""DPA"" — Epstein Files Search

Search Entities About Settings

/to search

Dataset

Sort

Status

DOJ Status

Date Range

–

Page Count

–

results for “"DPA"”

Keyboard Shortcuts

/

Focus search

Esc

Blur input

O

Open PDF

←→

Paginate

Results by Dataset179 total

Set 7

1

Set 8

6

Set 9

145

Set 10

22

Set 11

5

EFTA00611136Set 9

2013-12-1915p10,933w

coded J K L PGC-1a/p KO myotubes • Empty • HIF-la DPA O I-IIF-2o DPA 3.5 1.4 7 • D DMSO ... SIRT1 OE ° 1s - HA E >CD 0.6 — O HIF-la DPA §i 41 m 1.0 - :§" OA .§ : 3 (7) f 5 2 + SIRTI OE Tubulin O HIF-2a DPA ... overexpressing either HIP-tor or HIF-2a with the proline residues mutated NIF-1x DPA and HIF-2x DPA). 09 Expression of nuclear- versus milochcodriaIN encoded genes

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00611136.pdf

EFTA00039665Set 9

2021-05-2124p11,522w

cross border activity. For UBSS, the DOJ (Acosta Downing et al) dropped their DPA in 2010. My claims: the FINRA OpCo/Gibraltar complaint clearly implicates UBSS criminal activity AFTER ... dropped its UBSS x border DPA. This is what the SEC is protecting in the OpCo/Gibraltar complaint: NITE/UBSS/Hanover/Magna illegal activity. Also in my Knights 2013 TCR: IMDS. A multi year ... blatantly and knowingly false pretext for the DOJ dropping its UBSS x border DPA because "UBSS was in full compliance" in 2010. So, rather than open a new line

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00039665.pdf

EFTA00083403Set 9

2020-11-1943p17,177w

cross border activity. For UBSS, the DOJ (Acosta Downing et al) dropped their DPA in 2010. My claims: the FINRA OpCo/Gibraltar complaint clearly implicates UBSS criminal activity AFTER ... dropped its UBSS x border DPA. This is what the SEC is protecting in the OpCo/Gibraltar complaint: NITE/UBSS/Hanover/Magna illegal activity. Also in my Knight/Berger 2013 TCR: IMDS. A multi year ... blatantly and knowingly false pretext for the DOJ dropping its UBSS x border DPA because "UBSS was in full compliance" in 2010. So, rather than open a new line

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00083403.pdf

EFTA00094336Set 9

2020-09-1624p11,529w

cross border activity. For UBSS, the DOJ (Acosta Downing et al) dropped their DPA in 2010. My claims: the FINRA OpCo/Gibraltar complaint clearly implicates UBSS criminal activity AFTER ... dropped its UBSS x border EFTA00094340 DPA. This is what the SEC is protecting in the OpCo/Gibraltar complaint: NITE/UBSS/Hanover/Magna illegal activity. Also in my Knight/Berger 2013 TCR: IMDS. A multi ... blatantly and knowingly false pretext for the DOJ dropping its UBSS x border DPA because "UBSS was in full compliance" in 2010. So, rather than open a new line

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00094336.pdf

EFTA00086579Set 9

2021-02-1138p16,300w

cross border activity. For UBSS, the DOJ (Acosta Downing et al) dropped their DPA in 2010. My claims: the FINRA OpCo/Gibraltar complaint clearly implicates UBSS criminal activity AFTER ... dropped its UBSS x border DPA. This is what the SEC is protecting in the OpCo/Gibraltar complaint: NITE/UBSS/Hanover/Magna illegal activity. Also in my Knight/Berger 2013 TCR: IMDS. A multi year ... blatantly and knowingly false pretext for the DOJ dropping its UBSS x border DPA because "UBSS was in full compliance" in 2010. So, rather than open a new line

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00086579.pdf

EFTA00094159Set 9

2020-09-1123p11,506w

cross border activity. For UBSS, the DOJ (Acosta Downing et al) dropped their DPA in 2010. My claims: the FINRA OpCo/Gibraltar complaint clearly implicates UBSS criminal activity AFTER ... dropped its UBSS x border DPA. This is what the SEC is protecting in the OpCo/Gibraltar complaint: NITE/UBSS/Hanover/Magna illegal activity. Also in my Knight/Berger 2013 TCR: IMDS. A multi year ... blatantly and knowingly false pretext for the DOJ dropping its UBSS x border DPA because "UBSS was in full compliance" in 2010. So, rather than open a new line

