EFTA01184679Set 9
18p5,207w
allegations first appeared in Jane Doe #3's Motion for Joinder in December 2014 (DE
279), and therefore have absolutely no relevance as to whether there was a CVRA violation ... However, if the Court grants Jane
Does #3 and #4's motion for joinder (DE 279), then Prof. Dershowitz's motion for limited
intervention should be granted for such purposes ... listed her as a victim in the attachment to the NPA." (DE 279 at
6.) If she was already listed as a victim on the NPA, why would they need
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01184679.pdf
EFTA01132961Set 9
2015-02-0219p6,027w
allegations first appeared in
Jane Doe #3's Motion for Joinder in December 2014 (DE 279), and therefore have absolutely no
relevance as to whether there was a CVRA violation ... underlying CVRA case. If the Court
rejects the pending motion for joinder (DE 279), then the Court should strike the scurrilous
allegations against Dershowitz, or, alternatively, determine the possible mootness ... listed her as a victim in the attachment to the NPA." (DE 279 at
6.) If she was already listed as a victim on the NPA, why would they need
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01132961.pdf
EFTA01136992Set 9
16p4,553w
listed her as a victim in the attachment to the NPA." (DE 279 at
6.) If she was already listed as a victim on the NPA, why would they need ... allowed to intervene because
"he has declined to defend his reputation in other actions." (DE 279, at 12.) It is without
question, however, that the Motion for Joinder filed ... Jane Doe #3 on December 30, 2014 (DE
279), was the first time anyone has ever alleged that Prof. Dershowitz had any sexual contact
with a minor. It necessarily follows
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01136992.pdf
EFTA00590248Set 9
2015-05-1538p9,499w
respondent Government. These unnecessary details shall be stricken.
The original Rule 21 Motion (DE 279) shall be stricken in its entirety, as it is wholly
superseded by the "corrected" version ... DENIED AS MOOT; the following materials are hereby
STRICKEN from the record:
DE 279, in its entirety.
DE 280, all sentences between the following sentences:
"The Government then concealed from
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00590248.pdf
EFTA01249131Set 9
2014-12-3045p7,838w
respondent Government. These unnecessary details shall be stricken.
The original Rule 21 Motion (DE 279) shall be stricken in its entirety, as it is wholly
superseded by the "corrected" version ... DENIED AS MOOT; the following materials are hereby
STRICKEN from the record:
• DE 279, in its entirety.
• DE 280, all sentences between the following sentences:
"The Government then concealed from
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01249131.pdf
EFTA00812477Set 9
2014-12-3010p3,258w
respondent Government. These unnecessary details shall be stricken.
The original Rule 21 Motion (DE 279) shall be stricken in its entirety, as it is wholly
superseded by the "corrected" version ... DENIED AS MOOT; the following materials are hereby
STRICKEN from the record:
DE 279, in its entirety.
DE 280, all sentences between the following sentences:
"The Government then concealed from
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00812477.pdf
EFTA00074964Set 9
2020-06-1740p9,195w
respondent Government. These unnecessary details shall be stricken.
The original Rule 21 Motion (DE 279) shall be stricken in its entirety, as it is wholly
superseded by the "corrected" version ... DENIED AS MOOT; the following materials are hereby
STRICKEN from the record:
DE 279, in its entirety.
DE 280, all sentences between the following sentences:
"The Government then concealed from
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00074964.pdf
EFTA00097406Set 9
2014-12-3011p3,281w
respondent Government. These unnecessary details shall be stricken.
The original Rule 21 Motion (DE 279) shall be stricken in its entirety, as it is wholly
superseded by the "corrected" version ... DENIED AS MOOT; the following materials are hereby
STRICKEN from the record:
• DE 279, in its entirety.
DE 280, all sentences between the following sentences:
"The Government then concealed from
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00097406.pdf
EFTA00210559Set 9
2014-12-3010p3,254w
respondent Government. These unnecessary details shall be stricken.
The original Rule 21 Motion (DE 279) shall be stricken in its entirety, as it is wholly
superseded by the "corrected" version ... DENIED AS MOOT; the following materials are hereby
STRICKEN from the record:
DE 279, in its entirety.
DE 280, all sentences between the following sentences:
"The Government then concealed from
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00210559.pdf
EFTA00210130Set 9
2014-12-3010p3,254w
respondent Government. These unnecessary details shall be stricken.
The original Rule 21 Motion (DE 279) shall be stricken in its entirety, as it is wholly
superseded by the "corrected" version ... DENIED AS MOOT; the following materials are hereby
STRICKEN from the record:
DE 279, in its entirety.
DE 280, all sentences between the following sentences:
"The Government then concealed from
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00210130.pdf
EFTA00597098Set 9
2007-09-246p1,604w
Government first learned in December 2014, as part of
her Motion for Joinder. (DE 279, 280.) By definition, any information not known to the
Government prior to September ... December of 2014.
Tellingly, Jane Does #3 and #4's Motion for Joinder (DE 279) never even
attempts to address this threshold issue of timing. The CVRA calls ... negotiate an
agreement with a provision that provided protection for himself..." is simply false. (DE
279 at 4.) The Government can attest that the NPA was negotiated with other counsel
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00597098.pdf
EFTA01155826Set 9
2007-09-246p1,604w
Government first learned in December 2014, as part of
her Motion for Joinder. (DE 279, 280.) By definition, any information not known to the
Government prior to September ... December of 2014.
Tellingly, Jane Does #3 and #4's Motion for Joinder (DE 279) never even
attempts to address this threshold issue of timing. The CVRA calls ... negotiate an
agreement with a provision that provided protection for himself..." is simply false. (DE
279 at 4.) The Government can attest that the NPA was negotiated with other counsel
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01155826.pdf
EFTA01099134Set 9
2015-03-0226p11,196w
Joinder in Action, Does v. United States, No. 9:08-cv-80736-KAM (DE 279). Several
days later, they filed a corrected motion, fixing the signature block on the pleading
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01099134.pdf