EFTA00175835Set 9
2008-04-1457p16,565w
behalf of Jeffrey Epstein (ail) (Entered: 08/28/2008)
09/04/2008 45 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss 1 Complaint by Jeffrey Epstein. Responses
due by 9/22/2008 (Tein, Michael) (Entered: 09/04/2008)
09/22/2008 46 MEMORANDUM ... Opposition re 45 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss 1
Complaint filed by Jane Doe No. 5. (Herman, Jeffrey) (Entered: 09/22/2008)
09/22/2008 47 AMENDED COMPLAINT, filed by Jane ... 9/23/08. (ir) (Entered: 09/23/2008)
09/23/2008 42 ORDER denying as moot 4.5 Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot 12 Motion
for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Signed by Judge
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00175835.pdf
EFTA00189749Set 9
2009-05-1836p13,958w
Plaintiff,
v.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT
Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN ... through his undersigned counsel, moves to
dismiss or, alternatively, for a more definite statement of, the First Amended Complaint ... years
old."). Plaintiff is bound by that admission, and the FAC must be dismissed with prejudice.
Best Canvas Prods. & Supplies, Inc. v. Ploof Truck Lines. Inc., 713 F.2d
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00189749.pdf
EFTA00095371Set 9
2019-11-126p1,840w
LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge:
On January 21, 2021, Plaintiff iled a motion to dismiss this action with
prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure ... connection with her motion,
Plaintiff filed a proposed order of dismissal imposing certain conditions (the "Proposed Order").
Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell opposed the motion. For the following reasons, subject to
Plaintiff ... consent, dismissal is granted pursuant to the terms of the Proposed Order modified as
described below.
I. BACKGROUND
On November 12, 2019, Plaintiff filed a Complaint against Ms. Maxwell
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00095371.pdf
EFTA00092886Set 9
2021-07-1234p11,087w
begin on July 12, 2021.
Maxwell filed twelve pretrial motions seeking to dismiss portions of the Si superseding
indictment, suppress evidence, and compel discovery. After the parties fully briefed those ... trafficking charges. For the reasons that follow, the Court denies
Maxwell's motions to dismiss the SI superseding indictment in whole or in part. It grants her
motion to sever ... conclusions here and its reasoning on the
pages that follow:
• Maxwell moves to dismiss all counts based on a non-prosecution agreement between
Jeffrey Epstein and the U.S. Attorney
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00092886.pdf
EFTA00090494Set 9
2021-07-1234p11,087w
begin on July 12, 2021.
Maxwell filed twelve pretrial motions seeking to dismiss portions of the Si superseding
indictment, suppress evidence, and compel discovery. After the parties fully briefed those ... trafficking charges. For the reasons that follow, the Court denies
Maxwell's motions to dismiss the SI superseding indictment in whole or in part. It grants her
motion to sever ... conclusions here and its reasoning on the
pages that follow:
• Maxwell moves to dismiss all counts based on a non-prosecution agreement between
Jeffrey Epstein and the U.S. Attorney
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00090494.pdf
EFTA01299150Set 10
2013-10-0235p11,136w
Corrected March 17, 1981.
CASE SUMMARY:
PROCEDURAL POSTURE: Defendants moved the court to dismiss plaintiffs complaint,
which alleged violations of 42 U.S.C.S. §§ 1983. 1985. and 1986, and 15 U.S.C.S ... conspiracy in restraint of
trade Defendants moved the court for dismissal. Noting that pro se pleadings mandated a
more lenient standard. the court held that dismissal of plaintiff's antitrust ... cognizable claim that his civil rights
had been violated, but refused to dismiss his complaint as to his antitrust claim.
Defendants' motion was thus granted in part and denied
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01299150.pdf
EFTA00103308Set 9
2021-07-1234p11,087w
begin on July 12, 2021.
