Epstein Files Search

EFTA00298018Set 9

2011-07-0518p1,960w

Invoices Susman Godfrey Troutman Sanders Fowler White Burnett Critton's Revised Fee Agreement EPSTEIN VS ROTHSTEIN REDWELD #1 -REVISED PRIVILEGE LOG HILIGHTED BY JE -DISPUTE OVER PRODUCTION OF "PRIVILEGED" DOCUMENTS ... ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT EPSTEIN VS ROTHSTEIN REDWELD #2 -CONSENT OF PLAINTIFF JE TO MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL -INDICIES OF DOGS PRODUCED SCHERER & FARMER ... SCHERER'S OFFICE Rothstein Case Privelege Logs (this is it's own Redweld) EPSTEIN VS ROTHSTEIN JE VS ROTHSTEIN HEARING BINDER FOR JULY 13, 2011(MISSING OCT. 10,2012) EFTA00298027

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00298018.pdf

EFTA00300480Set 9

2012-03-0859p8,232w

AGREEMENT & GENERAL RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS -CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT AGAINST UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF SETTLEMENT EPSTEIN VS ROTHSTEIN REDWELD #1 -REVISED PRIVILEGE LOG HILIGHTED BY JE -DISPUTE OVER PRODUCTION OF "PRIVILEGED" DOCUMENTS ... EPSTEIN VS ROTHSTEIN REDWELD #2 -CONSENT OF PLAINTIFF JE TO MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL -INDICIES OF DOGS PRODUCED SCHERER & FARMER -COMPLETED INDEX OF VOLUME 7 OF CONRAD SCHERER'S DOCUMENTS

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00300480.pdf

EFTA00299864Set 9

2009-10-276p656w

AGREEMENT & GENERAL RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS -CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT AGAINST UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF SETTLEMENT EPSTEIN VS ROTHSTEIN REDWELD #1 -REVISED PRIVILEGE LOG HILIGHTED BY JE -DISPUTE OVER PRODUCTION OF "PRIVILEGED" DOCUMENTS ... EPSTEIN VS ROTHSTEIN REDWELD #2 -CONSENT OF PLAINTIFF JE TO MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL -INDICIES OF DOGS PRODUCED SCHERER & FARMER -COMPLETED INDEX OF VOLUME 7 OF CONRAD SCHERER'S DOCUMENTS

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00299864.pdf

EFTA01108095Set 9

2012-12-1725p5,451w

proceedings began at 10:02 a.m.: 3 THE COURT: Okay. This is 4 Epstein vs. Rothstein. This is the motion of 5 the counterplaintiff for -- to add punitive 6 damages

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01108095.pdf

EFTA00598448Set 9

2012-12-1725p5,425w

following proceedings began at 10:02 3 THE COURT: Okay. This is 4 Epstein vs. Rothstein. This is the motion of 5 the counterplaintiff for -- to add punitive 6 damages

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00598448.pdf

EFTA01188547Set 9

2013-03-1115p2,517w

EFTA01188548 Page 3 1 PROCEEDINGS 2 - - - 3 THE CLERK: Epstein vs. Rothstein. 4 MR. SCAROLA: Good morning. Jack Scarola on 5 behalf of Bradley Edwards. 6 THE COURT: Give

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01188547.pdf

EFTA01103190Set 9

2013-03-1117p3,695w

WWW.USLEGALSUPPORT.COM 561-835-0220 EFTA01103191 1 PROCEEDINGS 3 THE CLERK: Epstein vs. Rothstein. 4 MR. SCAROLA: Good morning. Jack Scarola on 5 behalf of Bradley Edwards. 6 THE COURT: Give

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01103190.pdf

EFTA00595377Set 9

2013-03-1117p3,664w

EFTA00595378 1 PROCEEDINGS 3 THE CLERK: Epstein vs. Rothstein. 4 MR. SCAROLA: Good morning. Jack Scarola on 5 behalf of Bradley Edwards. 6 THE COURT: Give me one second, please

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00595377.pdf

EFTA01188540Set 9

2013-03-117p2,483w

PROCEEDINGS 2 - - - 3 THE CLERK: Epstein vs. Rothstein. 4 MR. SCAROLA: Good morning. Jack Scarola on 5 behalf of Bradley Edwards. 6 THE COURT: Give me one second, please

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01188540.pdf

EFTA00299859Set 9

2009-10-275p572w

Relating to Correspondence with the US Attorneys Office -Supplemental Affidavit of Richard Barnett EPSTEIN VS ROTHSTEIN -Revised Privilege Log Hilighted by JE -Dispute Over Production of "Privileged" Documents -Consent

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00299859.pdf

EFTA00610108Set 9

2013-03-117p3,641w

PALM REACH COUNTY, FLORIDA PROCEEDINGS 2 CASE NO. 502009CAOSOSOOXXXXXRAG 3 THE CLERK: Epstein vs. Rothstein. JEFFREY EFSTEIN. Plaintiff, 4 MR. SCAROLA: Good morning. Jack Scarola on 5 behalf of Bradley

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00610108.pdf

EFTA00987386Set 9

2014-04-042p287w

details of the attached filing which was made in the case of Epstein vs Rothstein in the Palm Beach County Court. Under the new British Defamation Act we have privilege

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00987386.pdf

EFTA00987389Set 9

2014-04-043p492w

details of the attached filing which was made in the case of Epstein vs Rothstein in the Palm Beach County Court. Under the new British Defamation Act we have privilege

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00987389.pdf

EFTA00659388Set 9

2014-04-042p245w

details of the attached filing which was made in the case of Epstein vs Rothstein in the Palm Beach County Court. Under the new British Defamation Act we have privilege

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00659388.pdf