Epstein Files Search

EFTA00731431Set 9

2008-07-1066p17,583w

offender from viewing, owning or possessing certain materials." Ch. 97-308, Laws of Ha. (emphasis added). If anything, this suggests that the Legislature did not intend to leave the broad ... offender and his or her deviant sexual history." Staff Analysis at 7-8 (emphasis added) (quoting NIJ report at 3). The NIJ report also indicates that priorities include "individualized treatment ... charged with an offense." State v. Byars, 823 So. 2d 740, 742 (Fla. 2002) (emphasis added). As we have emphasized before, "lo]ne of the most fundamental principles of Florida

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00731431.pdf

EFTA00221363Set 9

2009-05-1836p13,958w

injury as a result of such violation may sue." 18 U.S.C. § 2255(a) (2003) (emphasis added). Yet the FAC affirmatively admits that Plaintiff is over ... actual damages such minor sustains" as a result of the predicate acts. Id. (emphasis added). The law's use of the present tense further underscored its limited scope: It spoke ... minor ... shall be deemed" to have sustained at least $50,000 in damages. Id. (emphasis added). Where the statute's words are unambiguous—as the are here--the "judicial inquiry

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00221363.pdf

EFTA00212960Set 9

2009-05-1836p13,958w

injury as a result of such violation may sue." 18 U.S.C. § 2255(a) (2003) (emphasis added). Yet the FAC affirmatively admits that Plaintiff is over ... actual damages such minor sustains" as a result of the predicate acts. Id. (emphasis added). The law's use of the present tense further underscored its limited scope: It spoke ... minor ... shall be deemed" to have sustained at least $50,000 in damages. Id. (emphasis added). Where the statute's words are unambiguous—as the are here--the "judicial inquiry

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00212960.pdf

EFTA00221460Set 9

2009-05-1836p13,928w

injury as a result of such violation may sue." 18 U.S.C. § 2255(a) (2003) (emphasis added). Yet the FAC affirmatively admits that Plaintiff is over ... actual damages such minor sustains" as a result of the predicate acts. Id. (emphasis added). The law's use of the present tense further underscored its limited scope: It spoke ... minor ... shall be deemed" to have sustained at least $50,000 in damages. Id. (emphasis added). Where the statute's words are unambiguous—as the are here--the "judicial inquiry

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00221460.pdf

EFTA00212893Set 9

2009-05-1836p13,958w

injury as a result of such violation may sue." 18 U.S.C. § 2255(a) (2003) (emphasis added). Yet the FAC affirmatively admits that Plaintiff is over ... actual damages such minor sustains" as a result of the predicate acts. Id. (emphasis added). The law's use of the present tense further underscored its limited scope: It spoke ... minor ... shall be deemed" to have sustained at least $50,000 in damages. Id. (emphasis added). Where the statute's words are unambiguous—as the are here--the "judicial inquiry

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00212893.pdf

EFTA00189749Set 9

2009-05-1836p13,958w

injury as a result of such violation may sue." 18 U.S.C. § 2255(a) (2003) (emphasis added). Yet the FAC affirmatively admits that Plaintiff is over ... actual damages such minor sustains" as a result of the predicate acts. Id. (emphasis added). The law's use of the present tense further underscored its limited scope: It spoke ... minor ... shall be deemed" to have sustained at least $50,000 in damages. Id. (emphasis added). Where the statute's words are unambiguous—as the are here--the "judicial inquiry

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00189749.pdf

EFTA01114178Set 9

2015-06-0233p10,670w

promised that NYGG would help Plaintiff find an apartment." (a. (emphasis omitted)) On December 1, 2013, 3 EFTA01114180 Plaintiff moved into an apartment that Wey found for her in lower ... part of her compensation, and that he would act as her guarantor." a (emphasis omitted)) Plaintiff assumed that this meant NYGG was giving her a raise, but she never received ... year-end bonus from NYGG," and then "plied Plaintiff with drinks." at166 (emphasis omitted)) After dinner, Wey accompanied Plaintiff to her apartment, and forced her to have sexual intercourse with