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00094159.pdf

EFTA00089576Set 9

2020-09-0522p10,807w

cross border activity. For UBSS, the DOJ (Acosta Downing et al) dropped their DPA in 2010. My claims: the FINRA OpCo/Gibraltar complaint clearly implicates UBSS criminal activity AFTER ... dropped its UBSS x border DPA. This is what the SEC is protecting in the OpCo/Gibraltar complaint: NITE/UBSS/Hanover/Magna illegal activity. Also in my Knight/Berger 2013 TCR: IMDS. A multi year ... blatantly and knowingly false pretext for the DOJ dropping its UBSS x border DPA because "UBSS was in full compliance" in 2010. So, rather than open a new line

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00089576.pdf

EFTA00069074Set 9

2020-07-2235p14,351w

cross border activity. For UBSS, the DOJ (Acosta Downing et al) dropped their DPA in 2010. My claims: the FINRA OpCo/Gibraltar complaint clearly implicates UBSS criminal activity AFTER ... dropped its UBSS x border DPA. This is what the SEC is protecting in the OpCo/Gibraltar complaint: NITE/UBSS/Hanover/Magna illegal activity. Also in my Knight/Berger 2013 TCR: IMDS. A multi year ... blatantly and knowingly false pretext for the DOJ dropping its UBSS x border DPA because "UBSS was in full compliance" in 2010. So, rather than open a new line

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00069074.pdf

EFTA00083198Set 9

2020-07-0224p11,826w

cross border activity. For UBSS, the DOJ (Acosta Downing et al) dropped their DPA in 2010. My claims: the FINRA OpCo/Gibraltar complaint clearly implicates UBSS criminal activity AFTER ... dropped its UBSS x border EFTA00083202 DPA. This is what the SEC is protecting in the OpCo/Gibraltar complaint: NITE/UBSS/Hanover/Magna illegal activity. Also in my Knight/Berger 2013 TCR: IMDS. A multi ... blatantly and knowingly false pretext for the DOJ dropping its UBSS x border DPA because "UBSS was in full compliance" in 2010. So, rather than open a new line

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00083198.pdf

EFTA00088144Set 9

2021-02-1741p16,775w

cross border activity. For UBSS, the DOJ (Acosta Downing et al) dropped their DPA in 2010. My claims: the FINRA OpCo/Gibraltar complaint clearly implicates UBSS criminal activity AFTER ... dropped its UBSS x border DPA. This is what the SEC is protecting in the OpCo/Gibraltar complaint: NITE/UBSS/Hanover/Magna illegal activity. Also in my Knight/Berger 2013 TCR: IMDS. A multi year ... blatantly and knowingly false pretext for the DOJ dropping its UBSS x border DPA because "UBSS was in full compliance" in 2010. So, rather than open a new line

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00088144.pdf

EFTA00083600Set 9

2020-11-1341p16,825w

cross border activity. For UBSS, the DOJ (Acosta Downing et al) dropped their DPA in 2010. My claims: the FINRA OpCo/Gibraltar complaint clearly implicates UBSS criminal activity AFTER ... dropped its UBSS x border DPA. This is what the SEC is protecting in the OpCo/Gibraltar complaint: NITE/UBSS/Hanover/Magna illegal activity. Also in my Knight/Berger 2013 TCR: IMDS. A multi year ... blatantly and knowingly false pretext for the DOJ dropping its UBSS x border DPA because "UBSS was in full compliance" in 2010. So, rather than open a new line

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00083600.pdf

EFTA00094263Set 9

2020-09-1824p11,653w

cross border activity. For UBSS, the DOJ (Acosta Downing et al) dropped their DPA in 2010. My claims: the FINRA OpCo/Gibraltar complaint clearly implicates UBSS criminal activity AFTER ... dropped its UBSS x border DPA. This is what the SEC is protecting in the OpCo/Gibraltar complaint: NITE/UBSS/Hanover/Magna illegal activity. Also in my Knight/Berger 2013 TCR: IMDS. A multi year ... blatantly and knowingly false pretext for the DOJ dropping its UBSS x border DPA because "UBSS was in full compliance" in 2010. So, rather than open a new line

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00094263.pdf

EFTA00064662Set 9

2020-07-2337p14,828w

cross border activity. For UBSS, the DOJ (Acosta Downing et al) dropped their DPA in 2010. My claims: the FINRA OpCo/Gibraltar complaint clearly implicates UBSS criminal activity AFTER ... dropped its UBSS x border DPA. This is what the SEC is protecting in the OpCo/Gibraltar complaint: NITE/UBSS/Hanover/Magna illegal activity. Also in my Knight/Berger 2013 TCR: IMDS. A multi year ... blatantly and knowingly false pretext for the DOJ dropping its UBSS x border DPA because "UBSS was in full compliance" in 2010. So, rather than open a new line

