EFTA00726931Set 9
2010-07-0220p15,549w
thus, regulated
activity and jurisdictional element were quite closely connected. United States v Ditomasso (2008, DC RI) 552 FSupp
2d 233.
Court rejected defendant's argument that Sex Offender Registration ... state registration laws; thus, SORNA conformed to
requirements of Tenth Amendment. United States v Ditomasso (2008, DC RI) 552 FSupp 2d 231
Charging defendant under 18 USCS§ 2250 with violating ... register in their states regardless of whether state fully implemented SORNA. United States
v Ditomasso (2008, DC RI) 552 F Supp 2d 233.
Although requiring defendant to comply with
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00726931.pdf
EFTA00032021Set 8
2021-09-152p612w
that Examiner MI has previously testified in federal court in
United States v. DiTomasso, 14 Cr. 160 (SAS), United States v. Hirst, 15 Cr. 643 (PKC), United
States v. Stasiv
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00032021.pdf
EFTA00019459Set 8
2021-09-152p587w
notifies you that Examiner has previously testified in federal court in
United States v. DiTomasso, 14 Cr. 160 (SAS), United States v. Hirst, 15 Cr. 643 (PKC), United
States
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00019459.pdf
EFTA00099133Set 9
2021-09-152p585w
notifies you that Examiner has previously testified in federal court in
United States v. DiTomasso, 14 Cr. 160 (SAS), United States v. Hirst, 15 Cr. 643 (PKC), United
States
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00099133.pdf