EFTA00726931Set 9
2010-07-0220p15,549w
person
whose underlying offense and travel in interstate commerce both allegedly predated SORNA's enactment could properly
be criminally prosecuted under § 2250(a) for failure to register; and (2) Federal ... USCS§ 2250 concerned his failure to register as sex offender during gap
period between enactment of Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act and Attorney General's retroactivity
determination under ... Defendant, who was convicted of sex offense before enactment of Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act
(SORNA), 42 USCS §§ 16901-16991, was properly charged under 18 USCS § 2250(a) with
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00726931.pdf
EFTA00726951Set 9
2010-07-0216p11,476w
applicability of the requirements of this title to sex offenders convicted before the enactment of
this Act [enacted July 27, 2006] or its implementation in a particular jurisdiction ... USCS § 16913 had a dual purpose. and in any
event, Congress could not enact a statute that was intended to merely encourage state action and also establish
affirmative obligations under ... Penal Law § 130.60 before July 27, 2006, which was date Walsh Act was enacted; and (3) defendant's prosecution
under 18 USCS § 2250(a) for violating Walsh
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00726951.pdf
EFTA00221460Set 9
2009-05-1836p13,928w
unless there is a clear statement that an amendment should apply
retroactively to pre-enactment conduct. See, e.g., Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United States ex rel.
Schumer ... expression of
congressional intent to apply the 1986 amendment to conduct completed before its enactment,
we ... hold that, under the relevant 1982 version of the [statute], the District Court ... that a particular amendment applies in
proceedings "commenced on or after the date of enactment," Tello v. Dean Witter Reynolds,.
Inc., 410 F.3d 1275, 1283 (11th Cir. 2005) (collecting examples
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00221460.pdf
EFTA00212960Set 9
2009-05-1836p13,958w
unless there is a clear statement that an amendment should apply
retroactively to pre-enactment conduct. See, e.g., Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United States ex rel.
Schumer ... expression of
congressional intent to apply the 1986 amendment to conduct completed before its enactment,
we ... hold that, under the relevant 1982 version of the [statute], the District Court ... that a particular amendment applies in
proceedings "commenced on or after the date of enactment," Tello v. Dean Witter Reynolds,.
Inc., 410 F.3d 1275, 1283 (11th Cir. 2005) (collecting examples
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00212960.pdf
EFTA00212893Set 9
2009-05-1836p13,958w
unless there is a clear statement that an amendment should apply
retroactively to pre-enactment conduct. See, e.g., Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United States ex rel.
Schumer ... expression of
congressional intent to apply the 1986 amendment to conduct completed before its enactment,
we ... hold that, under the relevant 1982 version of the [statute], the District Court ... that a particular amendment applies in
proceedings "commenced on or after the date of enactment," Tello v. Dean Witter Reynolds,.
Inc., 410 F.3d 1275, 1283 (11th Cir. 2005) (collecting examples
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00212893.pdf
EFTA00598276Set 9
40p16,756w
CONFERENCE OF COMMISSIONERS
ON UNIFORM STATE LAWS
and by it
APPROVED AND RECOMMENDED FOR ENACTMENT
IN ALL THE STATES
at its
ANNUAL CONFERENCE
MEETING IN ITS ONE-HUNDRED-AND-FIFTEENTH ... Columbia, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands to
research, draft and promote enactment of uniform state laws in areas of state law where
uniformity is desirable and practical.
• NCCUSL ... Commissioners on Uniform State Laws approved UMIFA in 1972, and
47 jurisdictions have enacted the act. UMIFA provided guidance and authority to charitable
organizations within its scope concerning the management
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00598276.pdf
EFTA01091933Set 9
64p33,998w
deferential
judiciary.
This Article does not challenge the state's legislative power to enact sex offender
registration laws. Instead, this Article posits that, even if sex offender registration schemes
initially ... post facto
principles by requiring retroactive application to offenders convicted
prior to the enactment of the laws.' And in Connecticut Department of
Public Safety v. Doe, the Court addressed whether ... offender registration schemes come with an exorbitant
pricetag and arc proving very difficult to enact and enforce. See Emanuella Grinberg.5 Years Later, States
Struggle to Comply with Federal Sex Offender
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01091933.pdf
EFTA01119335Set 9
2011-01-1111p11,650w
government
below for information on reserving time individuals interested in presenting subsequent to the enactment of SORNA.
