EFTA00799975Set 9
2007-04-2433p10,181w
stated during her April 24, 2007 interview that Epstein was "an awesome
man," (D.E. 403-3 at 23) who did not want underage girls providing him massages. D.E ... because he's an awesome guy and he didn't
do nothing wrong, nothing. D.E. 403-3 at 61.
Petitioners admit the direct quotations from the transcript of Jane ... interview. D.E.
EFTA00799976
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 425-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/06/2017 Page 3 of 33
415 at 4, 1 15.
At the time
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00799975.pdf
EFTA00800008Set 9
2007-04-2432p10,113w
stated during her April 24, 2007 interview that Epstein was "an awesome
man," (D.E. 403-3 at 23) who did not want underage girls providing him massages. D.E ... because he's an awesome guy and he didn't
do nothing wrong, nothing. D.E. 403-3 at 61.
Petitioners admit the direct quotations from the transcript of Jane ... interview. D.E.
EFTA00800008
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 427 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/10/2017 Page 2 of 32
415 at 4, 1 15.
At the time
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00800008.pdf
EFTA00210597Set 9
2008-07-1122p7,227w
Jane Doe No. 4. As the Government has previously
explained (see, e.g., D.E. 290 at 1-2), these CVRA proceedings are ancillary criminal
proceedings, see Fed.R.Crim.P. 60, Advisory Committee ... argument made by petitioners that Rule 21 applies because it is
more specific. D.E. 310 at 15-16 citin International Broth. of Teamsters I. AFL-CIO, 32
F.R.D ... became aware of the non-prosecution agreement
during the hearing on July 11, 2008 (D.E. 311 at 4), and received a copy of the non-prosecution
agreement pursuant to this
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00210597.pdf
EFTA00210569Set 9
2015-02-2325p8,788w
Jane Doe No. 4. As the Government has previously
explained (see, e.g., D.E. 290 at 1-2), these CVRA proceedings are ancillary criminal
proceedings see Fed.R.Crim.P. 60, Advisory Committee ... argument made by petitioners that Rule 21 applies because it is
more specific. D.E. 310 at 15-16, citin International Broth. of Teamsters'. AFL-CIO 32
F.R.D. 441, 442 (E.D.Mich ... aware of the non-prosecution agreement
during the hearing on July I I, 2008 (D.E. 311 at 4), and received a copy of the non-prosecution
agreement pursuant to this
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00210569.pdf
EFTA01081459Set 9
2015-02-2325p8,835w
Jane Doe No. 4. As the Government has previously
explained (see, e.g., D.E. 290 at 1-2), these CVRA proceedings are ancillary criminal
proceedings see Fed.R.Crim.P. 60, Advisory Committee ... argument made by petitioners that Rule 21 applies because it is
more specific. D.E. 310 at 15-16, citin International Broth. of Teamsters v. AFL-CIO 32
F.R.D ... aware of the non-prosecution agreement
during the hearing on July I I, 2008 (D.E. 311 at 4), and received a copy of the non-prosecution
agreement pursuant to this
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01081459.pdf
EFTA00595530Set 9
2010-10-2610p3,672w
Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Counts I and
ill (the 'Motion") (D.E. 106] seeking to avoid alleged, actual, fraudulent transfers under 11
U.S.C ... section 726.105(1)(A), Florida Statutes, the Defendants' Response
and Cross-Motion in Opposition [D.E. 118]. and the Trustee's Reply [D.E. 119]. Having carefully
reviewed the Motion, Response ... INTRODUCTION
The Trustee ("Plaintiff") commenced this case against the Defendants on February 8,
2010 [D.E. 1]. The Plaintiff thereafter amended his complaint on February 11, 2010 (the
"Amended Complaint") [D.E
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00595530.pdf
EFTA01069278Set 9
2010-10-2610p3,672w
Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Counts I and
ill (the 'Motion") (D.E. 106] seeking to avoid alleged, actual, fraudulent transfers under 11
U.S.C ... section 726.105(1)(A), Florida Statutes, the Defendants' Response
and Cross-Motion in Opposition [D.E. 118]. and the Trustee's Reply [D.E. 119]. Having carefully
reviewed the Motion, Response ... INTRODUCTION
The Trustee ("Plaintiff") commenced this case against the Defendants on February 8,
2010 [D.E. 1]. The Plaintiff thereafter amended his complaint on February 11, 2010 (the
"Amended Complaint") [D.E
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01069278.pdf
EFTA00210620Set 9
2008-07-1121p6,856w
argument made by petitioners that Rule 21 applies because it is
more specific. D.E. 310 at 15-16, citing International Broth. of Teamsters'. AFL-CIO, 32
F.R.D. 441, 442 (E.D.Mich ... became aware of the non-prosecution agreement during the
hearing on July 11, 2008 (D.E. 311 at 4), and received a copy of the non-prosecution agreement
pursuant to this ... Court's order of August 21, 2008 (D.E. 26).
Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2 became familiar enough with the non-prosecution
agreement to both invoke
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00210620.pdf
EFTA01069308Set 9
2010-04-1686p14,016w
records subpoenaed by any
party or requested from the trustee for RRA. (D.E. 672) A copy of that Order is
attached as Exhibit "3".
