EFTA00099598Set 9
2020-08-0525p7,788w
Robbins Tire & Rubber Co.,
437 U.S. 214 (1978) 6
Nat? Archives & Records Admin. v. Favish,
541 U.S. 157 (2004) 11, 13, 14
New York Times Co. v. Dep't ofJustice ... corpse publicly released. This position is contrary to Nat'l Archives & Records Admin.
v. Favish, 541 U.S. 157, 165-71 (2004), and lower court decisions that expressly recognize
surviving family ... under Exemption 6 audio recording of Challenger astronauts'
final moments). Plaintiff attempts to distinguish Favish by arguing that surviving family
members in that case submitted a declaration. But a declaration
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00099598.pdf
EFTA00071584Set 9
2020-08-0525p7,810w
Robbins Tire & Rubber Co.,
437 U.S. 214 (1978) 6
Nat? Archives & Records Admin. v. Favish,
541 U.S. 157 (2004) 11, 13, 14
New York Times Co. v. Dep't ofJustice ... corpse publicly released. This position is contrary to Nat'l Archives & Records Admin.
v. Favish, 541 U.S. 157, 165-71 (2004), and lower court decisions that expressly recognize
surviving family ... under Exemption 6 audio recording of Challenger astronauts'
final moments). Plaintiff attempts to distinguish Favish by arguing that surviving family
members in that case submitted a declaration. But a declaration
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00071584.pdf
EFTA00088605Set 9
2020-08-0525p7,830w
Robbins Tire & Rubber Co.,
437 U.S. 214 (1978) 6
Nat? Archives & Records Admin. v. Favish,
541 U.S. 157 (2004) 11, 13, 14
New York Times Co. v. Dep't ofJustice ... corpse publicly released. This position is contrary to Nat'l Archives & Records Admin.
v. Favish, 541 U.S. 157, 165-71 (2004), and lower court decisions that expressly recognize
surviving family ... under Exemption 6 audio recording of Challenger astronauts'
final moments). Plaintiff attempts to distinguish Favish by arguing that surviving family
members in that case submitted a declaration. But a declaration
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00088605.pdf
EFTA00071624Set 9
2020-09-1029p9,138w
Supp. 2d 309 (S.D.N.Y. 2012) 3
Nat'l Archives & Records Admin. v. Favish,
541 U.S. 157 (2004) 15
Nat'l Council of La Raza v. Dep't ofJustice,
411 F.3d ... their close family's death-scene images. See Nat?
Archives & Records Admin. v. Favish, 541 U.S. 157, 165-71 (2004). But unlike the Favish case
cited by the Government
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00071624.pdf
EFTA00088701Set 9
2020-09-1029p9,170w
Supp. 2d 309 (S.D.N.Y. 2012) 3
Nat'l Archives & Records Admin. v. Favish,
541 U.S. 157 (2004) 15
Nat'l Council of La Raza v. Dep't ofJustice,
411 F.3d ... their close family's death-scene images. See Nat?
Archives & Records Admin. v. Favish, 541 U.S. 157, 165-71 (2004). But unlike the Favish case
cited by the Government
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00088701.pdf
EFTA00075437Set 9
2020-08-0530p8,449w
S.D.N.Y. Nov. 30, 2 00 7) 15
National Archives & Records Administration v. Favish,
541 U.S. 157 (2004) 19
Nat 7 Assoc. of Homebuilders v. Norton,
309 F.3d ... details of a
relative's death. For example, in National Archives & Records Administration v. Favish, 541
U.S. 157, 165-71 (2004), the Supreme Court held that Exemption 7(C) protected
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00075437.pdf
EFTA00088671Set 9
2020-08-0530p8,403w
S.D.N.Y. Nov. 30, 2 00 7) 15
National Archives & Records Administration v. Favish,
541 U.S. 157 (2004) 19
Nat 7 Assoc. of Homebuilders v. Norton,
309 F.3d ... details of a
relative's death. For example, in National Archives & Records Administration v. Favish, 541
U.S. 157, 165-71 (2004), the Supreme Court held that Exemption 7(C) protected
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00088671.pdf
EFTA00071554Set 9
2020-08-0530p8,407w
S.D.N.Y. Nov. 30, 2 00 7) 15
National Archives & Records Administration v. Favish,
541 U.S. 157 (2004) 19
Nat 7 Assoc. of Homebuilders v. Norton,
309 F.3d ... details of a
relative's death. For example, in National Archives & Records Administration v. Favish, 541
U.S. 157, 165-71 (2004), the Supreme Court held that Exemption 7(C) protected
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00071554.pdf