Epstein Files Search

EFTA01221286Set 9

2013-08-0246p15,843w

petty coda applicable U.S. law for this transaction, this transaction has been reported to DTCC Data Repository (U.S.) LLC Reference Slumber. S000046103779 Page I of 5 J.P. Morgan Securities ... party under applicable U.S. law for this transaction, this transaction has been reported to DTCC Data Repository (US.) LLC Reference Nuaaber. 8000046103779 Page 2 of 5 .1-P. Morgan Securides ... pony wader applicable U.S. law for this transaction, this mnsacion has been reported to DTCC Data Repast:coy (U.S.) LLC Reference Number: 8000046103779 Page 3 of 5 J.P. Morgan Securities

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01221286.pdf

EFTA00072751Set 9

2020-06-3026p12,045w

intentionally misleads the public there is no naked shorting because the SEC authorized the DTCC to create the illegal, shadow clear mechanism Obligation Warehouse (OW) so NITE's criminal activity ... authorized by the issuer. Settlement: buyer brings cash/seller brings securities. The DTCC simply makes journal entries. But there are still "IOU's" in the system. The SEC authorized the DTCC ... Rule 204. The OW is just what it sounds like. Per my Knight TCR, DTCC suspends services (Chill/Lock) and trades are deemed "ex clearing". In a FOIA request made with

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00072751.pdf

EFTA00083600Set 9

2020-11-1341p16,825w

intentionally misleads the public there is no naked shorting because the SEC authorized the DTCC to create the illegal, shadow clear mechanism Obligation Warehouse (OW) so NITE's criminal activity ... authorized by the issuer. Settlement: buyer brings cash/seller brings securities. The DTCC simply makes journal entries. But there are still "IOU's" in the system. The SEC authorized the DTCC ... Rule 204. The OW is just what it sounds like. Per my Knight TCR, DTCC suspends services (Chill/Lock) and trades are deemed "ex clearing". In a FOIA request made with

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00083600.pdf

EFTA00086579Set 9

2021-02-1138p16,300w

intentionally misleads the public there is no naked shorting because the SEC authorized the DTCC to create the illegal, shadow clear mechanism Obligation Warehouse (OW) so NITE's criminal activity ... authorized by the issuer. Settlement: buyer brings cash/seller brings securities. The DTCC simply makes journal entries. But there are still "IOU's" in the system. The SEC authorized the DTCC ... Rule 204. The OW is just what it sounds like. Per my Knight TCR, DTCC suspends services (Chill/Lock) and trades are deemed "ex clearing". In a FOIA request made with

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00086579.pdf

EFTA00088144Set 9

2021-02-1741p16,775w

intentionally misleads the public there is no naked shorting because the SEC authorized the DTCC to create the illegal, shadow clear mechanism Obligation Warehouse (OW) so NITE's criminal activity ... authorized by the issuer. Settlement: buyer brings cash/seller brings securities. The DTCC simply makes journal entries. But there are still "IOU's" in the system. The SEC authorized the DTCC ... Rule 204. The OW is just what it sounds like. Per my Knight TCR, DTCC suspends services (Chill/Lock) and trades are deemed "ex clearing". In a FOIA request made with

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00088144.pdf

EFTA00071827Set 9

2015-05-3154p20,148w

intentionally misleads the public there is no naked shorting because the SEC authorized the DTCC to create the illegal, shadow clear mechanism Obligation Warehouse (OW) so NITE's criminal activity ... authorized by the issuer. Settlement: buyer brings cash/seller brings securities. The DTCC simply makes journal entries. But there are still "IOU's" in the system. The SEC authorized the DTCC ... Rule 204. The OW is just what it sounds like. Per my Knight TCR, DTCC suspends services (Chill/Lock) and trades are deemed "ex clearing". In a FOIA request made with

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00071827.pdf

EFTA00071433Set 9

2021-06-0747p18,723w

intentionally misleads the public there is no naked shorting because the SEC authorized the DTCC to create the illegal, shadow clear mechanism Obligation Warehouse (OW) so NITE's criminal activity ... authorized by the issuer. Settlement: buyer brings cash/seller brings securities. The DTCC simply makes journal entries. But there are still "IOU's" in the system. The SEC authorized the DTCC ... Rule 204. The OW is just what it sounds like. Per my Knight TCR, DTCC suspends services (Chill/Lock) and trades are deemed "ex clearing". In a FOIA request made with