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01114178.pdf

EFTA00022546Set 8

2019-07-2370p21,586w

then bar an appeal by Epstein of that remedy. 749 F.3d at 1005-06 (emphasis added). Plainly when it ruled in 2014, the Eleventh Circuit foresaw a situation where Epstein ... F.Supp.2d 1337, 1342 (S.D. Fla. 2011) (quoting 18 U.S.C. § 377(d)(3) (emphasis added)). This Court explained that the CVRA's language allows CVRA's rights to "be enforced ... before a prosecution is underway . . ", id. (emphasis added) — i.e., to be "enforced" in this Court. Of course, the Crime Victims Rights Act creates rights for "crime victims," which in Epstein

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00022546.pdf

EFTA00021442Set 8

2019-07-2370p21,698w

then bar an appeal by Epstein of that remedy. 749 F.3d at 1005-06 (emphasis added). Plainly when it ruled in 2014, the Eleventh Circuit foresaw a situation where Epstein ... F.Supp.2d 1337, 1342 (S.D. Fla. 2011) (quoting 18 U.S.C. § 377(d)(3) (emphasis added)). This Court explained that the CVRA's language allows CVRA's rights to "be enforced ... before a prosecution is underway . . ", id. (emphasis added) — i.e., to be "enforced" in this Court. Of course, the Crime Victims Rights Act creates rights for "crime victims," which in Epstein

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00021442.pdf

EFTA00178057Set 9

2011-05-0290p23,378w

accorded, the rights described in [the CVRA]." 18 U.S.C. § 3771(c)(1) (emphasis added). The victims have cited this provision prominently and repeatedly in their pleadings. See, e.g., Victims' Initial ... court in the district in which the crime occurred" 18 U.S.C. § 3771(d)(3) (emphasis added). Of course, the For clarity, the victims will refer to their Motion for Finding ... done enough. That would be a situation. July 11, 2008 Tr. at 10-11 (emphasis added). Of course, if the right to be reasonably protected applies before an indictment, there

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00178057.pdf

EFTA00210758Set 9

2015-01-2980p24,607w

danger oflosing their right to confer under the CVRA." DE 1 at 7 n.2 (emphasis added). After a Government response admitting that he had reached a secret plea deal, Jane ... with the many other young victims of [Epstein's] crimes." DE 9 at 1 (emphasis added). The reply went on to explain that the agreement "remarkably allowed the defendant ... victims in this matter before reaching any disposition in this case." Id. at 2 (emphasis added). The petition asked the Court to "hold that [Jane

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00210758.pdf

EFTA01112467Set 9

2010-03-2327p8,263w

know about. See Razorback Amended Complaint; pp. 16-17;9[48 (emphasis added). Additionally, Rothstein used RRA's representation in the Epstein case to pursue issues and evidence unrelated ... effort to bolster Rothstein's lies. See Razorback Amended Complaint; page 17; II 49 (emphasis added). All of these deposition subpoenas and discovery requests to which the Razorback Complaint refers ... Jane Doe No. 2 v. Epstein Dated November 5, 2009, 08-cv-80119 (emphasis added). Additionally, as soon as Edwards arrived at RRA, Edwards and his partners set and/or took

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01112467.pdf

EFTA01112494Set 9

2010-03-2327p8,305w

Rothstein did not yet know about. See Razorback Amended Complaint; pp. 16-17; ¶ 48 (emphasis added). Additionally, Rothstein used RRA's representation in the Epstein case to pursue issues ... deliberate effort to bolster Rothstein's lies. See Razorback Amended Complaint; page 17; ¶ 49 (emphasis added). All of these deposition subpoenas and discovery requests to which the Razorback Complaint refers ... Jane Doe No. 2 v. Epstein Dated November 5, 2009, 08-mi-80119 (emphasis added). Additionally, as soon as Edwards arrived at RRA, Edwards and his partners set and/or took