for public comment. comments at the meeting, reservations DATES: Effective Date: January ... they were advised of their registration couple of requirements that have been
was enacted on July 27, 2006. SORNA obligations. impediments to SORNA
(6) Provide additional information implementation in some ... inappropriate or impermissible
the Office of Sex Offender Sentencing, government following the enactment of exercise of legislative power by the
Monitoring, Apprehending, Registering, SORNA, authorization and time frames Attorney General
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01119335.pdf
EFTA01075338Set 9
2013-05-2140p19,322w
entities in tax
havens and shifting income to those entities. In fact, when Congress enacted Subpart F,
discussed in detail below, more than fifty years ago in 1962, an express ... compromise was struck instead, which became known as Subpart F.42
Subpart F was enacted by Congress in 1962, and was designed in substantial part to address the
tax avoidance techniques ... multinationals in tax havens. In fact, to
curb tax haven abuses, Congress enacted anti-tax haven provisions, despite extensive opposition
by the business community.43
F. Subpart F To Tax Current
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01075338.pdf
EFTA00598262Set 9
2006-08-1714p6,163w
August 17, 2006, M. 109-280, 120 Stat 780 (H.R. 4)
Be it enacted"'
ACT SEC. 1. SHORT TITLE, ETC. (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited ... effect of funding difficulties, funding rules in effect before the date of the enactment of this Act,
©2011 Wolters Kluwer. All rights reserved.
3 of 14 7/28/2011 ... first applicable plan year (or, if later, the date of the enactment of this Act) and at all
times thereafter while an election under this section is in effect
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00598262.pdf
EFTA00595846Set 9
2016-05-1076p47,451w
with taxable
REIT subsidiaries. Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2015, recently enacted legislation
imposes an excise tax of 100% on a REIT with respect to the gross ... gross income test.
Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2015, recently enacted legislation expands the treatment
of REIT hedges to exclude from gross income the income from clearly ... will not
exceed 20% of the value of our gross assets
Recently enacted legislation imposes a new asset test on REITs. Specifically, effective for taxable years
beginning after December
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00595846.pdf
EFTA01080289Set 9
2012-11-14130p66,380w
foreign business.'
—United States Senate, 1977
EFTA01080297
EFTA01080298
chapter 1
Introduction
INTRODUCTION
Congress enacted the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA or the Act) in
1977 in response to revelations ... decades
to make and keep accurate books and records and to devise since Congress enacted the FCPA, the extent of corporate
and maintain an adequate system of internal accounting bribery ... unfair playing field for honest businesses." By
embezzlement,' financial fraud,' and anti-competitive enacting a strong foreign bribery statute, Congress sought
behavior.10 Bribery thus raises the risks of doing business
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01080289.pdf
EFTA00797069Set 9
2017-12-28186p61,016w
VIII Top 100 Private Cannabis Companies 2018 are medical cannabis laws, 8 states have enacted recreational laws.
IX Cannabis Industry Risk Factors
X Glossary of Terms • Across all medical cannabis ... StatelProWnce Conflict
with Federal L.
Tenstle arrent, has a .0.1 lax. Assumes Canada enacts a pop. .reational law in mid-2018.
U.S. State Cannabis Laws (January 2018)
unit-,,,
-
Recreational ... believe that—like Uruguay and numerous U.S. states—other coun-
tries will ultimately enact legislation permitting the production, sale and use of recreational cannabis.
(Canada is widely expected
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00797069.pdf
EFTA01696604Set 10
2006-08-01100p28,102w
against former Presidents and members of their families, and for
other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress ... against Conner Presidents and members of their families, and for
other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House ofRepresentatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled ... against former Presidents and members of their families, and for
other outposts. Be it enacted by the Senate and House ofRepresentatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01696604.pdf
EFTA01696704Set 10
2005-05-08100p34,772w
against former Presidents and members of their families, and for
other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress ... against former Presidents and members of their families, and for
other purposes. Bc it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress ... former Presidents and member's of their families, and for
other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House ofRepresentatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01696704.pdf
EFTA00310814Set 9
2007-06-2529p10,989w
legitimately earned funds.
In addition, unlike the typical "sting" case, which 1956(aX3) was
enacted to address,
there is no evidence that Mr. Epstein was aware, or that gover
nment ... prosecution under § 1960 cannot lie.
18 U.S.C. § 1960 is a regulatory statute that was enacted in order
to combat the growing
use of money transmitting businesses for the purpose ... response to the growing concern about this
improper use of these businesses,
Congress enacted § 1960, in conjunction with § 5330, establishing
a regulatory scheme to assist
in the effective enforcement
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00310814.pdf