Epstein Files Search

EFTA00614065Set 9

2011-09-1621p6,499w

under Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(a) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(b) (DE 93). The motion for "limited" intervention should be denied for three separate and independent reasons ... hearing on all these issues -- Jeffrey Epstein filed his untimely "Motion for Limited Intervention" (DE #93). This document was also signed by attorney Roy Black, Esq. I. EPSTEIN MOTION ... CVRA were violated not only by the government, but also by Mr. Epstein." DE #93 at 4 (emphasis added). Epstein maintains that it was only "[w]hen the [victims] articulated

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00614065.pdf

EFTA01107740Set 9

2011-09-1621p6,503w

under Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(a) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(b) (DE 93). The motion for "limited" intervention should be denied for three separate and independent reasons ... hearing on all these issues -- Jeffrey Epstein filed his untimely "Motion for Limited Intervention" (DE #93). This document was also signed by attorney Roy Black, Esq. I. EPSTEIN MOTION ... CVRA were violated not only by the government, but also by Mr. Epstein." DE #93 at 4 (emphasis added). Epstein maintains that it was only "[w]hen the [victims] articulated

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01107740.pdf

EFTA00614086Set 9

2011-09-1621p6,470w

under Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(a) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(b) (DE 93). The motion for "limited" intervention should be denied for three separate and independent reasons ... hearing on all these issues -- Jeffrey Epstein filed his untimely "Motion for Limited Intervention" (DE #93). This document was also signed by attorney Roy Black, Esq. I. EPSTEIN MOTION ... CVRA were violated not only by the government, but also by Mr. Epstein." DE #93 at 4 (emphasis added). Epstein maintains that it was only "[w]hen the [victims] articulated

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00614086.pdf

EFTA01081647Set 9

2013-06-1810p2,756w

motion for limited intervention on issues relating to a protective order for the correspondence. DE 93. His pleading included as Exhibit 1, a proposed motion for a protective order regarding ... correspondence that he intended to file if granted leave to intervene. DE 93, Exhibit 1. On September 16, 2011, the victims filed a response in objection to Epstein's motion

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01081647.pdf

EFTA01099482Set 9

2011-03-2120p5,924w

Document 251 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/16/2014 Page 3 of 20 correspondence. DE 93. His pleading included, as Exhibit 1, a proposed motion for a protective order regarding the correspondence ... that he intended to file if granted leave to intervene. DE 93, Exhibit 1. On September 16, 2011, the victims filed a response in objection to Epstein's motion. DE

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01099482.pdf

EFTA00209236Set 9

2011-03-2120p5,563w

limited intervention on issues relating to a protective order for the 2 EFTA00209237 correspondence. DE 93. His pleading included, as Exhibit 1, a proposed motion for a protective order regarding ... correspondence that he intended to file if granted leave to intervene. DE 93, Exhibit 1. On September 16, 2011, the victims filed a response in objection to Epstein's motion

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00209236.pdf

EFTA01071961Set 9

2013-08-3071p17,109w

later filed his own motion to intervene to object to release of the correspondence. DE 93. Later, Epstein and his attorneys filed a motion for protective order, asking the Court ... moved to intervene with regard to correspondence between his attorneys and federal prosecutors (DE 93) — the intervention that has prompted this appeal. In response, the victims 47 EFTA01072016 Case

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01071961.pdf

EFTA00205537Set 9

2012-03-292p387w

before the Court upon the Motion to Intervene For Limited Intervention by Jeffrey Epstein (DE 93). This matter is fully briefed and is now ripe for review. The Court ... ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion to Intervene For Limited Intervention by Jeffrey Epstein (DE 93) is GRANTED. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00205537.pdf

EFTA01143529Set 9

2013-06-2817p4,700w

limited intervention in this case (which the Court granted, see DE 159, granting DE 93), Epstein is a litigant in this case and therefore he cannot take an interlocutory appeal

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01143529.pdf

EFTA00209600Set 9

2013-06-2816p4,515w

limited intervention in this case (which the Court granted, see DE 159, granting DE 93), Epstein is a litigant in this case and therefore he cannot take an interlocutory appeal

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00209600.pdf

EFTA01098146Set 9

2013-06-2817p4,747w

limited intervention in this case (which the Court granted, see DE 159, granting DE 93), Epstein is a litigant in this case and therefore he cannot take an interlocutory appeal

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01098146.pdf

EFTA00209567Set 9

2007-09-2428p5,531w

later filed his own motion to intervene to object to release of the correspondence. DE 93. Subsequently, Epstein and his attorneys filed a motion for a protective order, asking

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00209567.pdf

EFTA00209355Set 9

2007-09-2428p5,591w

later filed his own motion to intervene to object to release of the correspondence. DE 93. Subsequently, Epstein and his attorneys filed a motion for a protective order, asking

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00209355.pdf

EFTA01128707Set 9

2013-07-0228p5,886w

later filed his own motion to intervene to object to release of the correspondence. DE 93. Subsequently, Epstein and his attorneys filed a motion for a protective order, asking

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01128707.pdf

EFTA01710219Set 10

2001-07-0197p30,081w

FLORIDA CERTIFICATION OF IMMUNIZATION Legal Authority: sections 232.03Z, 402.305, 402.313, Florida Statutes; rules 640

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01710219.pdf

EFTA00209507Set 9

2013-07-1923p4,943w

later filed his own motion to intervene to object to release of the correspondence. DE 93. Epstein and his attorneys ultimately filed a motion for a protective order, asking

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00209507.pdf

EFTA01081823Set 9

2011-09-026p1,228w

filed such a motion with regard to correspondence between his attorneys and federal prosecutors. DE 93. In response, the victims objected that his efforts were untimely and appeared

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01081823.pdf

EFTA01081198Set 9

2011-09-026p1,429w

moved to intervene with regard to correspondence between his attorneys and federal prosecutors. DE 93. I EFTA01081198 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 221 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/08/2013

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01081198.pdf

EFTA00021442Set 8

2019-07-2370p21,698w

move to intervene in the case until September 2, 2011 (DE 93), and even then he sought only "limited" intervention with regard to remedy. In arguing that relief

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00021442.pdf

EFTA00022546Set 8

2019-07-2370p21,586w

move to intervene in the case until September 2, 2011 (DE 93), and even then he sought only "limited" intervention with regard to remedy. In arguing that relief

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00022546.pdf