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00064662.pdf

EFTA00069247Set 9

2020-07-0728p13,099w

cross border activity. For UBSS, the DOJ (Acosta Downing et al) dropped their DPA in 2010. My claims: the FINRA OpCo/Gibraltar complaint clearly implicates UBSS criminal activity AFTER ... dropped its UBSS x border DPA. This is what the SEC is protecting in the OpCo/Gibraltar complaint: NITE/UBSS/Hanover/Magna illegal activity. Also in my Knight/Berger 2013 TCR: IMDS. A multi year ... blatantly and knowingly false pretext for the DOJ dropping its UBSS x border DPA because "UBSS was in full compliance" in 2010. So, rather than open a new line

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00069247.pdf

EFTA00076843Set 9

2020-11-0539p16,331w

cross border activity. For UBSS, the DOJ (Acosta Downing et al) dropped their DPA in 2010. My claims: the FINRA OpCo/Gibraltar complaint clearly implicates UBSS criminal activity AFTER ... dropped its UBSS x border DPA. This is what the SEC is protecting in the OpCo/Gibraltar complaint: NITE/UBSS/Hanover/Magna illegal activity. Also in my Knight/Berger 2013 TCR: IMDS. A multi year ... blatantly and knowingly false pretext for the DOJ dropping its UBSS x border DPA because "UBSS was in full compliance" in 2010. So, rather than open a new line

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00076843.pdf

EFTA00069011Set 9

2020-07-1331p13,501w

cross border activity. For UBSS, the DOJ (Acosta Downing et al) dropped their DPA in 2010. My claims: the FINRA OpCo/Gibraltar complaint clearly implicates UBSS criminal activity AFTER ... dropped its UBSS x border DPA. This is what the SEC is protecting in the OpCo/Gibraltar complaint: NITE/UBSS/Hanover/Magna illegal activity. Also in my Knight/Berger 2013 TCR: IMDS. A multi year ... blatantly and knowingly false pretext for the DOJ dropping its UBSS x border DPA because "UBSS was in full compliance" in 2010. So, rather than open a new line

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00069011.pdf

EFTA00078132Set 9

2020-11-0437p16,124w

cross border activity. For UBSS, the DOJ (Acosta Downing et al) dropped their DPA in 2010. My claims: the FINRA OpCo/Gibraltar complaint clearly implicates UBSS criminal activity AFTER ... dropped its UBSS x border DPA. This is what the SEC is protecting in the OpCo/Gibraltar complaint: NITE/UBSS/Hanover/Magna illegal activity. Also in my Knight/Berger 2013 TCR: IMDS. A multi year ... blatantly and knowingly false pretext for the DOJ dropping its UBSS x border DPA because "UBSS was in full compliance" in 2010. So, rather than open a new line

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00078132.pdf

EFTA00083356Set 9

2021-02-1942p17,063w

cross border activity. For UBSS, the DOJ (Acosta Downing et al) dropped their DPA in 2010. My claims: the FINRA OpCo/Gibraltar complaint clearly implicates UBSS criminal activity AFTER ... dropped its UBSS x border DPA. This is what the SEC is protecting in the OpCo/Gibraltar complaint: NITE/UBSS/Hanover/Magna illegal activity. Also in my Knight/Berger 2013 TCR: IMDS. A multi year ... blatantly and knowingly false pretext for the DOJ dropping its UBSS x border DPA because "UBSS was in full compliance" in 2010. So, rather than open a new line

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00083356.pdf

EFTA00072364Set 9

2020-06-3025p11,624w

cross border activity. For UBSS, the DOJ (Acosta Downing et al) dropped their DPA in 2010. My claims: the FINRA OpCo/Gibraltar complaint clearly implicates UBSS criminal activity AFTER ... dropped its UBSS x border DPA. This is what the SEC is protecting in the OpCo/Gibraltar complaint: NITE/UBSS/Hanover/Magna illegal activity. Also in my Knight/Berger 2013 TCR: IMDS. A multi year ... blatantly and knowingly false pretext for the DOJ dropping its UBSS x border DPA because "UBSS was in full compliance" in 2010. So, rather than open a new line

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00072364.pdf

EFTA00069109Set 9

2020-07-2838p15,022w

cross border activity. For UBSS, the DOJ (Acosta Downing et al) dropped their DPA in 2010. My claims: the FINRA OpCo/Gibraltar complaint clearly implicates UBSS criminal activity AFTER ... dropped its UBSS x border DPA. This is what the SEC is protecting in the OpCo/Gibraltar complaint: NITE/UBSS/Hanover/Magna illegal activity. Also in my Knight/Berger 2013 TCR: IMDS. A multi year ... blatantly and knowingly false pretext for the DOJ dropping its UBSS x border DPA because "UBSS was in full compliance" in 2010. So, rather than open a new line

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00069109.pdf

Page 1

Corpus: 1990-03-17 – 2025-12-01

December 2013

Mo

Tu

We

Th

Fr

Sa

Su

None

Light

Medium

Heavy