EFTA00103801Set 9
2019-07-0810p5,004w
finding of dangerousness must be
supported by clear and convincing evidence. United States v. Ferranti, 66 F.3d 540, 542 (2d Cir.
1995); Chimurenga, 760 F.2d at 405. In addition ... government entitled
to proceed by proffer in detention hearings); Ferranti, 66 F.3d at 542 (same); United States v.
Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1145 (2d Cir. 1986) (same).
Where a judicial
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00103801.pdf
EFTA00105468Set 9
2019-07-0810p5,007w
dangerousness must
be supported by clear and convincing evidence. See, e.g., United States v. Ferranti, 66 F.3d 540,
542 (2d Cir. 1995); Chinmrenga, 760 F.2d at 405. In addition ... government entitled
to proceed by proffer in detention hearings); Ferranti, 66 F.3d at 542 (same); United States v.
Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1145 (2d Cir. 1986) (same).
Where a judicial
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00105468.pdf
EFTA00068050Set 9
2019-07-1228p13,916w
dangerousness must
be supported by clear and convincing evidence. See, e.g., United States v. Ferranti, 66 F.3d 540,
542 (2d Cir. 1995); Chinmrenga, 760 F.2d at 405. In addition ... government entitled
to proceed by proffer in detention hearings); Ferranti, 66 F.3d at 542 (same); United States v.
Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1145 (2d Cir. 1986) (same).
Where a judicial
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00068050.pdf
EFTA00074029Set 9
2019-07-0837p11,762w
dangerousness must be supported by clear and convincing evidence.
See. e.g., United States v. Ferranti. 66 F.3d 540, 542 (2d Cir. 1995). "Where there is a strong
probability that ... finding of dangerousness, a new bail proposal likely would be
futile. See. e.a. United Ferranti, 66 F.3d at 544 ("No conceivable conditions could ensure the
safety of the community."); Orena
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00074029.pdf
EFTA00015532Set 8
2019-07-1228p13,945w
dangerousness must
be supported by clear and convincing evidence. See, e.g., United States v. Ferranti, 66 F.3d 540,
542 (2d Cir. 1995); Chirnurenga, 760 F.2d at 405. In addition ... government entitled
to proceed by proffer in detention hearings); Ferranti, 66 F.3d at 542 (same); United States v.
Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1145 (2d Cir. 1986) (same).
Where a judicial
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00015532.pdf
EFTA00029004Set 8
2019-07-0810p4,995w
dangerousness must
be supported by clear and convincing evidence. See, e.g., United States v. Ferranti, 66 F.3d 540,
542 (2d Cir. 1995); Chirnurenga, 760 F.2d at 405. In addition ... government entitled
to proceed by proffer in detention hearings); Ferranti, 66 F.3d at 542 (same); United States v.
Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1145 (2d Cir. 1986) (same).
Where a judicial
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00029004.pdf
EFTA00028297Set 8
2019-07-0810p5,004w
finding of dangerousness must be
supported by clear and convincing evidence. United States v. Ferranti, 66 F.3d 540, 542 (2d Cir.
1995); Chimurenga, 760 F.2d at 405. In addition ... government entitled
to proceed by proffer in detention hearings); Ferranti, 66 F.3d at 542 (same); United States v.
Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1145 (2d Cir. 1986) (same).
Where a judicial
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00028297.pdf
EFTA00030832Set 8
2019-07-0810p4,992w
dangerousness must
be supported by clear and convincing evidence. See, e.g., United States v. Ferranti, 66 F.3d 540,
542 (2d Cir. 1995); Chimurenga, 760 F.2d at 405. In addition ... government entitled
to proceed by proffer in detention hearings); Ferranti, 66 F.3d at 542 (same); United States v.
Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1145 (2d Cir. 1986) (same).
Where a judicial
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00030832.pdf
EFTA00024584Set 8
2019-07-0810p4,973w
dangerousness must
be supported by clear and convincing evidence. See, e.g., United States v. Ferranti, 66 F.3d 540,
542 (2d Cir. 1995); Chirnurenga, 760 F.2d at 405. In addition ... government entitled
to proceed by proffer in detention hearings); Ferranti, 66 F.3d at 542 (same); United States v.
Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1145 (2d Cir. 1986) (same).
Where a judicial
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00024584.pdf
EFTA00089393Set 9
2019-07-1228p13,903w
dangerousness must
be supported by clear and convincing evidence. See, e.g., United States v. Ferranti, 66 F.3d 540,
542 (2d Cir. 1995); Chinmrenga, 760 F.2d at 405. In addition ... government entitled
to proceed by proffer in detention hearings); Ferranti, 66 F.3d at 542 (same); United States v.
Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1145 (2d Cir. 1986) (same).
