EFTA01657752Set 10
2015-07-0651p13,321w
United States v. Zingsheim, 384 F.3d 867, 872 (7th Cir. 2004) (citing
FTC v. Grolier Inc., 462 U.S. 19 (1983)).
The work-product privilege extends only to documents that ... These cases rely on the Supreme
Court's dicta in Federal Trade Communication v. Grolier, Inc., that "the literal language of [Rule
26(b)(3)] protects materials prepared
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01657752.pdf
EFTA00210140Set 9
2015-07-0651p13,318w
United States I. Zingsheim, 384 F.3d 867, 872 (7th Cir. 2004) (citing
FTC I. Grolier Inc., 462 U.S. 19 (1983)).
The work-product privilege extends only to documents that ... These cases rely on the Supreme
Court's dicta in Federal Trade Communication I. Grolier, Inc., that "the literal language of [Rule
26(b)(3)] protects materials prepared
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00210140.pdf
EFTA02335898Set 11
2015-07-0651p13,383w
United States v. Zingsheim, 384 F.3d 867, 872 (7th Cir. 2004) (citing
FTC v. Grolier Inc., 462 U.S. 19 (1983)).
The work-product privilege extends only to documents that ... These cases rely on the Supreme
Court's dicta in Federal Trade Communication v. Grolier, Inc., that "the literal language of [Rule
26(bX3)] protects materials prepared for ae litigation
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02335898.pdf
EFTA01206431Set 9
2015-07-0651p13,321w
United States v. Zingsheim, 384 F.3d 867, 872 (7th Cir. 2004) (citing
FTC v. Grolier Inc., 462 U.S. 19 (1983)).
The work-product privilege extends only to documents that ... These cases rely on the Supreme
Court's dicta in Federal Trade Communication v. Grolier, Inc., that "the literal language of [Rule
26(b)(3)] protects materials prepared
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01206431.pdf
EFTA01200390Set 9
2015-07-0651p13,320w
United States v. Zingsheim, 384 F.3d 867, 872 (7th Cir. 2004) (citing
FTC v. Grolier Inc., 462 U.S. 19 (1983)).
The work-product privilege extends only to documents that ... These cases rely on the Supreme
Court's dicta in Federal Trade Communication v. Grolier, Inc., that "the literal language of [Rule
26(b)(3)] protects materials prepared
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01200390.pdf
EFTA01081295Set 9
2013-09-0313p3,614w
prosecutors and investigating agents, both state and
federal. Id. at 872, citing FTC v. Grolier, Inc. 462 U.S. 19 (1983). Therefore, the government is
entitled to invoke the work product
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01081295.pdf
EFTA01142189Set 9
2013-09-0313p3,647w
prosecutors and investigating agents, both state and
federal. Id. at 872, citing FTC v. Grolier, Inc. 462 U.S. 19 (1983). Therefore, the government is
entitled to invoke the work product
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01142189.pdf
EFTA01200571Set 9
2015-07-067p1,692w
United States v.
Zingsheim, 384 F.3d 867, 872 (7th Cir. 2004) (citing FTC v. Grolier Inc., 462 U.S. 19 (1983)).
In its third supplemental privilege log, however, the Government does
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01200571.pdf