item three. The bona fide termination
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00792811.pdf
EFTA00801993Set 9
94p19,003w
Defendant, C") f>..)
`" r"
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO COUNTER-DEFENDANT
(PUNITIVE DAMAGES?
BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, by and through his undersigned counsel, and pursuant to
Florida Rule of Civil Procedure ... Request for Admissions pursuant to Rule
1.370 Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, requesting that Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein,
admit the truth of the facts set forth as follows:
1. Admit ... PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S AMENDED RESPONSES TO
DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY EDWARDS'S REQUEST FOR
PRODUCTION TO COUNTER-DEFENDANT (PUNITIVE DAMAGES)
Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his
undersigned counsel and pursuant
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00801993.pdf
cited, has
reviewed the discovery along with the objections filed on behalf of the
Counter-Defendant. Based upon the foregoing, and after a thorough review of same, it
is
CONSIDERED ... ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
The Counter-Defendant's Objections to Discovery other than privilege
(including but not limited to constitutional guarantees under the V, VI and XIV
Amendments, attorney/client ... guaranteed by the V,
VI and XIV Amendments of the United States Constitution, the Counter-Defendant shall
file a detailed privilege log outlining the documents and the applicable privilege
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01093426.pdf
EFTA00616954Set 9
2013-07-174p683w
EPSTEIN,
Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,
vs.
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and
BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually,
Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs.
/
ORDER GRANTING COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
THIS CAUSE having came before the Court ... upon Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's
Motion for Summary Judgment. Having reviewed the law and case file, having heard argument
of counsel and being otherwise fully advised in the premises ... Court hereby determines as
follows:
Plaintiff'Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") filed suit against
Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, Bradley Edwards ("Edwards"). Edwards then filed a counter-claim
against Epstein. Epstein subsequently dismissed
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00616954.pdf
EFTA00794277Set 9
2018-03-0221p6,249w
CA040800XXXXMBAG
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,
v.
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and
BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually,
Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff.
/
COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION
FOR AN IN CAMERA INSPECTION OF 30 E-MAILS
Counter ... such documents should
be deemed to have been produced by him.
WHEREFORE, Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, moves for this Court for an in camera
review of the 30 e-mails ... Scott J. Link (FBN
Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN
Primary
Primary
Second
Second
Counselfor Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
20
EFTA00794296
SERVICE LIST
Jack Scarola Philip M. Burlington
Karen E. Terry Nichole
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00794277.pdf
EFTA00620018Set 9
2011-08-2520p3,955w
EPSTEIN,
Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,
vs.
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and
BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually,
Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs.
ORDER GRANTING COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
THIS CAUSE having came before the Court ... upon Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's
Motion for Summary Judgment. Having reviewed the law and case file, having heard argument
of counsel and being otherwise fully advised in the premises ... than by the individual party. Accordingly, it is •
2
EFTA00620033
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for
Summary Judgment is GRANTED.
DONE and ORDERED in Chambers
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00620018.pdf