Where a judicial
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00089393.pdf
EFTA00092030Set 9
2019-07-0810p4,993w
dangerousness must
be supported by clear and convincing evidence. See, e.g., United States v. Ferranti, 66 F.3d 540,
542 (2d Cir. 1995); Chinmrenga, 760 F.2d at 405. In addition ... government entitled
to proceed by proffer in detention hearings); Ferranti, 66 F.3d at 542 (same); United States v.
Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1145 (2d Cir. 1986) (same).
Where a judicial
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00092030.pdf
EFTA00039383Set 9
2019-07-0833p10,702w
dangerousness must be supported by clear and convincing evidence.
See. e.g., United States v. Ferranti. 66 F.3d 540, 542 (2d Cir. 1995). "Where there is a strong
probability that ... finding of dangerousness, a new bail proposal likely would be
futile. See. e.a. United Ferranti, 66 F.3d at 544 ("No conceivable conditions could ensure the
safety of the community."); Orena
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00039383.pdf
EFTA00147211Set 9
2019-07-0810p4,993w
dangerousness must
be supported by clear and convincing evidence. See, e.g., United States v. Ferranti, 66 F.3d 540,
542 (2d Cir. 1995); Chinmrenga, 760 F.2d at 405. In addition ... government entitled
to proceed by proffer in detention hearings); Ferranti, 66 F.3d at 542 (same); United States v.
Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1145 (2d Cir. 1986) (same).
Where a judicial
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00147211.pdf
EFTA00078231Set 9
2019-07-1228p13,958w
dangerousness must
be supported by clear and convincing evidence. See, e.g., United States v. Ferranti, 66 F.3d 540,
542 (2d Cir. 1995); Chinmrenga, 760 F.2d at 405. In addition ... government entitled
to proceed by proffer in detention hearings); Ferranti, 66 F.3d at 542 (same); United States v.
Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1145 (2d Cir. 1986) (same).
Where a judicial
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00078231.pdf
EFTA00105478Set 9
2019-07-1228p13,950w
dangerousness must
be supported by clear and convincing evidence. See, e.g., United States v. Ferranti, 66 F.3d 540,
542 (2d Cir. 1995); Chinmrenga, 760 F.2d at 405. In addition ... government entitled
to proceed by proffer in detention hearings); Ferranti, 66 F.3d at 542 (same); United States v.
Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1145 (2d Cir. 1986) (same).
Where a judicial
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00105478.pdf
EFTA00076303Set 9
2019-07-1228p13,938w
dangerousness must
be supported by clear and convincing evidence. See, e.g., United States v. Ferranti, 66 F.3d 540,
542 (2d Cir. 1995); Chinmrenga, 760 F.2d at 405. In addition ... government entitled
to proceed by proffer in detention hearings); Ferranti, 66 F.3d at 542 (same); United States v.
Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1145 (2d Cir. 1986) (same).
Where a judicial
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00076303.pdf
EFTA00099790Set 9
2019-07-0810p4,994w
dangerousness must
be supported by clear and convincing evidence. See, e.g., United States v. Ferranti, 66 F.3d 540,
542 (2d Cir. 1995); Chimurenga, 760 F.2d at 405. In addition ... government entitled
to proceed by proffer in detention hearings); Ferranti, 66 F.3d at 542 (same); United States v.
Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1145 (2d Cir. 1986) (same).
Where a judicial
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00099790.pdf
EFTA00081947Set 9
2019-07-0833p10,720w
dangerousness must be supported by clear and convincing evidence.
See. e.g., United States v. Ferranti. 66 F.3d 540, 542 (2d Cir. 1995). "Where there is a strong
probability that ... finding of dangerousness, a new bail proposal likely would be
futile. See. e.a. United Ferranti, 66 F.3d at 544 ("No conceivable conditions could ensure the
safety of the community."); Orena
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00081947.pdf
EFTA00058445Set 9
2019-07-0810p5,089w
dangerousness must
be supported by clear and convincing evidence. See, e.g., United States v. Ferranti, 66 F.3d 540,
542 (2d Cir. 1995); Chinmrenga, 760 F.2d at 405. In addition ... government entitled
to proceed by proffer in detention hearings); Ferranti, 66 F.3d at 542 (same); United States v.
Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1145 (2d Cir. 1986) (same).
Where a judicial
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00058445.pdf
EFTA00092041Set 9
2019-07-0810p4,959w
dangerousness must
be supported by clear and convincing evidence. See, e.g., United States v. Ferranti, 66 F.3d 540,
542 (2d Cir. 1995); Chinmrenga, 760 F.2d at 405. In addition ... government entitled
to proceed by proffer in detention hearings); Ferranti, 66 F.3d at 542 (same); United States v.
Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1145 (2d Cir. 1986) (same).
Where a judicial
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00092041.pdf