limited intervention at remedy phase in Dkt 207 and that it was
granted at Dkt 246. The Govt said that JEs other intervention
asserting 6E rights had been resolved ... premature and
disadvantageous. Ms Villafana and Cassell disagreed about the
significance of Dkt 246, with the Govt saying that the
intervention was allowed, Cassell saying only prospectively
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00800957.pdf