Among other things, this Order provided ... Epstein filed a Motion to Compel Production of Documents
previously subpoenaed from the trustee. (D.E. 807)
E. On July 19, 2010, a client of Bradley J. Edwards and the former ... face asked for records which were clearly not the
subject of a privilege. (D.E. 818)
F. An Amended Motion for Protective Order was filed on behalf of■ on July
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01069308.pdf
EFTA00811395Set 9
2018-11-2112p4,431w
Case
ADLER, P.A.,
Debtor.
ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO FOWLER WHITE (D.E.
0661
This matter came before the Court on October 26. 2018 for an evidentiary hearing ... Held in
Contempt and Scheduling Show Cause Hearing (the "Order to Show Cause") (D.E. 6366). Based on
the Sworn Declarations and the testimony of the witnesses, and the exhibits admitted ... objected to the subpoena on the basis of attorney-client and work product privileges.
[D.E. Nos. 818, 819). On August 13, 2010, this Court appointed retired Judge Robert B. Camey
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00811395.pdf
EFTA00725476Set 9
2010-10-0814p3,130w
Forbidding Further Obstructions in the Cases, and to Set an Accelerated
Schedule for Discovery (D.E. 15); and 3) motion to strike impertinent portions of Plaintiff's
response, and states ... home", which is all that Plaintiff alleges, or whether Mr. Epstein
had actual notice (D.E. 15 at 12), but, rather, whether the suit papers were left with "someone
of suitable ... Order Requiring Counsel to Meet, File Joint Scheduling Report and Joint Discovery Report.
(D.E. 4)
Finally, the Court should enter an Order striking all portions of Plaintiff's response,
including
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00725476.pdf
EFTA00802116Set 9
2018-10-2612p4,437w
Held in
Contempt and Scheduling Show Cause Hearing (the "Order to Show Cause") (D.E. 6366). Based on
the Sworn Declarations and the testimony of the witnesses, and the exhibits admitted ... objected to the subpoena on the basis of attorney-client and work product privileges.
[D.E. Nos. 818, 819]. On August 13, 2010, this Court appointed retired Judge Robert B. Carney ... master to receive the documents from the Trustee and to produce a privilege log. D.E. 888.
On October 15, 2010, this court entered an Amended Order Respecting Production of Documents
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00802116.pdf
EFTA00206725Set 9
2008-07-077p2,922w
Petition for Enforcement of Crime
Victim's Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3771." (D.E. I). On the same day, this Court issued an Order directing
the United States Attorney ... file a response to the petition by 5:00 p.m., Wednesday, July 9, 2008. (D.E. 3).
On July 9, 2008, the United States Attorney filed the "Government's Response ... Victim's Emergency Petition
for Enforcement of Crime Victim Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3771." (D.E. 7). The Court held a hearing on July
11, 2008.
On August
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00206725.pdf
EFTA00235792Set 9
2008-07-077p2,986w
Petition for Enforcement of Crime
Victim's Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3771." (D.E. I). On the same day, this Court issued an Order directing
the United States Attorney ... file a response to the petition by 5:00 p.m., Wednesday, July 9, 2008. (D.E. 3).
On July 9, 2008, the United States Attorney filed the "Government's Response ... Victim's Emergency Petition
for Enforcement of Crime Victim Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3771." (D.E. 7). The Court held a hearing on July
11, 2008.
On August
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00235792.pdf
EFTA00206822Set 9
2008-07-077p2,967w
Petition for Enforcement of Crime
Victim's Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3771." (D.E. I). On the same day, this Court issued an Order directing
the United States Attorney ... file a response to the petition by 5:00 p.m., Wednesday, July 9, 2008. (D.E. 3).
On July 9, 2008, the United States Attorney filed the "Government's Response ... Victim's Emergency Petition
for Enforcement of Crime Victim Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3771." (D.E. 7). The Court held a hearing on July
11, 2008.
On August
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00206822.pdf
EFTA00206755Set 9
2008-07-077p2,910w
Petition for Enforcement of Crime
Victim's Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3771." (D.E. I). On the same day, this Court issued an Order directing
the United States Attorney ... file a response to the petition by 5:00 p.m., Wednesday, July 9, 2008. (D.E. 3).
On July 9, 2008, the United States Attorney filed the "Government's Response ... Victim's Emergency Petition
for Enforcement of Crime Victim Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3771." (D.E. 7). The Court held a hearing on July
11, 2008.
On August
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00206755.pdf
EFTA00211718Set 9
2007-04-2432p10,140w
Victims' Rights
Act ("CVRA"), 18 U.S.C. § 3771, by: (1) failing to confer with them (D.E. 361 at 48-51; (2)
failing to treat them with fairness (D.E ... failing to provide petitioners with
reasonable and accurate notice (D.E. 361 at 54-55).
The Government disputes many of the facts which petitioners contend are not in dispute,
and have ... CVRA applies prior to the initiation of formal charges in a federal court. D.E. 361 at 48
n.175. More than seven years after the NPA was signed and nearly
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00211718.pdf