EFTA00793957Set 9
2018-04-198p2,389w
Requests filed by Interested Party Farmer, Jafe, Weissing, Edwards, Fixtos & Lehrman,
P.L [D.E. 1194] (the "Agreed Order"). The Agreed Order [D.E. 1194] stated that:
Fowler White will not retain ... Farmer Jaffe has alleged that Fowler White and Jeffrey Epstein violated the Agreed
Order [D.E. 1194] because Fowler White allegedly retained a copy of the "subject documents" and
passed these ... Court has jurisdiction here because the Court retained jurisdiction in the Agreed Order [D.E.
1194], and this alleged discovery violation is a core proceeding. See 28 U.S.C. § 157 ("Core
proceedings
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00793957.pdf
EFTA00806967Set 9
2010-11-309p2,339w
retains
jurisdiction to award sanctions in favor of Farmer, Brad Edwards or
his client.
(D.E. 1194.)
There is only one sentence in the Agreed Order that applies to Epstein: "Should ... retains jurisdiction to award sanctions in favor of Farmer, Brad Edwards
or his client." (D.E. 1194, at 2.)
The Agreed Order was a result of Farmer Jaffe not wanting
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00806967.pdf
EFTA00808869Set 9
2018-04-0927p8,919w
justice to allow Edwards to hide
behind this Court's November 30, 2010, Order (D.E. 1194) because, as Edwards well knows, the
documents which Edwards refused to produce to Epstein ... EFTA00808870
Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 6351 Filed 04/09/18 Page 3 of 27
(D.E. 1194.) First, the Agreed Order does not provide that if Fowler White retained images or
copies
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00808869.pdf
EFTA00811395Set 9
2018-11-2112p4,431w
Request Filed by Interested Party Farmer,
Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos, & Lehrman, P.L. [D.E. 1194] (hereinafter, the "Agreed Order").
That Order provided:
The Motion for Relief From Amended Order (D.E
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00811395.pdf
EFTA00802116Set 9
2018-10-2612p4,437w
Request Filed by Interested Party Farmer, Jaffe,
Weissing, Edwards, Fistos, & Lehrman, P.L. D.E. 1194 (hereinafter, the "Agreed Order"). That Order
provided:
The Motion for Relief From Amended Order (D.E
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00802116.pdf
EFTA00794256Set 9
2018-10-2413p3,254w
retains jurisdiction to award sanctions in favor
of Farmer, Brad Edwards, or his client.
(D.E. 1194.)
During the April 13, 2018,' hearing on the Motions, Edwards' counsel asked the Court
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00794256.pdf
EFTA00808704Set 9
2018-11-1315p4,769w
justice
to allow Edwards to hide behind this Court's November 30, 2010, Order (D.E. 1194) because,
as Edwards well knows, the documents which Edwards refused to produce to Epstein
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00808704.pdf