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00071433.pdf

EFTA00070950Set 9

2017-07-3148p18,482w

intentionally misleads the public there is no naked shorting because the SEC authorized the DTCC to create the illegal, shadow clear mechanism Obligation Warehouse (OW) so NITE's criminal activity ... authorized by the issuer. Settlement: buyer brings cash/seller brings securities. The DTCC simply makes journal entries. But there are still "IOU's" in the system. The SEC authorized the DTCC ... Rule 204. The OW is just what it sounds like. Per my Knight TCR, DTCC suspends services (Chill/Lock) and trades are deemed "ex clearing". In a FOIA request made with

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00070950.pdf

EFTA00069074Set 9

2020-07-2235p14,351w

intentionally misleads the public there is no naked shorting because the SEC authorized the DTCC to create the illegal, shadow clear mechanism Obligation Warehouse (OW) so NITE's criminal activity ... authorized by the issuer. Settlement: buyer brings cash/seller brings securities. The DTCC simply makes journal entries. But there are still "IOU's" in the system. The SEC authorized the DTCC ... Rule 204. The OW is just what it sounds like. Per my Knight TCR, DTCC suspends services (Chill/Lock) and trades are deemed "ex clearing". In a FOIA request made with

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00069074.pdf

EFTA00092123Set 9

2007-01-1850p18,097w

intentionally misleads the public there is no naked shorting because the SEC authorized the DTCC to create the illegal, shadow clear mechanism Obligation Warehouse (OW) so NITE's criminal activity ... authorized by the issuer. Settlement: buyer brings cash/seller brings securities. The DTCC simply makes journal entries. But there are still "IOU's" in the system. The SEC authorized the DTCC ... Rule 204. The OW is just what it sounds like. Per my Knight TCR, DTCC suspends services (Chill/Lock) and trades are deemed "ex clearing". In a FOIA request made with

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00092123.pdf

EFTA00069011Set 9

2020-07-1331p13,501w

intentionally misleads the public there is no naked shorting because the SEC authorized the DTCC to create the illegal, shadow clear mechanism Obligation Warehouse (OW) so NITE's criminal activity ... authorized by the issuer. Settlement: buyer brings cash/seller brings securities. The DTCC simply makes journal entries. But there are still "IOU's" in the system. The SEC authorized the DTCC ... Rule 204. The OW is just what it sounds like. Per my Knight TCR, DTCC suspends services (Chill/Lock) and trades are deemed "ex clearing". In a FOIA request made with

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00069011.pdf

EFTA00078132Set 9

2020-11-0437p16,124w

intentionally misleads the public there is no naked shorting because the SEC authorized the DTCC to create the illegal, shadow clear mechanism Obligation Warehouse (OW) so NITE's criminal activity ... authorized by the issuer. Settlement: buyer brings cash/seller brings securities. The DTCC simply makes journal entries. But there are still "IOU's" in the system. The SEC authorized the DTCC ... Rule 204. The OW is just what it sounds like. Per my Knight TCR, DTCC suspends services (Chill/Lock) and trades are deemed "ex clearing". In a FOIA request made with

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00078132.pdf

EFTA00064662Set 9

2020-07-2337p14,828w

intentionally misleads the public there is no naked shorting because the SEC authorized the DTCC to create the illegal, shadow clear mechanism Obligation Warehouse (OW) so NITE's criminal activity ... authorized by the issuer. Settlement: buyer brings cash/seller brings securities. The DTCC simply makes journal entries. But there are still "IOU's" in the system. The SEC authorized the DTCC ... Rule 204. The OW is just what it sounds like. Per my Knight TCR, DTCC suspends services (Chill/Lock) and trades are deemed "ex clearing". In a FOIA request made with

