""D.E. 189"" — Epstein Files Search

Search Entities About Settings

/to search

Dataset

Sort

Status

DOJ Status

Date Range

–

Page Count

–

15 results for “"D.E. 189"”

Keyboard Shortcuts

/

Focus search

Esc

Blur input

O

Open PDF

←→

Paginate

EFTA00211718Set 9

2007-04-2432p10,140w

September 9, 2010, and then re-opened at petitioners' request on October 28, 2010." D.E. 189 at 5, ¶ 8. Petitioners' initial position, on July II, 2008, was that ... Court previously denied its motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (D.E. 189), the government now adopts and renews the jurisdictional arguments made in its filings seeking dismissal

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00211718.pdf

EFTA00799825Set 9

2017-06-0632p10,748w

September 9, 2010, and then re-opened at petitioners' request on October 28, 2010." D.E. 189 at 5,1 8. Petitioners' initial position, on July 11, 2008, was that ... Court previously denied its motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (D.E. 189), the government now adopts and renews the jurisdictional arguments made in its filings seeking dismissal

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00799825.pdf

EFTA00591461Set 9

2017-06-0233p10,820w

September 9, 2010, and then re-opened at petitioners' request on October 28, 2010." D.E. 189 at 5, 1 8. Petitioners' initial position, on July 11, 2008, was that ... Court previously denied its motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (D.E. 189), the government now adopts and renews the jurisdictional arguments made in its filings seeking dismissal

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00591461.pdf

EFTA00210597Set 9

2008-07-1122p7,227w

aside a pre-charge 15 EFTA00210611 prosecutorial agreement based upon a CVRA violation. D.E. 189 at 7-8. Congress's intent that victims must address their claims to the courts

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00210597.pdf

EFTA00211273Set 9

2016-05-165p2,423w

outside the reach of the CVRA, which reserves absolute prosecutorial discretion to the government." D.E. 189 at 10, citing 18 U.S.C. § 3771(d)(6). The government respectfully disagrees with

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00211273.pdf

EFTA00594003Set 9

2011-09-266p1,385w

outside the reach of the CVRA, which reserves absolute prosecutorial discretion to the government." D.E. 189 at 10, tg 18 U.S.C. § 3771(d)(6). In Request for Production

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00594003.pdf

EFTA00705602Set 9

2011-09-266p1,432w

Entered on FLSD Docket 10/06/2014 Page 4 of 6 discretion to the government." D.E. 189 at 10, citing 18 U.S.C. § 3771(d)(6). In Request for Production No. 18, petitioners

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00705602.pdf

EFTA01081459Set 9

2015-02-2325p8,835w

open or set aside a pre-charge prosecutorial agreement based upon a CVRA violation. D.E. 189 at 7-8. The petitioners in this case are seeking to set aside

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01081459.pdf

EFTA00211464Set 9

2016-05-165p2,425w

outside the reach of the CVRA, which reserves absolute prosecutorial discretion to the government." D.E. 189 at 10, citing 18 U.S.C. § 3771(d)(6). The government respectfully disagrees with

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00211464.pdf

EFTA01183947Set 9

2008-07-0714p4,487w

prosecutorial agreements made in derogation of the government's CVRA conferral obligations as well." D.E. 189 at 8. Because Jane Doe #3 and Jane Doe #4, as well as Jane

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01183947.pdf

EFTA01199841Set 9

Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction & Order Lifting Stay of Discovery [D.E. 189], that "[t]he victims' CVRA injury is not the government's failure to prosecute

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01199841.pdf

EFTA01626136Set 10

2016-01-1418p4,901w

government's failure to confer with the victims before disposing of contemplated federal charges." D.E. 189 at 10. Moreover, the Court Respondent's Exhibit B Case No. 08.80736-CIV-MARRA

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01626136.pdf

EFTA00210894Set 9

2008-07-0714p4,366w

prosecutorial agreements made in derogation of the government's CVRA conferral obligations as well." D.E. 189 at 8. Because Jane Doe #3 and Jane Doe #4, as well as Jane

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00210894.pdf

EFTA00210569Set 9

2015-02-2325p8,788w

open or set aside a pre-charge prosecutorial agreement based upon a CVRA violation. D.E. 189 at 7-8. The petitioners in this case are seeking to set aside

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00210569.pdf

EFTA00209329Set 9

2011-09-265p1,155w

outside the reach of the CVRA, which reserves absolute prosecutorial discretion to the government." D.E. 189 at 10, citing 18 U.S.C. § 3771(d)(6). In Request for Production

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00209329.pdf

Corpus: 1990-03-17 – 2025-12-01

April 2007

Mo

Tu

We

Th

Fr

Sa

Su

None

Light

Medium

Heavy

Results by Dataset15 total

Set 9

14

Set 10

1