EFTA00801275Set 9
90p17,710w
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN
2 AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
3 Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB
4
5 JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
6 Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,
7 vs.
8 SCOTT ROTHSTEIN ... GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE
23
24
25
PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICE, INC.
EFTA00801276
1 THE COURT: Good morning. Have a seat.
2 Thank you.
3 Needless to say the recent barrage ... flurry, of activity that has
5 transpired is of extreme consternation to
6 the court. It has caused me to have to
7 engage in an inordinate amount of time
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00801275.pdf
EFTA00603264Set 9
2010-08-1657p11,344w
Mark auprente Court
Appellate Elittisian, 'first £firpttrtutrut
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,
Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,
Defendant-Appellant.
On Appeal from
Case ... Epstein seeks to vacate the final decision and
order of the New York Supreme Court, Criminal Term, New York
County, determining him to be a Level 3 sex offender, without ... Control. (Pickholz, J. at SORA hearing). Appellant seeks to
vacate the Order because the Court's risk level determination was not
supported by clear and convincing evidence, was based
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00603264.pdf
EFTA00234424Set 9
2008-07-2132p12,835w
Entered on FLSD Docket 08)18:2008 Page 1 of 11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO.: 08-80804-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON
JANE DOE, a/k/a,
JANE ... Plaintiff,
VS.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN
and
Defendants.
MOTION TO REMAND
Plaintiff Jane Doe moves the Court to remand this action to state court for lack of
subject matter jurisdiction and states ... sues , also a Florida
citizen, in this action, Defendants removed the case to federal court on July 21,
2008, citing diversity of citizenship as the basis for federal subject matter
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00234424.pdf
EFTA01105448Set 9
2016-03-1771p8,812w
G3hdgium
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
2
3
4 Plaintiff, New York, N.Y.
5 v. 15 Civ. 7433(RWS)
6 GHISLAINE MAXWELL,
7 Defendant ... SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
EFTA01105448
EFTA01105449
2
G3hdgium
1 THE COURT: Thank you all very much. I'm sorry for
2 the inconvenience that I have imposed upon ... your litigation skills and not
10 leave it up to the ignorant district court judge who doesn't
11 really get into this kind of thing very often
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01105448.pdf
EFTA00089154Set 9
2020-12-0834p11,257w
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
x
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
GHISLAINE MAXWELL,
Defendant.
x
THE GOVERNMENT'S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION ... United States of America
Assistant United States Attorneys
- Of Counsel -
EFTA00089154
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
x
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
GHISLAINE ... Motion"). Five
months ago, after thorough briefing and a nearly two-hour hearing, this Court concluded that the
defendant posed a serious flight risk and that no condition or combination
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00089154.pdf
EFTA00589617Set 9
2015-02-1830p6,231w
FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, CASE NO.: 4D14-2282
L.T. Case No.: 502009CA040800
Appellant,
v.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Appellee.
I
ANSWER BRIEF OF APPELLEE JEFFREY ... CASE AND FACTS 3
SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT 5
ARGUMENT 7
THE TRIAL COURT CORRECTLY GRANTED SUMMARY
JUDGMENT, AS THE LITIGATION PRIVILEGE IS A BAR TO
APPELLANT'S CLAIM BASED ... STATEMENT
This matter arises from the Appellant, Bradley Edwards's appeal of the trial
court's final Order granting Appellee's Motion for Summary Judgment. In this
brief, the parties
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00589617.pdf
EFTA00617907Set 9
2014-12-0838p7,992w
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH
JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR
2 PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
3 CASE NO.: 502009CA040800SSSSMB
4
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
5
6 Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,
7 vs.
8 SCOTT ROTHSTEIN ... PIIRS@PalmBeackRep?rting.com
EFTA00617908
3
PROCEEDINGS
2 NM'
3 THE COURT: Okay. Welcome everybody.
4 MR. BREWER: Good morning.
5 MR. SCAROLA: Good morning, your Honor.
6 THE COURT: Thank ... your Honor. Would you
11 prefer we do this from the podium?
12 THE COURT: Whichever. You can stay there if
13 you want.
14 MR. BREWER: I'll stand
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00617907.pdf
EFTA00213642Set 9
2007-11-2196p13,457w
indicated that you would be
calling this Office regarding the upcoming March 3,
2008 court date in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, in and
for Palm Beach County. As you know ... 113.pdf
f
OLY Plea Agreement v4 1512 and 113 vlolations.pd
EFTA00213669
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO.
18 U.S.C. § 1512(d)(2)
18 U.S.C ... ALEXANDER AC
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
air
ASSISTANT UNITED STATES All
EFTA00213671
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case No.
UNITE ATES OF AMERICA
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00213642.pdf
EFTA00209806Set 9
2014-04-1816p7,014w
Weekly Fed. C 1270
(Cite as: 749 F.3d 999)
H
United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.
Jane DOE NO. 1, Jane Doe No. 2, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
1.
