EFTA00209657Set 9
2013-08-0575p16,720w
district court from which this appeal is taken was entered on June 18, 2013 (DE188)
and June 19, 2013 (DE200), and intervenors/appellants' notices of appeal were filed
on June ... intervene, DE158, 159, but ultimately
ruled that the correspondence was subject to disclosure. DE188. The district court
rejected intervenors' argument based on Rule 410, erroneously concluding that the
correspondence fell ... district
court indicated that it considered in ruling on the disclosure issue. See DE188:1.
5
EFTA00209675
Case: 13-12923 Date Filed: 08/05/2013 Page: 20 of 75
pending. During
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00209657.pdf
EFTA01072194Set 9
2013-06-1858p13,073w
intervene, DEI58, 159, but
ultimately ruled that the correspondence was subject to disclosure. DE188. The
district court rejected intervenors' argument based on Rule 410, erroneously
concluding that the correspondence fell ... district court
indicated that it considered in ruling on the disclosure issue. See DE188:1.
8
EFTA01072201
4. The district court also rejected — again erroneously — the application of Rule ... discussions of leniency and
statements made in the hope of avoiding a federal indictment," DE188:4, and (2)
22
EFTA01072215
that the communications resulted in Epstein's plea of guilty
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01072194.pdf
EFTA01134321Set 9
2013-06-1858p13,086w
intervene, DEI58, 159, but
ultimately ruled that the correspondence was subject to disclosure. DE188. The
district court rejected intervenors' argument based on Rule 410, erroneously
concluding that the correspondence fell ... district court
indicated that it considered in ruling on the disclosure issue. See DE188:1.
8
EFTA01134328
4. The district court also rejected — again erroneously — the application of Rule ... discussions of leniency and
statements made in the hope of avoiding a federal indictment," DE188:4, and (2)
22
EFTA01134342
that the communications resulted in Epstein's plea of guilty
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01134321.pdf
EFTA00211513Set 9
2016-03-2811p2,895w
document privilege issue was later resolved by the district court in favor of
Petitioners (DE188), and the attorneys appealed (DE194, DE196). The Eleventh Circuit
affirmed the district court's ruling ... seek a protective order (DE159). Epstein's motion for protective order
(DE162) was denied (DE188), and Epstein appealed along with his attorneys (DE195). The
Eleventh Circuit affirmed the district court
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00211513.pdf