Maxwell filed twelve pretrial motions seeking to dismiss portions of the Si superseding
indictment, suppress evidence, and compel discovery. After the parties fully briefed those ... trafficking charges. For the reasons that follow, the Court denies
Maxwell's motions to dismiss the SI superseding indictment in whole or in part. It grants her
motion to sever ... conclusions here and its reasoning on the
pages that follow:
• Maxwell moves to dismiss all counts based on a non-prosecution agreement between
Jeffrey Epstein and the U.S. Attorney
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00103308.pdf
EFTA00307083Set 9
2011-05-2413p5,972w
MEMORANDUM OPINION
(Filed: May /S. , 2011)
Defendant Fancelli Paneling, Inc., ("Fanelli") moves to dismiss Plaintiffs' First
Amended Complaint, arguing, among other things, that Plaintiffs' service of process was
insufficient that ... must join Molyneux as a necessary party. The Court will deny the Motion to Dismiss,
t will direct Plaintiffs to join the necessary party.
Fancelli flied its motion to Dismiss ... envelope was returned as "addressee
not at this location"
Fancelli has moved to dismiss. In support of its Motion, Fancelli challenges the
sufficiency of the service of process. It states
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00307083.pdf
EFTA00310004Set 9
2010-08-1026p8,275w
PANELING, INC., )
)
Defendant. ) (CARROLL, J.)
)
I DEFENDANT'S REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT
WITH POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
COMES NOW Defendant, FANCELLI PANELING, INC. ("Fancelli ... through its undersigned counsel, to provide its Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to Motion to
Dismiss the First Amended Complaint filed herein, pursuant to Super. Ct Rules ... facts and circumstances:
EFTA00310004
DEE DANT'S REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS
E' tel t et aL v. Fancelli Panelin nc.
Pa 'e
DEFENDANT HAS CONTINUING CHALLENGES
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00310004.pdf
EFTA00595583Set 9
2015-11-3029p8,962w
MAXWELL,
DEFENDANT.
X
GHISLAINE MAXWELL'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW
IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT
Laura A. Menninger, Esq.
HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C.
150 East 10th Avenue
Denver ... Statement is Not Defamatory Per Se 23
b. Failure to Allege Special Damages Warrants Dismissal 24
CONCLUSION 25
ii
EFTA00595584
Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 15 Filed 12/01/15 ... renders denials such as Ms. Maxwell's privileged
under the law and requires dismissal of this defamation action. As one commentator
wrote in 1881, "If I am attacked
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00595583.pdf
EFTA00795846Set 9
32p9,929w
legitimate claim of entitlement to continued
employment unless the tenured faculty member is dismissed or released
in accordance with ABOR Policy 6-201H., J., or K., (Conditions of Faculty ... Service, Post-Tenure Review, Dismissal or Suspension, or Release of
Faculty for Reorganization Caused by Budgetary Reasons or
Programmatic Changes), of these conditions.
20. "Tenured" means having tenure.
21. "Tenure ... performance
improvement plan in a timely manner shall result in a
recommendation for dismissal.
e. A faculty member who is recommended for dismissal as a result of
the post-tenure
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00795846.pdf
EFTA00080160Set 9
2019-08-2786p22,123w
This hearing that
4 we're having today considers the government's motion to dismiss
5 the indictment in this case.
6 I must add that it also serves ... this case would be defense motion practice, including a
18 motion to dismiss, followed by a trial on the merits before a
19 jury, if the motions were not successful ... rather stunning turn of events.
24 The government's motion to dismiss the indictment
25 because of Jeffrey Epstein's death on August 10, 2019, is
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00080160.pdf
EFTA00800147Set 9
2017-10-1618p5,835w
court's order of October 5, 2016, Defendant,
Jeffrey Epstein, filed a Motion to Dismiss. As grounds for the Motion to Dismiss, Mr. Epstein
relied on the express terms ... deadline specifically provided in the Order, the case was to be automatically dismissed and "no
further order of this Court shall be necessary." Copies of this court's Order ... Epstein's
Motion to Dismiss are attached hereto as Exhibits B & C respectively. In the seven months that
have passed since Mr. Epstein filed his Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiff never
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00800147.pdf