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01112494.pdf

EFTA02729255Set 11

2009-01-0742p10,491w

until the end of all phases of the criminal action." 18 U.S.C. § 3509(k) (emphasis added).' 1 I I The full text of the mandatory-stay provision reads ... Decl. of AUSA 07/09/08, ¶ 5, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" (emphasis added). Under the Agreement, the USAO presently retains the continuing right to indict Mr. Epstein - - or to unseal ... unless and until the defendant violates any term of this agreement." Agreement, at 5 (emphasis added). The Agreement directs the USAO and Epstein to. "maintain their evidence, specifically evidence requested

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02729255.pdf

EFTA00299022Set 9

2006-07-1953p14,386w

United States, 359 F. Supp. 3d 1201, 1208 (S.D. Fla. 2019) (emphasis added) (DE 435:8) (citing DE 407, at ¶48). From that finding, Petitioners contend that the Court concluded ... unknown), from the beginning of the world to the day of this release. (Emphasis added). Thus, Petitioners expressly released Mr. Epstein from any federal actions, claims or demands in equity ... they had reached no settlement with the U.S. Attorney's Office..." (DE 41:1) (emphasis in original). Petitioners did not disclose at that time that they would seek to engineer

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00299022.pdf

EFTA00721915Set 9

2010-12-0617p3,126w

stand out and get noticed. • Format text using different fonts and font sizes • Add emphasis with bold and italic text styles or color. Body • Include graphics classic.tif , . Stickies has lots ... noticed. EFTA00721921 • Format text using different fonts and font sizes • Add emphasis with bold and italic text styles or color. • Include graphics classic.tif , . Stickies has lots of other great features ... stand out and get noticed. • Format text using different fonts and font sizes • Add emphasis with bold and italic text styles or color. Body • Include graphics classic.tif , . Stickies has lots

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00721915.pdf

EFTA01079203Set 9

2016-01-1260p13,979w

Motion to Determine Confidentiality, November 23, 2015, attached hereto as Exhibit E at 4 (emphasis added). Those "sexual abuse allegations filed by Edwards and Cassell for their client" go beyond ... must use the least restrictive closure necessary to accomplish its purpose." Id. at 118 (emphasis added); see also Carter v. Conde Nast Pithrtis ... able to prove it and she will end up in prison for perjury." (emphasis added). See Exhibit 1, New York Daily News, April 7, 2015. Defendant has subjected Jane

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01079203.pdf

EFTA00207984Set 9

2011-05-0229p9,189w

accorded, the rights described in [the CVRA]." 18 U.S.C. § 3771(c)(1) (emphasis added). The victims have cited this provision prominently and repeatedly in their pleadings. See, e.g., Victims' Initial ... court in the district in which the crime occurred." 18 U.S.C. § 3771(d)(3) (emphasis added). Of course, the For clarity, the victims will refer to their Motion for Finding ... done enough. That would be a situation. July 11, 2008 Tr. at 10-11 (emphasis added). Of course, if the right to be reasonably protected applies before an indictment, there

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00207984.pdf

EFTA01098264Set 9

2011-05-0229p9,339w

accorded, the rights described in [the CVRA]." 18 U.S.C. § 3771(c)(1) (emphasis added). The victims have cited this provision prominently and repeatedly in their pleadings. See, e.g., Victims' Initial ... court in the district in which the crime occurred." 18 U.S.C. § 3771(d)(3) (emphasis added). Of course, the For clarity, the victims will refer to their Motion for Finding ... done enough. That would be a situation. July 11, 2008 Tr. at 10-11 (emphasis added). Of course, if the right to be reasonably protected applies before an indictment, there

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01098264.pdf

EFTA00614086Set 9

2011-09-1621p6,470w

Edwards to Robert D. Critton, Jr., Aug. 26, 2010 (Exhibit A to this pleading) (emphasis added) One week later, on September 2, 2010, Epstein filed a motion for a protective ... objections to the use of the correspondence in that case." DE 221 at 6 (emphasis added). On October 20, 2010, this Court (Marra, J.), entered an order (DE 222) remanding ... alleged violations of the Crimiel Victims Rights Act." DE 223 at p. 6 (emphasis added). On January 5, 2011, Magistrate Judge Johnson entered an order (DE 226) overruling Epstein

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00614086.pdf