EFTA00177701Set 9
2008-07-1790p16,925w
broad and encompassing' statutory victims' bill of rights." United States v.
5
EFTA00177713
Degenhardt, 405 F.Supp.2d 1341, 1342 (D. Utah 2005) (quoting 150 Cong. Rec. 54261 (daily ... broad and encompassing' statutory victims' bill of rights." United States v.
5
EFTA00177724
Degenhardt, 405 F.Supp.2d 1341, 1342 (D. Utah 2005) (quoting 150 Cong. Rec. 84261 (daily ... Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2008 Page 6 of 10
Degenhardt, 405 F.Supp.2d 1341, 1342 (D. Utah 2005) (quoting 150 Cong. Rec. S4261 (daily
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00177701.pdf
EFTA01091403Set 9
2009-04-3074p36,721w
effect that litigation rather than resolve a disputed controversy. In United States
v. Degenhardt, 405 R Supp.2d 1341 (D. Utah 2005), the Honorable Paul J. Cassell found that the
right ... right to speak directly to the judge at sentencing." Id. at 1345.46, 1349. The
Degenhardt opinion issued twelve days after the defendant's sentencing (where no objection was
made ... December 23, 2005, Kenna v.
United States District Court, No. 05.73467. Against this background, Degenhardt should be
viewed as an advisory opinion and taken with a large grain of salt
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01091403.pdf