UNITED STATES ... privilege to prevent the disclos-
ure of their plea negotiations. The United States District Court for the Southern
District of Florida Court, No. 9:08-CV-80736-KAM, ordered disclosure ... inter-
venors filed interlocutory appeal.
Holdings: The Court of Appeals, Pryor, Circuit Judge, held that:
(1) Court of Appeals had jurisdiction over interlocutory appeal;
(2) plea negotiations were not protected
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00209806.pdf
EFTA00603828Set 9
2013-08-1674p29,349w
Document 225 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson
JANE ... also referred to as "the victims"), by and
through undersigned counsel, to move this Court to turn over to them numerous documents that
to which the Government has asserted various ... privilege are not well founded, for the reasons described in this pleading, and the Court should
provide all of the documents to the victims. t The factual support
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00603828.pdf
EFTA00615316Set 9
9p4,145w
IMPROPER VENUE •
When an action is initially brought in a state or federal court and is dis-
missed for lack of proper venue or jurisdiction, it frequently becomes neces-
sary ... bring a second action.?
These so-called "saving" statutes vary in language and court intdrpretatiOn,
but a majority of states have held such statutes applicable when the first
action ... proper venue or jurisdiction. § 8-34 was judicially construed by
the Virginia Supreme Court in Jones v. Morris Plan Bank,7 where the plain-
'See generally Annot, 6 AL.R3d
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00615316.pdf
EFTA00040664Set 9
2016-02-2921p6,030w
USDC SONY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: 6/25/2021
United States of America,
—v—
20-cr-330 (AJN)
Ghislaine Maxwell,
OPINION ... seizures, and to due process of law. For the reasons that follow, the Court
concludes that the evidence should not be suppressed and that Maxwell is not entitled ... principal of BSF in the summer
of 2016. The Government has represented to the Court that the AUSA who participated in the
February 29, 2016 meeting did not participate
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00040664.pdf
EFTA00081947Set 9
2019-07-0833p10,720w
Filed ~'/1WI/1e P— 1- t 13
USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DOC #:
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
DATE FILEaft
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
•
Government ... DECISION & ORDER
• REMANDING DEFENDANT
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
x
A. Background
This ruling follows the Court's bail hearing held on July IS, 2019. The issue before the
Court is whether ... matter the answer to this
question and no matter what has been said in Court in analyzing the matter. this is a criminal
case and the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00081947.pdf
EFTA00086685Set 9
2016-03-1827p8,445w
EXHIBIT G
EFTA00086685
To Be Filed Under Seal
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
x C
IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENA
19 Misc. 149 (CM)
x
SEALED ... form of order originally proposed by
Maxwell. (Id 9:7-24.) The court agreed that it would "so order" Maxwell's proposed version
2
SDNY_GM_00000876
EFTA00086687 ... provision
of that order. (Id 9:25-10:6.)
On March 18, 2016, the court formally entered the Protective Order. (15-cv-7433, Dkt.
No. 62.) It provided, as such
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00086685.pdf
EFTA00805348Set 9
2018-11-2819p5,376w
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
APPELLATE DIVISION - FIRST DEPARTMENT
x
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW •
YORK, • App. Div. No. 6081
Respondent, • On Appeal from ... York Supreme Court,
• New York County, Index No. 30129/10
- against - (Pickholz, J.)
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,
Defendant-Appellant. :
x
MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT
OF MOTION TO UNSEAL APPELLATE BRIEFS
DAVIS ... First
Department 8
ARGUMENT 9
I. THE POST HAS THE RIGHT TO MOVE THIS COURT FOR AN ORDER
UNSEALING THE APPELLATE BRIEFING 9
II. GOOD CAUSE EXISTS TO UNSEAL
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00805348.pdf
EFTA00314991Set 9
2012-06-1935p25,593w
Smith,
December I. 2014
Circuit Judge, joined in part.
709 F.3d 952
United States Court of Appeals, M. Smith, Circuit Judge, filed dissenting opinion, with whom
Ninth Circuit. Clifton ... reasonableness remains the touchstone for a
to avoid prosecution. The United States District Court warrantless search. U.S.C.A. Const.Amend. 4.
for the District of Arizona, 2009 WL 465028, Raner C.
Cases ... Collins, J., granted defendant's motion to suppress evidence.
Government filed interlocutory appeal. The Court of Appeals,
637 F.3d 1068. reversed and remanded. The Court of Appeals [2] Criminal
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00314991.pdf
EFTA00090200Set 9
2021-11-1023p6,135w
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT USDC SDNY
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILER
DOC //:
DATE FILED: 11/19/21
United States of America,
—v—
20-CR-330 (AJN)
Ghislaine Maxwell,
MEMORANDUM ... Defendant. OPINION & ORDER
ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge:
Before the Court is the Defendant's fourth motion in limine to "exclude evidence related
to Accuser-3," to whom the Court ... under Federal Rules of Evidence
404(b) and 403. Dkt. Nos. 387, 444. The Court has twice heard argument related to this motion,
including argument at the November
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00090200.pdf