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00064662.pdf

EFTA00083356Set 9

2021-02-1942p17,063w

intentionally misleads the public there is no naked shorting because the SEC authorized the DTCC to create the illegal, shadow clear mechanism Obligation Warehouse (OW) so NITE's criminal activity ... authorized by the issuer. Settlement: buyer brings cash/seller brings securities. The DTCC simply makes journal entries. But there are still "IOU's" in the system. The SEC authorized the DTCC ... Rule 204. The OW is just what it sounds like. Per my Knight TCR, DTCC suspends services (Chill/Lock) and trades are deemed "ex clearing". In a FOIA request made with

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00083356.pdf

EFTA00076843Set 9

2020-11-0539p16,331w

intentionally misleads the public there is no naked shorting because the SEC authorized the DTCC to create the illegal, shadow clear mechanism Obligation Warehouse (OW) so NITE's criminal activity ... authorized by the issuer. Settlement: buyer brings cash/seller brings securities. The DTCC simply makes journal entries. But there are still "IOU's" in the system. The SEC authorized the DTCC ... Rule 204. The OW is just what it sounds like. Per my Knight TCR, DTCC suspends services (Chill/Lock) and trades are deemed "ex clearing". In a FOIA request made with

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00076843.pdf

EFTA00069109Set 9

2020-07-2838p15,022w

intentionally misleads the public there is no naked shorting because the SEC authorized the DTCC to create the illegal, shadow clear mechanism Obligation Warehouse (OW) so NITE's criminal activity ... authorized by the issuer. Settlement: buyer brings cash/seller brings securities. The DTCC simply makes journal entries. But there are still "IOU's" in the system. The SEC authorized the DTCC ... Rule 204. The OW is just what it sounds like. Per my Knight TCR, DTCC suspends services (Chill/Lock) and trades are deemed "ex clearing". In a FOIA request made with

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00069109.pdf

EFTA00094212Set 9

2020-09-1651p18,136w

intentionally misleads the public there is no naked shorting because the SEC authorized the DTCC to create the illegal, shadow clear mechanism Obligation Warehouse (OW) so NITE's criminal activity ... authorized by the issuer. Settlement: buyer brings cash/seller brings securities. The DTCC simply makes journal entries. But there are still "IOU's" in the system. The SEC authorized the DTCC ... Rule 204. The OW is just what it sounds like. Per my Knight TCR, DTCC suspends services (Chill/Lock) and trades are deemed "ex clearing". In a FOIA request made with

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00094212.pdf

EFTA00069247Set 9

2020-07-0728p13,099w

intentionally misleads the public there is no naked shorting because the SEC authorized the DTCC to create the illegal, shadow clear mechanism Obligation Warehouse (OW) so NITE's criminal activity ... authorized by the issuer. Settlement: buyer brings cash/seller brings securities. The DTCC simply makes journal entries. But there are still "IOU's" in the system. The SEC authorized the DTCC ... Rule 204. The OW is just what it sounds like. Per my Knight TCR, DTCC suspends services (Chill/Lock) and trades are deemed "ex clearing". In a FOIA request made with

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00069247.pdf

EFTA00091035Set 9

2021-04-0557p19,918w

intentionally misleads the public there is no naked shorting because the SEC authorized the DTCC to create the illegal, shadow clear mechanism Obligation Warehouse (OW) so NITE's criminal activity ... authorized by the issuer. Settlement: buyer brings cash/seller brings securities. The DTCC simply makes journal entries. But there are still "IOU's" in the system. The SEC authorized the DTCC ... Rule 204. The OW is just what it sounds like. Per my Knight TCR, DTCC suspends services (Chill/Lock) and trades are deemed "ex clearing". In a FOIA request made with

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00091035.pdf

EFTA00083403Set 9

2020-11-1943p17,177w

intentionally misleads the public there is no naked shorting because the SEC authorized the DTCC to create the illegal, shadow clear mechanism Obligation Warehouse (OW) so NITE's criminal activity ... authorized by the issuer. Settlement: buyer brings cash/seller brings securities. The DTCC simply makes journal entries. But there are still "IOU's" in the system. The SEC authorized the DTCC ... Rule 204. The OW is just what it sounds like. Per my Knight TCR, DTCC suspends services (Chill/Lock) and trades are deemed "ex clearing". In a FOIA request made with

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00083403.pdf